However, the publication's systematic review found that the evidence for zinc was “not conclusive.”

In order to counteract climate change, the authors call for a systematic approach for the entire catchment area of rivers in the high mountains.

His plan for a systematic review—considered the gold standard method to synthesize multiple studies on a topic and extract a broader conclusion—was in jeopardy.

This timing coincides with the rise of scientific observation, resulting in a systematic documentation of plant and animal life.

Now researchers at UC San Francisco have taken a systematic look at the available evidence.