Content-Length: 212854 | pFad | http://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/733

B0 Investigate if predicates for specific roles are needed. · Issue #733 · OP-TED/ePO · GitHub
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate if predicates for specific roles are needed. #733

Open
AchillesDougalis opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate if predicates for specific roles are needed. #733

AchillesDougalis opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@AchillesDougalis
Labels
act: for implementation it can be implemented and closed, all is clear module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Milestone
5.0.0

Comments

@AchillesDougalis
Copy link
Contributor

WGM 2024/12/17: Are the predicates for the roles needed ? The roles should be self-explainable. To re-evaluate how roles are connected with other objects in the ontology. The role should be linked with a procurement Object. (epo:contextualisedBy inherited by epo:AgentInRole) and not by an action that the role will be doing.

To investigate if each predicate that connects a Role with other Concepts is needed or if it could be replaced by the predicates of epo:AgentInRole.
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release act: for implementation it can be implemented and closed, all is clear module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature labels Jan 7, 2025
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Jan 7, 2025
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis self-assigned this Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis

Labels
act: for implementation it can be implemented and closed, all is clear module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@AchillesDougalis








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/733

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy