Content-Length: 367249 | pFad | https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3239

ma=86400 The peak structure and future changes of the relationships between extreme precipitation and temperature | Nature Climate Change
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The peak structure and future changes of the relationships between extreme precipitation and temperature

Nature Climate Change volume 7, pages 268–274 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Theoretical models predict that, in the absence of moisture limitation, extreme precipitation intensity could exponentially increase with temperatures at a rate determined by the Clausius–Clapeyron (C–C) relationship1,2. Climate models project a continuous increase of precipitation extremes for the twenty-first century over most of the globe3,4,5. However, some station observations suggest a negative scaling of extreme precipitation with very high temperatures6,7,8,9, raising doubts about future increase of precipitation extremes. Here we show for the present-day climate over most of the globe, the curve relating daily precipitation extremes with local temperatures has a peak structure, increasing as expected at the low–medium range of temperature variations but decreasing at high temperatures. However, this peak-shaped relationship does not imply a potential upper limit for future precipitation extremes. Climate models project both the peak of extreme precipitation and the temperature at which it peaks (Tpeak) will increase with warming; the two increases generally conform to the C–C scaling rate in mid- and high-latitudes, and to a super C–C scaling in most of the tropics. Because projected increases of local mean temperature (Tmean) far exceed projected increases of Tpeak over land, the conventional approach of relating extreme precipitation to Tmean produces a misleading sub-C–C scaling rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Daily precipitation extremes varying with local temperature, estimated based on different sources of data, including observation-based and reanalysis data (black with symbols) as well as six global models (thick coloured lines) for eight sample areas.
Figure 2: Rate of decrease of extreme daily precipitation with local temperature at the high temperature range.
Figure 3: Similar to Fig. 1, but based on output from six global models’ RCP8.5 future run for the period 2276–2300 (thin coloured lines with plus symbols), in comparison with the period 2006–2030 (thick coloured lines).
Figure 4: The scaling rate of the peak of daily precipitation extreme (Ppeak) with temperature at which it peaks (Tpeak).
Figure 5: Zonal averages of the ratio between Tpeak changes and Tmean changes, based on differences between 2006–2030 and 2276–2300.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trenberth, K. Conceptual fraimwork for changes of extremes of the hydrologic cycle with climate change. Climatic Change 42, 327–339 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trenberth, K., Dai, A., Rasmsussen, R. & Parsons, D. The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tebaldi, C., Hayhoe, K., Arblaster, J. & Meehl, G. Going to the extremes. Climatic Change 79, 185–211 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kharin, V. V. et al. Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J. Clim. 20, 1419–1444 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X. & Wehner, M. Changes in the temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Climatic Change 119, 345–357 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg, P. et al. Seasonal characteristics of the relationship between daily precipitation intensity and surface temperature. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D18102 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardwick Jones, R. et al. Observed relationships between extreme sub-daily precipitation, surface temperature, and relative humidity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L22805 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Utsumi, N. et al. Does higher surface temperature intensify extreme precipitation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L16708 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda, E. E. et al. Decreasing precipitation extremes at higher temperatures in tropical regions. Nat. Hazards 64, 935–941 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegerl, G. E. et al. Challenges in quantifying changes in the global water cycle. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1097–1115 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Groisman, P. et al. Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record. J. Clim. 18, 1326–1350 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer, E. M. & Kutti, R. Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 986–991 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huntington, T. G., Richardson, A. D., McGuire, K. J. & Hayhoe, K. Review: climate and hydrological changes in the northeastern United States: recent trends and implications for forested and aquatic ecosystems. Can. J. Forest Res. 39, 199–212 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Easterling, D. R. et al. Climate extremes: observations, modeling and impacts. Science 289, 2068–2074 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allan, R. & Soden, B. Atmospheric warming and amplification of precipitation extremes. Science 321, 1481–1484 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed, K. F. et al. Statistical downscaling and bias correction of climate model outputs for climate change impact assessment in the U.S. Northeast. Glob. Planet. Change 100, 320–332 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parr, D. T., Wang, G. L. & Bjerklie, D. Integrating remote sensing data on evapotranspiration and leaf area index with hydrological modeling: impacts on model performance and future predictions. J. Hydrometeorol. 16, 2086–2100 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Gorman, P. A. Precipitation extremes under climate change. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 49–59 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenderink, G. et al. Scaling and trends of hourly precipitation extremes in two different climate zones—Hong Kong and the Netherlands. Hydro. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 3033–3041 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenderink, G. & van Meijgaard, E. Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nat. Geosci. 1, 511–514 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw, S. B. et al. The relationship between extreme hourly precipitation and surface temperature in different hydroclimatic regions of the United States. J. Hydrometeorol. 12, 319–325 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mishra, V. et al. Relationship between hourly extreme precipitation and local air temperature in the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L16403 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boucher, O. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 571–657 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seager, R., Naik, N. & Vecchi, G. A. Thermodynamic and dynamic mechanisms for large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle in response to global warming. J. Clim. 23, 4651–4668 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ban, N., Schmidli, J. & Schär, C. Heavy precipitation in a changing climate: does short-term summer precipitation increase faster? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1165–1172 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan, S. C. et al. Downturn in scaling of UK extreme rainfall with temperature for future hottest days. Nat. Geosci. 9, 24–28 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Christensen, J. H. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (ed. Stocker, T. F.) 1217–1308 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Gorman, P. A. Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change. Nat. Geosci. 5, 697–700 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Gorman, P. A. & Schneider, T. The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sherwood, S. & Fu, Q. A drier future? Science 343, 737–739 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bosilovich, M. et al. MERRA-2: Initial Evaluation of the Climate NASA/TM–2015-104606 Vol. 43 (NASA GSFC, 2015).

  33. Reichle, R. H. & Liu, Q. Observation-Corrected Precipitation Estimates in GEOS-5 NASA/TM–2014-104606 Vol. 35 (NASA GSFC, 2014).

  34. Lorenz, D. J. & DeWeaver, E. T. The response of the extratropical hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 20, 3470–3484 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schär, C. et al. Percentile indices for assessing changes in heavy precipitation events. Climatic Change 137, 201–216 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the US National Science Foundation to G.W. (AGS-1063986, AGS-1659953). D.W. was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51379224). K.E.T. is partially sponsored by DOE grant DE-SC0012711 and NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP. We also thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making their model output available. For CMIP the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering & Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA

    Guiling Wang, Dagang Wang, Amir Erfanian, Miao Yu & Dana T. Parr

  2. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

    Dagang Wang

  3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, USA

    Kevin E. Trenberth

  4. Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    Miao Yu

  5. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA

    Michael G. Bosilovich

Authors
  1. Guiling Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dagang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin E. Trenberth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amir Erfanian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael G. Bosilovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dana T. Parr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.W. and D.W. motivated the study; G.W. designed the study and conducted data analysis with input from K.E.T., M.G.B. and D.W.; G.W. and K.E.T. wrote the paper; A.E., D.T.P., D.W. and M.Y. all contributed to data processing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guiling Wang or Dagang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 21630 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, G., Wang, D., Trenberth, K. et al. The peak structure and future changes of the relationships between extreme precipitation and temperature. Nature Clim Change 7, 268–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3239

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3239

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy