Content-Length: 203719 | pFad | https://dlmf.nist.gov/./../././bib/../././bib/.././19.7#i.info
19.7.1 | |||
Also,
19.7.2 | ||||
If then
19.7.3 | ||||
where upper signs apply if and lower signs if . This dichotomy of signs (missing in several references) is due to Fettis (1970).
See also (19.2.10).
19.7.4 | ||||
, . | ||||
Provided the functions in these identities are correctly analytically continued in the complex -plane, then the identities will also hold in the complex -plane.
19.7.5 | ||||
where
19.7.6 | ||||
With ,
19.7.7 | ||||
For two further transformations of this type see Erdélyi et al. (1953b, p. 316).
There are three relations connecting and , where is a rational function of . If and are real, then both integrals are circular cases or both are hyperbolic cases (see §19.2(ii)).
The first of the three relations maps each circular region onto itself and each hyperbolic region onto the other; in particular, it gives the Cauchy principal value of when (see (19.6.5) for the complete case). Let . Then
19.7.8 | |||
. | |||
Since we have ; hence implies .
The second relation maps each hyperbolic region onto itself and each circular region onto the other:
19.7.9 | |||
. | |||
The third relation (missing from the literature of Legendre’s integrals) maps each circular region onto the other and each hyperbolic region onto the other:
19.7.10 | |||
. | |||
Fetched URL: https://dlmf.nist.gov/./../././bib/../././bib/.././19.7#i.info
Alternative Proxies: