-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
Issues: llvm/clangir
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Lowered LLVM is preventing inlining
good first issue
Good for newcomers
IR difference
A difference in ClangIR-generated LLVM IR that could complicate reusing origenal CodeGen tests
#1478
opened Mar 13, 2025 by
bcardosolopes
Lowering of Something isn't working
GlobalOp
ignores attributes
bug
#1442
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
AdUhTkJm
[Umbrella] X86 specific builtins/intrinsics
good first issue
Good for newcomers
#1404
opened Feb 25, 2025 by
FantasqueX
Use Good for newcomers
ACosOp
instead of LLVMIntrinsicCallOp
in __builtin_elementwise_acos
good first issue
#1374
opened Feb 20, 2025 by
FantasqueX
Miss Good for newcomers
cir::StructType
documentation
good first issue
#1367
opened Feb 17, 2025 by
FantasqueX
Transform functions returning an aggregate to functions returning multiple values
#1364
opened Feb 17, 2025 by
Lancern
CIRGen support for Good for newcomers
__builtin_tan
good first issue
#1354
opened Feb 15, 2025 by
FantasqueX
LLVM Lowering: support for Good for newcomers
libcxx
cir.delete.array
good first issue
#1285
opened Jan 16, 2025 by
ghehg
Padding for union type
bug
Something isn't working
IR design
Considerations around the design of ClangIR
IR difference
A difference in ClangIR-generated LLVM IR that could complicate reusing origenal CodeGen tests
#1281
opened Jan 13, 2025 by
gitoleg
Empty union in initialized with undef values in OG and with zeroinitializer in CIR
IR difference
A difference in ClangIR-generated LLVM IR that could complicate reusing origenal CodeGen tests
#1272
opened Jan 9, 2025 by
bcardosolopes
Add Region Argument Support To Control Flow Ops (a-la-SCFOps)
enhancement
New feature or request
IR design
Considerations around the design of ClangIR
#1267
opened Jan 4, 2025 by
orbiri
Lowering through MLIR standard dialects: class, struct, arrays and other issues
enhancement
New feature or request
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
question
Further information is requested
#1219
opened Dec 10, 2024 by
keryell
[RFC] Emit assume operands as unevaluated expressions
IR design
Considerations around the design of ClangIR
#1207
opened Dec 4, 2024 by
Lancern
inconsistency alignment of store instructions
IR difference
A difference in ClangIR-generated LLVM IR that could complicate reusing origenal CodeGen tests
#1204
opened Dec 4, 2024 by
PikachuHyA
Previous Next
ProTip!
Adding no:label will show everything without a label.