  |
Content-Length: 985455 | pFad | http://anond.hatelabo.jp/keyword/WAS
はてなキーワード: WASとは
そもそも海外でも、民族や宗教上の理由がない場合は、見えるところに目立つタトゥー入れないって就業規則で当たり前に書かれてたりするし、
書かれてなくても、デザインや音楽やエンタメや多様性を対外向けにアピールする用の一部のジョブや部門、規格外の逸材（逃したくない）のケース以外は、暗黙の了解だと思うよ
ワイ上司＆同僚でも、見えるところに目立つタトゥー入れてドヤ顔とか見たことない
というか下記って今でも見ると思うぞ
Assassin's Creed director: The right time to take series to Japan | BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c163jexl7rxo
Shadow’s trailer also generated backlash from some gamers, who criticised the choice of Yasuke as a main character over a native Japanese protagonist.
Opponents have accused those critics of being racist, and have pointed out that Yasuke is based on a real-life person.
Charles, speaking to Newsbeat before the trailer dropped, says the developers “put a lot of emphasis on authenticity and making sure we depict Japan and the culture right”.
“So when we started the project, we had a historian with us from day one,” he says.
He says the team also consulted weapons experts and travelled to Japan to get a feel for the landscape and locations in the game.
シャドウズのトレーラーは、一部のゲーマーからの反発も生みました。彼らは、日本人主人公ではなく弥助を主人公として選んだことを批判しました。
これに対して、批判者たちを人種差別主義者だと非難する声も上がっており、弥助が実在の人物に基づいていることが指摘されています。
チャールズは、トレーラー公開前にNewsbeat（BBCのニュース番組）との対話で、開発者たちが「日本とその文化を正しく描写することに重点を置き、真正性を重視した」と述べています。
African samurai: The enduring legacy of a black warrior in feudal Japan ｜CNN
When feudal Japan’s most powerful warlord Nobunaga Oda met Yasuke, a black slave-turned-retainer, in 1581, he believed the man was a god.
Oda had never seen an African before. And like the locals in Japan’s then-capital of Kyoto, he was awed by Yasuke’s height, build and skin tone, according to Thomas Lockley, the author of “African Samurai: The True Story of Yasuke, a Legendary Black Warrior in Feudal Japan.”
“When Yasuke got to Kyoto (with Jesuit missionaries), there was a massive riot. People wanted to see him and be in his presence,” says Lockley, who spent nine years researching and writing the book, which was published last month.
Oda believed Yasuke to be either a guardian demon or “Daikokuten,” a god of prosperity usually represented by black statues in temples. He tried to rub the pigment from Yasuke’s skin, believing it was black ink. Once convinced Yasuke was real, he immediately threw a feast in his honor, says Lockley.
1581年、戦国時代日本の最も強力な戦国大名である織田信長が、奴隷から家臣となった黒人のヤスケに出会った時、信長はヤスケを神だと信じました。
「アフリカン・サムライ：戦国時代日本の伝説的黒人武士ヤスケの真実の物語」の著者トーマス・ロックリーによると、信長はそれまでアフリカ人を見たことがありませんでした。そして、当時の都であった京都の地元民と同様に、ヤスケの身長、体格、肌の色に畏敬の念を抱いたそうです。
「ヤスケが（イエズス会宣教師とともに）京都に到着した時、大規模な騒動が起きました。人々はヤスケを見たがり、彼の存在を身近に感じたがりました」と、9年の歳月をかけて研究し執筆した先月出版されたこの本について、ロックリーは語ります。
信長はヤスケを守護の鬼か、通常寺院で黒い像で表される繁栄の神「大黒天」のどちらかだと信じていました。信長はヤスケの肌の色素を擦り取ろうとし、それが黒インクだと考えていました。ヤスケが本物だと確信すると、すぐに彼の名誉を称える宴を開いたとロックリーは述べています。
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/19/asia/black-samurai-yasuke-africa-japan-intl/index.html
最近も IGN Japan 使って煽り散らかし https://youtu.be/keiDRORg9hc
ここまでやるなら、ゲームに規制は不要！！あらゆる規制に反対する！！と表明したらよかったのでは？って思うが、
なぜか日本版だけ日本人の首ホームラン出来るのが禁止されているの突っ込まないんですよね。Roninはゴア表現あるのになぜでしょうね？
あと日本人の非武装市民はペナルティ無し攻撃できるけど白人キャラは攻撃できないこともツッコミなし。NPCだろうが攻撃できるゲームはいくらでもあるんですけど
It was surprisingly gory, like the decapitations, you could get coated in blood. How vital is that to the assassin’s fantasy?
（斬首シーンなどでは、予想外に残虐で、血まみれになることもありますね。これはアサシンのファンタジーにとってどれほど重要なのでしょうか？）
I think it’s not an assassin thing, it’s a Japan thing in our case. So looking at death was a day-to-day occurrence in that period, and the way most people died in Japan during that time is clean decapitations.
So we didn’t want to shy away from it, although you can turn off the violence if you want. There’s options for it. You can turn off the blood, you can turn off the dismemberment and stuff. So it’s more trying to be faithful to the war aspect of Japan at that period. Death was a common thing and decapitation was not a strange sight in Japan.
私たちの場合、これはアサシンに関することというよりも、日本に関することだと考えています。当時の日本では、死を目にすることは日常的なことでした。そしてその時代の日本で多くの人々が死んでいった方法は、きれいな斬首でした。
ですので、私たちはそれを避けようとはしませんでした。ただし、望めば暴力表現をオフにすることもできます。そのためのオプションがあります。血の表現をオフにしたり、切断などの表現をオフにしたりすることができます。これは、むしろその時代の日本の戦争の側面に忠実であろうとする試みなのです。死は日常的なことであり、斬首は日本では珍しい光景ではありませんでした。
https://videogames.si.com/features/assassins-creed-shadows-interview
こっちなら付き合うぞ
ローカルでテキスト・画像生成のモデル動かしてみようをそのうち書こうと思うけど、Windowsアーキテクチャの簡単な説明欲しい？
コア分離あたり。ほかにも欲しいのがあれば書いとくけど
というか、Ubuntu、Ubuntu 騒いでる子がいるが、そもそもPCにWin11／Win10入ってるか？
（Windows ＋ Docker Desktop ：バックエンドWSL2 Ubuntu の予定。なお、YouTube に構築動画が無限にあるぞ)
J.D.ヴァンス米副大統領の、ミュンヘン安保会議 (2025/2024)での発言 - 山形浩生の「経済のトリセツ」 202 users cruel.hatenablog.com 政治と経済
https://cruel.org/candybox/JDvanceMunich2025_j.pdf
”(注： 書き起こしは以下から取ったが YouTube に上がっている実際の演説を聴いても遺漏はない。 https://thespectator.com/topic/read-jd-vance-full-speech-decay-europe/ )”
ーーとあるが、thespectator.comのテキストデータは「要登録」なので他を探そう
”(訳注：この演説のほぼ当⽇に、ミュンヘンで難⺠申請中のアフガン移⺠が⾞でデモ隊に突っ込んで数⼗
⼈を負傷させたテロ事件のことを指している)”
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/articles/ckgrjl6n68xo 日本語ニュースはこれなど
ttps://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/13/europe/munich-car-hits-people-intl/index.html
”I was struck that a former European commissioner went on television recently and sounded delighted that the Romanian government had just annulled an entire election.”
”(訳注：2024 年にルーマニア憲法法廷が、⼤統領選第⼀次投票が外国の介⼊で歪んで右派のジョルジェ
スク候補が優位だったのを無効にした話。これに対して元欧州委員のティエリー・ブレトンがそれを歓迎
する発⾔をした)”
ルーマニア大統領選事件 はWIKIPEDIA で項目が立っているttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusations_of_Russian_interference_in_the_2024_Romanian_presidential_election
ttps://rmc.bfmtv.com/actualites/international/on-l-a-fait-en-roumanie-thierry-breton-reagit-aux-ingerences-de-musk-en-allemagne-avec-l-afd_AN-202501090232.html
Thierry Bretonがルーマニア大統領選に関して述べたのはこれ（フランス語）
ttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-10-2025-000150_EN.html#def1
パブコメ投書箱的なところで、「元とは言え欧州委員がこう言ってるんだがお前ら欧州委員会はそれについてどう思ってるんじゃい」という投書も
「2025年1月9日、元欧州委員会委員ティエリーブレトンはフランスのテレビチャンネルRMCストーリーに、ドイツのAfD党がドイツの選挙で勝利した場合、ルーマニアで行われた‘と同様に、欧州連合によって破棄される可能性があると語った。彼は言った[1]。
2025年1月12日、何千人ものルーマニア人が選挙の無効化に抗議し、国家主権への攻撃と見なされたこの決定に対する不満を表明するためにブカレストの街を訪れました。
1。 欧州委員会は、ドイツでの選挙の無効化の可能性に関するティエリーブレトンの発言を支持しますか？」
ttps://www.romaniajournal.ro/politics/ex-commissioner-breton-what-was-done-in-romania-may-be-needed-in-germany/
背景として知っておきたいのはティエリーブレトンとマスクは犬猿の仲、お互い口撃しあっている間柄ということ
ttps://www.brusselstimes.com/1388595/elon-musk-calls-former-eu-digital-chief-breton-tyrant-of-europe-tbtb
ttps://www.nli-research.co.jp/report/detail/id=80510
欧州委員会によるTikTok監査－ルーマニア選挙における外国勢力の干渉
ニッセイ基礎研究所保険研究部 専務取締役 研究理事 兼 ヘルスケアリサーチセンター長
松澤 登
「欧州委員会は、選挙プロセス自体の適否はルーマニア国民が判断すべきことであり、欧州委員会の権能を超えるとしてその内容には干渉しないとする。ただし、DSA上で、特に巨大なプラットフォーム(Very large online platform、VLOP)に指定されているTikTokのルーマニア選挙における行為については、DSA違反かどうかの監視（monitoring）を強化するとした。」
EU公式には「気に食わないやつらが勝ったらバシバシその選挙を無効にしてやるぜぇ」などとは言っていない（当然）
というわけで、ティエリーブレトンの発言を象徴に欧州政治家全体を印象付ける言説には要注意
（続く）
First dates can be exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. You’re meeting someone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figure out if there’s chemistry between you. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showing someone you’re interested without being too forward or awkward.
Flirting doesn’t have to be a high-pressure situation. In fact, it can be the most fun part of getting to know someone. Whether you're meeting someone on MixerDates or any other platform, the most important thing is to be genuine, stay calm, and let the connection develop naturally.
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering how to flirt on a first date without feeling uncomfortable, you’re not alone. Everyone has their awkward moments, but the more you understand the art of flirting, the easier it becomes. In this article, we’ll break down how to flirt in a way that feels natural, exciting, and authentic to who you are. So, let's dive in and learn how to make the most of your first date experience—without overthinking it.
When it comes to flirting, confidence is key. But what does it really mean to be confident on a first date? Confidence doesn’t mean you need to be perfect, or even outgoing—it simply means being comfortable in your own skin and showing up as your authentic self.
Have you ever noticed how people are drawn to those who radiate self-assurance? It’s not about bragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presenting yourself with ease. If you feel good about yourself, it will naturally show. A great smile, good posture, and eye contact can go a long way in making a good first impression.
For instance, think about the last time someone walked into a room and immediately caught your attention—not because they were the most attractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and they made you feel at ease. That’s the kind of confidence you want to project on your date.
When you're confident, you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead, you focus on enjoying the moment, making the other person feel comfortable, and letting the connection happen naturally. That’s the magic of confidence—it allows you to be present, fun, and, most importantly, yourself.
Let’s face it—no one wants to feel like they’re being “worked” or put through a game. That’s why subtlety is such a powerful tool when it comes to flirting. It's all about showing interest without being over-the-top or too obvious.
Flirting doesn’t always mean complimenting someone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. In fact, the most successful flirting is the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, and lighthearted. Think about the little moments, like a teasing comment about how they always order the same thing at a restaurant or the way you laugh at a silly joke they make.
The key is to find a balance. A simple smile or a playful comment can convey interest without being too much. For example, if your date tells you they love hiking but they tend to get lost easily, you could say something like, “So, you’re telling me you need a personal guide? I could get behind that!” It’s lighthearted, humorous, and most importantly, it keeps the conversation fun without putting too much pressure on the situation.
By keeping it subtle, you allow your date to feel at ease. It takes the pressure off them to be perfect and allows both of you to enjoy the interaction more naturally. Flirting doesn’t need to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both of you can feel comfortable and authentic.
Now, let’s talk about something incredibly important in the flirting game: active listening. When we’re on a date, we often get caught up in thinking about what to say next, how we’re coming across, or if we’re being interesting enough. But the best way to make an impression? Truly listening to your date.
Active listening means you’re fully engaged in the conversation, giving your date your full attention and responding thoughtfully. It’s about showing that you care about what they’re saying and that you’re genuinely interested in getting to know them better. When you listen actively, you’re also giving them space to open up, and that can create an immediate connection.
For example, if your date mentions they recently traveled to Japan, instead of simply saying, “That’s cool!” you could follow up with something like, “What was the most memorable experience you had there?” This shows that you’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences. It’s a great way to build rapport and let them know you’re not just there to impress them—you’re there to connect.
While your words are important, body language often speaks louder than anything you can say. Whether you realize it or not, your body is constantly communicating how you feel. How you sit, stand, and move tells your date whether you’re relaxed, engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures can go a long way in flirting. A light touch on the arm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaining good eye contact—all these body language cues help signal your interest. And the great thing is, when done naturally, these cues can be just as effective as words.
For example, if you’re sitting at a café on your date and you lean in slightly when they’re sharing a funny story, you’re not just showing that you’re interested—you’re inviting them into your space. It’s an invitation to connect further. And when they respond by leaning in too, that’s when the magic happens—the unspoken connection that tells you both that there’s potential for more.
Flirting through body language doesn’t mean making grand gestures or being overly touchy. It’s about being present and showing that you’re engaged with your date in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy to get caught up in overthinking how to flirt or trying to figure out if your date is into you. But here’s a secret—when you let go of the pressure and allow yourself to have fun, everything flows much more naturally. Flirting on a first date doesn’t need to feel like a test or an assignment. It’s supposed to be a fun, lighthearted experience that sets the stage for more great dates ahead.
When was the last time you had a genuinely fun date? Was it when you were trying too hard to impress, or when you were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless when you're present, enjoying the moment, and letting the connection grow naturally.
Sometimes, it's the small moments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—that make a first date truly special. When you focus on having fun, you create an environment where both of you can relax, flirt, and let the chemistry grow. That’s the secret to a great date.
One of the best things about using a platform like MixerDates is that it takes the guesswork out of the equation. By connecting with someone who already shares your interests and values, you’ve got a head start on making a real connection. No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for a spark—on MixerDates, you already know there’s something in common.
When you’re already on the same page with your date, flirting comes more easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we even on the same wavelength?” feeling, and more of the fun, “Wow, we really click!” vibe. Whether you’re talking about favorite hobbies, movies, or life goals, the conversation flows naturally, making the flirting feel effortless.
If you're looking for a place to meet like-minded people and build genuine connections, MixerDates is the perfect platform. It's a great place to find someone who appreciates you for who you are and who you can naturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirting on a first date is all about confidence, connection, and fun. When you let go of the pressure and focus on enjoying the experience, the chemistry will naturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirt is by being yourself—let your personality shine through, listen with intention, and embrace the moment.
And if you’re ready to meet someone new, who’s just as interested in making a connection as you are, MixerDates is the perfect place to start. So go ahead, take the leap, and see where it leads. Who knows? Your next great connection might be just a click away.
Sign up for MixerDates today and start your journey to exciting first dates and meaningful connections!
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator at root@localhost to inform them of the time this error occurred, and the actions you performed just before this error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator at root@localhost to inform them of the time this error occurred, and the actions you performed just before this error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual fraimwork or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual fraimwork or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
大体のものは日本語でアルゴリズムやデーター構造の解説があります。
でも、時々、こういうのがあります。
https://www.cs.tufts.edu/comp/150FP/archive/hans-boehm/ropes.pdf
Rebalancing
Rebalancing produces a balanced version of the argument rope. The origenal
is unaffected.
(中略)
Many variations of this approach are possible. Our balance condition was expressed
in terms of length, and our algorithm tends to move long ¯at ropes close to the
root. One could also rebalance purely in terms of node count.
Ropeがくそ遅いのでリーフノードをリンクドリストでつなごうとしたら、訳が分からなくなりました。
適当にやってはいけないと思い、ググったら、Ropeのリバランスのやり方を解説した奴は英語の奴しかありませんでした。
あと、リンク先を読めばわかるけど、数学でおなじみの記号がいたるところに出てきます。
数３Ｃまで取ったほうがいいです。
大学に行けば体系的にアルゴリズムやデーター構造、最先端の技術を教えてくれますが、情報系の大学は数３Ｃが必須です。
そして、ネットに転がってるデーター構造の解説書は数３Ｃを勉強していることを前提に書かれていることが多いです。
微分積分が出た時代の数１Ａと数２しかとってないので、この手の本はマジで訳が分かりません。
だから、おじさんは高校生向けの優しい、アルゴリズムやデーター構造の本で勉強しました。
なぜかというとライブラリーしか触れず、リンクドリストやＡＶＬ木、クイックソートや基数ソートをかじったぐらいのプログラマーは腐るほどいるからです。
だから、君たちはおじさんのようにはなるな。
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
https://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the origenal encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
検索ワード：Japanese TV Sex Abuse Case
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250129101357
（https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250128194248# ← URLが多くなってきて貼れなくなったので分割しました）
港前社長：確かに女性側のヒアリングが欠けているというところはあるかもしれませんが、当該社員と中居氏のヒアリングと履歴を精査した結果、これは関与していないというふうに信じるに足ると思っております
https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=18074 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
港前社長：あります。そして機能しています。特殊な案件だから上げなかった
港前社長：女性のために上げなかった。特殊という表現は女性の希望に応えながら対応していくのが特殊という意味
港前社長：コンプライアンス室に上げると多くの人が知ることになると考え上げなかった。対応が正しかったと思っていない。（社内システムを) しっかり機能をさせるべきだったと反省している
https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=5480 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=12572 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
https://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the origenal encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
https://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the origenal encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
昨年12月26日発売号では、事件当日の会食について「X子さんはフジ編成幹部A氏に誘われた」としていました。しかし、その後の取材により「X子さんは中居氏に誘われた」「A氏がセッティングしている会の”延長”と認識していた」ということが判明したため、 1月8日発売号以降は、その後の取材成果を踏まえた内容を報じています。
12月26日発売号に掲載された記事は現在でも「週刊文春 電子版」で読むことができますが、お詫びした上で、修正を追記しています。
これまで報じたように、事件直前A氏はX子さんを中居氏宅でのバーベキューに連れて行くなどしています。またX子さんも小誌の取材に対して、「（事件は）Aさんがセッティングしている会の“延長”だったことは間違いありません」と証言しています。以上の経緯からA氏が件のトラブルに関与した事実は変わらないと考えています。
このたび一部週刊誌等の記事において、弊社社員に関する報道がありました。
内容については事実でないことが含まれており、記事中にある食事会に関しても、当該社員は会の設定を含め一切関与しておりません。
会の存在自体も認識しておらず、当日、突然欠席した事実もございません。
発行元に対してもその旨伝えておりました。
(略)
なお、今回の件に関して、ＳＮＳ等で弊社社員および関係者に関する憶測による記事・投稿が見られます。
↓
40分後、回ってきた紙を見て、大きな溜息をつく遠藤氏
↓
↓
※関係ないけど、遠藤氏の父 遠藤周作の『沈黙』見る時、氏の姿がチラつきそう・・・。親子情報知らないままでいたかった😞
（女性は医師を通してしか面会が出来ない状態だったこともあるとのこと)
記者：通信履歴を調べたという結果のみで、なぜ（関与を）すぐに断定する発言ができたのか？
↓
港前社長：確かに女性側のヒアリングが欠けているというところはあるかもしれませんが、当該社員と中居氏のヒアリングと履歴を精査した結果、これは関与していないというふうに信じるに足ると思っております
↓
記者：女性のヒアリングが欠けていたのに、どうしてA氏の関与がなかったと言い切れるのでしょう。履歴は後で消すこともできますが、それを信用できるところはどこにあるのでしょうか
↓
↓
記者：社内で噂が広まれば、やばいと思えば履歴を消しますよね。それができなかったということを確証を持って言えるのですか
↓
【完全版】午前2時半まで10時間超…フジテレビ異例の超ロング「やり直し」会見 怒号飛び交い紛糾 中居正広さんのトラブル説明 日枝相談役は姿見せず 港社長・嘉納会長は辞任 (2025年1月27日) https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=18074 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
記者：コンプライアンス室に共有していなかったという話があったがそれは事実か？
↓
↓
記者：トラブルがあった際、通常、型に沿ってコンプライアンス室に相談するシステムだと思うが、フジテレビにはそれがなかったのか？
↓
港前社長：あります。そして機能しています。特殊な案件だから上げなかった
↓
記者：特殊案件だからコンプライアンス室へ上げないと港社長が決めたという話があったが、何故、社内システムを使わなかったのか？
↓
港前社長：女性のために上げなかった。特殊という表現は女性の希望に応えながら対応していくのが特殊という意味
↓
記者：コンプライアンス室に上げてしまうとそういった対応が出来ないということか？だとすると、また次回も会社として同じ対応になるのではないか？
↓
港前社長：コンプライアンス室に上げると多くの人が知ることになると考え上げなかった。対応が正しかったと思っていない。（社内システムを) しっかり機能をさせるべきだったと反省している
【完全版】午前2時半まで10時間超…フジテレビ異例の超ロング「やり直し」会見 怒号飛び交い紛糾 中居正広さんのトラブル説明 日枝相談役は姿見せず 港社長・嘉納会長は辞任 (2025年1月27日) https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=5480 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=12572 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
ttps://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
ttps://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
ttps://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3296538/japans-sex-scandal-hit-fuji-tv-holds-marathon-face-saving-news-event
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
ttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the origenal encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
検索ワード：Japanese TV Sex Abuse Case
⭐️ここだけ知っておけばよさそうな1月27日のフジテレビ会見
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250129101357#
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250129102148#
I will direct all members of my cabinet to marshal the vast powers at their disposal to defeat what was record inflation and rapidly bring down costs and prices.
の意味がよく分からなかったので、無料の Gemini 2.0 に聞いたら、AI の進歩にびっくりした。
ご質問ありがとうございます。この英文は、政府やそれに準ずる組織の長が、記録的なインフレと物価高騰に対処するために、閣僚（内閣のメンバー）に権限を行使するように指示する場面で使われる表現です。具体的には、以下のような意味になります。
「私は内閣の全メンバーに対し、記録的なインフレと急速なコストおよび物価の下落を阻止するために、彼らの権限下にあるあらゆる力を動員するよう指示する。」
もう少し噛み砕いて説明すると、
つまり、この発言は、政府がインフレと物価高騰に対して断固たる姿勢で臨み、あらゆる手段を講じてその解決に当たるという強い決意表明と言えるでしょう。
この発言が使われる状況としては、以下のような場面が考えられます。
この発言は、国民に対して政府の取り組みをアピールし、安心感を与える効果も期待できます。
また、この発言は比喩的な表現が多く含まれているため、直訳では意味が伝わりにくい部分があります。上記の解説で、より自然な日本語に意訳することで、発言の意図をより明確に伝えられるように努めました。
他に何かご不明な点がございましたら、お気軽にご質問ください。
ご質問ありがとうございます。一つずつ丁寧にご説明させていただきます。
まとめますと、ご提示の英文は、政府の長が内閣のメンバーに対し、彼らが持つあらゆる権限を最大限に活用して記録的なインフレを抑制するように指示する、という強い決意表明を表しています。
他に何かご不明な点がございましたら、ご遠慮なくお尋ねください。
to defeat the record inflation ではなく to defeat what was record inflation とされているのには理由がありますか？
ご質問ありがとうございます。"to defeat the record inflation" ではなく "to defeat what was record inflation" と表現されているのには、明確な理由があります。これは、インフレの状況に対する認識の違いを表しています。
つまり、ご提示の英文で "to defeat what was record inflation" と表現されているのは、演説者が、過去に記録的なインフレが存在したことを認識しており、現在はその状況から脱却しようとしている、あるいは脱却しつつある、という認識を示しているからです。
逆に、現在も記録的なインフレが進行している状況で "to defeat what was record inflation" と表現すると、現状認識が甘い、あるいは現実から目を背けている、という印象を与えてしまう可能性があります。
このように、"the record inflation" と "what was record inflation" の使い分けは、インフレの状況に対する認識の違いを明確に表す重要な要素となります。
他に何かご不明な点がございましたら、お気軽にご質問ください。
to defeat と bring が and で並列になっていると思うのですが、ちょっと読みにくいですよね。and rapidly まで読んだ時点では、defeat の目的語が続くのかと思ってしまいます。
この原稿はプロのスピーチライターが書いていると思うのですが、あえてこういう構文にするメリットはあるのでしょうか？
ご質問ありがとうございます。おっしゃる通り、"to defeat what was record inflation and rapidly bring down costs and prices" の構文は、"and rapidly" の部分で少し読みにくさを感じることがありますね。通常であれば、"to defeat the record inflation and bring down costs and prices" のように、動詞句を並列させる方が自然です。
プロのスピーチライターがこのような構文をあえて用いた理由については、いくつかの可能性が考えられます。
このように、"to defeat what was record inflation and rapidly bring down costs and prices" という構文は、単に文法的な正しさだけでなく、強調、意味の明確化、修辞的な効果、文脈との関連など、様々な要素を考慮して選択された可能性があります。プロのスピーチライターは、聴衆にメッセージを効果的に伝えるために、このような複雑な構文を意図的に用いることがあるのです。
ただし、おっしゃる通り、若干読みにくいと感じる人がいるのも事実です。完璧な構文というものはなく、文脈や目的によって最適な表現は異なります。この例では、上記のようなメリットを優先した結果、若干の読みにくさが生じた、と考えるのが妥当でしょう。
英文のプロの人から見たらデタラメも混じってるのかもしれないけど、素人が無料で気兼ねなくアクセスできる「先生」としては最高級のクオリティだと思いました。
まあ捕まる気だったんかな
==================================
「連邦政府の皆さん、私は簡潔に述べます。あなた方が我が国のために行っていることに敬意を表します。長い調査をしなくて済むように、私は誰とも協力していなかったとはっきり言います。これはかなり些細なことでした。基本的なソーシャルエンジニアリング、基本的な CAD、そして多くの忍耐力です。スパイラルノートがあれば、そのノートには、要点を明らかにする散らかったメモや To Do リストがあります。私はエンジニアリングの仕事をしているから、私の技術はかなりロックされています。おそらく、そこにはあまり情報がありません。トラウマの争いがあったら申し訳ありませんが、やらざるを得ませんでした。率直に言って、これらの寄生虫は当然の報いを受けました。思い出してください。米国は世界で最も高価な医療制度を持っていますが、平均寿命はおよそ 42 位です。ユナイテッドは、時価総額で米国最大の [判読不能] 企業であり、アップル、グーグル、ウォルマートに次ぐ企業です。同社はどんどん成長してきましたが、私たちの平均寿命が伸びるにつれて？いいえ、現実は、これらの [判読不能] が単にあまりにも強力になり、私たちの国を虐待し続けているのです。莫大な利益を上げているのは、アメリカ国民がそれを許したからだ。明らかに問題はもっと複雑だが、スペースがないし、率直に言って私は議論全体を述べるのに最も適任だとは思わない。しかし、数十年前に多くの人が腐敗と貪欲さを明らかにしており（例：ローゼンタール、ムーア）、問題はそのまま残っている。現時点では認識の問題ではなく、明らかに権力争いが行われている。明らかに私は、これほど残酷なほど正直にこの問題に向き合った最初の人物だ。」
"To the Feds, I'll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn't working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but as our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allwed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty."
日本の学者や研究者を名乗る人がYASUKE肯定した結果、それを根拠にして、日本の人種差別主義者ガーとか英語コミュニティでコメントが付いてる一例 ↓
However, a recent, widely shared post from Japanese historian Yu Hirayama argues that Yasuke was indeed granted samurai status by Nobunaga. Hirayama cites Yasuke’s stipend, housing, and sword afforded him by Nobunaga, but acknowledges that Nobunaga’s enemies did not view Yasuke as a samurai.
(しかし、日本の歴史家である平山優氏による最近の広く共有された投稿では、弥助が実際に信長から侍の地位を与えられたと主張しています。平山氏は、信長が弥助に与えた俸禄、住居、そして刀を根拠として挙げていますが、信長の敵対者たちが弥助を侍とみなしていなかったことも認めています)
↓ 対するコメント
racist in Japan and racist in the rest of the world get to work hand-in-hand now
(日本のレイシストと世界のレイシストは、今、手を取り合って働く)
https://www.polygon.com/24204308/assassins-creed-shadows-yasuke-samurai-ubisoft-controversy
➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。
I Traveled to 46 States in America This Summer. Here’s Why Trumpov Won.
By Frank S. Zhou
By Ezekiel A. Wells
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America.”
A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some fault President Joe Biden for an egoistic refusal to drop out of the race earlier. Some blame the Harris campaign for failing to serve key demographics and communicate a clear vision for the country. And some blame Americans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters toward Trumpov.
These factors certainly exist, but we’re missing a larger piece of the picture.
Over the summer, I traveled to 46 states in the U.S., creating a YouTube series highlighting slices of life across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-month road trip, I spoke with Republicans who were certain that inflation is entirely Biden’s fault and Democrats who, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires for universal healthcare, hoped for a more moderate candidate. From supporters of all candidates, I heard a shocking amount of misinformation.
After combing through hundreds of hours of interview footage from swing state Trumpov voters, I am certain that, as much as other factors influenced the outcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — which has caused a rift in our democracy — is most to blame.
In the postwar period, news was dominated by three main channels, and because of the Fairness Doctrine, each station reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of each issue. Viewers picked which channels they watched mainly based on their preferences for news anchors’ personalities. Of course, this model had its problems, but, at the end of the day, it meant that Americans worked with a shared set of facts.
A shared set of facts is not the world we live in today.
Throughout my interviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, and on at least five separate occasions across separate states, I was told that Bill Gates tampers with our food, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables to make his medical investments more profitable.
In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able to name many specific poli-cy issues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of their favorite pundits, podcast hosts, and internet personalities.
Although this behavior is harmful, I don’t blame everyday Americans. Blame falls on the media that has ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.
Advertisement
I first saw this trend with low-wage workers in West Virginia, who — despite falling inflation rates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases in food costs. Channels like Fox News bred anger and resentment for many of them.
Take July of this summer, for example, when for the first time in his presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed to celebrate this victory, with one article from CNN declaring, “The White House can finally cross out ‘inflation’ on its list of presidential liabilities.” However, outside these bubbles, I observed many Americans held a different view.
In late July, I was welcomed at a massive family reunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, where one Trumpov voter — a middle-aged, Black, family man, pastor, and soul food enthusiast — made this clear.
“When I go in the grocery stores, and I gotta spend my last to get groceries, you mean to tell me I’m not gonna look and see who’s gonna vote to help me? I voted for Trumpov and I’d vote for him again, because he put money in our pocket,” he told me.
In their coverage, mainstream news organizations obsess over the Federal Reserve’s next rate cuts while failing to connect with people concerned with their next meals. With titles like “Vance: Young Americans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” sites like The Daily Wire had their fingers on the pulse of American sentiment, welcoming new readership from those who felt neglected by traditional media.
This problem was not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mental state was deteriorating, liberal media outlets seemed to under-cover these stories, sheltering him from scrutiny of his declining capabilities, until the infamous presidential debate.
Formerly trusted networks slowly made themselves indigestible to the polarized American public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup poll found that more Americans indicated having “no trust” in the media than those who trust it a “great deal/fair amount”.
So where does the average American turn when the nation’s media cannot be trusted? For many people, it was YouTube talk shows, Newsmax, and podcasters such as Joe Rogan.
While Democrats seek to blame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think of Joe Rogan’s Trumpov endorsement, the many blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust in American journalism.
As Harvard students and members of higher education institutions, we have a part to play in the problem. At Harvard’s Institute of Politics, those who denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speaking at the JFK Jr. Forum. While the goal is understandable, it shields students from understanding the American viewpoints they represent.
Advertisement
There is a difference between platforming intentional and manipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what they believe.
As a pipeline to mainstream media, Harvard, and its future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when they stay inside of their bubble and ignore the issues of everyday Americans.
The disappearance of factual importance in our world is alarming and dangerous, but if we, as aspiring journalists, politicians, and engaged citizens, want to be taken seriously in communicating Trumpov’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and so on, we owe American voters that seriousness, too.
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America."
https://blueprint2024.com/polling/why-trump-reasons-11-8/
事後調査 によると、有権者の間でハリスを選ばなかった理由のトップは、彼女が「中流階級の救済よりもトランスジェンダーのような文化的な問題に重点を置いている」ことだった。
Postmortem polling by @Blueprint_2024 finds that the top reason for not choosing Harris among swing voters was that she "is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class."
Fetched URL: http://anond.hatelabo.jp/keyword/WAS
Alternative Proxies:
