Content-Length: 5734 | pFad | http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/amsver/index.htm

QPF verification

QPF verification

11/16/01


Click here to start


Table of Contents

QPF verification

Why verification is so important

Verification methods

Subjective Verification

HPC 24-h QPF Verification 30+ years of deterministic forecasts

HPC verification (Cont.)

THREAT SCORE

HPC 06 hr QPF Verification

What can you learn from verification?

What can you learn about a model or man

How Good are the Forecasts?

How Good Are the Forecasts?

Forecast Verification Strategy

PPT Slide

Objective and subjective verification suggests that some patterns are more predictable than others.

A perfect threat score is 1.00. Forecasts are slowly improving but we have a long way to go before we even get good at forecasting precipitation amounts.

Conclusions

References for verification

Author: NCEP_User

Email: njunker@ncep.noaa.gov

Home Page: http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/res2.html

Download presentation source









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/amsver/index.htm

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy