Content-Length: 12412 | pFad | http://lwn.net/Articles/397640/

Realtime Linux: academia v. reality [LWN.net]
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Realtime Linux: academia v. reality

Realtime Linux: academia v. reality

Posted Jul 28, 2010 13:01 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: Realtime Linux: academia v. reality by mjthayer
Parent article: Realtime Linux: academia v. reality

Yeah, but even now you have people like Christoph Hellwig turning up on e.g. the glibc list when probe point adding patches were proposed, saying 'no, uprobes will never exist in this form'. So uprobes may exist but some kernel hackers are trying as hard as possible to make sure they stay useless and out of *every* package's upstream.

to post comments

Realtime Linux: academia v. reality

Posted Jul 28, 2010 16:08 UTC (Wed) by mjthayer (guest, #39183) [Link] (2 responses)

> Yeah, but even now you have people like Christoph Hellwig turning up on e.g. the glibc list when probe point adding patches were proposed, saying 'no, uprobes will never exist in this form'.

I thought I read about work to make SystemTap work with procfs. Any idea what is happening there (Frank?) Although something seems to be happening currently with uprobes, and Christoph Hellwig seemed to be actively (positively) involved in the discussion (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/27/121).

Realtime Linux: academia v. reality

Posted Jul 28, 2010 16:18 UTC (Wed) by fuhchee (guest, #40059) [Link] (1 responses)

> I thought I read about work to make SystemTap work with procfs.
> Any idea what is happening there (Frank?)

I'm not quite sure which effort you may be referring to.

> ... Christoph Hellwig seemed to be actively (positively) involved

Yes. It is unfortunate though that instructions of the form "Don't SYMBOL_EXPORT this facility [since you-know-who might use it]" are still the order of the day.

Realtime Linux: academia v. reality

Posted Jul 28, 2010 16:27 UTC (Wed) by mjthayer (guest, #39183) [Link]

>> I thought I read about work to make SystemTap work with procfs.
>> Any idea what is happening there (Frank?)
> I'm not quite sure which effort you may be referring to.
I can't seem to find any reference to it now. If you are not aware of it then I strongly assume I misunderstood something at some point.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/397640/

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy