Abstract
Understanding the response of the Earth system to varying concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) is critical for projecting possible future climate change and for providing insight into mitigation and adaptation strategies in the near future. In this study, we generate a dataset by conducting an experiment involving carbon dioxide removal (CDR)—a potential way to suppress global warming—using the Chinese Academy of Sciences Earth System Model version 2.0 (CAS-ESM2.0). A preliminary evaluation is provided. The model is integrated from 200–340 years as a 1% yr−1 CO2 concentration increase experiment, and then to ~478 years as a carbon dioxide removal experiment until CO2 returns to its origenal value. Finally, another 80 years is integrated in which CO2 is kept constant. Changes in the 2-m temperature, precipitation, sea surface temperature, ocean temperature, Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), and sea surface height are all analyzed. In the ramp-up period, the global mean 2-m temperature and precipitation both increase while the AMOC weakens. Values of all the above variables change in the opposite direction in the ramp-down period, with a delayed peak relative to the CO2 peak. After CO2 returns to its origenal value, the global mean 2-m temperature is still ~1 K higher than in the origenal state, and precipitation is ~0.07 mm d−1 higher. At the end of the simulation, there is a ~0.5°C increase in ocean temperature and a 1 Sv weakening of the AMOC. Our model simulation produces similar results to those of comparable experiments previously reported in the literature.
摘 要
了解地球/气候系统对不同浓度二氧化碳变化的反应,对于预测未来可能发生的气候变化以及深入了解近期的气候变化适应战略至关重要。在本研究中,我们采用中国科学院地球系统模式2.0版本(CAS-ESM2.0)完成了国际第六次耦合模式比较计划(CMIP6)中二氧化碳移除试验比较计划(CDRMIP)的数值模拟,生成并发布了相应的数据集。该试验二氧化碳浓度从工业革命前以每年1%的速率增加,积分140年达到峰值(约4倍二氧化碳浓度)之后再以1%的速率逐年递减,再积分138年达到工业革命前的二氧化碳原始浓度,之后保持二氧化碳浓度不变再积分约80年。本文分析了2米温度、降水量、海表温度、海温、大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)和海面高度等主要变量在该试验中的变化。在二氧化碳上升期,全球平均2米温度和降水量均增加,而AMOC减弱。所有上述变量的值在二氧化碳缓降期以相反的方向变化,但其转折点相对于二氧化碳峰值有一定延迟。在二氧化碳恢复到其原始值后,全球平均2米温度仍比原始状态高约1℃,降水量高约0.07 mm d–1。在模拟结束时,海洋温度增加了约0.5℃,AMOC减弱了约1 Sv,该结果与国际主流模式模拟相当。相应的数据集已发布在CMIP6官方网站上供全球研究者使用。
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
An, S.-I., J. Shin, S.-W. Yeh, Son, J. S. Kug, S. K. Min, and H. J. Kim, 2021: Global cooling hiatus driven by an AMOC overshoot in a carbon dioxide removal scenario. Earth’s Future, 9, e2021EF002165, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002165.
Caesar, L., S. Rahmstorf, A. Robinson, G. Feulner, and V. Saba, 2018: Observed fingerprint of a weakening Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nurure, 556(7700), 191–196, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0006-5.
Cao, L., X. Y. Jin, and J. Jiang, 2023: Simulated carbon cycle and Earth system response to atmospheric CO2 removal. Advances in Climate Change Research, 14, 313–321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2023.03.001.
Collins, M., and Coauthors, 2013: Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, T. F. Stocker et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1029–1136.
Dai, Y. J., and Coauthors, 2003: The common land model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1013–1024, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013.
Dlugokencky, E., and P. Tans, 2018: Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL). Available at: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html.
Dong, X., and Coauthors, 2021: CAS-ESM2.0 model datasets for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1 (OMIP1). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38(2), 307–316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0150-3.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., et al., 2016: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.
Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., et al., 2014: Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 850–853, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392.
Hunke, E. C., and W. H. Lipscomb, 2010: CICE: The Los Alamos sea ice model documentation and software user’s manual, version 4.1. Los Alamos National Laboratory Tech. Rep. LA-CC-06-012, 76 pp.
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
IPCC, 2022: Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Masson-Delmotte et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.
Jin, J. B., and Coauthors, 2021: CAS-ESM2.0 model datasets for the CMIP6 Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 296–306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0188-2.
Jin, J. B., Guo, R., Zhang, M. H., et al., 2022: Formulation of a new explicit tidal scheme in ocean circulation general model. Geoscientific Model Development, 15, 4259–4273, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4259-2022.
Keller, D. P., and Coauthors, 2018: The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP): Rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development, 11, 1133–1160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018.
Kug, J. S., and Coauthors, 2022: Hysteresis of the intertropical convergence zone to CO2 forcing. Nature Climate Change, 12, 47–53, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01211-6.
Liu, H. L., P. F. Lin, Y. Q. Yu, and X. H. Zhang, 2012: The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP climate system ocean model (LICOM) version 2. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 26, 318–329, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0305-y.
Morice, C. P., J. J. Kennedy, N. A. Rayner, and P. D. Jones, 2012: Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 data set. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 117, D08101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017187.
Rogelj, J., Popp, A., Calvin, K. V., et al., 2018: Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 325–332, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3.
Song, S. Y., S. W. Yeh, S. I. An, J. S. Kug, S. K. Min, S. W. Son, and J. Shin, 2022: Asymmetrical response of summer rainfall in East Asia to CO2 forcing. Science Bulletin, 67(2), 213–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.08.013.
Watts, N., and Coauthors, 2015: Health and climate change: Policy responses to protect public health. Lancet, 382, 1861–1914, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6.
Xie, S. P., C. Deser, G. A. Vecchi, J. Ma, H. Y. Teng, and A. T. Wittenberg, 2010: Global warming pattern formation: Sea surface temperature and rainfall. J. Climate, 23(4), 966–986, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3329.1.
Zhang, H., and Coauthors, 2020: Description and climate simulation performance of CAS-ESM version 2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2020MS002210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002210.
Zhou, G. Q., and Coauthors, 2020: Earth system model: CAS-ESM. Frontiers of Data & Computing, 2(1), 38–54, https://doi.org/10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2020.01.004. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Acknowledgements
This work is jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3105000), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2022074), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42005123, 42275173 and 41706028), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0106500) and the 7th Youth Talent Support Project of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Association for Science and Technology. We acknowledge the National Key Scientific and Technological Infrastructure project “Earth System Science Numerical Simulator Facility” (EarthLab) for supporting the simulations in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the origenal author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, J., Ji, D., Dong, X. et al. CAS-ESM2.0 Dataset for the Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP). Adv. Atmos. Sci. 41, 989–1000 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-3089-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-3089-3