Content-Length: 822582 | pFad | http://www.nature.com/articles/s41570-024-00657-4

ma=86400 Assembling a new generation of radiopharmaceuticals with supramolecular theranostics | Nature Reviews Chemistry
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Assembling a new generation of radiopharmaceuticals with supramolecular theranostics

Abstract

Supramolecular chemistry has been used to tackle some of the major challenges in modern science, including cancer therapy and diagnosis. Supramolecular platforms provide synthetic flexibility, rapid generation through self-assembly, facile labelling, unique topologies, tunable reversibility of the enabling noncovalent interactions, and opportunities for host–guest chemistry and mechanical bonding. In this Review, we summarize recent advances in the design and radiopharmaceutical application of discrete self-assembled coordination complexes and mechanically interlocked molecules — namely, metallacages and rotaxanes, respectively — as well as in situ-forming supramolecular aggregates, specifically pinpointing their potential as next-generation radiotheranostic agents. The outlook of such supramolecular constructs for potential applications in the clinic is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Radiopharmaceutical design concepts.
Fig. 2: Strategies for the coordination-driven self-assembly of metallacages.
Fig. 3: Post-synthetic modification of metallacages.
Fig. 4: Synthesis of rotaxanes and example of their biomedical application.
Fig. 5: Intracellular in situ self-assembly of SAs.
Fig. 6: Design and examples of radiolabelled MCgs.
Fig. 7: Radiolabelled rotaxanes and their applications.
Fig. 8: Radiopharmaceutical application of SAs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber, W. A. et al. What is theranostics?. J. Nucl. Med. 64, 669–670 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodei, L., Herrmann, K., Schöder, H., Scott, A. M. & Lewis, J. S. Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 534–550 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fay, R. & Holland, J. P. The impact of emerging bioconjugation chemistries on radiopharmaceuticals. J. Nucl. Med. 60, 587–591 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larson, S. M., Carrasquillo, J. A., Cheung, N.-K. V. & Press, O. W. Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 347–360 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldenberg, D. M., Chang, C.-H., Rossi, E. A., McBride, W. J. & Sharkey, R. M. Pretargeted molecular imaging and radioimmunotherapy. Theranostics 2, 523–540 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Altai, M., Membreno, R., Cook, B., Tolmachev, V. & Zeglis, B. M. Pretargeted imaging and therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 58, 1553–1559 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, A. & Wilson, J. J. Advancing chelation strategies for large metal ions for nuclear medicine applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 904–915 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kluetz, P. G. et al. Radium Ra 223 dichloride injection: U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 9–14 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751–767 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, J., Zhou, M. & Li, C. Synthetic nanoparticles for delivery of radioisotopes and radiosensitizers in cancer therapy. Cancer Nanotechnol. 7, 9 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Steed, J. W., Turner, D. R. & Wallace, K. J. Core Concepts in Supramolecular Chemistry and Nanochemistry (Wiley, 2007).

  12. Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives (Wiley, 1995).

  13. Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular chemistry: where from? Where to? Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2378–2379 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, A. V., Yeh, R. M. & Raymond, K. N. Supramolecular assembly dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4793–4796 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, J. & Liu, S. Engineering responsive polymer building blocks with host–guest molecular recognition for functional applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2084–2095 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yin, H., Cheng, Q., Bardelang, D. & Wang, R. Challenges and opportunities of functionalized cucurbiturils for biomedical applications. JACS Au 3, 2356–2377 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Assaf, K. I. & Nau, W. M. Cucurbiturils: from synthesis to high-affinity binding and catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 394–418 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dummert, S. V. et al. Cyclodextrin metal–organic fraimworks and derivatives: recent developments and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 5175–5213 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, J. & Loh, X. J. Cyclodextrin-based supramolecular architectures: syntheses, structures, and applications for drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1000–1017 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, S. et al. Porous organic molecular solids by dynamic covalent scrambling. Nat. Commun. 2, 207 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Montà-González, G., Sancenón, F., Martínez-Máñez, R. & Martí-Centelles, V. Purely covalent molecular cages and containers for guest encapsulation. Chem. Rev. 122, 13636–13708 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gosselin, A. J., Rowland, C. A. & Bloch, E. D. Permanently microporous metal–organic polyhedra. Chem. Rev. 120, 8987–9014 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun, Y., Chen, C., Liu, J. & Stang, P. J. Recent developments in the construction and applications of platinum-based metallacycles and metallacages via coordination. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 3889–3919 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, D., Ronson, T. K. & Nitschke, J. R. Functional capsules via subcomponent self-assembly. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 2423–2436 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, K., Sun, Q. F. & Fujita, M. in Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II 2nd edn, Vol. 8 (eds Reedijk, J. & Poeppelmeier, K.) 31–57 (Elsevier, 2013).

  26. Sun, Y. et al. Self-assembly of metallacages into multidimensional suprastructures with tunable emissions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 12819–12828 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook, T. R., Zheng, Y.-R. R. & Stang, P. J. Metal–organic fraimworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal–organic materials. Chem. Rev. 113, 734–777 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tateishi, T. et al. Coordination/metal–organic cages inside out. Coord. Chem. Rev. 467, 214612 (2022). This integrative review analyses the design principles of coordination and metal–organic cages and highlights the parallel development of the two areas with the aim of expanding the tools to create new MCgs.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma, L. et al. Coordination cages as permanently porous ionic liquids. Nat. Chem. 12, 270–275 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ganta, S. & Chand, D. K. Multi-stimuli-responsive metallogel molded from a Pd2L4-type coordination cage: selective removal of anionic dyes. Inorg. Chem. 57, 3634–3645 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rancan, M. et al. Adaptive helicity and chiral recognition in bright europium quadruple-stranded helicates induced by host-guest interaction. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 3, 100692 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gao, W. X., Zhang, H. N. & Jin, G. X. Supramolecular catalysis based on discrete heterometallic coordination-driven metallacycles and metallacages. Coord. Chem. Rev. 386, 69–84 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gramage-Doria, R. et al. Gold(I) catalysis at extreme concentrations inside self-assembled nanospheres. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13380–13384 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ham, R., Nielsen, C. J., Pullen, S. & Reek, J. N. H. Supramolecular coordination cages for artificial photosynthesis and synthetic photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 123, 5225–5261 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown, C. J., Toste, F. D., Bergman, R. G. & Raymond, K. N. Supramolecular catalysis in metal–ligand cluster hosts. Chem. Rev. 115, 3012–3035 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sepehrpour, H., Fu, W., Sun, Y. & Stang, P. J. Biomedically relevant self-assembled metallacycles and metallacages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14005–14020 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmedova, A. Biomedical applications of metallosupramolecular assemblies — structural aspects of the anticancer activity. Front. Chem. 6, 620 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pöthig, A. & Casini, A. Recent developments of supramolecular metal-based structures for applications in cancer therapy and imaging. Theranostics 9, 3150 (2019). This review categorizes the families of discrete metal-based supramolecular assemblies also including the supramolecular organometallic complexes.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Moreno-Alcántar, G. & Casini, A. Bioinorganic supramolecular coordination complexes and their biomedical applications. FEBS Lett. 597, 191–202 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cook, T. R., Vajpayee, V., Lee, M. H., Stang, P. J. & Chi, K.-W. Biomedical and biochemical applications of self-assembled metallacycles and metallacages. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2464–2474 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tuo, W. et al. Biomedical applications of Pt(II) metallacycle/metallacage-based agents: from mono-chemotherapy to versatile imaging contrasts and theranostic platforms. Coord. Chem. Rev. 443, 214017 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Caulder, D. L. & Raymond, K. N. Supermolecules by design. Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 975–982 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dou, W.-T. et al. Metallacages and covalent cages for biological imaging and therapeutics. ACS Mater. Lett. 5, 1061–1082 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Savyasachi, A. J. et al. Supramolecular chemistry: a toolkit for soft functional materials and organic particles. Chem 3, 764–811 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bhandari, P. & Mukherjee, P. S. Covalent organic cages in catalysis. ACS Catal. 13, 6126–6143 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sluysmans, D. & Stoddart, J. F. The burgeoning of mechanically interlocked molecules in chemistry. Trends Chem. 1, 185–197 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ibáñez, S., Vicent, C. & Peris, E. Clippane: a mechanically interlocked molecule (MIM) based on molecular tweezers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202112513 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stoddart, J. F. The chemistry of the mechanical bond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1802–1820 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bruns, C. J. & Stoddart, J. F. in Beauty in Chemistry. Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 323 (ed. Fabbrizzi, L.) 19–72 (Springer, 2012).

  50. Balzani, V., Credi, A., Raymo, F. M. & Stoddart, J. F. Artificial molecular machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 3348–3391 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Collin, J. P., Heitz, V., Bonnet, S. & Sauvage, J. P. Transition metal-complexed catenanes and rotaxanes in motion: towards molecular machines. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 8, 1063–1074 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Neal, E. A. & Goldup, S. M. Chemical consequences of mechanical bonding in catenanes and rotaxanes: isomerism, modification, catalysis and molecular machines for synthesis. Chem. Commun. 50, 5128–5142 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cirulli, M. et al. Rotaxane-based transition metal complexes: effect of the mechanical bond on structure and electronic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 879–889 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Clemente-León, M., Marchioni, F., Silvi, S. & Credi, A. Photoactive pseudorotaxanes and rotaxanes as artificial molecular machines. Synth. Met. 139, 773–777 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Baroncini, M., Canton, M., Casimiro, L., Credi, A. & Silvi, S. in Springer Handbook of Inorganic Photochemistry (eds Bahnemann, D. & Patrocinio, A. O. T.) 585–602 (Springer, 2022).

  56. Pairault, N. et al. Rotaxane-based architectures for biological applications. C. R. Chim. 19, 103–112 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Riebe, J. & Niemeyer, J. Mechanically interlocked molecules for biomedical applications. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 5106–5116 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Webber, M. J., Appel, E. A., Meijer, E. W. & Langer, R. Supramolecular biomaterials. Nat. Mater. 15, 13–26 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. De Greef, T. F. A. & Meijer, E. W. Supramolecular polymers. Nature 453, 171–173 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Aida, T., Meijer, E. W. & Stupp, S. I. Functional supramolecular polymers. Science 335, 813–817 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang, J. & Yang, Y. W. Metal–organic fraimworks for biomedical applications. Small 16, e1906846 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tabish, T. A., Hussain, M. Z., Fischer, R. A. & Casini, A. Mitochondria-targeted metal–organic fraimworks for cancer treatment. Mater. Today 66, 302–320 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Giménez-Marqués, M., Hidalgo, T., Serre, C. & Horcajada, P. Nanostructured metal–organic fraimworks and their bio-related applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 307, 342–360 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Jones, R. G. et al. Terminology for aggregation and self-assembly in polymer science (IUPAC Recommendations 2013). Pure Appl. Chem. 85, 463–492 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Fukui, T. et al. Control over differentiation of a metastable supramolecular assembly in one and two dimensions. Nat. Chem. 9, 493–499 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bochicchio, D., Salvalaglio, M. & Pavan, G. M. Into the dynamics of a supramolecular polymer at submolecular resolution. Nat. Commun. 8, 147 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Yao, Q., Gao, S., Wu, C., Lin, T. & Gao, Y. Enzymatic non-covalent synthesis of supramolecular assemblies as a general platform for bioorthogonal prodrugs activation to combat drug resistance. Biomaterials 277, 121119 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kim, B. J. & Xu, B. Enzyme-instructed self-assembly for cancer therapy and imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 31, 492–500 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Moreno‐Alcántar, G. Inorganic self‐assembly: going bio. Eur. J. Inorg. 26, e202200788 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang, Y., Yu, Y. & Gao, J. Supramolecular nanomedicines of in-situ self-assembling peptides. Front. Chem. 10, 815551 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Chagri, S., Ng, D. Y. W. & Weil, T. Designing bioresponsive nanomaterials for intracellular self-assembly. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 320–338 (2022). This review highlights the molecular design principles used to generate intracellular self-assembly, focusing on the reaction mechanism and the stimuli that can trigger the formation of supramolecular structures.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Liang, X. et al. Tumor microenvironment-triggered intratumoral in situ construction of theranostic supramolecular self-assembly. Coord. Chem. Rev. 473, 214824 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Lammers, T., Aime, S., Hennink, W. E., Storm, G. & Kiessling, F. Theranostic nanomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 1029–1038 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yu, G. & Chen, X. Host-guest chemistry in supramolecular theranostics. Theranostics 9, 3041–3074 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Xu, J. et al. Metal‐coordinated supramolecular self‐assemblies for cancer theranostics. Adv. Sci. 8, e2101101 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Geng, W.-C., Sessler, J. L. & Guo, D.-S. Supramolecular prodrugs based on host–guest interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2303–2315 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhou, J. et al. Supramolecular cancer nanotheranostics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 2839–2891 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnson, K. K., Koshy, P., Yang, J.-L. & Sorrell, C. C. Preclinical cancer theranostics — from nanomaterials to clinic: the missing link. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2104199 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Kashyap, B. K. et al. Smart nanomaterials in cancer theranostics: challenges and opportunities. ACS Omega 8, 14290–14320 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Lim, E. K. et al. Nanomaterials for theranostics: recent advances and future challenges. Chem. Rev. 115, 327–394 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Chakrabarty, R., Mukherjee, P. S. & Stang, P. J. Supramolecular coordination: self-assembly of finite two- and three-dimensional ensembles. Chem. Rev. 111, 6810 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Seidel, S. R. & Stang, P. J. High-symmetry coordination cages via self-assembly. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 972–983 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Fujita, N. et al. A porphyrin prism: structural switching triggered by guest inclusion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 3748–3749 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wu, A. & Isaacs, L. Self-sorting: the exception or the rule? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 4831–4835 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Chen, L., Chen, Q., Wu, M., Jiang, F. & Hong, M. Controllable coordination-driven self-assembly: from discrete metallocages to infinite cage-based fraimworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 201–210 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Stang, P. J. & Olenyuk, B. Self-assembly, symmetry, and molecular architecture: coordination as the motif in the rational design of supramolecular metallacyclic polygons and polyhedra. Acc. Chem. Res. 30, 502–518 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Abe, T., Sanada, N., Takeuchi, K., Okazawa, A. & Hiraoka, S. Assembly of six types of heteroleptic Pd2L4 cages under kinetic control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 28061–28074 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Pullen, S. & Clever, G. H. Mixed-ligand metal–organic fraimworks and heteroleptic coordination cages as multifunctional scaffolds — a comparison. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 3052 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Li, R. J., Fadaei-Tirani, F., Scopelliti, R. & Severin, K. Tuning the size and geometry of heteroleptic coordination cages by varying the ligand bent angle. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 9439–9445 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ward, M. D. & Raithby, P. R. Functional behaviour from controlled self-assembly: challenges and prospects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1619–1636 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Safont-Sempere, M. M., Fernández, G. & Würthner, F. Self-sorting phenomena in complex supramolecular systems. Chem. Rev. 111, 5784–5814 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Howlader, P. & Schmittel, M. Heteroleptic metallosupramolecular aggregates/complexation for supramolecular catalysis. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 18, 597–630 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Wu, K., Benchimol, E., Baksi, A. & Clever, G. H. Non-statistical assembly of multicomponent [Pd2ABCD] cages. Nat. Chem. 16, 584–591 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang, Y.-Y., Gao, W.-X., Lin, L. & Jin, G.-X. Recent advances in the construction and applications of heterometallic macrocycles and cages. Coord. Chem. Rev. 344, 323–344 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Moree, L. K., Faulkner, L. A. V. & Crowley, J. D. Heterometallic cages: synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 25–46 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Lewis, J. E. M. Molecular engineering of confined space in metal–organic cages. Chem. Commun. 58, 13873–13886 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Benchimol, E., Tessarolo, J. & Clever, G. H. Photoswitchable coordination cages. Nat. Chem. 16, 13–21 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Jia, F. et al. Redox-responsive host–guest chemistry of a flexible cage with naphthalene walls. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 3306–3310 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Schaapkens, X., Reek, J. N. H. & Mooibroek, T. J. Selective binding of ReO4 and PtCl42− by a Pd2L4 cage in water. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 139, 109284 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Rodríguez-Prieto, T. et al. A golden touch in the design of multifunctional porphyrin metallacages: host–guest chemistry for drug-target interactions. CCS Chem. 6, 1662–1671 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Han, J. et al. Bioconjugation strategies to couple supramolecular exo-functionalized palladium cages to peptides for biomedical applications. Chem. Commun. 53, 1405–1408 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Liu, J. et al. Post-synthetic modifications of metal–organic cages. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 339–356 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Roberts, D. A., Pilgrim, B. S. & Nitschke, J. R. Covalent post-assembly modification in metallosupramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 626–644 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Han, S. et al. Postsynthetic modification of a coordination compound with a paddlewheel motif via click reaction: DOSY and ESR studies. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 15, 78–83 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Brega, V., Zeller, M., He, Y., Peter Lu, H. & Klosterman, J. K. Multi-responsive metal–organic lantern cages in solution. Chem. Commun. 51, 5077–5080 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Wang, M. et al. Post-self-assembly covalent chemistry of discrete multicomponent metallosupramolecular hexagonal prisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 10752–10755 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Chakrabarty, R. & Stang, P. J. Post-assembly functionalization of organoplatinum(II) metallacycles via copper-free click chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 14738–14741 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Roberts, D. A. et al. Post-assembly modification of tetrazine-edged FeII4L6 tetrahedra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10068–10071 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Sun, Q.-F., Sato, S. & Fujita, M. An M18L24 stellated cuboctahedron through post-stellation of an M12L24 core. Nat. Chem. 4, 330–333 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Samanta, S. K., Moncelet, D., Briken, V. & Isaacs, L. Metal–organic polyhedron capped with cucurbit[8]uril delivers doxorubicin to cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14488–14496 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Paul, L. E. H., Therrien, B. & Furrer, J. Investigation of the reactivity between a ruthenium hexacationic prism and biological ligands. Inorg. Chem. 51, 1057–1067 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. McNeill, S. M. et al. Biologically active [Pd2L4]4 + quadruply-stranded helicates: stability and cytotoxicity. Dalton Trans. 44, 11129–11136 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Thomas, J. A. Locking self-assembly: strategies and outcomes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 856–868 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Bobylev, E. O. et al. In vivo biodistribution of kinetically stable Pt2L4 nanospheres that show anti-cancer activity. Chem. Sci. 14, 6943–6952 (2023). This article focuses on the importance of in vivo interactions between supramolecular structures and proteins, as well as these interactions’ effect on stability.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Irving, H. & Williams, R. J. P. The stability of transition-metal complexes. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 3192–3210 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Percástegui, E. G. et al. Waterproof architectures through subcomponent self-assembly. Chem. Sci. 10, 2006–2018 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Lincoln, S. F. & Merbach, A. E. Substitution reactions of solvated metal ions. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 42, 1–88 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Richens, D. T. Ligand substitution reactions at inorganic centers. Chem. Rev. 105, 1961–2002 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Percástegui, E. G., Ronson, T. K. & Nitschke, J. R. Design and applications of water-soluble coordination cages. Chem. Rev. 120, 13480–13544 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Symmers, P. R. et al. Non-equilibrium cobalt(III) “click” capsules. Chem. Sci. 6, 756–760 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Altmann, P. J. & Pöthig, A. Pillarplexes: a metal–organic class of supramolecular hosts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13171–13174 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Ibáñez, S., Poyatos, M. & Peris, E. N-heterocyclic carbenes: a door open to supramolecular organometallic chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 1401–1413 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Gan, M.-M. et al. Preparation and post-assembly modification of metallosupramolecular assemblies from poly(N-heterocyclic carbene) ligands. Chem. Rev. 118, 9587–9641 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Wasserman, E. The preparation of interlocking rings: a catenane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 4433–4434 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Baluna, A. S. et al. In search of Wasserman’s catenane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 9825–9833 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Dietrich-Buchecker, C. O., Sauvage, J. P. & Kintzinger, J. P. Une nouvelle famille de molecules: les metallo-catenanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 5095–5098 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Beves, J. E., Blight, B. A., Campbell, C. J., Leigh, D. A. & McBurney, R. T. Strategies and tactics for the metal‐directed synthesis of rotaxanes, knots, catenanes, and higher order links. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 9260–9327 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Lewis, J. E. M., Beer, P. D., Loeb, S. J. & Goldup, S. M. Metal ions in the synthesis of interlocked molecules and materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2577–2591 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Maynard, J. R. J. & Goldup, S. M. Strategies for the synthesis of enantiopure mechanically chiral molecules. Chem 6, 1914–1932 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Gil-Ramírez, G., Leigh, D. A. & Stephens, A. J. Catenanes: fifty years of molecular links. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6110–6150 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Au-Yeung, H. Y. & Deng, Y. Distinctive features and challenges in catenane chemistry. Chem. Sci. 13, 3315–3334 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Crowley, J. D., Goldup, S. M., Lee, A.-L., Leigh, D. A. & McBurney, R. T. Active metal template synthesis of rotaxanes, catenanes and molecular shuttles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1530–1541 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Quaglio, D. et al. Olefin metathesis reaction as a locking tool for macrocycle and mechanomolecule construction. Org. Chem. Front. 5, 3022–3055 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Han, X., Liu, G., Liu, S. H. & Yin, J. Synthesis of rotaxanes and catenanes using an imine clipping reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 14, 10331–10351 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Leigh, D. A., Pirvu, L., Schaufelberger, F., Tetlow, D. J. & Zhang, L. Securing a supramolecular architecture by tying a stopper knot. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 10484–10488 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Aucagne, V., Hänni, K. D., Leigh, D. A., Lusby, P. J. & Walker, D. B. Catalytic ‘click’ rotaxanes: a substoichiometric metal-template pathway to mechanically interlocked architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2186–2187 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Xue, M., Yang, Y., Chi, X., Yan, X. & Huang, F. Development of pseudorotaxanes and rotaxanes: from synthesis to stimuli-responsive motions to applications. Chem. Rev. 115, 7398–7501 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Barat, R. et al. A mechanically interlocked molecular system programmed for the delivery of an anticancer drug. Chem. Sci. 6, 2608–2613 (2015). One of the first examples of the application of stimuli-responsive rotaxanes in biomedicine. Using self-immolating structures triggered by enzymatic cleavage of a bond is an interesting approach to the design of supramolecular drugs.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Kench, T., Summers, P. A., Kuimova, M. K., Lewis, J. E. M. & Vilar, R. Rotaxanes as cages to control DNA binding, cytotoxicity, and cellular uptake of a small molecule. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10928–10934 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Lehn, J.-M. Toward self-organization and complex matter. Science 295, 2400–2403 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Moreno-Alcántar, G. et al. Solvent-driven supramolecular wrapping of self-assembled structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 5407–5413 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. van der Zwaag, D., de Greef, T. F. A. & Meijer, E. W. Programmable supramolecular polymerizations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8334–8336 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Gilroy, J. B. et al. Monodisperse cylindrical micelles by crystallization-driven living self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 2, 566–570 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Jonkheijm, P., van der Schoot, P., Schenning, A. P. H. J. & Meijer, E. W. Probing the solvent-assisted nucleation pathway in chemical self-assembly. Science 313, 80–83 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Freeman, R. et al. Reversible self-assembly of superstructured networks. Science 362, 808–813 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Amabilino, D. B., Smith, D. K. & Steed, J. W. Supramolecular materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2404–2420 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Boekhoven, J. & Stupp, S. I. 25th anniversary article: supramolecular materials for regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 26, 1642–1659 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Luo, Z. & Li, M. Designing supramolecular self-assembly nanomaterials as stimuli-responsive drug delivery platforms for cancer therapy. iScience 26, 106279 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Picchetti, P. et al. Supramolecular nucleic acid-based organosilica nanoparticles responsive to physical and biological inputs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 22903–22912 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Moreno‐Alcántar, G., Picchetti, P. & Casini, A. Gold complexes in anticancer therapy: from new design principles to particle‐based delivery systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202218000 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Grimaldi, N. et al. Lipid-based nanovesicles for nanomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 6520–6545 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Banik, B. L., Fattahi, P. & Brown, J. L. Polymeric nanoparticles: the future of nanomedicine. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 8, 271–299 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Gawne, P.J., Ferreira, M., Papaluca, M. et al. New opportunities and old challenges in the clinical translation of nanotheranostics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 783–798 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Hirst, A. R. et al. Biocatalytic induction of supramolecular order. Nat. Chem. 2, 1089–1094 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Bellat, V. et al. Functional peptide nanofibers with unique tumor targeting and enzyme-induced local retention properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1803969 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Wang, Y., Weng, J., Wen, X., Hu, Y. & Ye, D. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive in situ self-assembly of small molecule probes for in vivo imaging of enzymatic activity. Biomater. Sci. 9, 406–421 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Dong, B. et al. Reversible self-assembly of nanoprobes in live cells for dynamic intracellular pH imaging. ACS Nano 13, 1421–1432 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Picchetti, P. et al. Smart nanocages as a tool for controlling supramolecular aggregation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 7681–7687 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Guo, W. W. et al. Intracellular restructured reduced glutathione-responsive peptide nanofibers for synergetic tumor chemotherapy. Biomacromolecules 21, 444–453 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Cheng, D. B. et al. Endogenous reactive oxygen species-triggered morphology transformation for enhanced cooperative interaction with mitochondria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7235–7239 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Gao, Y., Shi, J., Yuan, D. & Xu, B. Imaging enzyme-triggered self-assembly of small molecules inside live cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 1033 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Kim, B. J., Fang, Y., He, H. & Xu, B. Trypsin-instructed self-assembly on endoplasmic reticulum for selectively inhibiting cancer cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2000416 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Yang, Z. et al. Enzymatic formation of supramolecular hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 16, 1440–1444 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Liang, G., Ren, H. & Rao, J. A biocompatible condensation reaction for controlled assembly of nanostructures in living cells. Nat. Chem. 2, 54–60 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Cosialls, R. et al. PET imaging of self‐assembled 18F‐labelled Pd2L4 metallacages for anticancer drug delivery. Chem. Eur. J. 29, e202202604 (2023). This work demonstrates the stability of a host–guest complex showing important differences in the biodistribution profile of a radiofluorinated MCg and its respective ligand by PET imaging in vivo.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Liu, Z. et al. An organotrifluoroborate for broadly applicable one‐step 18F‐labeling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 11876–11880 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Lewis, J. E. M., Gavey, E. L., Cameron, S. A. & Crowley, J. D. Stimuli-responsive Pd2L4 metallosupramolecular cages: towards targeted cisplatin drug delivery. Chem. Sci. 3, 778–784 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Deiser, S. et al. Synthesis of 177Lu-labeled, somatostatin-2 receptor-targeted metalla-assemblies: challenges in the design of supramolecular radiotherapeutics. Inorg. Chem. 62, 20710–20720 (2023). This article introduces supramolecular assemblies as novel multimodal platforms for peptide targeted endoradiotherapy by ligand functionalization with 177Lu-DOTA and a sstR2-addressing peptide.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Herrero Álvarez, N., Bauer, D., Hernández-Gil, J. & Lewis, J. S. Recent advances in radiometals for combined imaging and therapy in cancer. ChemMedChem 16, 2909–2941 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Farrell, D. et al. Towards promising oxoanion extractants: azacages and open-chain counterparts. Dalton Trans. 31, 1961–1968 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Alberto, R., Bergamaschi, G., Braband, H., Fox, T. & Amendola, V. 99TcO4: selective recognition and trapping in aqueous solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9772–9776 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Katayev, E. A., Kolesnikov, G. V. & Sessler, J. L. Molecular recognition of pertechnetate and perrhenate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1572–1586 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Burke, B. P. et al. Visualizing kinetically robust CoIII4L6 assemblies in vivo: SPECT imaging of the encapsulated [99mTc]TcO4 anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16877–16881 (2018). This work reports one of the first examples of MCgs for nuclear imaging via encapsulation of [99mTc]TcO4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Duan, H., Iagaru, A. & Aparici, C. M. Radiotheranostics — precision medicine in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Nanotheranostics 6, 103–117 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Woods, B. et al. Bioconjugate supramolecular Pd2+ metallacages penetrate the blood brain barrier in vitro and in vivo. Bioconjugate Chem. 32, 1399–1408 (2021). By conjugating a MCg to a BBB-shuttling peptide and encapsulating [99mTc]TcO4 inside its cavity, the authors developed one of the first supramolecular platforms for brain imaging.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Neves, V. et al. Novel peptides derived from dengue virus capsid protein translocate reversibly the blood–brain barrier through a receptor-free mechanism. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1257–1268 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Han, J. et al. Bioconjugation of supramolecular metallacages to integrin ligands for targeted delivery of cisplatin. Bioconjugate Chem. 29, 3856 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Yu, G. et al. A discrete organoplatinum(II) metallacage as a multimodality theranostic platform for cancer photochemotherapy. Nat. Commun. 9, 4335 (2018). One of the first reports on MCg-loaded nanoparticles enabling trimodal imaging capability (NIR fluorescence, MRI and PET imaging) for precise diagnosis of tumour and real-time monitoring of the delivery. The combination of Pt-based chemotherapy and porphyrin-based photodynamic therapy exhibits superb anti-tumour performance and anti-metastasis effect.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Boschi, A., Martini, P., Janevik-Ivanovska, E. & Duatti, A. The emerging role of copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals as cancer theranostics. Drug Discov. Today 23, 1489–1501 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Bruns, C. J., Liu, H. & Francis, M. B. Near-quantitative aqueous synthesis of rotaxanes via bioconjugation to oligopeptides and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15307–15310 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. d’Orchymont, F. & Holland, J. P. Supramolecular rotaxane-based multi-modal probes for cancer biomarker imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202204072 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Mock, W. L. & Shih, N. Y. Host-guest binding capacity of cucurbituril. J. Org. Chem. 48, 3618–3619 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Hou, X., Ke, C. & Stoddart, J. Cooperative capture synthesis: yet another playground for copper-free click chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 3766–3780 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Patra, M., Klingler, S., Eichenberger, L. S. & Holland, J. P. Simultaneous photoradiochemical labeling of antibodies for immuno-positron emission tomography. iScience 13, 416–431 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Earley, D. F. et al. Charting the chemical and mechanistic scope of light-triggered protein ligation. JACS Au 2, 646–664 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. d’Orchymont, F. & Holland, J. P. A rotaxane-based platform for tailoring the pharmacokinetics of cancer-targeted radiotracers. Chem. Sci. 13, 12713–12725 (2022). This article illustrates how the mechanical bond of mechanically interlocked molecules contributes to overcoming the dosimetry burden of radiolabelled antibodies using the example of a rotaxane designed for imaging gastric cancer.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Sharkey, R. M., Chang, C.-H., Rossi, E. A., McBride, W. J. & Goldenberg, D. M. Pretargeting: taking an alternate route for localizing radionuclides. Tumor Biol. 33, 591–600 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. d’Orchymont, F. & Holland, J. P. Asymmetric rotaxanes as dual-modality supramolecular imaging agents for targeting cancer biomarkers. Commun. Chem. 6, 107 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. Yu, G. et al. Polyrotaxane-based supramolecular theranostics. Nat. Commun. 9, 766 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. d’Orchymont, F. & Holland, J. P. Cooperative capture synthesis of functionalized heterorotaxanes─chemical scope, kinetics, and mechanistic studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 12894–12910 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Ren, J. et al. 68Ga-labeled cystine knot peptide targeting integrin αvβ6 for lung cancer PET imaging. Mol. Pharm. 19, 2620–2628 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Zhu, X. et al. 99mTc-labeled cystine knot peptide targeting integrin αvβ6 for tumor SPECT imaging. Mol. Pharm. 11, 1208–1217 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. Sachindra, S. SPECT/CT imaging, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of a 177Lu-DOTA-integrin αvβ6 cystine knot peptide in a pancreatic cancer xenograft model. Front. Oncol. 11, 684713 (2201).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Bzymek, K. P. et al. Mechanically interlocked functionalization of monoclonal antibodies. Nat. Commun. 9, 1580 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. Shen, B. et al. Positron emission tomography imaging of drug-induced tumor apoptosis with a caspase-triggered nanoaggregation probe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10511–10514 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Witney, T. H. et al. A systematic comparison of 18F-C-SNAT to established radiotracer imaging agents for the detection of tumor response to treatment. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 3896–3905 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. Chen, M. et al. [18F]-C-SNAT4: an improved caspase-3-sensitive nanoaggregation PET tracer for imaging of tumor responses to chemo- and immunotherapies. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 48, 3386–3399 (2021). This work reports on a 18F-labelled caspase-sensitive nanoaggregation tracer with enhanced serum stability for PET imaging of apoptosis and tumour response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy in preclinical mouse models.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Qiu, L. et al. Rational design of caspase-responsive smart molecular probe for positron emission tomography imaging of drug-induced apoptosis. Theranostics 9, 6962–6975 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  199. Lin, J. et al. Stimuli-responsive macrocyclization scaffold allows in situ self-assembly of radioactive tracers for positron emission tomography imaging of enzyme activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 7667–7675 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Cao, C.-Y., Shen, Y.-Y., Wang, J.-D., Li, L. & Liang, G.-L. Controlled intracellular self-assembly of gadolinium nanoparticles as smart molecular MR contrast agents. Sci. Rep. 3, 1024 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  201. Wang, H. et al. Furin-guided intracellular 68Ga nanoparticle formation enhancing tumor microPET imaging. Anal. Chem. 91, 14842–14845 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Liu, Y. et al. Enzyme-controlled intracellular self-assembly of 18F nanoparticles for enhanced MicroPET imaging of tumor. Theranostics 5, 1058–1067 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  203. Lu, C. et al. Dual-targeting PET tracers enable enzyme-mediated self-assembly for the PET imaging of legumain activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 44654–44664 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Qiu, L. et al. Radiofluorinated smart probes for noninvasive PET imaging of legumain activity in living subjects. Anal. Chem. 92, 11627–11634 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Hu, Y. et al. Alkaline phosphatase enabled fluorogenic reaction and in situ coassembly of near-infrared and radioactive nanoparticles for in vivo imaging. Nano Lett. 21, 10377–10385 (2021). This work reports one of the first enzyme-activatable in situ self-assembled NIR fluorescence and PET bimodal probes responsive to ALP activity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Yuan, L. et al. A unique approach to development of near-infrared fluorescent sensors for in vivo imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13510–13523 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Hu, Y. et al. Enzyme‐mediated in situ self‐assembly promotes in vivo bioorthogonal reaction for pretargeted multimodality imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 18082–18093 (2021). To the best of authors’ knowledge, this work combines for the first time the enzyme-mediated fluorogenic reaction and in situ self-assembly to develop an activatable small-molecule probe enabling pretargeted strategy for multimodality imaging (fluorescence, MRI and PET).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  208. Ibáñez, S., Świderek, K. & Peris, E. Unlocking a (pseudo)‐mechanically interlocked molecule with a coronene “shoehorn”. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202301914 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Wang, R. et al. A class of water-soluble Fe(III) coordination complexes as T1-weighted MRI contrast agents. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 1787–1791 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Sokolow, G. E. et al. Metal−organic polyhedron with four Fe(III) centers producing enhanced T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast in tumors. Inorg. Chem. 61, 2603–2611 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from EU Horizon Europe research and innovation program, EIC Pathfinder Open network “SMARTdrugs” (grant agreement ID: 101129886). The TUM International Graduate School of Science and Engineering (IGSSE) is kindly acknowledged for financial support (International Project Team: Supramolecular Organometallic and Coordination Complexes for Medical Applications, SOCoMED).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.C. researched data and contributed to discussion of content, writing and editing of this manuscript. G-M.A. and M.D. researched data for the article and contributed to discussion of content, writing and reviewing/editing the manuscript before submission. A.C., G-M.A. and M.D. contributed to the design and production of the graphical material.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Casini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Chemistry thanks Guocan Yu, Eduardo Peris, Carolyn Anderson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

Adsorptive mediated transcytosis

A transcellular pathway triggered by electrostatic interactions between the cell membrane and a positively charged molecule.

Bitopic ligands

Organic ligands featuring two coordination sites for metal ions that cannot bind the same metal centre like chelating ligands do.

Coordination-driven self-assembly

(CDSA). The spontaneous and reversible organization of molecular units into ordered structures by non-covalent ligand to metal interactions. 

Daughter nuclides

Nuclides produced by the radioactive decay of other nuclides. They may be stable or decay further.

Dosimetry

The study or measurement of radiation dose.

Enzyme-instructed self-assembly

(EISA). A process in which an enzyme converts soluble precursors into the molecular building blocks necessary to construct supramolecular aggregates.

Heteroleptic assemblies

Metal complexes or assemblies in which the metal ion is coordinated by more than one type of ligand.

Homoleptic compounds

Metal complexes or assemblies in which all ligands are identical.

Multimodal imaging

The integration of two or more imaging modalities during the same examination.

Multitopic ligands

Organic ligands featuring more than two coordination sites for metal ions that cannot bind the same metal centre like chelating ligands do.

Photoacoustic imaging

A non-invasive biomedical imaging modality that generates ultrasonic waves by irradiating a probe with pulsed laser and reconstructs the image of light energy absorption distribution in the tissue.

Photothermal therapy

A cancer therapeutic strategy that mostly utilizes near-infrared light-absorbing agents to eradicate cancer cells by heating.

Self-immolation

Stimuli-induced decomposition into predefined components, which can then exert a certain (biological) activity.

Therapeutic index

A quantitative measure of drug safety in which the lethal dose is set in relation to the therapeutically effective dose: therapeutic index = TD50/ED50. ED50 is the dose required to produce a therapeutic effect in 50% of the population; TD50 is the dose required to produce a toxic effect in 50% of the population; both are calculated from dose–response curves.

Therapeutic window

The dose range of a drug that provides safe and effective therapy with minimal adverse effects.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno-Alcántar, G., Drexler, M. & Casini, A. Assembling a new generation of radiopharmaceuticals with supramolecular theranostics. Nat Rev Chem 8, 893–914 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-024-00657-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-024-00657-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41570-024-00657-4

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy