Content-Length: 290412 | pFad | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0094-6

a=86400 Collapsing characteristics of gas-bearing cavitation bubble | Journal of Hydrodynamics
Skip to main content

Collapsing characteristics of gas-bearing cavitation bubble

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cavitation is directly related to the safety of many large water conservancy projects. There are two types of cavitation bubbles, one is generated by the gas nucleus, called the non gas-bearing cavitation bubble, and another is generated by the gas bubble, called the gas-bearing cavitation bubble. They have significantly different collapsing characteristics. This paper studies the cavitation bubbles, generated by a high voltage pulse bubble generation system, and discusses the gas-bearing cavitation bubble’s characteristics a from the aspects of the collapse process, the cycle, the size and the collapse strength. It is shown that: (1) the collapse of the gas-bearing cavitation bubbles can be divided into two types: the centripetal collapse and the bisected collapse, (2) the cycle period and the size of the gas-bearing cavitation bubble increase significantly, and the increase norm has a certain relationship with the bubble diameter ratio, (3) the collapse strength of the gas-bearing cavitation bubble decreases significantly. The larger the bubble diameter ratio, the greater the effect will be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Viktor V. Pavlov, MSc, CEng and MICE. Impounding reservoir spillways and energy dissipators: hydraulic design challenges and lessons learnt [J]. Dams and Reservoirs, 2013, 23(2): 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. L. Cabiron, and S. Lavigne. Resistance of alag concrete to hydraulic abrasion and cavitation in dam structures [J]. Innovation in Concrete Structures: Design and Construction, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alan Brown, John Gosden, Martin Hewitt, Jonathan Hinks and Keith Gardiner. Use of risk-based methods to evaluate spillway capacity: case histories [J]. Dams and Reservoirs, 2014, 24(3): 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L. X., Zhang N., Peng X. X., Wang B. L. and Shao X. M. A review of studies of mechanism and prediction of tip vortex cavitation inception [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2015, 27(4): 488–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhixia He, Xicheng Tao, Wenjun Zhong, Xianyin Leng, Qian Wang and Peng Zhao. Experimental and numerical study of cavitation inception phenomenon in diesel injector nozzles [J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 65: 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bu-Geun Paik, Ki-Sup Kim, Kyung-Youl Kim, Jong-Woo Ahn, Tae-Gyu Kim, Kyung-Rae Kim, Young-Hun Jang and Sang-Uk Lee. Test method of cavitation erosion for marine coatings with low hardness [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 13(38): 1495–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu W. L., Luo S. J. and Zheng Q. W. Experimental study on pressure and aeration characteristics in stepped chute flows [J]. Sci. China Tech. Sci, 2015, 58(4): 720–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Qin, D.Y. Ju and R. Oba. Improvement on the process capability of water cavitation peening by aeration[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2006, 200(19): 5364–5369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu J. H. and Luo C. Effects of entrained air manner on cavitation damage [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2011, 23(3): 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.K. Kumar, S. Seetharamu and M. Kamaraj. Quantitative evaluation of 3D surface roughness parameters during cavitation exposure of 16Cr–5Ni hydro turbine steel [J]. Wear, 2014, 15(320): 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shuji Hattori, Ryohei Ishikura. Revision of cavitation erosion database and analysis of stainless steel data[J]. Wear, 2010, 2(268): 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.-A. Weitendorf. Cavitation phenomena, Propeller excited hull pressure amplitudes and cavitation scale effect [J]. Ocean Engineering, 1981, 8(5): 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jian-Min Zhang, Yu-Rong Wang, Qing Yang, Wei-Lin Xu and Peng-Zhi Lin. Scale effects of incipient cavitation for high-speed flows [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers -Water Management, 2013, 166(7): 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Kudzma and M. Stosiak. Studies of flow and cavitation in hydraulic lift valve [J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 15(4): 951–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Tomov, S. Khelladi, F. Ravelet, C. Sarraf, F. Bakir and P. Vertenoeuil. Experimental study of aerated cavitation in a horizontal venturi nozzle [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 70: 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y. H., Wang J. A., Ren X. C. Laser induced bubble characteristics with experimental and numerical methods [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(12): 8372–8378.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shen Z. Z. Dynamical behaviors of cavitation bubble under acoustic standing wave field [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(12): 124701–124702.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.J.D. van Stralen, R. Cole, W.M. Sluyter and M.S. Sohal. Bubble growth rates in nucleate boiling of water at subatmospheric pressures [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1975, 18(5): 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leen van Wijngaarden. Mechanics of collapsing cavitation bubbles [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2016, 29: 524–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karel Vokurka and Jaroslav Plocek. Experimental study of the thermal behavior of spark generated bubbles in water [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2013, 51: 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Hajizadeh Aghdam, S.W. Ohl, B.C. Khoo, M.T. Shervani-Tabar and M.R.H. Nobari. Effect of the viscosity on the behavior of a single bubble near a membrane [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 47: 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Jiménez-Fernández and A. Crespo. The collapse of gas bubbles and cavities in a viscoelastic fluid [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2006, 32(10): 1294–1299.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Jian Li, Ji-li Rong. Bubble and free surface dynamics in shallow underwater explosion [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(17): 1861–1868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeung-Hoon Lee, Hyoung-Gil Park, Jin-Hak Kim, Kyung-Jun Lee and Jong-Soo Seo. Reduction of propeller cavitation induced hull exciting pressure by a reflected wave from air-bubble layer [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 77: 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liyan Liu, Yang Yang, Penghong Liu and Wei Tan, The influence of air content in water on ultrasonic cavitation field [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2014, 2(21): 566–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haipeng Li, Artin Afacan, Qingxia Liu and Zhenghe Xu. Study interactions between fine particles and micron size bubbles generated by hydrodynamic cavitation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 84: 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu R. Q., Chen X. and Shen Z. H. Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles near solid boundaries [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(5): 1413–1418.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu W. L., Bai L. X. and Zhang F. X. Interaction of a cavitation bubble and an air bubble with a rigid boundary [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2010, 22(4): 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Akira Sou, Baris Biçer and Akio Tomiyama. Numerical simulation of incipient cavitation flow in a nozzle of fuel injector [J]. Computers & Fluids, 2014, 103: 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Biao Huang, Yu Zhao and Guoyu Wang. Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent vortex-cavitation interactions in transient sheet/cloud cavitating flows [J]. Computers & Fluids, 2014,92: 113–124.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Andreas Peters, Hemant Sagar, Udo Lantermann and Ould el Moctar. Numerical modelling and prediction of cavitation erosion [J]. Wear, 2015, 338: 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bin Ji, Xianwu Luo, Roger E.A. Arndt and Yulin Wu. Numerical simulation of three dimensional cavitation shedding dynamics with special emphasis on cavitation–vortex interaction [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 87: 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-lin Xu.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program, Grant No. 2013CB035905), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51179114, 51409180).

Biography: Ya-lei Zhang (1988-), Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Yl., Xu, Wl., Zhang, Fx. et al. Collapsing characteristics of gas-bearing cavitation bubble. J Hydrodyn 31, 66–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0094-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0094-6

Key words









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0094-6

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy