Content-Length: 206063 | pFad | http://github.com/eth-sri/securify/issues/44
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Memory tagging needs to be improved for certain opcodes including ReturnDataCopy and CallDataCopy.
ReturnDataCopy
CallDataCopy.
Reference: https://github.com/eth-sri/securify/blob/master/src/main/java/ch/securify/analysis/AbstractDataflow.java#L472
Example:
No MissingInputValidation here:
contract SimpleBank { bytes32 x; function withdraw(bytes memory a) public { x = keccak256(a); } }
but it is detected if a non-dynamic data type is used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Fetched URL: http://github.com/eth-sri/securify/issues/44
Alternative Proxies:
Alternative Proxy
pFad Proxy
pFad v3 Proxy
pFad v4 Proxy
Memory tagging needs to be improved for certain opcodes including
ReturnDataCopy
andCallDataCopy.
Reference:
https://github.com/eth-sri/securify/blob/master/src/main/java/ch/securify/analysis/AbstractDataflow.java#L472
Example:
No MissingInputValidation here:
but it is detected if a non-dynamic data type is used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: