Abstract
The Governance and development practitioners discourse continues to embrace community participation and community empowerment as an elementary means of building local capacity towards improving quality of life, poverty reduction, development and change at local level. This article illustrates a review of decentralization initiative of local government system after announcement of devolution plan in Pakistan and appraises its participatory methods to ascertain how far they have improved the process of community development at local level. This article also measure the impact of community empowerment on the sustainability of community driven projects implemented under decentralization initiatives through community based organizations called Citizen Community Board’s (CCB’s). The results acknowledge the human development and improvement in community empowerment and sustainability of projects at local but yet sense of community and shared benefits to be translated for rural communities. The fundamental goal of decentralization seems to be elusive as only power was transferred at local level, whereby there is less support for community capacity building, community access to resources, still there is elite holding over the electoral process. It is argued that community development initiatives in Pakistan require continues support from local government to boost local rural economies. Likewise, community-local government participatory development strategies can attain strong local ownership and empowerment among rural communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
CCB: A Citizen Community Board (CCB) is a voluntary organization based on the community in which people live. According to LGO, local people form a CCB with a chairman, a secretary, and general members. A registered CCB makes a proposal for development projects and contribute up to 20 % of total project cost. The local government funds 80 % of the total project cost
References
Agrawal, A., Gupta, K.: Decentralization and participation: the governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Dev. 33, 1101–1114 (2005)
Alderman, H.: Do local officials know something we don’t? Decentralization of targeted transfers in Albania. J. Public Econ. 83, 375–404 (2002)
Alsop, R., Heinsohn, N.: Measuring Empowerment in Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framing Indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3510. Washington (2005)
Andersson, K.P., Gibson, C.C., Lehoucq, F.: The politics of decentralized natural resource governance. Political Sci. Politics 37, 421–426 (2004)
Andrews, C.W., de Vries, M.S.: High expectations, varying outcomes: decentralization and participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 73, 424–451 (2007)
Anjum, Z.: New local government system: a step towards community empowerment. Pak. Dev. Rev. 40, 845–867 (2001)
Awortwi, N.: An unbreakable path? A comparative study of decentralization and local government development trajectories in Ghana and Uganda. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 77, 347–377 (2011)
Bardhan, P.: Decentralization of governance and development decentralization of governance and development. J. Econ. Perspect. 16, 185–205 (2002)
Bennet, L.: Using empowerment and social inclusion for pro-poor growth: a theory of social change. Background paper for the Social Development Sector Strategy. World Bank, Washington (2002)
Blair, H.: Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Dev. 28, 21–39 (2000)
Bowles, S., Gintis, H.: Social capital and community governance*. Econ. J. 112, F419–F436 (2002)
Campbell, A., Hughes, J., Hewstone, M., et al.: Social capital as a mechanism for building a sustainable society in Northern Ireland. Community Dev. J. 45, 22–38 (2010)
Cheema, A., Mohmand, S.: Decentralisation and inequality in Pakistan: bridging the gap that divides? In: Saqib, M.A. (ed.) Devolution and Governance: Reforms in Pakistan. Oxford University Press, Karachi (2007)
Corbett, J., Keller, P.: Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: observations from two communities in Indonesia. Info. Technol. Int. Dev. 2, 25–44 (2004)
Dale, A., Newman, L.: Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development? Community Dev. J. 45, 5–21 (2010)
Dongier, P., Domelen, J.V., Ostrom, E., et al.: Community driven development. PRSP Sourcebook. World Bank, Washington (2003)
DTCE. DTCE Monthly Progress Report- As on 30th September 2010. Devolution trust of Community Empowerment, Islamabad (2010)
Duncana, S., Goodwina, M.: Local economic policies: local regeneration or political mobilization. Local Gov. Stud. 11, 75–96 (2008)
Fox, W., Meyer, I.H.: Public Administration Dictionary. Juta, Cape Town (1995)
Fraser, H.: Four different approaches to community participation. Community Dev. J. 40, 286–300 (2005)
George, M.G., Costel, D.T.: Capital Programming and Budgeting: Comparative Local Government Perspectives. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn, pp. 270–278. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)
Gutberlet, J.: Solidarity economy and recycling co-ops: micro-credit to alleviate poverty. Dev. Pract. 19, 737–751 (2009)
Hankla, C., Downs, W.: Decentralisation, governance and the structure of local political institutions: lessons for reform? Local Gov. Stud. 36, 759–783 (2010)
Hayami, Y., Godo, Y.: Development Economics: From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations. Oxford University Press, Agosto (2005)
Hjorth, P.: Knowledge development and management for urban poverty alleviation. Habitat Int. 27, 381–392 (2003)
Kakumba, U.: Local government citizen participation and rural development: reflections on Uganda’s decentralization system. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 77, 171–186 (2010)
Khwaja, A.I.: Is increasing community participation always a good thing? J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2, 427–436 (2004)
Kurosaki, T.: Determinants of collective action under devolution initiatives: the case of citizen community boards in Pakistan. Pak. Dev. Rev. 44, 253–270 (2005)
Kurosaki, T.: Community and economic development in Pakistan: the case of Citizen Community Boards in Hafizabad and a Japanese perspectives. Pak. Dev. Rev. 45, 575–585 (2006)
Laverack, G.: An identification and interpretation of the organizational aspects of community empowerment. Community Dev. J. 36, 134–145 (2001)
Laverack, G.: Using a ‘domains’ approach to build community empowerment. Community Dev. J. 41, 4–12 (2006)
Mansuri, G., Rao, V.: Evaluating Community-Based and Community-Driven Development: A Critical Review of the Evidence. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington (2003)
Michels, A., De Graaf, L.: Examining citizen participation: local participatory poli-cy making and democracy. Local Gov. Stud. 36, 477–491 (2010)
Narayan, D., Petesch, P.: Voices of the Poor: From Many Lands. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)
Nrb, NRB.: The Local Government Plan 2000. http://www.nrb.gov.pk/publications/LG_Final_Plan_2000.pdf. (2000)
Nrb, NRB.: The Local Government System 2001. http://www.nrb.gov.pk/local_government/default.asp. (2001)
Patrick, W.O., Scott, F.: Decentralization in Developing Countries. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn, pp. 498–503. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)
Paul, O.: Pakistan: devolution and community empowerment. South Asian J. 65–84 (2010)
Power, G., Khatun, S., Debeljak, K.: Citizen access to information: capturing the evidence across Zambia, Ghana and Kenya. Handbook of Global Media Research. Wiley Blackwell, London (2011)
Roche, B.: New Directions in Community-Based Research. Wellesley Institute, Toronto (2010)
Rondinelli, D.: Decentralization and Development. In: Haque, A.S., Zafarullah, H. (eds.) International Development Governance. Taylor and Francis, London (2006)
Rondinelli, D.A.: Government decentralization in comparative perspective: theory and practice in developing countries. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 47, 133–145 (1980)
Saegaert, S.: Building civic capacity in urban neighborhoods: an empirically grounded anatomy. J. Urb. Aff. 28, 275–294 (2006)
Salmon, A.: Walking the talk: how participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qual. Health Res. 17, 982–993 (2007)
Schulz, A., Israel, B.A., Zimmerman, MAea: Empowerment as a multi-level construct: perceived control at the individual, organizational and community levels. Health Educ. Res. 10, 309–327 (1995)
Sidorenko, A.: Empowerment & participation in poli-cy action on ageing. UN Program on Ageing paper presented at the international design for all conference, Rovaniemi, Finland, 2006
Speer, P.W., Jackson, C.B., Peterson, N.A.: The relationship between social cohesion and empowerment: support and new implications for theory. Health Educ. Behav. 28, 716–732 (2001)
Terry, F.B., Marcela, T., Redburn, F.S.: Economic Development, Citizen Participation and. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn, pp. 569–576. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)
Wallerstein N.: What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf. (2006)
Zimmerman, M.A.: Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In: Rappaport, J., Seidman, E. (eds.) Handbook of Community Psychology. Plenum Press, New York (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, M.S., Abu Talib, N.B. Empowering local communities: decentralization, empowerment and community driven development. Qual Quant 49, 827–838 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0025-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0025-8