Content-Length: 265669 | pFad | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0333-1

a=86400 An effective method for improving the accuracy of Argo objective analysis | Acta Oceanologica Sinica
Skip to main content

An effective method for improving the accuracy of Argo objective analysis

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the optimal interpolation objective analysis of the Argo data, improvements are made to the empirical formula of a background error covariance matrix widely used in data assimilation and objective analysis systems. Specifically, an estimation of correlation scales that can improve effectively the accuracy of Argo objective analysis has been developed. This method can automatically adapt to the gradient change of a variable and is referred to as “gradient-dependent correlation scale method”. Its effect on the Argo objective analysis is verified theoretically with Gaussian pulse and spectrum analysis. The results of one-dimensional simulation experiment show that the gradient-dependent correlation scales can improve the adaptability of the objective analysis system, making it possible for the analysis scheme to fully absorb the shortwave information of observation in areas with larger oceanographic gradients. The new scheme is applied to the Argo data objective analysis system in the Pacific Ocean. The results are obviously improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Akima H. 1970. A new method for interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. J Assoc Comput Mech, 17: 589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrinoer David W, Ji Ming, Leetmaa Ants. 1998. An improved coupled method for ENSO prediction and implications for ocean initialization: Part I. The ocean data assimilation system. Monthly Weather Review, 126: 1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonekamp H G, Oldenborgh J V, Burgers G. 2001. Variational assimilation of TAO and XBT data in the HOPE OGCM: adjusting the surface fluxes in the tropical ocean. J Geophys Res, 106: 16693–16709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton J A, Chepurin G, Cao X. 2000. A simple ocean data assimilation analysis of the global upper ocean 1950–95: Part I. Methodology. J Phys Oceanogr, 30: 294–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean Roemmich, Gilson John. 2009. The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of temperature, salinity and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo program. Progress in Oceanography, 82: 81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee D P, Silva A Da. 1998. Data assimilation in the presence of forecast bias. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 124: 269–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derber J, Rosati A. 1989. A global oceanic data assimilation system. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 19: 1333–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Weiwei, Zhou Guangqing, Wang Huijun. 2004. Ocean data assimilation with background error covariance: derived from OGCM outputs. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 21(2): 181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard F. 2010. ISAS-Tool Version 5.3: Method and Configuration. Brest: Laboratoere de Physique de Oceans, 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandin L S. 1963. Objective analysis of meteorological fields. Leningrad: Gidromet, 242

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Li, Liu Yuguang, Rong Zengrui. 2007. The sea level anomaly and analysis of mesoscale eddies in Kuroshio extensions. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 1: 14–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspari G, John S E. 1999. Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Q J RMeteorol Soc, 125: 723–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Zhongjie, Xie Yuanfu, Li Wei. 2007. Application of the sequential three-dimensional variation method to assimilating SST in a global ocean model. Journal of Atmospheric and oceanic Technology, 25: 1018–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth A, Lonnberg P. 1986. The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data: Part I. The wind field. Tellus, 38A: 111–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenneth H, Bergman. 1979. Multivariate analysis of temperature and wind using optimums interpolation. Mon Wea Rev, 107(11): 1423–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuragano T, Kamachi M. 2000. Global statistical space-time scales of oceanic variability estimated from the TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data. J Geophys Res, 105: 955–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Wei, Xie Yuanfu, He Zhongjie, et al. 2008. Application of the multi-grid data assimilation scheme to the China seas’ temperature forecast. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25: 2106–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers G H, Phillips N S, Springtall J. 1991. Space and timescales for optimal interpolation of temperature tropical Pacific. Progr Oceanogr, 28: 189–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds R W, Smith T M. 1994. Improved global sea surface temperature analysis. J Clim, 6: 929–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riishogaard L P. 1998. A direct way of specifying flow-dependent background error correlations for meteorological analysis system. Tellus, 50A: 42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigeki H, Tsuyoshi O, Tomoaki N. 2008. A monthly mean dataset of global oceanic temperature and salinity derived from Argo float observations. JAMSTEC Rep Res Dev, 8: 47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver A, Courtier P. 2001. Correlation modeling on the sphere using a generalized diffusion equation. Q J RMeteorol Soc, 127: 1815–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Koch S E, McGinley J A, et al. 2010. A space-time multi-scale analysis system: a sequential variational analysis approach. Mon Wea Rev, 139: 1224–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Luping. 2007. Digital Image Processing (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 80

  • Zhang Weimin, Cao Xiaoqun, Xiao Qingnong, et al. 2010. Variational data assimilation using wavelet background error covariance: initialization of Typhoon Kaemi (2006). Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 16(4): 334–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Zhaorong, Xue Jishan, Zhuang Shiyu, et al. 2006. Research for background error statistical analysis of geopotential height. Atmospheric Science (in Chinese), 30(3): 533–544

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunling Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation item: The Marine Public Welfare Special Funds, the State Oceanic Administration of China under contract No. 200705022; the Technology Special Basic Work, the Ministry of Science and Technology under contract No. 2012FY112300; the Basic Scientific Research Special Funds of the Second Institute of Oceanography, the State Oceanic Administration of China under contract No. JT0904.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Xu, J., Bao, X. et al. An effective method for improving the accuracy of Argo objective analysis. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 32, 66–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0333-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0333-1

Key words









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0333-1

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy