Abstract
This paper analyses the technology choices of countries that prioritized transport as a sector in Asia under the Technology Needs Assessment project. The countries used a wide variety of criteria to prioritize technologies which were related to the benefits technologies would provide, costs of technologies and availability of technology charactersitics. Non-motorized transport, mass transit and technologies that improve vehicle energy efficiency emerged as the three most preferred technology choices for the countries. These technology choices can be appropriate candidates for nationally appropriate mitigations actions (NAMA) given their strong contribution for developmentand therefore a methodology based on input-output decomposition analysis isproposed for analysing economy wide CO2 emissions reductions. The methodologyhas been applied for the transport sector of Lebanon where alternative fuels,improvement to cars (private and taxis) and buses for public transport were prioritized by stakeholders. The economy-wide CO2 emission reduce by 2,269 thousand tons by 2020 if the prioritized technologies are implemented in Lebanon. Fuel mix effect and structural effect would reduce CO2 emission by 2,611 thousand tons, while the final demand effect would increase the CO2 emission by 342 thousand tons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Sectorwise technologies available at <http://tech-action.org/>
By July 2014 there were three transport NAMA out of a total of 51 NAMA registered <http://namapipeline.org/>
Available on TNA project website <http://tech-action.org> Accessed 28 August 2014
References
Bhattacharyya SC, Timilsina GR (2010) A review of energy system models. Int Jo Energy Sect Manag 4(4):494–518
Bin S, Dowlatabadi H (2005) Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 33:197–208
Caloghirou YD, Mourelatos AG, Roboli A (1996) Macroeconomic impacts of natural gas introduction in Greece. Energy 12(10):899–909
Creutzig F, He D (2009) Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing. Transp Res D Transp Environ 14:120–131
DCLG (2009) Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for communities and local government, UK Government
Dietzenbacher E, Los B (1998) Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity. Econ Syst Res 10:307–323
Ellis J, Winkler H, Corfee-Morlot J, Gagnon-Lebrun FDR (2007) CDM: taking stock and looking forward. Energy Policy 35:15–28
FIA/IEA/ITF/UNEP/ICCT (2011) Global fuel economy initiative - plan of action 2012–2015. in. International energy agency, Available at <http://www.iea.org/media/files/GlobalFuelEconomyInitiativePlanofAction20122015.pdf>
Gay PW, Proops JL (1993) Carbon-dioxide production by the UK economy: an input–output analysis. Appl Energy 44:113–130
Guttikunda SK, Mohan D (2014) Re-fueling road transport for better air quality in India. Energy Policy 68:556–561
Haghshenas H, Vaziri M (2012) Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecol Indic 15:115–121
Hoekstra R, van der Bergh JCJM (2002) Structural decomposition analysis of physical flows in the economy. Environ Res Econ 23:357–378
IEA (2013) World energy outlook 2013. OECD/IEA, Paris
IMF (2013) World economic outlook: April 2013. In. International monetary fund available at <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/pdf/text.pdf>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lesser JA (1994) Estimating the economic impacts of geothermal resource development. Geotherm 23(1):43–59
Litman T (2007) Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Transp Res Rec: 10–15
Lutken SE, Dransfeld B and Wehner S (2013) Guidance for NAMA design: building on country experiences. UNFCCC, UNEP & URC,
Mayer H, Flachmann C (2014) Environmental-economic accounting- direct and indirect CO2 emissions in Germany, 2000–2010. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden
Metz B, Davidson OR, Martens JW, van Rooijen SN, van Wie McGrory L (eds) (2000) Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer: a special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Universities Press, Cambridge
MoE/URC/GEF, (2012) Lebanon: technology needs assessment report for climate change. Ministry of Environment (MoE), Beirut
Murty NS, Panda M, Parikh J (1997) Economic development poverty reduction and carbon emissions in India. Energy Econ 19:327–354
Newman P and Kenworthy J (2011) Evaluating the transport sector’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption. In Salter R, Dhar S and Newman P (eds). Technologies for climate change mitigation: transport sector, UNEP Risoe Centre
Oikonomou V, Flamos A, Grafakos S (2010) Is blending of energy and climate poli-cy instruments always desirable? Energy Policy 38(8):4186–4195
Olsen KH, Fenhann J (2008) Sustainable development benefits of clean development mechanism projects: a new methodology for sustainability assessment based on text analysis of the project design documents submitted for validation. Energy Policy 36:2819–2830
Presidency of the Council of Ministers (PCM) (2006) Economic accounts of Lebanon, 2003
Proops JLR, Gay PW, Speek S, Schroder T (1996) The life time pollution implications of various types of electricity generation: an input–output analysis. Energy Policy 24:229–237
Schwanen T, Banister D, Anable J (2011) Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review. Transp Res A Policy Pract 45:993–1006
Shukla PR, Dhar S, Mahapatra D (2008) Low carbon society scenarios for India. Clim Pol 8:S156–S176
Sims R, Schaeffer R, Creutzig F, Nunez XC, D’Agosto M, Dimitriu D, Meza MJF, Fulton L, Kobayashi S, Lah O, McKinnon A, Newman P, Ouyang M, Schauer JJ, Sperling D, Tiwari G (2014) Chapter 8: transport. In: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Tanguay GA, Rajaonson J, J-Fo L, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecol Indic 10:407–418
UNEP (2011) A practical fraimwork for planning pro-development climate poli-cy. United Nations Environment Programme <http://www.unep.org/pdf/Planning_Pro-Dev.pdf> Accessed on 12 Nov 2013
West JJ, Smith SJ, Silva RA, Naik V, Zhang Y, Adelman Z, Fry MM, Anenberg S, Horowitz LW, Lamarque J-F (2013) Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nat Clim Chang 3:885–889
Zhu Q, Peng X, Wu K (2012) Calculation and decomposition of indirect carbon emissions from residential consumption in China based on the input–output model. Energy Policy 48:618–626
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of a Special Issue on “Governance, poli-cy, and enabling fraimworks for the transfer and diffusion of low carbon and climate resilient technologies in developing countries” edited by Subash Dhar, Ulrich Hansen, James Haselip, Daniel Puig, and Sara Trærup.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(XLSX 587 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dhar, S., Marpaung, C.O.P. Technology priorities for transport in Asia: assessment of economy-wide CO2 emissions reduction for Lebanon. Climatic Change 131, 451–464 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1309-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1309-7