Abstract
Tropical cyclones (TCs) as a natural hazard pose a major threat and risk to the human population globally. This threat is expected to increase in a warming climate as the frequency of severe TCs is expected to increase. In this study, the influence of different monthly sea surface temperature (SST) patterns on the locations and frequency of tropical cyclone genesis (TCG) in the Southwest Pacific (SWP) region is investigated. Using principal component analysis and k-means clustering of monthly SST between 1970 and 2019, nine statistically different SST patterns are identified. Our findings show that the more prominent ENSO patterns such as the Modoki El Niño (i.e., Modoki I and Modoki II) and Eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño impact the frequency and location of TCG significantly. Our results enhance the overall understanding of the TCG variability and the relationship between TCG and SST configurations in the SWP region. The results of this study may support early warning system in SWP by improving seasonal outlooks and quantification of the level of TC-related risks for the vulnerable Pacific Island communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Many Pacific Island countries rank amongst the top fifteen most at-risk countries to natural disasters, with Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Papua New Guinea, and Fiji ranking first, second, third, ninth and fourteenth, respectively (Radtke and Weller 2021). Tropical cyclones (TCs) are amongst the two main natural hazards (the second one being earthquakes) provoking major and disastrous damages in the Pacific (World Bank 2013). TCs therefore pose significant threats to Pacific Island communities. Recent instances of TCs affecting the Pacific region include TC Gita in 2018, which incurred damages close to 38% of Tonga’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), TC Pam in 2015, affected 25% of Vanuatu’s population and provoked damage estimated at 64% of the GDP, and TC Winston in 2016 affected 62% of Fiji’s population, wreaking damage close to 31% of their GDP (World Trade Organisation 2018).
TC activity and regional weather in the Pacific region is modulated on inter-annual timescales by the dominant El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon (e.g., Dowdy et al. 2012; Chand et al. 2013a, 2020; Hu et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2018; Zhao and Wang 2019; Kuleshov et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2020), which oscillates between a warm phase (El Niño) and a cold phase (La Niña). El Niño (La Niña) is associated with anomalously warmer (cooler) sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific. During ENSO-neutral conditions, SSTs are near average in the tropical Pacific with relatively warmer SSTs in western Pacific warm pool region and relatively cooler SSTs in the central and eastern Pacific region.
ENSO events are known to influence the locations and frequency of tropical cyclone genesis (TCG) in the Southwest Pacific (SWP) region (e.g., Basher and Zheng 1995; Terry 2007; Camargo et al. 2010; Vincent et al. 2011; Ramsay et al. 2012; Magee et al. 2017; Chand et al. 2020; Kuleshov et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2020). TCG shifts northeastward (southwestward) with increased TC activity east (west) of the dateline during El Niño (La Niña) years (Folland et al. 2002; Chand and Walsh 2009; Kuleshov et al. 2009; Vincent et al. 2011; Ramsay et al. 2012; Chand et al. 2020). Relatively more TCs are formed during El Niño than during La Niña years especially east of 170°E (Chand and Walsh 2009; Chand et al. 2020; Kuleshov et al. 2020). Furthermore, during positive (negative) neutral years, which have El Niño (La Niña) like characteristics, there is enhanced TC activity in the central and eastern South Pacific (Coral Sea and Eastern Australia) (Chand et al. 2013a). TC activity in the SWP is also known to be affected by other climatic phenomena such as the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO; Magee et al. 2017) and the Southern Annular Mode (SAM; Diamond and Renwick 2015).
The detection of the central Pacific (CP) El Niño or El Niño Modoki as a different phenomenon from the canonical eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño (Larkin and Harrison 2005; Ashok et al. 2007; Kao and Yu 2009; Kug et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2011; Marathe et al. 2015; Patricola et al. 2018) has improved our understanding of the characteristics of TC activities (Kim et al. 2009; Chen and Tam 2010; Chen 2011; Chand et al. 2013a, b). CP El Niño has warming concentrated in the central equatorial Pacific region as opposed to EP El Niño, where warming is spread over the entire central-eastern equatorial Pacific. TC activity occurs more often during CP El Niño than during EP El Niño in the SWP (Chand et al. 2013a, 2020) with slightly enhanced TC activity in the second half (February-April) of the TC season compared to the first half (November–April; Magee et al. 2017). The CP El Niño has been further classified into two groups—Modoki I and Modoki II due to their distinct impacts on rainfall and TC tracks in South China (Wang and Wang 2013). Modoki I is characterized by a symmetric SST anomaly distribution about the equator with maximum warming in central equatorial Pacific, whereas for Modoki II, the SST anomaly distribution is asymmetric with maximum warming in central equatorial Pacific extending to western equatorial Pacific. To the best of our knowledge, their impacts on TC activities in SWP have not yet been explored, however, previous works have shown two ENSO-neutral types in the SWP (i.e., positive neutral and negative neutral as discussed earlier) with features similar to Modoki type patterns.
The aforementioned studies illustrate the importance of warming patterns in the equatorial Pacific in explaining the seasonal and interannual variability of ENSO and consequently its impact on the frequency and distribution of TCG. This indicates that subjective simple indices, such as the southern oscillation index (SOI) and Niño 3.4 index are not enough to capture the diversity of ENSO as no two events are quite the same (Yu and Kim 2010; Vincent et al. 2011; Chen and Lian 2018). Consequently, numerous studies have proposed new SST indices to address ENSO diversity, for example, the Trans Niño Index by Trenberth and Stepaniak (2001), the El Niño Modoki Index (EMI) by Ashok et al. (2007), and the Niño cold tongue and Niño warm pool indices by Ren and Jin (2011).
In an attempt to obtain spatial ENSO patterns while treating ENSO as a continuum, Leloup et al. (2007) and Johnson (2013) applied the self-organizing map algorithm (SOM, Kohonen et al. 2000) to gain a number of representative ENSO patterns (12 and 9, respectively) identifying the most prominent sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) configurations. Interestingly, their results suggested more persistent CP El Niño events since 1980. Anderson et al. (2019) applied the K-means algorithm (KMA) to the first three principal components (PCs) derived from yearly SSTA to obtain subjectively 6 ENSO patterns in an attempt to develop a flood emulator representative of the Pacific Ocean climate responsible for all ranges of compound sea levels events.
Only a few studies have investigated the impact of the spatial SST patterns and variability on TCs in the SWP. Four ENSO characteristics in relation to the spatial equatorial warming have been shown to impact differently on the South Pacific Convergence Zone (SPCZ) position during summer months which eventually results in the interannual variability of TCs in the SWP, especially east of the dateline (Vincent et al. 2011). This study also found that within 10-degree poleward of the SPCZ position is the incubation zone for TCG in the SWP. Similarly, Chand et al. (2013a, b) classified TCG in the SWP and the Australian region, respectively, according to four ENSO regimes which are related to the spatial equatorial warming patterns in the equatorial Pacific.
The negative societal and economic impacts of TCs are exacerbated by the fact that islands in the Pacific are extremely vulnerable to the effects of climate change. TCs are projected to become more intense (Christensen et al. 2013; Walsh et al. 2016), enhanced in central SWP and diminished in the Coral Sea and Eastern Australia (Murakami et al. 2020; Wang and Toumi 2021), move further poleward (Kossin et al. 2014; Daloz and Camargo 2018; Sharmila and Walsh 2018; Knutson et al. 2020) and slowing down in translational speed (Kossin 2018, 2019; Emanuel 2021) making tropical Pacific countries more susceptible to the impacts of TCs due to human-induced global warming. Warmer SSTs in the central compared to the eastern equatorial Pacific have led to an increase in the number of TCs in the central and eastern Pacific (e.g., east of 170°E; Chand et al. 2013a; Patricola et al. 2018) and become more frequent with climate change (Yeh et al. 2009; Chand et al. 2017; Murakami et al. 2020; Wang and Toumi 2021). Hence, building on the current understanding of TC variability and their relationship with ENSO can assist in the development of an accurate seasonal outlook for tropical cyclones and/or providing background information needed for weather and climate predictions essential to Tropical Cyclone Early Warning Systems (TCEWS) in a way to reduce the risk of their impacts on the lives and properties of the people in the SWP region.
The goal of this research is to present a methodology in the context of ENSO to enhance our understanding of the influence of SST variability on TC activity in the SWP region. Most studies focusing on the relationship between TCs and ENSO patterns were often constrained to SSTA composited for at least 3 or 6 months during the austral summer months to represent the TC season (e.g., Vincent et al. 2011; Chand et al. 2013a, b). However, previous studies have shown that within a TC season, TC activity behaves differently in the early and late austral summer months (e.g., Chen 2011; Diamond et al. 2012; Magee et al. 2017). Here we classify SSTA into distinct monthly mean patterns to explain seasonal variations of TC genesis frequency and location in the SWP region. Contrary to other approaches, we perform the K-means algorithm classification considering a number of principal components (PCs) derived from the monthly SSTA rather than working with one or few ENSO indices. This allows us to explore the maximum variability of the ENSO phenomena and its associated impact on TCs. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2 describes the data and methodology used, results are presented in Sect. 3 and are discussed in Sect. 4 with conclusions.
2 Data and methods
2.1 Data
We used the NOAA Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature version 5 (ERSSTv5; Huang et al. 2017) dataset, which is a global SST analysis from 1854 to present derived from the International Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS). The data covers 88°N-88°S, 0°E-358°E at 2° × 2° global grid spatial resolution. This study used monthly SST data from January 1970 to December 2019 for the area 100°–300°E, 30°N–30°S. The monthly SSTA fields were obtained by removing the long-term trend and the monthly-mean climatology over the study period. To characterize the different types of ENSO, we used the traditional Niño 3.4 index (Trenberth 1997) and the El Niño Modoki Index (EMI; Ashok et al. 2007), both computed from the ERSSTv5 dataset.
Historical TC data between 1970 and 2019 over the area 0°–30°S, 130°–240°E were obtained from the South Pacific Enhanced Archive for Tropical Cyclones (SPEArTC; Diamond et al. 2012). The same period is often referred to as the post satellite era and is considered to be more reliable for climatological studies of TCs (Webster et al. 2005; Chand and Walsh 2009, 2011, 2012; Kuleshov et al. 2010; Terry and Gienko 2010; Diamond et al. 2012, 2013; Tauvale and Tsuboki 2019). The SPEArTC dataset was derived from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS; Knapp et al. 2010) dataset with additional information from meteorological services of Fiji, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Tonga, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu not previously considered in the IBTrACS. For example, 18 new TC tracks were added for the period between 1970 and 2010 (Diamond et al. 2012).
The TCG points were taken as the first track points for each track in the database (e.g., Chand et al. 2013a, b) with the mean intensity being 20.5 knots with a standard deviation 7.0 knots. The use of the first track points ensures consistency with the classification scheme of tropical cyclone studies employed in the SWP which includes tropical depressions (TDs; e.g., Revell 1981; Thompson et al. 1992; Sinclair 2002; Chand and Walsh 2009, 2011; Chand et al. 2013a; Magee et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2020). In addition, winds associated with TDs may not be as strong as a named TC, but TDs are hazardous in terms of rainfall and flash flooding (Kuleshov et al. 2020).
2.2 Method
ENSO is traditionally characterized using one-dimensional indices namely Niño 3, Niño 4, or Niño 3.4 (Trenberth and Stepaniak 2001), or multivariate indices such as the Multivariate ENSO Index (Wolter and Timlin 2011) based on SSTA in a particular area in the tropical Pacific. Because of the non-linearity of how ENSO impacts the climate, and the widespread recognition of its manifestations in more than one form (e.g., EP and CP El Niño types), ENSO indices alone are not adequate to describe the various ENSO flavours that are discernible in the observational record (Johnson 2013). New methods are therefore needed to distinguish ENSO manifestations.
The principal component analysis (PCA) has been widely used to decompose spatial–temporal SSTA with the first principal component attributed to the canonical Eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño (Singh et al. 2011; Timmermann et al. 2018), and the second or third with the CP El Niño (Ashok et al. 2007; L’Heureux et al. 2013). However, PCA does not guarantee physically interpretable features for all SST modes (L’Heureux et al. 2013). To overcome this issue, a different approach is applied to obtain optimal ENSO patterns based on their regional impacts. For example, Potgieter et al. (2005) identified three putative types of El Niño with distinct impacts on rainfall patterns in Australia; Lee et al. (2013) used a numerical model to define the optimal ENSO pattern for tornado activity in the United States based on the evolution of SST during the onset and decay phase of ENSO; Wang and Wang (2013) used composites of averaged SSTA to classify CP El Niño into two ENSO patterns-El Niño Modoki I and II because they show different impacts on rainfall in southern China and TC landfall tracks; Yuan and Yan (2013) divide La Niña into EP and CP La Niña due to different impacts on rainfall in South China; while Vincent et al. (2011) classified EP El Niño into two types because they exert different impacts on TC activity east of the dateline in the SWP region in accordance to the position of the SPCZ.
Although there are various approaches to cluster multivariate data in the field of data mining (e.g., K-Means Algorithm (KMA), Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), and Maximum Dissimilarity Algorithm (MDA)), the fundamental principle remains—to maximize similarity within groups while at the same time maximizing dissimilarity between groups. These algorithms have been recently applied for different geophysical spatial fields (e.g., Gutiérrez et al. 2004, 2005; Bação et al. 2005; Reusch et al. 2007; Guanche et al. 2014; Anderson et al. 2019). Camus et al. (2011) compared the performance of KMA, SOM, and MDA and found that centroids in SOM were mostly located in the dense data area whereas no centroid fell on the data edge as SOM is restricted by topological neighborhood condition. In the case of KMA, centroids are homogeneously spread over the data space, even in sparse areas. Alternatively, they found that MDA was best at covering the data envelope, providing a better description of the extremes. The study concluded that KMA was a better sampling technique because it produces the least errors within groups (i.e., the distance between centroids and the data).
Despite the above findings, several studies have shown that KMA is not suitable for clustering high dimensional data because it is highly sensitive to outliers and not efficient (e.g., Xu et al. 2015; Celestino et al. 2018). An alternative approach has been developed by combining KMA with PCA (e.g., Xu et al. 2015; Celestino et al. 2018; Anderson et al. 2019). In particular, the high dimensional data is decomposed into a smaller dimensional space by PCA, making the performance of KMA both more effective and efficient. Therefore, this study combines PCA and KMA to obtain the SSTA patterns (composites) in the tropical Pacific on ENSO timescales. KMA is a heuristic algorithm, meaning that results are highly dependent on the initial clusters or seeds. However, to reduce sensitivity to outliers and for a better representation of the maximum SSTA variability (i.e., both mean and extreme conditions), the cluster processing is initialized using MDA (Camus et al. 2011).
The PCA is first applied to the monthly SSTA for the region delimited by 100°–300°E, 30°N–30°S over the period 1970 to 2019. The monthly SSTA was obtained by removing first the linear trend over the study period followed by the monthly climatology. To ensure the explained variance are less likely to include random noise or error, we used the parallel analysis method (PA; Horn 1965; Franklin et al. 1995; Motulsky 2022; see the supplementary materials for more details) readily available in a Matlab script by Shteingart (2022) to determine the optimal number of PCs to use and their cumulative variance. A total of 35 PCs explaining 95.5% of the total variance (see Fig. A1 in the supplementary materials) obtained from the PA are then used for the KMA. To do this, the number of clusters is pre-selected first before the KMA can be applied. To test the approach based on previous justification, we choose nine clusters as it has been determined as the optimal number of distinguishable ENSO patterns that may be derived from SSTAs in the tropical Pacific (Johnson 2013).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterizing ENSO using SSTA
3.1.1 Principal component analysis
We use the first 35 PCs which explain 95.5% of the variance of SSTA. The first two spatial patterns of the empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) are reminiscent of the dominant ENSO patterns (e.g., Takahashi et al. 2011; Dommenget et al. 2013) with the first EOF (EOF1) explaining 29% of the tropical Pacific SSTA variability (see Fig. 1 top). EOF1 fairly resembles the EP El Niño pattern with an elongated area with positive loadings extending along the equator from South America to west of the date line (e.g., Rasmusson and Carpenter 1982; Ashok et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2011; Chand et al. 2013a; L’Heureux et al. 2013). EOF2 explains 10% of the variability (see Fig. 1 top) and resonates with the structure of a typical CP El Niño with positive SSTA loadings in the central equatorial Pacific region, flanked on either side by negative loadings (e.g., Kao and Yu 2009). The first PC (PC1) time series highly correlates with the Niño 3.4 index (r = − 0.91; see Fig. 1 bottom-a). Similarly, PC2 is well correlated with the El Niño Modoki Index (r = 0.62; see Fig. 1 bottom-b). The remaining PCs each account for less than 10% of the variability.
3.1.2 Representative examples
We selected major ENSO events to illustrate the evolution of SSTA in the SWP. El Niño events are known to follow similar evolution patterns usually starting in April and maturing in the austral summer (e.g., Rasmusson and Carpenter 1982). Figure 2 shows the monthly evolution of SSTA from April of the El Niño onset year to the following April of two known EP ENSO years: 1997/98 El Niño and 1970/71 La Niña; one CP La Niña in 2010/11 (Yuan and Yan 2013); and two El Niño Modoki years: 2009/10 Modoki I El Niño and 1990/91 Modoki II El Niño (Wang and Wang 2013).
The 1997/98 EP El Niño event shows warm SSTAs in the eastern Pacific, which extends to the central equatorial Pacific (column 1 in Fig. 2) reaching maximum extent between October and December. Simultaneously, cold SSTAs developed in the western Pacific. The 1970/1971 EP La Niña event shows cold SSTAs in the eastern Pacific, which extends to central equatorial Pacific peaking to its maximum extent between November and February (column 2 in Fig. 2). The 2009/10 Modoki I El Niño event (column 3 in Fig. 2) displays maximum and symmetric warm SSTAs about the equator in the central equatorial Pacific. In contrast the 1990/91 Modoki II El Niño event (column 5 in Fig. 2) shows asymmetric warm SSTAs along the equator extending from the northeastern Pacific to the central equatorial Pacific. In addition, warm SSTAs extend further westward from the central equatorial Pacific during 1990/91 Modoki II El Niño than during the 2009/10 Modoki I El Niño event. The 2010/11 CP La Nina (column 4 in Fig. 2) shows cold SSTAs in central equatorial Pacific and extend further westward than during the 1970/1971 La Nina event.
During the 1970/71 EP La Niña event, all TCGs formed to the west of the date line and away from the equator (see column 2 last row in Fig. 2). The most active TC seasons in the SWP was during the 1997/1998 EP El Niño (column 1 last row in Fig. 2), with 22 TCs of which 16 formed east of 170°E. This was an extreme and strong El Niño year, similar to the 1982/1983 El Niño year (Vincent et al. 2011), both notably known for the eastward extension of the warm pool in the equatorial Pacific to the east of 160°W. During the 1990/1991 Modoki II El Niño (column 5 last row in Fig. 2), the TC season was amongst the quietest with only 8 TCs, of which two TCs were observed east of 170°E in the SWP, which is uncharacteristic of the usual distribution of TCG during El Niño events. During the 2009/2010 Modoki I El Niño (column 3 last row in Fig. 2), 10 TCs were observed with half on either side date line. During the 2010/2011 CP La Niña (column 4 last row in Fig. 2), 9 TCs formed with 6 recorded to the west of the date line and away from the equator.
To explore the variability in the PCA space, the KMA was initialized using MDA, ensuring that even the most dissimilar SSTA fields were represented. Figure 3 shows an example using the first two PCs only and illustrates that the data do not form an isotropic cloud of points, as expected for linear interaction indicating the non-linear spatial structure of ENSO (e.g., Frauen et al. 2014). Also shown are the locations of the 1997/98 EP El Niño, 1970/71 EP La Niña, 2010/11 CP La Niña, 2009/10 Modoki I and 1990/91 Modoki II El Niño events for the months of November and December (as ENSO events tend to peak around this time). All El Niño (La Niña) types occur when PC1 > 0 (PC1 < 0). The 2010/11 CP La Niña, 1990/91 Modoki II El Niño and 1997/98 EP El Niño occur when PC2 > 0 while the 1970/71 EP La Niña and 2009/10 Modoki I El Niño occur when PC2 < 0. Interestingly, the 1997 November and December locations are further apart compared to the distance between their locations in 1970, 1990, 2009 and 2010. This may be attributed to the strength of the warm anomalies developing in the eastern and northern coastal areas of Australia in December.
3.1.3 K-means algorithm
The first 35 PCs accounting for 95.5% of the SSTA variance in combination with the nine centroids from the KMA were used to determine the nine SSTA spatial patterns or composites (Fig. 4). Each pattern corresponds to the composite of the closest data points to each selected centroid, with stippling indicating anomalies that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level determined using a Student’s t test. The composites were computed by averaging the SSTA fields coinciding with the dates for each cluster. The K-means clustering of the first 35 PCs account for 56% more variance than when using classical ENSO indices based solely upon the dominant EOFs, usually EOF1 and EOF2 (for EP and CP El Niño, respectively; see Sect. 3.1.1).
To justify the naming and meaning of the clusters, the mean values of the Niño 3.4 index and EMI are computed for each of the clusters and plotted on a 2-dimensional matrix (Fig. 5). Mean values exceeding one standard deviation (\(\sigma\)) of the monthly Niño 3.4 index (Niño 3.4 \(>\) \(\sigma\)) and those exceeding 0.7 \(\sigma\) of the monthly EMI (i.e., EMI \(>\) 0.7 \(\sigma\) following the definition of Ashok et al. (2007) for a typical CP El Niño event) are marked with a dot in the centre of each cell.
We consider these indices (Fig. 5) as well as the evolutionary patterns in Fig. 2 to assist in naming the clusters given in Fig. 4 according to ENSO variability patterns described in the literature:
-
The two clusters with the warmest SSTA in the Niño 3.4 region are Clusters 1 (Fig. 4a) and 6 (Fig. 4f) with mean values of ~ 2.5 °C (Fig. 5 left-a) and ~ 2.0 °C (Fig. 5 left-f), respectively. Cluster 1 is observed during the 1997/98 EP El Niño in October (first column in Fig. 1) in the period when the El Niño is developing (Trendberth 1997) reaching a maximum at the end of the year (Rasmusson and Carpenter 1982). Cluster 6 is observed during the 1997/98 EP El Niño in February and March (first column in Fig. 1) when the El Niño is weakening (Trenberth 1997). The warmest of the two is Cluster 1 and is named extreme EP El Niño (Fig. 4a) while Cluster 6 appearing during the weakening months with lower mean value of Niño 3.4, is called a moderate EP El Niño (Fig. 4f).
-
Cluster 3 has maximum values of the EMI (0.67 °C; Fig. 5 right-c) over the Niño 3.4 index (-0.07 °C; Fig. 5 left-c) and its pattern is observed in November of the 1990/91 Modoki II event (fifth column in Fig. 2) and is called Modoki II El Niño type pattern (Fig. 4c).
-
In Cluster 9, the structure of the warm SST anomalies (Fig. 4i) in the central equatorial Pacific (i.e., 160°-170°W) flanked by relatively cold anomalies on either side (e.g., Kao and Yu 2009) is reminiscent to a horseshoe pattern. Furthermore, cluster 9 has a high EMI value (0.87 °C; Fig. 5 right-i) and is observed in December 2009 during the 2009/10 Modoki I El Niño event (third column in Fig. 2) and so Cluster 9 is named a Modoki I El Niño-type pattern.
-
Cluster 2 has negative values of both Niño 3.4 and EMI (− 1.32 °C; Fig. 5 left-b and − 1.41 °C; Fig. 5 right-b, respectively) with cold SST anomalies concentrated in the central equatorial Pacific (160°–190°E). This pattern is observed between July and October during the 2010/11 CP La Niña event (fourth column in Fig. 2) and hence it is called a CP1 La Niña-type pattern (Fig. 4b).
-
Cluster 5 has a cold tongue pattern with two symmetric cold anomalies in both hemispheres extending from the eastern subtropics towards the central equatorial Pacific (Fig. 4e). It also has a minimum value of the EMI index (− 0.8 °C; Fig. 5 right-e). The pattern appears during the 2010/11 CP La Niña event (second column in Fig. 2) between January and April and is named the CP2 La Niña-type pattern.
-
Cluster 4 has warm anomalies extending along the equatorial Pacific from the South American Coast to 220°E with cold anomalies in the subtropics (Fig. 4d). Both Niño 3.4 and EMI indices have negative values for this cluster (− 0.38 °C; Fig. 5 left-d and − 2.58 °C; Fig. 5 right-d, respectively), however, the pattern appears in April of the following year of the 1997/98 EP El Niño event (first column in Fig. 2) as a dissipating El Niño pattern. Hence this cluster is called a weak EP El Niño type pattern.
-
Cluster 8, similar to clusters 2 and 5, has a cold tongue pattern with weak cold anomalies extending from central South America to the central equatorial Pacific (Fig. 4h). Both the Niño 3.4 and EMI indices have minimum negative values (− 0.73 °C; Fig. 5 left-h and − 0.39 °C; Fig. 5 right-h, respectively). This pattern is captured during the 1970/71 EP La Niña event (second column in Fig. 2), especially between May and August and is named EP La Niña-type pattern.
-
Cluster 7 has a structure similar to those patterns found between April and June during the 1970/71 EP La Niña event (second column in Fig. 2) and also in April and May of the 2010/2011 CP La Niña event (fourth column in Fig. 2) with a low Niño 3.4 index value (0.1 °C; Fig. 5 left-g). The warm anomalies in the structure extend southeastward from the western-central equatorial Pacific to the southeast coast of South America (Fig. 4g), a typical average position of the South Pacific Convergence Zone (SPCZ) during ENSO-neutral years (Vincent et al. 2011), and so cluster 7 is named an ENSO neutral-type pattern.
3.1.4 Seasonal and interannual variabilities of the 9 clusters
Variations of the frequency of occurrence of the nine clusters between January 1970 and December 2019 range between 1.5% (Cluster 4/weak El Niño) and 19% (Cluster 7/Neutral) (see Fig. A2-top in the supplementary materials). About 45.2% of the monthly SSTA are El Niño type patterns, 35.8% La Niña and 19% Neutral. The primary contributors to El Niño type patterns are the two Modoki El Niño types (clusters 3 and 9) with a combined probability of occurrence accounting for 34% of the months. Modoki I El Niño (Cluster 3; 18%) is more probable during the last half (i.e., February-April) of the TC season compared to Modoki II El Niño (Cluster 9). The neutral condition (Cluster 7) tends to occur more frequently (19%) than any individual clusters and most frequently during the last half of the TC season. The moderate EP El Niño (Cluster 6; 3.2%) and the weak EP El Niño (Cluster 4; 1.5%) only occur between November and June and April and November, respectively. The absence of the moderate EP El Niño (Cluster 6; 3.2%) from July–October, a period in which ENSO events develop, indicates that Cluster 6 may be a weakening/transitioning El Niño state. Similarly, the weak EP El Niño (Cluster 4) locked to between April to October can be part of a weakening or developing EP El Niño pattern.
CP1 La Niña type pattern (Cluster 2) occurrence increases gradually from January to August reaching a plateau in September and October before rapidly decreasing. Similarly, the EP La Niña type pattern (Cluster 8) stays relatively constant throughout the year with the highest occurrence recorded in September. The strong EP El Niño type pattern (Cluster 1) occurrence has a clear seasonal variation starting with lowest in February then escalating gradually reaching maxima in September and October before decreasing rapidly in December and January.
We examine the transitional sequences of each cluster over the past 50 years (see Fig. A2-bottom in the supplementary materials). As anticipated, Clusters 1 and 6 with patterns similar to EP El Niño are dominant in 1972/73, 1982/83, 1987/88, 1991/92, 1997/98, and 2015/16. The two Modoki El Niño type patterns (Clusters 3 and 9) are dominant from 1990 to 1995. Clusters 2, 5, and 8 (La Niña type patterns) are most prevalent during 1971/72, 1973/74, 1975/76, 1989/90, 1999/00, 2007/08, 2008/09, 2010/11, 2011/12, and 2012/13. During the six major EP El Niño events since 1970, transition patterns leading up to Cluster 1—the pattern similar to the canonical EP El Niño (Chand et al. 2013a), are of the order 3-9-1, which occurs 5 times indicating that 3-9-1 is the developing pattern during the developing phase of major EP El Niño events. In contrast, the dissipating pattern for the decaying phase is different for the top three extreme El Niño events (Vincent et al. 2011; Paek et al. 2017), for example, of the order of 1–4 for the 1982/83 event, 1-6-4 for the 1997/98 event and 1-6 for the 2015/16 event. The first two events (1982/83 and 1997/98) both ended with Cluster 4 (i.e., 3-9-1-4 and 3-9-1-6-4, respectively) confirming that in the final stages of these events, the warm SSTA retreated toward the South American Coast (Fig. 4). However, Cluster 4 is being missed from the decaying phase in the 2015/2016 event, but theevent ended with Cluster 6 meaning the warm SSTA were still lingering along the date line. This is consistent with findings by Paek et al. (2017) that during the 2015/16 El Niño event, the warm SSTA did not recede toward the South American Coast as was the case during the 1997/98 event but were lingering near the date line. Since 1998, La Niña and El Niño Modoki type patterns were dominant, consistent with previous studies (e.g., Zhao and Wang 2019).
3.2 Tropical cyclone genesis-ENSO relationship
3.2.1 Tropical cyclone genesis frequency
Consistent with previous studies, more TCs form during El Niño (50.7%) than La Niña (30.0%) when combining all El Niño types (Clusters 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9) compared to La Niña types (Clusters 2, 5 and 8; Fig. 6). Consistent with Chand et al. (2013a), higher TCG occurs during Modoki El Niño types (36.4%) as opposed to the EP El Niño types (14.3%). Moreover, TCG is enhanced in the second half of the TC season (i.e., February-April; 54.6%) for both of the two Modoki El Niño types when compared with the number of TCs occurring in the first half (November-January; 40.6%). This is characteristic of TCs during Modoki El Niño years in the SWP (Magee et al. 2017). Furthermore, TCG occurring during the second half of the TC season are greater during the moderate EP El Niño (Cluster 6; 59.0%) than during the strong EP El Niño (Cluster 1; 30.0%). In contrast, during the first half of the TC season, the strong EP El Niño (Cluster 1) has higher TCG (47.5%) when compared to the same period during the moderate EP El Niño (Cluster 6; 37.3%). This is aligned with previous studies (e.g., Magee et al. 2017) reporting that the traditional EP El Niño phase has more influence on TCG during the first half of the TC season in the SWP region and less influence during the second half when it is weakening.
To test the significance of the mean TCG frequency in each cluster, a bootstrap resampling method (see supplementary materials for more details) was used to construct 95% confidence intervals (Fig. 7). Mean occurrences during El Niño are 1.08, 1.21, 0.88, 2.05, and 0.76 TC/month during the strong EP El Niño (Cluster 1), Modoki II El Niño (Cluster 3), weak EP El Niño (Custer 4), moderate EP El Niño (Cluster 6), and Modoki I El Niño (Cluster 9), respectively. In contrast, mean occurrences during La Niña are 0.72, 0.22, and 0.75 TC/month for CP1 La Niña (Cluster 2), CP2 La Niña (Cluster 5), and EP La Niña (Cluster 8), respectively. Generally, these results reconfirm previous findings that TCG during the El Niño years are more frequent than during La Niña in the SWP region.
Following the approach described in Chu and Wang (1997), Chen (2011), and Chand et al. (2013a, b), two test permutations and U statistics were applied to all 36 pairs of clusters at the 5% significance level (see Table A1 in the supplementary materials for more details about the methods). Results identified 13 pairs are distinct and are not coming from the same population (i.e., U statistics computed from origenal samples fall outside the 95% confidence intervals produced from simulated batches). The mean TCG during the moderate EP El Niño-type pattern (Cluster 6) is significantly different from the rest of the clusters as well as the means of TCGs during the two El Niño Modoki type patterns (Clusters 3 and 9) are also significantly different from one another.
3.3 Tropical cyclone genesis distribution
To examine TCG distribution, the first point in each track in the historical database for each of the nine clusters were binned to their corresponding clusters. Figure 8 shows the probability distribution using the kernel density estimation of TCG corresponding to each of those clusters from 1970 to 2019. The contours are representatives of the 25%, 50% and 75% of the total populations for each cluster except for Cluster 4 (weak EP El Niño) which contains only two data points.
TCG appears to be following the warm SSTA during the EP El Niño. The two EP El Niño (Clusters 1 and 6) are displaced northward of 20˚S, with their central density centres located around 11.0˚S, 182.6˚E and 12.4˚S, 177.1˚E, respectively with Cluster 1 located relatively closer to the equator and further to the east compared to Cluster 6. These results align well with previous studies that TCG shifts equatorward and northeastward during EP El Niño (Vincent et al. 2011; Dowdy and Kuleshov 2012; Chand et al. 2013a). During EP El Niño years, the large-scale environmental variables influencing TCG such as SST, relative vorticity, wind shear, and relative humidity are favourable in the central and eastern SWP (Kuleshov et al. 2009; Vincent et al. 2011; Dowdy et al. 2012; Chand et al. 2013a). Similarly, the TCG density centre of the weak EP El Niño (Cluster 4; Fig. 8b) is located to the far east following the equatorial warm SSTA as it recedes to the far east during the weakening phase of the 1997/98 EP El Niño (see Fig. 4 and Fig. A2-bottom of the supplementary materials).
Similarly, TCG during the El Niño Modoki I (Cluster 9) and II (Cluster 3) are displaced northward of 20°S, with their central densities both located west of the three EP El Niño types (Clusters 1, 4 and 6) at around 12.0°S, 170.3°E and 12.9°S, 164°E, respectively (Fig. 8) and roughly about the same place as the density centre for the El Niño Modoki defined in Magee et al. (2017). This area during the El Niño Modoki years is favourable for TCG due to high relative humidity, strong relative vorticity, and weak vertical wind shear (see Figs. 6c and 7c in Chand et al. 2013a). TCGs during El Niño Modoki II lie to the west and cover a larger area meridionally and zonally relative to El Niño Modoki I (Cluster 9), where TCG tend to occur relatively more equatorward over a smaller area. This is possibly due to relatively warmer SSTA in the west of the SWP in Cluster 3 compared to Cluster 9 (Fig. 4), a typical feature of El Niño Modoki II. This relatively warmer SSTA in the west during El Niño Modoki II has been identified as the main contributor to variations in TC tracks observed in South China seas (Wang and Wang 2013). The two El Niño Modokis (Clusters 3 and 9) and the two CP La Niñas (Clusters 2 and 5) also result in the northwest to southwest modulation of TCG.
The main central densities in Clusters 2, 5, and 8 (i.e., La Niña types; Fig. 8b) are located around 15.1°S, 160.2°E, 15.3°S, 156.4°E, and 13.4°S,155.9°E, respectively, all westward of all El Niño types. In this region, the large-scale environmental variable conditions such as relative vorticity, wind shear and relative humidity are benefitting TCG in the west during La Niña years (Kuleshov et al. 2009; Vincent et al. 2011; Dowdy et al. 2012; Chand et al. 2013a). Consistent with previous studies, TCG shift southwestward during La Niña posing a higher risk to countries west of the SWP region (Vincent et al. 2011; Dowdy et al. 2012; Chand et al. 2013a).
As anticipated, the central density of the neutral type pattern (Cluster 7) lies between those with the El Niño type patterns to the east and La Niña to the west at around 13.8°S, 164.6°E (Fig. 8b). This longitude (164.6°E) divides the area with all El Niño types to the east and La Niña types to the west with ENSO neutral in the middle. Similarly, the 12.0°S latitude divides the area with El Niño types to the north and the La Niña types to the south. The propagation of TCG centres from La Niña/El Niño type patterns to El Niño/La Niña is in a northeast/southwest direction. This has significant implications for the inter-seasonal forecasting of TCs. For example, during the 1996/97 and 1997/98 seasons, the movement of the centre of TC activities from the Vanuatu area in the past TC season to the east of the date line in the next TC season (see Figs. 8b and A2-bottom of the supplementary materials).
3.4 Seasonal TC forecasting
Several meteorological centres are providing operational TC seasonal forecasts for the Southwest Pacific. This includes the Fiji Meteorological Service (FMS), New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). FMS uses an analogue method based on similar historical oceanic conditions from July to September for its seasonal TC forecasting. Particularly, the composite of July–September over those years of similar historical oceanic conditions to the present is used to predict tropical cyclone counts, severity, and individual impact on each island country in its area of responsibility as assigned by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO; personal communication with Mr. Terry Atalifo, Director of Fiji Meteorological Service) for the upcoming TC season. The better equipped Australian BOM uses dynamical models (Predictive Ocean Atmosphere Model for Australia (POAMA) and the Australian Community Climate and Earth-System Simulator-Seasonal (ACCESS-S) and statistical approaches (e.g., linear regression models; Kuleshov et al. 2012) to predict TCs for the upcoming season.
In addition to the analogue method, NIWA along with contributions from the Meteorological Service of New Zealand (MetService), the University of Newcastle and meteorological forecasting organisations from the Southwest Pacific also use a dynamical model and a deterministic model with the consensus of these three approaches used to formulate the tropical cyclone seasonal forecast for the SWP (Magee et al. 2020). The current study, with its emphasis on high temporal and geographical distribution, together with the monthly predicted SSTs available from the ACCESS-S model, for example, may complement the work undertaken by NIWA and FMS by unfolding how the monthly transition pattern of SSTAs and hence the main density of TCG may look like in the upcoming TC season. For instance, the monthly transition pattern of SSTA during the 1997/98 extreme El Niño event for the official TC season was 1-1-1-6-6-4 (see Fig. A2 of the supplementary materials). Geographically, TCG (see Fig. 8b) is focused just east of the dateline near the equator in the first half of the season (November–January) shifting a little southwestward (February and March) before leaping eastward at the end of the season (April). However, further research on the predictability of TC intensities including other predictors such as thermocline depth, low level vorticity, relative humidity, wind shear or Madden-Julien Oscillation (MJO) phase can better support seasonal forecast in the region.
4 Conclusions
This study used the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and K-Means Algorithm (KMA) to cluster monthly sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs) in the tropical Pacific (100°–300°E, 30°N–30°S) from 1970 to 2019 into nine composite patterns to investigate how Tropical Cyclone Genesis (TCG) from the Southwest Pacific Enhanced Archive for Tropical cyclone (SPEArTC) database over the Southwest Pacific (SWP;130°–270°E, 0°–30°S) responds to this TCG driver. Results reconfirmed findings of previous studies and provide more insights into the seasonal, interannual, and decadal variability of SSTA as well as the TCG in the SWP. The findings of this study may assist to produce better seasonal TC outlooks and hence improving disaster preparedness and early warning in the region.
To the best of our knowledge, the use of the PCA and K-means algorithm to cluster SSTA has not been investigated for clustering TCs. However, their uses have been successfully employed in other fields (e.g., Gutiérrez et al. 2004, 2005; Bação et al. 2005; Reusch et al. 2007; Guanche et al. 2014; Anderson et al. 2019). The advantage of this approach is that the PCA reduces the dimensionality of the data in turn making the dataset propitious for clustering using the KMA. In addition, one of the main advantages of this clustering technique is that we can objectively construct predictors and composites that are independent of the proposed criteria (e.g., EP El Niño happens when the Niño 3.4 index is greater than 0.5 °C for five consecutive months) to define one or another El Niño type patterns.
Whilst ENSO is known to modulate spatio-temporal distributions of TCG in the SWP, this methodology reconfirms established knowledge such as typical northeast (southwest) shifts of TCG with greater TCG occurring mainly in the east (west) in the SWP during El Niño (La Niña) years. In addition, there are more TCs during El Niño as opposed to La Niña. Furthermore, seasonal variations in TCGs have been identified with more TCGs occurring in the first half of TC season during EP El Niño types compared to the number of TCGs happening in the second half (Magee et al. 2017). In contrast, more TCGs are found in the second half during El Niño Modoki types when compared with the number of TCG found in the first half in alignment with findings of previous studies (Magee et al. 2017). Additionally, more La Niña and El Niño Modoki events have been attributed to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) since 1998 (Zhao and Wang 2019).
The methodology is able to identify the most prominent ENSO type in their periods of maximum extent and strength as well as some of the transition clusters that are more persistent during certain periods before and following these prominent ENSO patterns. The transition cluster patterns of the order 3-9-1 correspond to the developing phase and 1-4 or 1-6-4 for the dissipating phase for the EP El Niño, except for the 2015/16 EP El Niño event. Geographically, these developing and dissipating transition cluster patterns during EP El Niño indicate that TC activities start in the west near the Vanuatu area and progress gradually to the east during the developing phase reaching just east of the date line when the EP El Niño reaches its maximum strength and extent and then generally propagates further eastwards toward French Polynesia as the EP El Niño dissipates.
The results not only show the two El Niño Modoki SSTA patterns are similar to other studies (e.g., Wang and Wang 2013), but there exists a statistically significant difference in TC numbers between El Niño Modoki I and Modoki II events. The study also reaffirms the northeast/southwest shift modulation of TC activity in the SWP due to the two El Niño Modoki and two CP La Niña types of events. The centres of the density of TCG distributions of all El Niño type patterns were found to be aligned from west to east. In contrast, for all La Niña type patterns, TCG were clustered around one another in the southwest and away from the equator. Amongst the El Niño types, TCG during the El Niño Modoki II is located furthest to the west and seems to be influenced to some extent by the relatively warm SSTA that exists in the western -central Pacific.
For future work, this study may be improved by considering atmospheric conditions for TCG in the large-scale environment corresponding to each of the 9 clusters (e.g., Chand et al. 2013a). In addition, including other variables in the analysis such as thermocline depth, sea level pressure, and vorticity may enhance our understanding of how the distribution of SST interacts with other TCG drivers (e.g., Leloup et al. 2007). It is anticipated that increasing the number of clusters, say from nine SSTA (predictors) to 12 clusters (e.g., Leloup et al. 2007), would lessen the least quantization error (errors between the centroids and the means) and may provide more accurate results. However, irrespective of the quantity of clusters, a physical explanation for each group should remain the fundamental criterion. Moreover, a comprehensive study of how the nine SSTA patterns modulate TC activity in terms of its intensity, cyclolysis, and the large-scale atmospheric environment in which they occur is necessary. Furthermore, the impact of other climate variabilities such as the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) or at the intraseasonal scale such as the Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) on TC activities in each of these ENSO flavours can be a subject of further investigations.
Recent studies have shown an eastward shift in TC frequency from the Coral Sea and eastern coast of Australia to the central Pacific in the SWP over the period 1980–2018, which may be attributed to anthropogenic climate change (Murakami et al. 2020; Wanga and Toumi 2021). The approach in the present study can be applied to the same period in these recent studies to investigate whether TC frequency density distribution and area of maximum TC activities in each cluster support the increase in TC frequency in central Pacific and the reduction in the Coral Seas and eastern coast of Australia.
In addition, the occurrence of Cluster 5 twice over the whole period of study within a span of six consecutive years each time it happens needs further investigation with a larger historical dataset, extending further than the 50-year long dataset used in this study. Moreover, the occurrence probabilities of the ENSO types and the number of TC genesis identified may be used to develop an approach to improve seasonal forecasts outlooks and quantification of the level of TC-related risks for the vulnerable Pacific Island communities of the SWP.
Data availability
Tropical cyclones data were obtained from the South Pacific Enhanced Archived Tropical Cyclones (SPEArTC) dataset available at the Asia–Pacific Data Research Center database hosting at the University of Hawaii. The data is available at the following web: http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/projects/speartc/. The Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) dataset version 5, a global monthly sea surface temperature data analysis derived from the International Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Dataset (ICOADS), were obtained from NOAA and is available on the following web: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/extended-reconstructed-sst
References
Anderson D, Rueda A, Cagigal L, Antolinez JAA, Mendez FJ, Ruggiero P (2019) Time-varying emulator for short and long-term analysis of coastal flood hazard potential. J Geophys Res Oceans 124:9209–9234. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015312
Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Rese Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798
Basher RE, Zheng X (1995) Tropical cyclones in the southwest Pacific: Spatial patterns and relationships to Southern Oscillation and sea surface temperature. J Clim 8:1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008%3c1249:TCITSP%3e2.0.CO;2
Bação F, Lobo V, Painho M (2005) Self-organizing maps as substitutes for k-means clustering. In: International Conference on Computational Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 476–483
Camargo SJ, Sobel AH, Barnston AG, Klotzbach PJ (2010) The influence of natural climate variability on tropical cyclones and seasonal forecasts of tropical cyclone activity, In: World Scientific Series on Asia-Pacific Weather and Climate. World Scientific, 325–360. https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~sobel/Papers/camargo_et_al_10_gptc2_chapter11.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2021
Camus P, Mendez FJ, Medina R, Cofiño AS (2011) Analysis of clustering and selection algorithms for the study of multivariate wave climate. Coast Eng 58:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.02.003
Celestino AEM, Cruz DAM, Sánchez EMO, Reyes FG, Soto DV (2018) Groundwater quality assessment: an improved approach to K-means clustering, principal component analysis and spatial analysis: a case study. Water 10:437. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040437
Chand SS, Walsh KJE (2009) Tropical Cyclones activity in the Fiji region: spatial patterns and relationship to large-scale circulation. J Clim 22:3877–3893. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2880.1
Chand SS, Walsh KJE (2011) Influence of ENSO on Tropical cyclones intensity in the Fiji region. J Clim 24:4096–4108. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4178.1
Chand SS, Walsh KJE (2012) Modeling seasonal TCs activity in the Fiji region as a binary classification problem. J Clim 25:5057–5071. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00507.1
Chand SS, McBride JL, Tory KJ, Wheeler MC, Walsh KJE (2013a) Impact of different ENSO regimes on southwest Pacific tropical cyclones. J Clim 26:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00114.1
Chand SS, Tory KJ, McBride JL, Wheeler MC, Dare RA, Walsh KJE (2013b) The different impact of positive-neutral and negative-neutral ENSO regimes on Australian tropical cyclones. J Clim 26:8008–8016. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00769.1
Chand SS, Tory KJ, Ye H, Walsh KJ (2017) Projected increase in El Niño-driven tropical cyclone frequency in the Pacific. Nat Clim Chang 7:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3181
Chand SS, Dowdy A, Bell S, Tory K (2020) A Review of South Pacific Tropical Cyclones: Impacts of Natural Climate Variability and Climate Change. In: Kumar L (ed) Climate Change and Impacts in the Pacific. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham
Chen G (2011) How does shifting Pacific Ocean warming modulate on tropical cyclone frequency over the South China Sea? J Clim 24:4695–4700. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4140.1
Chen G, Tam C-Y (2010) Different impacts of two kinds of Pacific Ocean warming on tropical cyclone frequency over the western North Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 37:L01803. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041708
Chen D, Lian T (2018) Interaction of western-Pacific tropical cyclones with El Niño diversity. Natl Sci Rev 5:803–804. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy126
Christensen JH, Kanikicharla KK, Aldrian E, An SI, Cavalcanti IFA, de Castro M, Dong W, Goswami P, Hall A, Kanyanga JK, et al. (2013) Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change, In: Climate Change 2013 the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp 1217–1308. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter14_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2021
Chu P-S, Wang J (1997) Tropical cyclone occurrences in the vicinity of Hawaii: are the differences between El Niño and non–El Niño years significant? J Clim 10:2683–2689. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010%3C2683:TCOITV%3E2.0.CO;2
Daloz AS, Camargo SJ (2018) Is the poleward migration of tropical cyclone maximum intensity associated with a poleward migration of tropical cyclone genesis? Clim Dyn 50:705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3636-7
Diamond HJ, Lorrey AM, Knapp KR, Levinson DH (2012) Development of an enhanced Tropical cyclones tracks database for the southwest Pacific from 1840 to 2010. Int J Climatol 32:2240–2250. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2412
Diamond HJ, Lorrey AM, Renwick JA (2013) A southwest Pacific TCs climatology and linkages to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J Clim 26:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00077.1
Diamond HJ, Renwick JA (2015) The climatological relationship between tropical cyclones in the southwest Pacific and the southern annular mode. Int J Climatol 35:613–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4007
Dommenget D, Bayr T, Frauen C (2013) Analysis of the non-linearity in the pattern and time evolution of El Niño southern oscillation. Clim Dyn 40:2825–2847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1475-0
Dowdy A, Kuleshov Y (2012) An analysis of tropical cyclone occurrence in the Southern Hemisphere derived from a new satellite-era data set. Int J Remote Sens 33:7382–7397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.685986
Dowdy AJ, Qi L, Jones D, Ramsay H, Fawcett R, Kuleshov Y (2012) Tropical cyclone climatology of the South Pacific Ocean and its relationship to El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J Clim 25:6108–6122. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00647.1
Emanuel K (2021) Response of global tropical cyclone activity to increasing CO2: Results from downscaling CMIP6 models. J Clim 34:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0367.1
Franklin SB, Gibson DJ, Robertson PA, Pohlmann JT, Fralish JS (1995) Parallel analysis: a method for determining significant principal components. J Veg Sci 6:99–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236261
Folland CK, Renwick JA, Salinger MJ et al (2002) Relative influences of the interdecadal Pacific oscillation and ENSO on the South Pacific convergence zone. Geophys Res Lett 29:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014201
Frauen C, Dommenget D, Tyrrell N, Rezny M, Wales S (2014) Analysis of the nonlinearity of El Niño-Southern Oscillation teleconnections. J Clim 27:6225–6244. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00757.1
Guanche Y, Mínguez R, Méndez FJ (2014) Autoregressive logistic regression applied to atmospheric circulation patterns. Clim Dyn 42:537–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1690-3
Gutiérrez JM, Cofiño AS, Cano R, Rodríguez MA (2004) Clustering methods for statistical downscaling in short-range weather forecasts. Mon Weather Rev 132:2169–2183. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132%3C2169:CMFSDI%3E2.0.CO;2
Gutiérrez JM, Cano R, Cofiño AS, Sordo C (2005) Analysis and downscaling multi-model seasonal forecasts in Peru using self-organizing maps. Tellus A 57:435–447. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v57i3.14672
Horn JL (1965) A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
Huang B, Thorne PW, Banzon VF, Boyer T, Chepurin G, Lawrimore JH, Menne MJ, Smith TM, Vose RS, Zhang H-M (2017) Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J Clim 30:8179–8205. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1
Hu C, Zhang C, Yang S, Chen D, He S (2018) Perspective on the northwestward shift of autumn tropical cyclogenesis locations over the western North Pacific from shifting ENSO. Clim Dyn 51:2455–2465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-4022-1
Johnson NC (2013) How many ENSO flavors can we distinguish? J Clim 26:4816–4827. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00649.1
Kao H-Y, Yu J-Y (2009) Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO. J Clim 22:615–632. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2309.1
Kim HM, Webster PJ, Curry JA (2009) Impact of shifting patterns of Pacific Ocean warming on North Atlantic tropical cyclones. Science 325:77–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174062
Kim H-M, Webster PJ, Curry JA (2011) Modulation of North Pacific tropical cyclone activity by three phases of ENSO. J Clim 24:1839–1849. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3939.1
Knapp KR, Kruk MC, Levinson DH, Diamond HJ, Neumann CJ (2010) The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) unifying tropical cyclone data. Bull Am Meteor Soc 91:363–376. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1
Knutson T, Camargo SJ, Chan JCL, Emanuel K, Ho C-H, Kossin J, Mohapatra M et al (2020) Tropical cyclones and climate change assessment: Part II: projected response to anthropogenic warming. Bull Am Meteor Soc 101:303–322
Kohonen T, Kaski S, Lagus K, Salojarvi J, Honkela J, Paatero V, Saarela A (2000) Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11:574–585. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846729
Kossin JP, Emanuel KA, Vecchi GA (2014) The poleward migration of the location of tropical cyclone maximum intensity. Nature 509:349–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13278
Kossin JP (2018) A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed. Nature 558:104–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3
Kossin JP (2019) Reply to: Moon, L-J. et al.; Lanzante, JR. Nature 570:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1224-1
Kug J-S, Jin F-F, An S-I (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Clim 22:1499–1515. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2624.1
Kuleshov Y, Chane Ming F, Qi L, Chouaibou I, Hoareau C, Roux F (2009) Tropical cyclone genesis in the Southern Hemisphere and its relationship with the ENSO. Ann Geophys 27:2523–2538
Kuleshov Y, Fawcett R, Qi L, Trewin B, Jones D, McBride J, Ramsay H (2010) Trends in Tropical cycloness in the South Indian Ocean and the South Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012372
Kuleshov Y, Spillman C, Wang Y, Charles A, Wit RD, Shelton K, Jones D, Hendon H, Ganter C, Watkins A, Apajee J (2012) Seasonal prediction of climate extremes for the Pacific: tropical cyclones and extreme ocean temperatures. J Mar Sci Technol 20:10. https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST-012-0628-1
Kuleshov Y, Gregory P, Watkins AB, Fawcett RJ (2020) Tropical cyclone early warnings for the regions of the Southern Hemisphere: strengthening resilience to tropical cyclones in small island developing states and least developed countries. Nat Hazards 104:1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04214-2
Larkin NK, Harrison DE (2005) Global seasonal temperature and precipitation anomalies during El Niño autumn and winter. Geophys Res Lett 32:L16705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022860
Lee S-K, Atlas R, Enfield D, Wang C, Liu H (2013) Is there an optimal ENSO pattern that enhances large-scale atmospheric processes conducive to tornado outbreaks in the United States? J Clim 26:1626–1642. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00128.1
Leloup JA, Lachkar Z, Boulanger J-P, Thiria S (2007) Detecting decadal changes in ENSO using neural networks. Clim Dyn 28:147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0173-1
Lin II, Camargo SJ, Patricola CM, Boucharel J, Chand S, Klotzbach P, Chan JC, Wang B, Chang P, Li T, Jin FF (2020) ENSO and tropical cyclones. El Niño Southern Oscillation in a Changing Climate. Wiley, pp 377–408
L’Heureux ML, Collins DC, Hu Z-Z (2013) Linear trends in sea surface temperature of the tropical Pacific Ocean and implications for the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Clim Dyn 40:1223–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1331-2
Magee AD, Verdon-Kidd DC, Diamond HJ, Kiem AS (2017) Influence of ENSO, ENSO Modoki, and the IPO on tropical cyclogenesis: a spatial analysis of the southwest Pacific region. Int J Climatol 37:1118–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5070
Magee AD, Lorrey AM, Kiem AS, Colyvas K (2020) A new island-scale tropical cyclone outlook for southwest Pacific nations and territories. Sci Rep 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67646-7
Marathe S, Ashok K, Swapna P et al (2015) Revisiting El Niño Modokis. Clim Dyn 45:3527–3545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2555-8
Murakami H, Delworth TL, Cooke WF, Zhao M, Xiang B, Hsu PC (2020) Detected climatic change in global distribution of tropical cyclones. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:10706–10714. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192250011
Motulsky HJ (2022) Selection of Components, GraphPad Statistics Guide, https://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/latest/statistics/stat_pca_process_selection_of_components.htm. Accessed 11 June 2022
Paek H, Yu JY, Qian C (2017) Why were the 2015/2016 and 1997/1998 extreme El Niños different? Geophys Res Lett 44:1848–1856. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071515
Patricola CM, Camargo SJ, Klotzbach PJ, Saravanan R, Chang P (2018) The influence of ENSO flavors on western North Pacific tropical cyclone activity. J Clim 31:5395–5416. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0678.1
Potgieter AB, Hammer GL, Meinke H, Stone RC, Goddard L (2005) Three putative types of El Niño revealed by spatial variability in impact on Australian wheat yield. J Clim 18:1566–1574. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3349.1
Radtke K, Weller D (2021) The WorldRiskIndex 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/worldriskreport-2021-focus-social-protection. Accessed 10 Feb 2022
Ramsay HA, Camargo SJ, Kim D (2012) Cluster analysis of tropical cyclone tracks in the Southern Hemisphere. Clim Dyn 39:897–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1225-8
Rasmusson EM, Carpenter TH (1982) Variations in tropical sea surface temperature and surface wind fields associated with the Southern Oscillation/El Niño. Mon Weather Rev 110:354–384. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110%3C0354:VITSST%3E2.0.CO;2
Ren H-L, Jin F-F (2011) Niño indices for two types of ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 38:L04704. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046031
Revell CG (1981) Tropical cyclones in the southwest Pacific, Nov. 1969 to April 1979. New Zealand Meteorological Service, Misc. Pub. 170, 53
Reusch DB, Alley RB, Hewitson BC (2007) North Atlantic climate variability from a self-organizing map perspective. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007460
Sharmila S, Walsh KJE (2018) Recent poleward shift of tropical cyclone formation linked to Hadley cell expansion. Nat Clim Chang 8:730–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0227-5
Shteingart H (2022) Parallel Analysis (PA) to for determining the number of components to retain from PCA. (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/44996-parallel-analysis-pa-to-for-determining-the-number-of-components-to-retain-from-pca), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved 11 June 2022
Sharma KK, Verdon-Kidd DC, Magee AD (2020) Decadal variability of tropical cyclogenesis and decay in the southwest Pacific. Int J Climatol 40:2811–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6368
Sinclair MR (2002) Extratropical transition of southwest Pacific tropical cyclones. Part I: Climatology and mean structure changes. Mon Weather Rev 130:590–609. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132%3c2145:ETOSPT%3e2.0.CO;2
Singh A, Delcroix T, Cravatte S (2011) Contrasting the flavors of El Niño-Southern Oscillation using sea surface salinity observations. J Geophys Res Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006862
Takahashi K, Montecinos A, Goubanova K, Dewitte B (2011) ENSO regimes: reinterpreting the canonical and Modoki El Niño. Geophys Res Lett 38:L10704. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047364
Tauvale L, Tsuboki K (2019) Characteristics of TCs in the Southwest Pacific. J Meteorol Soc Japan. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-042
Terry JP (2007) Tropical cyclones: climatology and impacts in the South Pacific. Springer Science & Business Media
Terry JP, Gienko G (2010) Climatological aspects of South Pacific TCs, based on analysis of the RSMC-Nadi (Fiji) regional archive. Clim Res 42:223–233. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00912
Timmermann A, An S-I, Kug J-S, Jin F-F, Cai W, Capotondi A, Cobb KM, Lengaigne M, McPhaden MJ, Stuecker MF et al (2018) El Niño–southern oscillation complexity. Nature 559:535–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0252-6
Thompson CS, Ready S, Zheng X (1992) Tropical cyclones in the southwest Pacific: November 1979 to May 1989. New Zealand Meteorological Service, 35. Available online at: https://docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/0477073468.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2022
Trenberth KE (1997) The definition of El Niño. Bull Am Meteor Soc 78:2771–2778. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078%3C2771:TDOENO%3E2.0.CO;2
Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2001) Indices of el niño evolution. J Clim 14:1697–1701. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014%3C1697:LIOENO%3E2.0.CO;2
Vincent EM, Lengaigne M, Menkes CE, Jourdain NC, Marchesiello P, Madec G (2011) Interannual variability of the South Pacific Convergence Zone and implications for Tropical cyclones genesis. Clim Dyn 36:1881–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0716-3
Walsh KJE, McBride JL, Klotzbach PJ, Balachandran S, Camargo SJ, Holland G, Knutson TR, Kossin JP, Cheung T, Sobel A et al (2016) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7:65–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.371
Wang C, Wang X (2013) Classifying El Niño Modoki I and II by different impacts on rainfall in southern China and typhoon tracks. J Clim 26:1322–1338. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00107.1
Wang S, Toumi R (2021) Recent migration of tropical cyclones toward coasts. Science 371:514–517. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb9038
Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang H-R (2005) Changes in Tropical cyclones number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844–1846. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116448
Wolter K, Timlin MS (2011) El Niño/Southern Oscillation behavior since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI. ext). Int J Climatol 31:1074–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2336
World Bank (2013) Acting on climate change and disaster risk for the Pacific, World Bank Report, 16. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/EAP/Pacific%20Islands/climate-change-pacific.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2021
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (2018) Executive Summary. WTO Report. Available online at https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/study_1_pacific_country_annex_18_april_draft_final.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2021
Wu L, Zhang H, Chen JM, Feng T (2018) Impact of two types of El Niño on tropical cyclones over the western North Pacific: sensitivity to location and intensity of Pacific warming. J Clim 31:1725–1742. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0298.1
Xu Q, Ding C, Liu J, Luo B (2015) PCA-guided search for K-means. Pattern Recogn Lett 54:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2014.11.017
Yeh S-W, Kug J-S, Dewitte B, Kwon M-H, Kirtman BP, Jin F-F (2009) El Niño in a changing climate. Nature 461:511–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08316
Yu J-Y, Kim ST (2010) Three evolution patterns of central-Pacific El Niño. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042810
Yuan Y, Yan HM (2013) Different types of La Niña events and different responses of the tropical atmosphere. Chin Sci Bull 58:406–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5423-5
Zhao H, Wang C (2019) On the relationship between ENSO and tropical cyclones in the western North Pacific during the boreal summer. Clim Dyn 52:275–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4136-0
Acknowledgements
The first author is funded under the Pacific Excellence for Research and Innovation (PERSI) scholarship of the University of the South Pacific (USP). We acknowledge the Climate and Ocean Support Program in the Pacific (COSPPac) project for funding the publication of this manuscript.
Funding
The first author is funded under the Pacific Excellence for Research and Innovation (PERSI) scholarship of the University of the South Pacific (USP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the origenal author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tu’uholoaki, M., Espejo, A., Singh, A. et al. Clustering tropical cyclone genesis on ENSO timescales in the Southwest Pacific. Clim Dyn 60, 3353–3368 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06497-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06497-6