In the first of two pieces on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, Gert Jan Kramer and Martin Haigh analyse historic growth in energy systems to explain why deploying alternative technologies will be a long haul.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

HISTORIC DATA: ENERGY BALANCES OF OECD COUNTRIES (IEA, 2009), ENERGY BALANCES OF NON-OECD COUNTRIES (IEA, 2009); PROJECTIONS: SHELL INTERNATIONAL
References
Friedman, T. L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution — and How it Can Renew America (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008)
Gore, A. The Climate for Change New York Times (9 November 2009).
Shell Energy Scenarios to 2050 (Shell International, 2008); available at http://www.shell.com/scenarios
Energy Technology Perspectives 2008, Chapter 6 (International Energy Agency, 2008).
Jacobson, M. Z. & Delucchi, M. A. Sci. Am. 301, 58–65 (November, 2009).
Science 325, 1644–1645 (2009).
MacKay, D. J. C. Sustainable Energy — Without the Hot Air (UIT Cambridge, 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors are employed by Royal Dutch Shell, a global group of energy and petrochemicals companies, but are writing in a personal capacity.
Additional information
See Opinion, page 570 . Discuss this article at http://go.nature.com/9eLudp and see online at http://www.nature.com/roadtocopenhagen .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kramer, G., Haigh, M. No quick switch to low-carbon energy. Nature 462, 568–569 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/462568a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/462568a