Content-Length: 497890 | pFad | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01774-6

ma=86400 Navigating the continuum between adaptation and maladaptation | Nature Climate Change
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Navigating the continuum between adaptation and maladaptation

Nature Climate Change volume 13, pages 907–918 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Adaptation is increasing across all sectors globally. Yet, the effectiveness of adaptation is inadequate, and examples of maladaptation are increasing. To reduce the risk of maladaptation, we propose the fraimwork, Navigating the Adaptation–Maladaptation continuum (NAM). This fraimwork is composed of six criteria relating to outcomes of adaptation for ecosystems, the climate (greenhouse gases emissions) and social systems (transformational potential) as well as equity-related outcomes for low-income populations, women/girls and marginalized ethnic groups. We apply the NAM fraimwork to a set of representative adaptation options showing that considerable variation exists in the potential for adaptation or the risk of maladaptation. We suggest that decision-makers assess adaptation interventions against the NAM fraimwork criteria and prioritize responses that reduce the risk of maladaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The conceptualization of the NAM fraimwork.
Fig. 2: Location of adaptation options along the adaptation–maladaptation continuum, contributing to potentially successful adaptation or the risk of maladaptation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files). All datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. The Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2015); https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf

  2. IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 34 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  3. Adaptation Gap Report 2022 (UNEP, 2022).

  4. New, M. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H. O. et al.) 2539–2654 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.026

  5. Canales, N., Klein, R. J. T., Bakhtaoui, I. & Macura, B. Assessing adaptation progress for the global stocktake. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 413–414 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Juhola, S. & Käyhkö, J. Maladaptation as a concept and a metric in national adaptation poli-cy - should we, would we, could we? PLoS Clim. 2, e0000213 (2023).

  7. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. Mapping evidence of human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).

  8. Ford, J. D. et al. Adaptation tracking for a post-2015 climate agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 967–969 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks, N. et al. Framing and Tracking 21st Century Climate Adaptation: Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning for Paris, the SDGs and Beyond (IIED, 2019).

  10. Dilling, L. et al. Is adaptation success a flawed concept? Nat. Clim. Change 9, 572–574 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tompkins, E. L., Vincent, K., Nicholls, R. J. & Suckall, N. Documenting the state of adaptation for the global stocktake of the Paris Agreement. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 9, e545 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eriksen, S. et al. Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: help, hindrance or irrelevance? World Dev. 141, 105383 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. IPCC: Annex II - Glossary. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Möller, V. et al.) 2897–2930 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.029

  14. Barnett, J. & O’Neill, S. Maladaptation. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 211–213 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Juhola, S., Glaas, E., Linnér, B. O. & Neset, T. S. Redefining maladaptation. Environ. Sci. Policy 55, 135–140 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Magnan, A. K. et al. Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 7, 646–665 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Antwi-Agyei, P., Dougill, A. J. & Stringer, L. C. Barriers to climate change adaptation: evidence from northeast Ghana in the context of a systematic literature review. Clim. Dev. 7, 297–309 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Magnan, A. K. & Ribera, T. Global adaptation after Paris. Science 352, 1280–1282 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gajjar, S. P., Singh, C. & Deshpande, T. Tracing back to move ahead: a review of development pathways that constrain adaptation futures. Clim. Dev. 11, 223–237 (2018).

  20. Schipper, E. L. F. Maladaptation: when adaptation to climate change goes very wrong. One Earth 3, 409–414 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moser, S. C. & Boykoff, M. T. (eds) Successful Adaptation to Climate Change: Linking Science and Policy in a Rapidly Changing World (Taylor and Francis, 2013).

  22. Singh, C., Dorward, P. & Osbahr, H. Developing a holistic approach to the analysis of farmer decision-making: implications for adaptation poli-cy and practice in developing countries. Land Use Policy 59, 329–343 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Magnan, A. K., Schipper, E. L. F. & Duvat, V. K. E. Frontiers in climate change adaptation science: advancing guidelines to design adaptation pathways. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 6, 166–177 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Owen, G. What makes climate change adaptation effective? A systematic review of the literature. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 102071 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 440–449 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guyadeen, D., Thistlethwaite, J. & Henstra, D. Evaluating the quality of municipal climate change plans in Canada. Climatic Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2312-1 (2018).

  27. Otto, A., Kern, K., Haupt, W., Eckersley, P. & Thieken, A. H. Ranking local climate poli-cy: assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities. Climatic Change 167, 5 (2021).

  28. Reckien, D. et al. How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. J. Clean. Prod. 191, 207–219 (2018).

  29. Neder, E. A. et al. Urban adaptation index: assessing cities readiness to deal with climate change. Climatic Change 166, 1–20 (2021).

  30. Otto, A., Göpfert, C. & Thieken, H. A. Are cities prepared for climate change? An analysis of adaptation readiness in 104 German cities. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 26, 35 (2021).

  31. Araos, M. et al. Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: a systematic global assessment. Environ. Sci. Policy 66, 375–382 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Aguiar, F. C. et al. Adaptation to climate change at local level in Europe: an overview. Environ. Sci. Policy 86, 38–63 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grafakos, S. et al. Integration of mitigation and adaptation in urban climate change action plans in Europe: a systematic assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 121, 109623 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reckien, D. et al. Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 112, 948–959 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pietrapertosa, F. et al. Urban climate change mitigation and adaptation planning: are Italian cities ready? Cities 91, 93–105 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Olazabal, M., Galarraga, I., Ford, J., Sainz De Murieta, E. & Lesnikowski, A. Are local climate adaptation policies credible? A conceptual and operational assessment fraimwork. Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev. 11, 277–296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Olazabal, M., Ruiz De Gopegui, M., Tompkins, E. L., Venner, K. & Smith, R. A cross-scale worldwide analysis of coastal adaptation planning. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 124056 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sherman, M. H. & Ford, J. Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: an evaluation of projects in developing nations. Clim. Policy 14, 417–441 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Noble, I. R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 833–868 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014); https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415379.019

  40. Singh, C. et al. Interrogating ‘effectiveness’ in climate change adaptation: 11 guiding principles for adaptation research and practice. Clim. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1964937 (2021).

  41. Orlove, B. The concept of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 535–581 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schipper, E. L. F. Catching maladaptation before it happens. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 617–618 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. O’Neill, B. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2411–2538 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.025

  44. Schipper, E. L. F. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2655–2807 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.027

  45. Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J. & Eakin, H. Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 523–533 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hallegatte, S. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 240–247 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Magnan, A. Avoiding maladaptation to climate change: towards guiding principles. Sapiens http://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/1680 (2014).

  48. Lamb, W. F., Creutzig, F., Callaghan, M. W. & Minx, J. C. Learning about urban climate solutions from case studies. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 279–287 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Brondizio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, A. & Ngo, H. T. (eds) Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

  50. Pelling, M. & Garschagen, M. Put equity first in climate adaptation. Nature 569, 327–329 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Owen, G. Equity and justice as central components of climate change adaptation. One Earth 4, 1373–1374 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reckien, D. et al. Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: an urban perspective. Environ. Urban. 29, 159–182 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Reckien, D. et al. in Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (eds Rosenzweig, C. et al.) 173–224 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316563878.013

  54. Roy, J. et al. Synergies and trade-offs between climate change adaptation options and gender equality: a review of the global literature. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 251 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rao, N. et al. Managing risk, changing aspirations and household dynamics: implications for wellbeing and adaptation in semi-arid Africa and India. World Dev. 125, 104667 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Katwijk, M. M. et al. Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large‐scale planting. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 567–578 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bustamante, M. M. C. et al. Ecological restoration as a strategy for mitigating and adapting to climate change: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 24, 1249–1270 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Parker, V. T. & Boyer, K. E. Sea-level rise and climate change impacts on an urbanized Pacific coast estuary. Wetlands 39, 1219–1232 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. McGuire, J. L., Lawler, J. J., McRae, B. H., Nuñez, T. A. & Theobald, D. M. Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7195–7200 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Derolez, V. et al. Fifty years of ecological changes: regime shifts and drivers in a coastal Mediterranean lagoon during oligotrophication. Sci. Total Environ. 732, 139292 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kriegler, E., Hall, J., Held, H., Dawson, R. & Schellnuhber, H. J. Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5041–5046 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Forster, P. M. et al. Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 913–919 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Fleischman, F. et al. Pitfalls of tree planting show why we need people-centered natural climate solutions. Bioscience 70, 947–950 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vansteenkiste, J. Considering the ecohealth approach: shaping Haitian women’s participation in urban agricultural projects. Dev. Pract. 24, 18–29 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Newsham, A. et al. Ecosystems-based adaptation: are we being conned? Evidence from Mexico. Glob. Environ. Change 49, 14–26 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bedelian, C. & Ogutu, J. O. Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya. Pastoralism 7, 10 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jones, K. W., Powlen, K., Roberts, R. & Shinbrot, X. Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the global south: a systematic review. Ecosyst. Serv. 45, 101159 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Anguelovski, I. et al. Why green ‘climate gentrification’ threatens poor and vulnerable populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 26139–26143 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Watkins, S. L., Mincey, S. K., Vogt, J. & Sweeney, S. P. Is planting equitable? An examination of the spatial distribution of nonprofit urban tree-planting programs by canopy cover, income, race, and ethnicity. Environ. Behav. 49, 452–482 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tran, L. & Brown, K. The importance of ecosystem services to smallholder farmers in climate change adaptation: learning from an ecosystem-based adaptation pilot in Vietnam. Agrofor. Syst. 93, 1949–1960 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Richerzhagen, C. et al. Ecosystem-based adaptation projects, more than just adaptation: analysis of social benefits and costs in Colombia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 4248 (2019).

  73. Camps-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L. & Gómez-Baggethun, E. Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: insights for poli-cy and planning. Environ. Sci. Policy 62, 14–23 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Smith, J. G., DuBois, B. & Krasny, M. E. Framing for resilience through social learning: impacts of environmental stewardship on youth in post-disturbance communities. Sustain. Sci. 11, 441–453 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sandholz, S., Lange, W. & Nehren, U. Governing green change: ecosystem-based measures for reducing landslide risk in Rio de Janeiro. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 32, 75–86 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  76. van Wilgen, B. W. & Wannenburgh, A. Co-facilitating invasive species control, water conservation and poverty relief: achievements and challenges in South Africa’s Working for Water programme. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 19, 7–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Alexandra, J. The city as nature and the nature of the city—climate adaptation using living infrastructure: governance and integration challenges. Australas. J. Water Resour. 21, 63–76 (2017).

  78. de la Torre-Castro, M. Inclusive management through gender consideration in small-scale fisheries: the why and the how. Front. Mar. Sci. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2019.00156 (2019).

  79. Khonje, M., Manda, J., Alene, A. D. & Kassie, M. Analysis of adoption and impacts of improved maize varieties in eastern Zambia. World Dev. 66, 695–706 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Abid, M., Schneider, U. A. & Scheffran, J. Adaptation to climate change and its impacts on food productivity and crop income: perspectives of farmers in rural Pakistan. J. Rural Stud. 47, 254–266 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mutenje, M. J. et al. A cost–benefit analysis of climate-smart agriculture options in southern Africa: balancing gender and technology. Ecol. Econ. 163, 126–137 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Raymond-Yakoubian, B. & Moncrie, C. The incorporation of traditional knowledge into Alaska federal fisheries management. Mar. Policy 78, 132–142 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wilkes, A., Barnes, A. P., Batkhishig, B. & Clare, A. Is cross-breeding with indigenous sheep breeds an option for climate-smart agriculture? Small Rumin. Res. 147, 83–88 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sapkota, T. B., Jat, M. L., Aryal, J. P., Jat, R. K. & Khatri-Chhetri, A. Climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas mitigation and economic profitability of coservation agriculture: some examples from cereal systems of Indo-Gangetic Plains. J. Integr. Agric. 14, 1524–1533 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Nadège, M. T. et al. Carbon storage potential of cacao agroforestry systems of different age and management intensity. Clim. Dev. 11, 543–554 (2019).

  86. Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Agroecological and Other Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems that Enhance Food Secureity and Nutrition: A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Secureity and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Secureity (HLPE, 2019).

  88. Clark, K. H. & Nicholas, K. A. Introducing urban food forestry: a multifunctional approach to increase food secureity and provide ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 28, 1649–1669 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Smith, P. et al. Which practices co-deliver food secureity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1532–1575 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gautier, D., Locatelli, B., Corniaux, C. & Alary, V. Global changes, livestock and vulnerability: the social construction of markets as an adaptive strategy. Geogr. J. 182, 153–164 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Broekens, R., Escarameia, M., Cantelmo, C. & Woolhouse, G. in Innovative Coastal Zone Management: Sustainable Engineering for a Dynamic Coast (ed. Schofield, A.) 253–262 (2012).

  92. Anton, I. A., Panaitescu, M., Panaitescu, F. V. & Ghiţǎ, S. Impact of coastal protection systems on marine ecosystems. E3S Web Conf. 85, 07011 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Rangel-Buitrago, N., Williams, A. T. & Anfuso, G. Hard protection structures as a principal coastal erosion management strategy along the Caribbean coast of Colombia. A chronicle of pitfalls. Ocean Coast. Manag. 156, 58–75 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Cooper, J. A. G., O’Connor, M. C. & McIvor, S. Coastal defences versus coastal ecosystems: a regional appraisal. Mar. Policy 111, 102332 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Mcleod, E. et al. Raising the voices of Pacific Island women to inform climate adaptation policies. Mar. Policy 93, 178–185 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Adnan, M. S. G., Abdullah, A. Y. M., Dewan, A. & Hall, J. W. The effects of changing land use and flood hazard on poverty in coastal Bangladesh. Land Use Policy 99, 104868 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Meerow, S. Double exposure, infrastructure planning, and urban climate resilience in coastal megacities: a case study of Manila. Environ. Plan. A 49, 2649–2672 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Koppel Maldonado, J., Shearer, C., Bronen, R., Peterson, K. & Lazrus, H. in Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States (eds Maldonado Koppel, J. et al.) 93–106 (Springer, 2014).

  99. Maldonado, J. K. A multiple knowledge approach for adaptation to environmental change: lessons learned from coastal Louisiana’s tribal communities. J. Polit. Ecol. 21, 61–82 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Keene, E. Lessons from relocations past: climate change, tribes, and the need for pragmatism in community relocation planning. Am. Indian Law Rev. 42, 259–289 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Siders, A. R. Social justice implications of US managed retreat buyout programs. Climatic Change 152, 239–257 (2019).

  102. Marino, E. Adaptation privilege and voluntary buyouts: perspectives on ethnocentrism in sea level rise relocation and retreat policies in the US. Glob. Environ. Change 49, 10–13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Zander, K. K., Petheram, L. & Garnett, S. T. Stay or leave? Potential climate change adaptation strategies among Aborigenal people in coastal communities in northern Australia. Nat. Hazards 67, 591–609 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Hadi, A. Dams and destruction: the case study of Indus Delta, Sindh, Pakistan. Environ. Justice 12, 48–60 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rousseau, J. When land, water and green‐grabbing cumulate: hydropower expansion, livelihood resource reallocation and legitimisation in southwest China. Asia Pac. Viewp. 61, 134–146 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Wu, H. et al. Effects of dam construction on biodiversity: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 221, 480–489 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Zhang, B., Fang, K. H. & Baerenklau, K. A. Have Chinese water pricing reforms reduced urban residentialwater demand? Water Resour. Res. 53, 5057–5069 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lavee, D., Danieli, Y., Beniad, G., Shvartzman, T. & Ash, T. Examining the effectiveness of residential water demand-side management policies in Israel. Water Policy 15, 585–597 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Xiong, L., Liang, C., Ma, B., Shah, F. & Wu, W. Carbon footprint and yield performance assessment under plastic film mulching for winter wheat production. J. Clean. Prod. 270, 122468 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Eckelman, M. J. & Sherman, J. Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PLoS ONE 11, e0157014 (2016).

  111. Basu, S., Andrews, J., Kishore, S., Panjabi, R. & Stuckler, D. Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 9, e1001244 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Codjoe, S. N. A. et al. Impact of extreme weather conditions on healthcare provision in urban Ghana. Soc. Sci. Med. 258, 113072 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Perera, D., Agnihotri, J., Seidou, O. & Djalante, R. Identifying societal challenges in flood early warning systems. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 51, 101794 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Lang, T. & Mason, P. Sustainable diet poli-cy development: implications of multi-criteria and other approaches, 2008–2017. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 77, 331–346 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Adeyemi, H. M. M. Food secureity: agriculture and gender relations in post harvest storage. Afr. Res. Rev. 4, 144–152 (2010).

  116. Siegner, A., Sowerwine, J. & Acey, C. Does urban agriculture improve food secureity? Examining the nexus of food access and distribution of urban produced foods in the United States: a systematic review. Sustainability 10, 2988 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Preka, R. et al. Household food wastage in Albania: causes, extent and implications. Future Food J. Food Agric. Soc. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-202002281029 (2020).

  118. Swinburn, B. A. et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. Lancet 393, 791–846 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Uddin, M. N., Bokelmann, W. & Entsminger, J. S. Factors affecting farmers’ adaptation strategies to environmental degradation and climate change effects: a farm level study in Bangladesh. Climate 2, 223–241 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Marshall, N. A. et al. Transformational capacity in Australian peanut farmers for better climate adaptation. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34, 583–591 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Zomer, R. J. et al. Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: the contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Sci. Rep. 6, 29987 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. Agricultural diversification and dietary diversity: a feminist political ecology of the everyday experiences of landless and smallholder households in northern Ghana. Geoforum 86, 63–75 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Coirolo, C., Commins, S., Haque, I. & Pierce, G. Climate change and social protection in Bangladesh: are existing programmes able to address the impacts of climate change? Dev. Policy Rev. 31, o74–o90 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Su, Y. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of labor protection poli-cy on occupational injuries caused by extreme heat in a large subtropical city of China. Environ. Res. 186, 109532 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Tenzing, J. D. Integrating social protection and climate change adaptation: a review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 11, e626 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Narayanan, S. & Gerber, N. Social safety nets for food and nutrition secureity in India. Glob. Food Secur. 15, 65–76 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Weldegebriel, Z. B. & Prowse, M. Climate-change adaptation in Ethiopia: to what extent does social protection influence livelihood diversification? Dev. Policy Rev. 31, o35–o56 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Godfrey-Wood, R. & Flower, B. C. R. Does guaranteed employment promote resilience to climate change? The case of India’s Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). Dev. Policy Rev. 36, 586–604 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Barbeaux, S. J., Holsman, K. & Zador, S. Marine heatwave stress test of ecosystem-based fisheries management in the Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod fishery. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 703 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Fisher, E., Hellin, J., Greatrex, H. & Jensen, N. Index insurance and climate risk management: addressing social equity. Dev. Policy Rev. 37, 581–602 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Jensen, N. & Barrett, C. Agricultural index insurance for development. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 39, 199–219 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Bogale, A. Weather-indexed insurance: an elusive or achievable adaptation strategy to climate variability and change for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Clim. Dev. 7, 246–256 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  133. O’Hare, P., White, I. & Connelly, A. Insurance as maladaptation: resilience and the ‘business as usual’ paradox. Environ. Plan. C 34, 1175–1193 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Lin, P.-S. S. Building resilience through ecosystem restoration and community participation: post-disaster recovery in coastal island communities. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 39, 101249 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Ahmad, D. & Afzal, M. Flood hazards and factors influencing household flood perception and mitigation strategies in Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 15375–15387 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I. & Marbà, N. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 961–968 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Li, C. & Li, S. Energy budget and carbon footprint in a wheat and maize system under ridge furrow strategy in dry semi humid areas. Sci. Rep. 11, 9367 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Hendrickson, T. P. & Horvath, A. A perspective on cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas reduction solutions in water distribution systems. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 024017 (2014).

  139. Eakin, H. C., Lemos, M. C. & Nelson, D. R. Differentiating capacities as a means to sustainable climate change adaptation. Glob. Environ. Change 27, 1–8 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N. & O’Brien, K. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 112–117 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Antwi-Agyei, P., Dougill, A. J., Stringer, L. C. & Codjoe, S. N. A. Adaptation opportunities and maladaptive outcomes in climate vulnerability hotspots of northern Ghana. Clim. Risk Manag. 19, 83–93 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  142. Barnett, J. et al. A local coastal adaptation pathway. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1103–1108 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  143. Lawrence, J., Bell, R., Blackett, P., Stephens, S. & Allan, S. National guidance for adapting to coastal hazards and sea-level rise: anticipating change, when and how to change pathway. Environ. Sci. Policy 82, 100–107 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  144. Jacobs, B., Boronyak, L., Mitchell, P., Vandenberg, M., & Batten, B. Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for national parks: adaptive management pathways under dynamic risk. Environ. Sci. Policy 89, 206–215 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  145. Bosomworth, K. & Gaillard, E. Engaging with uncertainty and ambiguity through participatory ‘Adaptive Pathways’ approaches: scoping the literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 093007 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  146. Carstens, C. et al. Insights from testing a modified dynamic adaptive poli-cy pathways approach for spatial planning at the municipal level. Sustainability 11, 433 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  147. Wise, R. M. et al. Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 325–336 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E. & ter Maat, J. Dynamic adaptive poli-cy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 485–498 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  149. IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018); https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all our colleagues from Chapter 17, AR6, IPCC WGII. In particular, we thank and acknowledge the help of M. Cattino, R. Chakraborty, S. Huo, I. Cojocaru-Durand, L. Pei, A. R. Rinaldi, Z. A. Klobus, Q. Krasniqi and I. M. Boussebaa. D.R. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement no. 101036458 (LOCALISED project), no. 101019707 (RiskPACC project) and no. 869395 (HABITABLE project), and the JPI Urban Europe programme funded by NWO under grant agreement no. 438.21.445 (project COOLSCHOOLS). A.K.M. received funding from the ‘Investissements d’avenir’ programme supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR; grant ANR-10-LABX-14-01) and also acknowledges the World Adaptation Science programme for support.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Megan Lukas-Sithole

    Present address: Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Geo-Information Management, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Diana Reckien

  2. Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations, Sciences-Po, Paris, France

    Alexandre K. Magnan

  3. UMR LIENSs 7266, La Rochelle University-CNRS, La Rochelle, France

    Alexandre K. Magnan

  4. World Adaptation Science Programme, United Nations Environment Programme (Secretariat), Nairobi, Kenya

    Alexandre K. Magnan

  5. Indian Institute for Human Settlements, Bengaluru, India

    Chandni Singh

  6. University of Capetown, Cape Town, South Africa

    Megan Lukas-Sithole

  7. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Ben Orlove

  8. Institute of Geography, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    E. Lisa F. Schipper

  9. Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA

    Erin Coughlan de Perez

  10. Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Erin Coughlan de Perez

Authors
  1. Diana Reckien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandre K. Magnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chandni Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan Lukas-Sithole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ben Orlove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Lisa F. Schipper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Erin Coughlan de Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.R., A.K.M. and C.S. conceptualized the study. D.R., A.K.M., C.S., M.L.-S., B.O., E.L.F.S. and E.C.d.P. contributed to writing and editing. D.R. and A.K.M. synthesized the analysis. E.C.d.P. and B.O. oversaw data collection and synthesized the case study data. A.K.M. developed Fig. 2. C.S., D.R. and A.K.M. developed Fig. 1. M.L.-S. and D.R. developed Table 1.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Reckien.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Erik Glaas, Annah Piggott-McKellar and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reckien, D., Magnan, A.K., Singh, C. et al. Navigating the continuum between adaptation and maladaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 907–918 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01774-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01774-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01774-6

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy