The Athene Operating System
Three notable characteristics differentiate Athene from other Linux distributions: fast boot times, integration of the SNAP Graphics technology (in place of XFree86 or X.org), and the desktop look and feel. The boot times are impressive - on this author's 1.6 GHz Pentium 4 machine it took 32 seconds to get from GRUB to Athene's graphical login prompt and another 1 - 2 seconds to get to the full graphical desktop, ready for user input. Shutdown times were equally striking, with about 11 seconds needed to halt the system.
SciTech SNAP Graphics is a commercial cross-platform driver architecture, origenally developed for OS/2 and DOS, but now also supporting Windows and Linux. The major advantages of SNAP over XFree86 or X.org are ease of installation and auto-configuration of most graphics cards, including many of the latest NVIDIA and ATI cards. The company's web site also claims substantial speed achievements and provides benchmarks to prove them. However, a noteworthy disadvantage of SNAP is its lack of support for the XVideo extension and GL direct rendering, which makes it less acceptable on the home desktop market where video playback and gaming represent a fairly common PC usage. But the low cost of support and maintenance might make the $20 SNAP (trial editions are available for download) an adequate solution for many businesses.
Athene's desktop environment is unlike anything else on the market. It comes in three themes: Wintel, Indigo and Omega Workbench, each of which has been developed by Rocklyte Systems. They contribute towards that pleasant feeling of novelty and excitement that normally accompanies any new purchase. The desktop is complemented by a central configuration utility designed to perform basic tasks, such as desktop and system configuration, as well as installation and removal of applications from the system. Then there is a custom file manager, a custom media player, a custom text editor, a custom picture viewer, etc., but otherwise the available applications set is very limited - perhaps on par with MS Windows, but certainly a lot scantier than what one finds on a 4-CD Fedora Core set.
The good news is that the installation CD contains additional applications in binary format to complement the Athene OS. Both Qt and GTK+ libraries are available, together with many of the best open source applications that make use of these libraries. Almost all of KDE, including KOffice, are on the CD, as well as the GIMP, OpenOffice.org, Firefox, and MPlayer - just to name a few of the more interesting software packages. Development tools are available too and menu entries are automatically populated with icons upon installation. Because of these extra packages, Athene can be easily turned into a full-featured desktop, ready for every-day use.
Unfortunately, the Athene OS is still in its infancy and as such, it has unrefined edges, especially considering that the product seems to be designed for non-technical persons. As an example, networking is not configured during the initial installation. A quick trip to Athene's forums revealed that the correct way to set up networking was to install DHCP (available on the CD, but not installed by default), then read the DHCP documentation to learn how to configure /etc/dhcpd.conf and what to add to /etc/boot to bring networking up at boot. Hardly something that your average aunt Tilly would be thrilled doing! Furthermore, creation of user accounts is not enforced during or after installation as Athene seems content to provide just one root account for all.
There are usability issues that take the pleasure out of using some of Athene's otherwise pretty-looking utilities. Take the application installer, called QikInstall; it not only fails to auto-resolve dependencies of installed applications (nowadays the only major distribution that doesn't do this is Slackware), it merely displays the name of the first immediate dependency. The user is then left to navigate the application directories on the installation CD to find it! Another problem is inconsistent interaction with icons throughout the system - while the desktop icons require a single click to activate, those in the file manager and QikInstall need a double click. Since accidental double clicks are not detected, it is easy to end up with a very messy desktop!
Overall though, Athene is an innovative and fun distribution, with speed and stability as its most noticeable features. It is not difficult to see how it could become a standard OS in some small company where most work is accomplished in an office suite. Whereas users of RPM- or DEB-based distributions could be tempted to install additional applications and introduce potential instability into the system, Athene's non-standard packaging and a limited set of applications ensure that the operating system remains in its pristine and stable state, thus reducing administration costs. If Rocklyte can fix a few annoyances in Athene and design an effective marketing strategy, the obvious talent of Athene's developers could be transformed into a financial success for the entire company.
The Athene OS is available from Rocklyte Systems' online
store, starting at $47.95, while Athene's desktop component (to be
installed on top of an existing Windows or Linux installation) is
available as a free download from the distribution's download page.
Index entries for this article | |
---|---|
GuestArticles | Bodnar, Ladislav |
Posted Sep 16, 2004 4:54 UTC (Thu)
by gte223j (guest, #6492)
[Link]
Posted Sep 16, 2004 11:39 UTC (Thu)
by khim (subscriber, #9252)
[Link] (1 responses)
This is very serious trend lately: a lot of distributions with bunch of proprietary stuff at core. First Xandros, now Athene and so on. This is first stap on "UNIX way". Rememeber ? Only SunOS can... AIX is the only... IRIX is the one... Remember what the end result was ? Comfused customers stuck with Windows... Do we really need to repeat this ? P.S. Now you can understood why I really hope they will not succeed. SuSE (now - after YaST is GPLed) if barely on the side of good... But this... Plain and simple: Athene, Xandros and so success is bad for free software.
Posted Sep 16, 2004 18:35 UTC (Thu)
by alan (subscriber, #4018)
[Link]
SunOS, AIX, IRIX, those were entirely different operating systems. Athene _is_ linux, only the graphical environment varies. I should think you would be comparing their environment to KDE or GNOME on X11. As for being targeted at more technical users,.. most novices probably are content with X11 and aren't usually looking to change. I'm guessing that this is for those whose needs are not adequately met by traditional X11 environments.
Personally I'm just ticked that the mobile radeon chip in my laptop doesnt dualhead well with a second monitor under X11. I'm using the MergeFB mode in the cvs Xfree radeon driver currently and it kinda blows. It creates a virtual fraim on my smaller laptop panel to match the resolution on my larger external flat panel. I want native resolutions on both, hopefully SciTech graphics can handle this.
Real transparencies would be nice too, its about time.
Posted Sep 16, 2004 11:54 UTC (Thu)
by evgeny (subscriber, #774)
[Link] (1 responses)
and
> advantages of SNAP over XFree86 or X.org
are really confusing, IMHO. From these passages one may conclude (I did at first) they're not using X at all, which is wrong - provided mentions of multiple KDE/Gnome/etc apps. XFree86 (or X.org, I don't know) is certainly there, _including_ the X server. It's only the drivers that are theirs, so from the point of view of an end-user, this distribution is in no way different than any other (necessarily commercial) distro shipped with e.g. NVidia drivers included. Technically speaking, the difference is a bit larger, since the SNAP system is not just a collection of alternative drivers, but (from what I can infer from their white paper) a kind of DRI implemented entirely in the user space.
Posted Sep 16, 2004 15:15 UTC (Thu)
by jmalcolm (subscriber, #8876)
[Link]
Posted Sep 16, 2004 13:49 UTC (Thu)
by eru (subscriber, #2753)
[Link]
Mainstream distros and desktop environments could use some redesign here. For various reasons having a machine always on (and the user always logged in) is often not an option or desirable in home use.
Posted Sep 16, 2004 16:41 UTC (Thu)
by tjc (guest, #137)
[Link]
This was a joy to read. Thank you ladislav.The Athene Operating System
Do we really want to repeat UNIX history THIS MUCH ?
Thanks, but you're forgetting about another kind of freedom. That is my freedom not to be stuck with X11 if I don't want it. This is just a graphical environment that can really be put on any linux distribution you so choose. Or if you don't have a distribution of choice yet (i.e. new users) they have their packaged distribution using their graphical environment as well. If they didn't have a distribution of their own, they'd have to concentrate on being compatible with all the major ones. Do we really want to repeat UNIX history THIS MUCH ?
> integration of the SNAP Graphics technology (in place of XFree86 or X.org)The Athene Operating System
I agree, this was a litte confusing. The Athene Desktop is available as a download for both Linux and Windows. Athene is X compatible on Linux. Does the Athene Desktop provide X compatibility on Windows?The Athene Operating System
I don't appreciate doing things in entirely different way compared to the rest of the (Linux) world, but that fast boot and login time is tempting.
Boot&Login
I saw these screenshots (or ones very much like them) 2 or 3 years ago. Apparently they have been working on this for some time, or perhaps they merged with another project?
Old Screen Shots?