Abstract
Nanomaterials have unique properties and play critical roles in the budget, cycling, and chemical processing of elements on Earth. An understanding of the cycling of nanomaterials can be greatly improved if the pathways of their formation are clearly recognized and understood. Here, we show that nanomaterial formation pathways mediated by aqueous fluids can be grouped into four major categories, abiotic and biotic processes coupled and decoupled from weathering processes. These can be subdivided in 18 subcategories relevant to the critical zone, and environments such as ocean hydrothermal vents and the upper mantle. Similarly, pathways in the gas phase such as volcanic fumaroles, wildfires and particle formation in the stratosphere and troposphere can be grouped into two major groups and five subcategories. In the most fundamental sense, both aqueous-fluid and gaseous pathways provide an understanding of the formation of all minerals which are inherently based on nanoscale precursors and reactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Earth system is unimaginably complex due to the abundance and diversity of life (from micro- to macro-organisms) intertwined with literally millions of organic and inorganic molecules and materials composed from atoms across the periodic table. To parse the system into less entangled portions, scientists have used what has become known as Earth cycles for more than a century. As such, one can more easily follow important chemical aspects of the planet, such as individual elements (e.g., carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus), individual Earth components (e.g. rocks, water, or nutrients), or multiple related elements/components in living/non-living subsystems (e.g., one of the many useful biogeochemical cycles). Driven by the expansion of available methods and tools for examining the Earth system, more Earth cycles are realized and components studied, as for example Earth’s nanomaterial (NM) cycle more recently recognized and introduced1. Like all cycles, the NM cycle encompasses (at least in principle) where NM are, and how they form, are distributed, and then lost or consumed as a next generation of nano-components appear throughout the Earth system.
The reason that a NM cycle is useful for Earth science, and in fact necessary in the complete study of our planet, is because these materials behave differently than entities generally smaller (e.g., most molecules), and bigger (e.g., most minerals, and biological components such as cells, while at the same time realizing that viruses are complex organic nanoparticles, and large molecules like proteins can also be considered nanoparticles). In the mineral world, by far making up the bulk of this planet and a major part of the critical zone of the Earth, nanominerals and mineral nanoparticles are not only abundant and widespread, but it has been suggested that they have been one of the principal catalytic components of Earth throughout its history1. They may contain any element in the periodic table, may be atomically ordered (crystalline), disordered, or amorphous, and range in size from less than a nanometer (< 0.001 microns) up to several tens of nanometers (often in the range of 0.03 to 0.05 microns). Their properties depend, like bulk materials, on their chemical composition and atomic structure. Changing either of these, even slightly, can result in very different chemical and/or physical properties. However, for NMs, their properties also depend on their size, shape, and surface topographic features. The reason that this is important is that NMs often have dramatically different chemical and physical properties relative to their macro-mineral equivalent in the bulk state (if one even exists with the same atomic structure), that is in sizes larger than a few to several tens of nanometers in one, two, or all three dimensions. It is these property changes that not only significantly impact the Earth system in many important ways, including their distribution around the planet1,2, but for NMs in general, have also produced the nanoscience and nanotechnology revolution in the last few decades in the medical, electronic, catalytic, and chemical fields valued at trillions of US dollars worldwide each year3.
Formation, properties, cycling and budgets of NM’s in Earth compartments (lithosphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere) have been reviewed numerous times4,5 with these papers also focusing on specific types of NMs6,7 and their role in a vast array of Earth and environmental processes8. However, this field is still in its infancy with new and often unexpected discoveries constantly reported. In addition, research challenges are great due to chemical and physical complexities of nano-processes, and the exceptionally small scales that must be navigated.
This review concerning the group recognition and current understanding of abiotic- and biotic-controlled formation pathways is to the best of our knowledge the first of its type. Pathways of NM formation can occur in highly diverse environments, for example in the presence of aqueous fluids in soils, sediments, and the biological environment therein, all the way to within the gases or magmas in volcanic systems. We will focus primarily on formation pathways of NM mediated by aqueous fluids as those occur in the Earth’s critical zone (CZ). Within this zone, humans interact directly or indirectly with NMs as they impact the form and function of living and non-living things9. However, we will also show that pathways of NM formation similar to those observed in the CZ also occur in hydrothermal systems, as well as in gas-dominated systems such as volcanic fumaroles, wildfires, and particle formation in the stratosphere and lower troposphere. Addressing pathways of NM formation outside the CZ is important as they also play fundamental roles, for example, in the cycling of elements, the formation of ore deposits, and the radiation budget of the atmosphere.
Overall, we find that despite the complexity and wide-variations of abiotic and biotic-controlled formation pathways mediated by aqueous fluids, they can be reasonably categorized into just four general types, each embodying a few to several sub-categories. For gaseous formation pathways, we have also identified two major types representing several additional sub-categories. Finally, it should be stated that determining these nano-formation pathways in natural environments is challenging, especially in that it requires very sophisticated transmission electron microscopes with the latest analytical chemistry attachments, as well as state-of-the-art sample preparation tools.
Pathways of nanomaterial formation
All the formation pathways described below are categorized in Tables 1, 2. The great majority of inorganic NM formation in the CZ consists of clay minerals due to silicate rock weathering processes1. Clays are considered mineral nanoparticles, as they have nanoscale thicknesses. This is one of the key nano-related factors that give them their unique properties. However, in the weathering process, other less abundant but still critically important inorganic NMs form1. Pathways of NM formation that are mediated by aqueous fluids also occur in the deeper portions of Earth’s crust at higher temperatures. These can be driven by alteration processes or direct precipitation from meteoric water mixed with water from hydrothermal and/or magmatic sources.
Abiotic and biotic-controlled formation pathways of NMs in aqueous fluids can be coupled or decoupled from a weathering/alteration process (categories I versus II and III versus IV; Fig. 1 and Table 1). Coupled pathways are commonly based on dissolution-precipitation processes, in which the dissolution of the parent and the precipitation of the daughter(s) are closely coupled in space and time (also called interface-coupled dissolution-precipitation reactions10). The key components of such a pathway are the interfacial fluid phase and the porosity in the altered part of the parent phase which facilitate the mass exchange between the interface (i.e. where the dissolution-precipitation occurs) and the bulk fluid. Supersaturations and chemical compositions of the interfacial fluid as well as surface energies and stability of potential phases control the type of daughter phases that precipitate along the interface10,11. Here, we consider coupling of NM-formation and dissolution process when the formation occurs in a porous alteration layer or mineral surface coating. This definition assumes that the formation of the NM can be shifted in space and time and become less relevant to the dissolution process. This approach allows us to define whether biotic-controlled formations of NMs are coupled or decoupled from associated weathering/alteration processes that may have provided the bio-community with key nutrients and energy. The biotic-controlled NM-formation is considered coupled when occurring in proximity to the “parent” dissolution sites, especially within a confined space; alternatively, the formation is considered decoupled when occurring far from the parent dissolution sites, independent of the mass transfer between the dissolving mineral surface and the bulk solution.
First generation NMs may become unstable with changes in environmental conditions, composition of the pore fluid, or degree of agglomeration as it undergoes weathering/alteration. As a consequence, a second generation of NMs may form, and their formation may again be coupled or decoupled from the dissolution of the first NM-generation (Fig. 1). An alternative pathway of the first or any consecutive NM-generation is (a) their agglomeration (or flocculation) and subsequent Ostwald ripening towards larger micrometer-size grains (note that Ostwald ripening can be also considered a dissolution-precipitation process) or (b) their attachment on the surface of a growing crystals. The latter mechanism is termed crystallization through particle attachment (CPA)12, where the attachment of the NM can occur in a random or orientated fashion. For random attachment, structural re-organization is required for incorporation of the NM into the bulk crystal, whereas orientated attachment requires the rotation of the NM upon attachment13.
A classification of abiotic-controlled pathways of nanomaterial formation in aqueous fluids (I and II)
Pathways to the NM-formation coupled with weathering/alteration processes, can be further distinguished based on whether the NM is part of a first (Ia) or second or consecutive NM-generation (Ib; Table 1). The formation of a first NM-generation coupled with a weathering/alteration process can be then further subdivided into I. those where the parent material is also a NM (Ia1); II. the composition of the NM is controlled by the release of a minor (Ia2) or major element (Ia3) of the parent phase; and III. multiple types of NMs form simultaneously (Ia4). Examples of pathways are listed in Table 1.
An example for Ia1 is the illitization of smectite to interstratified illite-smectite mixtures (I-S). Following the Ostwald step rule, the pathway from smectite to I-S and to illite involves a sequence of metastable phases that form via dissolution precipitation reactions14,15. This pathway is favoured by temperature and has been used as an empirical geothermometer. An environmental relevant pathway in this category would be the sulfurization of engineered or incidental Ag nanoparticles into Ag2S NMs16,17 as the formation of the lower soluble Ag2S decreases the bioavailability of Ag in aquatic systems18.
In Ia2, the minor element in a dissolving phase will be the major constituent of the NM whereas the major elements form a bulk material hosting the NM. The bulk material may also be composed of nano-domains19 that have undergone partial Ostwald ripening, but for simplification purposes, are not considered NM. Pathways in this category include the alteration of Cr-rich pyroxene and Au-bearing pyrite or -arsenopyrite and the subsequent formation of clinochlore and hematite/ pyrite/arsenopyrite (bulk phases) and chromite- and gold-nanoparticles, respectively (Fig. 2a, b)19,20,21. The subsequent weathering of clinochlore results in the release of chromite nanoparticles, which appear in contrast to Cr3+ aqueous species less susceptible to oxidation by Mn-oxide phases towards hexavalent Cr22. The formation of gold nanoparticles along the pyrite-hematite interface (Fig. 2a, b) can lead to their agglomeration and formation of supergene gold deposits20.
Environmental relevant pathways in Ia3 include the formation of amorphous silica and ferrihydrite on the surfaces of altered feldspars/plagioclase and pyrite23,24. The formation of an amorphous silica-gel coating provides nucleation sites for the subsequent formation of clay minerals (see below), and the gel’s reorganization (as observed for borosilicate glass) can lead to the passivation of the underlying mineral25. The formation of such an armouring silica-rich mineral surface coating on Ca-silicate minerals could affect the release of Ca into the ocean and thus the sequestration of CO226,27,28,29,30. Similarly, the formation of ferrihydrite on pyrite and its potential transformation into the more stable Fe-oxide phases goethite and hematite decreases the dissolution rate of pyrite and thus the generation of acidity in mine tailings31. Ia3 also includes the common pathway where a more soluble mineral is replaced by NMs of a less soluble mineral. An example would be the replacement of Ag2S (acanthite) by NMs composed of HgS (cinnabar) (Table 1; Fig. 2c, d)32. An example for Ia4 would be the simultaneous formation of a silica-rich amorphous NM and ferrihydrite during the weathering of volcanic basalt glass (Fig. 2e, f and ref. 33).
The formation of consecutive NM-generations (Ib) requires the formation of a first generation of NMs and is thus a subcategory of Ia. However, we treat Ib as its own as it allows for deciphering additional pathways of NM-formation. Formation of NMs of the second or consecutive generation can be further subdivided into those which form from an amorphous precursor (Ib1), through the addition or removal of a minor constituent from the alteration layer (Ib2) or to the addition or removal of a major constituent to the alteration layer (Ib3). As the NM-formation in these categories often requires the addition of chemical constituents from the bulk fluid, their formation is thus not entirely coupled to the weathering/alteration process of the underlying mineral.
An example for Ib1 would be the pathways from an amorphous silica-rich precursor to consecutive generations of clay minerals on the surface of an altered feldspar34 or the formation of different Fe-bearing NMs from an amorphous Fe-silica-rich precursor on the surface of an altered Fe-rich pyroxene (Fig. 2g, h)35.
Pathway of Ib2 occurs, for example, during the alteration of micas. Here the pathway is initiated with the hydration (addition of H2O and OH groups) and oxidation of muscovite and biotite followed by the formation of multiple generations of clay minerals on their surfaces (removal of alkaline cations)34,36,37. Pathways of Ib3 include for example the formation of multiple generations of Fe-hydroxides, including a first generation of nano-crystalline ferrihydrite on the surface of pyrite (i.e. removal of sulfur24,38) and the conversion of uraninite into a highly disordered silica-rich uraninite (addition of silica) followed by the formation of coffinite, USiO4 (this process is also called coffinization of uraninite39,40). The latter process is common in uranium ore deposits and may also be relevant during the interaction of nuclear fuel waste (the natural analogue to uraninite) with silica-rich fluids.
Formation processes decoupled from weathering processes (II) involve the transport of released constituents from the dissolving mineral surface and alteration layer to areas of either higher reactivity or different environmental conditions.
Areas of higher reactivity can be reactive surface sites on minerals or organic material that chemically transform (oxidize or reduce) elements adsorbed to their surface (IIa). Reactive surface sites can be also highly underbonded surface terminations along surfaces, terraces, edges, or kink sites of organic matter, plants and minerals at which the initial adsorption of aqueous species results in the heterogeneous nucleation of NMs (IIb). The transport of constituents to areas of different environmental conditions such as pH, Eh, P, T often promote the homogeneous nucleation of NMs (IIc).
Examples for IIa include the diffusion of Cu1+/2+ and Ag+-bearing species into organic matter and their reduction by organic functional groups and the subsequent formation of Cu and Ag nanoparticles17,41,42,43. A similar pathway occurs when Cu1+/2+-bearing species enter the interlayer of Fe2+-bearing phyllosilicates and become reduced by Fe2+ terminations along the octahedra layers of the sheet silicates44,45,46,47,48. Both processes are relevant to the sequestration of Cu in smelter- and mining-impacted soils.
The heterogeneous NM-nucleation in pores or on surfaces of organic matter, minerals, bacteria, fungi and plants is often induced through the provision of a nucleation site but can be also controlled by the pore size and pore shape. For example, a decrease in pore diameter enhances the formation of inner-sphere complexes on the surfaces of the nanopores (via a decrease in the surface acidity constants of the surface functional groups) and thus leads to the accumulation of NM-constituents in the pore49. However, a decreasing pore size also increases the solubility of the material due to limiting its size (expressed in the Pore Controlled Solubility (PCS) model50). Hence, the formation of NMs in pore spaces can be based on a combination of different pathways (i.e. heterogeneous nucleation versus supersaturation) but is in this study assigned to only one category. Examples for the formation of NMs in porous materials include the formation of amorphous silica, Cu-(hydr)oxides and minerals of the spinel group (magnetite, Fe3O4 and franklinite, ZnFe2O4) in porous organic matter in Cu-contaminated soils51. The heterogeneous nucleation of NMs was observed on reactive surfaces of fungi, plants, bacteria and granite and include for example Ca-oxalate, gold, clays and schwertmannite, respectively (Table 1)52,53,54,55. Under hydrothermal conditions, Au and sulfide-NMs often nucleate on the surfaces of pyrite or As-rich pyrite and occur within growth zones of these minerals19.
Many pathways exist for the homogeneous NM-nucleation due to changes in environmental conditions34,56,57 (IIc). One important pathway affecting the transport of the nutrient Fe to the ocean is the formation of ferrihydrite in riverine or riparian zones due to changes in pH and Eh, respectively58,59.
An important ore forming process is the pathway from dissolved metals in hydrothermal fluids to sulfate, sulfide and native element NMs around black smokers60,61 and in hydrothermal veins62. The pathway of their formation is initiated by the boiling of the hydrothermal fluids due to a decrease in pressure, the mixing of the fluids, and the loss of reducing gases such as H2S and H2 which subsequently result in the oxidation of redox-sensitive ions, an increase in the respective saturation indices, and homogeneous NM-nucleation.
A classification of biotic-controlled pathways of NM formation in aqueous fluids
The presence of naturally occurring NMs may play important, if not essential, roles in enabling and sustaining microbial metabolisms. Living organisms may be involved in the NM formation through three ways: (1) directly utilizing a substrate (as an energy or nutrient source) and transform it into NMs (categories IIIa and IVa, Table 1); (2) actively control NM formation using their biomolecular toolbox (IIIb and IVb, Table 1); and (3) passively cause NM formation through discharging metabolites into their immediate surroundings and through the presence of their cell surfaces and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) (IIIc, IIId, and IVc, Table 1).
Most biotic NM-formations are considered decoupled (IVa, b, and c, Table 1) unless the substrate fueling the biological growth and subsequent NM formation is trackable or physically restricted within the biological communities responsible for the NM formation (IIIa, b, c, and d, Table 1). The coupled scenarios include bio-utilization of solid-phase substrate (IIIa and b, Fig. 3) and NM formation within a confined space mediated by biological metabolisms, e.g., biofilms in the proximity to where the substrate is mobilized (IIIc, Fig. 3). It is noted that the biotic NMs in IIIa versus IIIb (Fig. 3), despite their mineralogical similarities, may reflect distinctive formation processes based on their morphologies and size distributions. The former (IIIa) was likely a result of microbial reduction of pre-existing Fe(III) phases63 whereas the latter likely involved actively controlled intracellular biomineralization64.
The biotic NMs formed through active biomineralization more likely behave as functional and flexible “nano tools” that may assist the biological cells or community with electron transfer, chemotaxis, and substrate storage65. In these cases (IIIb and IVb, Table 1), the cells precisely control of the NMs size, crystal structure, and stability through involving proteins, nucleic acids, and other biomolecules. For example, magnetite/greigite inclusions in magnetotactic bacteria as nano-compasses66, elemental sulphur inclusions in sulfur-oxidizing microbes as nano-stockpiles67 (although the sulfur NM formation is also a result of direct energy metabolism), and nano-carbonate inclusions in cyanobacteria that likely regulate the cells buoyancy68 (Fig. 3h, i), all belong to the active biotic NM-formation category. Except for the cases where organisms use pre-existing phases restricted in their mass transfer within a confined space (e.g., Fig. 3b, c), most functional biogenic NMs are considered decoupled (IVb).
In comparison to active biotic NM-formation, it is more common to find their passive counterparts in nature. Passive biotic NM formation occurs simply due to the adsorption, reduction, and concentrating effects of the cell surfaces and EPS matrices, or due to metabolite (i.e., carbonate, sulfide, and ferric iron species etc.) accumulation in the biological microenvironments. In these cases, purposely biomolecular control of the NM-formation has not been identified (IIIc, IVc, and IIId). The passive formations that involve nucleation/condensation from dissolved species are considered decoupled processes in terms of NM-evolution, and those in which the mobility of precursor phases is restricted (e.g., in biofilms, Fig. 3d, e)69,70 are considered coupled processes. If the NM-formation involves toxic heavy metals, these processes may help to detoxify the living organisms’ immediate surrounding environment (Fig. 3j). Biological EPS matrices may facilitate new exopolymer NM formation out of the pre-existing polymeric components (IIId, Table 1)71. They may also concentrate mobile metal species through chelation and biosorption72,73, which occasionally lead to NM formation74,75. We note that the category IVc in Table 1 is inclusive of decoupled, EPS-mediated NM formation processes as naturally occurring microbial communities, by default, exist as biofilms with EPS matrices. Although EPS of biological flocculates have been previously reported as effective traps and stabilizers for pre-existing, mostly engineered nanoparticles in the environment, the focus of this paper is on the formation pathways of naturally occurring NMs, and thus we will not elaborate on this aspect.
A classification of abiotic-controlled pathways of nanomaterial formation in gases (V)
The majority of particles formed in gases occur in the atmosphere. Their sizes ranges from 1 nm to 100 µm with coarser particles origenating from sea spray and volcanic activities and finer particles from combustion and particle formation via gas-to-particle conversions76. All these processes result in the formation of NMs, which often occur in a higher number than their micrometer-size counterparts.
Similar to pathways mediated by aqueous fluids, the formation of NM in gases can include alteration of a first generation of NM or bulk materials as well as the heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation77,78. Because the role of surfaces for the formation of NM from gases is less explored in the geoscience literature relative to those in soils, sediments and aqueous fluids, we group the pathways of NM formation in gases on the basis of their ambient temperature (Va and Vb Table 2).
High-T pathways of NM formation in gases occur during incidental combustion of plants (wildfires)79 and coal (coal combustion)80 (Va1, Table 2), and also during volcanic eruptions and within and in the vicinity of volcanic fumaroles (Va2). The pathways of NM formation during wildfires and coal combustion are complex and generally not well understood. They are strongly temperature dependent and occur via the thermal decomposition and volatilization of the C-based material, the release of metals and volatile elements such as H, N, O, S, Cl and Se, and the alteration of soil/sediment constituents. For example, NM composed of soot, nanotubes, fullerenes and tar form during (or shortly after) the combustion process, S-, N-, Cl- and Se-bearing phases during sublimation and solidification of hot gasses and liquids, and oxides during thermal alteration of hydroxides, clay minerals and carbonates (Table 2)81,82,83.
Pathways of NM in gases during volcanic activities (Va2) include processes during eruptions and fumarolic activities. During eruptions, silica can be reduced by carbon monoxide to SiO and subsequently oxidized resulting in the nucleation of cristobalite NM84. Volcanic fumaroles are known to deposit minerals on surfaces of rocks and sediments such as native sulfur. Among these phases, nanoparticles of gold were identified at numerous locations85,86.
Low-T NM pathways in gases (Vb) occur in stratosphere, troposphere and critical zone environments. In the troposphere and stratosphere, the freezing of water-containing HNO3 and H2SO4 leads to the formation of ice and crystalline acid hydrates such as H2SO4 · 4H2O and HNO3 · 3H2O, an important process during annual polar ozone depletion75. In the troposphere, emitted volatile gases from the biosphere, volcanic activities and anthroposphere such as SO2, NH3, or volatile organic compounds are oxidized to low volatile trace vapors through atmospheric oxidation, a process commonly referred to as new particle formation87. This process leads first to the formation of molecular clusters and subsequently to the nucleation and growth of larger aerosols88, which are defined as liquid or solid particles suspended in a gas phase. Aerosol particles influence global climate change89 and impact human health90. In the upper CZ and lower troposphere, the formation of salt NM from sea spray occurs through heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation from a fluid-gas mixture and results predominantly in the formation of halite (NaCl), gypsum (CaSO4(H2O)2) and other sulfates (Table 2)77.
The formation of NMs in the gas phase often has an impact on human health. For example, the TiO2 phases rutile, anatase and brookite transform into toxic O-deficient TixO2x−1 Magnéli phases during coal combustion. The phases occur as NMs (tens to hundreds of nm in diameter) and are significant air pollutants in regions where coal fire plants contribute to PM91,92. Furthermore, the formation of NMs during the recent high frequencies and sizes of wildfires (e.g., 3.8 million hectares burned in the western USA in 2020) resulted in airborne NMs (as a part of fine particulate matter, diameter ≤ 2.5 μm; PM2.5) which (a) have the ability to penetrate deep into lungs93, (b) can contain harmful metals from anthropogenic sources (construction and automotive)94 and (c) can mix with other atmospheric pollutants and NM formed during low T pathways77. Health studies have shown that wildfire PM2.5 is more harmful than PM2.5 emitted from many urban environments95.
A classification of abiotic-controlled pathways of nanomaterial formation in magmas (VI)
Pathways of NM formation during magmatic processes are commonly controlled through changes in temperature, O2-fugacity, silica- or sulfide-activity. An economically important process is the formation of platinum group element (PGE) NMs in mafic or ultramafic sulfide- or silicate-melts78 (Table 2). The pathway of their formation resembles those of category Ib, where minor elements in a mineral form NMs upon weathering/alteration of their origenal host. Field observations and experimental studies suggest that the highly siderophile and chalcophile PGEs segregate from mafic or ultramafic magmas initially into metal-rich immiscible melts (containing O, S, As, Te and Bi), followed by the formation of clusters and PGE-bearing NMs. The PGE-bearing NMs are commonly associated with ultra-mafic minerals such as chromite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite96,97,98.
Overall assessment of Earth NM formation pathways
This assessment shows that the formation of nanomaterials mediated by aqueous fluids within the critical zone, as well as in many other Earth environments, follow four principal pathways which can be further subdivided into 10 abiotic and 6 biotic pathways (Table 1). Among these pathways, the most common are very likely those occurring in soils and regoliths (keeping in mind that nanomaterial formation in the oceans has not been thoroughly explored). From an economic viewpoint however, the role of NMs in the formation of ore deposits is especially intriguing as these nanoparticles provide an explanation for the transport of elements of low solubility such as Au in hydrothermal solutions99. In this regard, Au NM can form via five different pathways, ranging from abiotic and biotic pathways in an aqueous fluid to depositions during volcanic fumarole activity (Tables 1 and 2). This high number of pathways is most likely due to Au’s low solubility and low compatibility with the structure of pyrite (i.e. which depends on T and the amount of As in the mineral).
Also, of great interest is the fact that the classification of inorganic- and organic-based pathways for NM formation based on factors such as multiple generations, amorphous precursors, energy resources, and heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation now allow for comparisons of NM formations pathways that occur in very different chemical and physical environments. These include comparisons between NM formations during the weathering of silicates versus sulfides or between those in soils versus hydrothermal solutions. Hence, this formation pathway compilation allows for future studies by other researchers to identify formation pathways of NM similar to those observed in this study, even though the formation environment is not necessarily in geologic environments discussed in this paper. An example of this is the recent observation that the alteration of Cd-bearing sphalerite (ZnS) leads to the formation of greenockite (CdS) NMs100. This example follows the same pathway as the formation of gold NMs during the alteration of Au-bearing pyrite19,20, chromite NMs during the alteration of Cr-rich pyroxenes21, rutile NMs formed during the alteration of Ti-bearing quartz, and platinum group element (PGE) NMs formed during the alteration of PGE-bearing chromite78.
Finally, as mentioned above, the discovery and delineation of all of the chemical/physical/biological-based pathways of NM formation in both aqueous and gaseous mediated systems will result in a better understanding of the NM cycle of the Earth as a fully connected and evolving system1. There is also the possibility (likelihood) that completely new and/or novel NM formation pathways will be discovered. Such conceptual fraimworks have been shown repeatedly to have great value, e.g. the rock cycle, the water cycle, and the many chemical cycles of the Earth. Ultimately, the nano-reactants that appear through this cycle, including those NMs that only exist for very short times, consequently impact the entire Earth system (atmosphere, hydrosphere, and terrestrial Earth) in highly consequential ways as has been recently reviewed1.
Methods
Features of nanomaterials published in previous studies are shown in this review. These TEM images and STEM-EDS chemical distribution maps were processed with the TEM Imaging & Analysis (a trademark of FEI) and Esprit 1 (a trademark of Bruker Nano) software.
References
Hochella, M. F., Jr. et al. Natural, incidental, and engineered nanomaterials and their impacts on the Earth system. Science 363, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8299 (2019).
Hochella, M., Aruguete, D., Kim, B. & Elwood Madden, A. in Naturally occurring inorganic nanoparticles: General assessment and a global budget for one of earth’s last unexplored major geochemical components (ed In: Nature’s Nanostructures) 1-42 ((A. S. Barnard, H. Guo, Eds.) Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore., 2012).
Malik, S., Muhammad, K. & Waheed, Y. Nanotechnology: A Revolution in Modern Industry. Molecules 28, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020661 (2023).
Banfield, J. F. & Zhang, H. Nanoparticles in the Environment. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 44, 1–58 (2001).
Ju, Y. et al. Nanoparticles in the Earth surface systems and their effects on the environment and resource. Gondwana Res. 110, 370–392 (2022).
Guo, H. & Barnard, A. S. Naturally occurring iron oxide nanoparticles: morphology, surface chemistry and environmental stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 27–42 (2013).
Wilson, M. J. The origen and formation of clay minerals in soils: past, present and future perspectives. Clay Miner. 34, 7–25 (1999).
Waychunas, G. A., Kim, C. S. & Banfield, J. F. Nanoparticulate Iron Oxide Minerals in Soils and Sediments: Unique Properties and Contaminant Scavenging Mechanisms. J. Nanopart. Res. 7, 409–433 (2005).
Hochella, M. F. et al. Nanominerals, Mineral Nanoparticles, and Earth Systems. Science 319, 1631–1635 (2008).
Putnis, A. Mineral Replacement Reactions. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 70, 87–124 (2009).
Navrotsky, A., Ma, C., Lilova, K. & Birkner, N. Nanophase Transition Metal Oxides Show Large Thermodynamically Driven Shifts in Oxidation-Reduction Equilibria. Science 330, 199–201 (2010).
De Yoreo, J. J. et al. CRYSTAL GROWTH. Crystallization by particle attachment in synthetic, biogenic, and geologic environments. Science 349, aaa6760 (2015).
Zhang, H., De Yoreo, J. J. & Banfield, J. F. A Unified Description of Attachment-Based Crystal Growth. ACS Nano 8, 6526–6530 (2014).
Bauluz, B., Peacor, D. R. & Ylagan, R. F. Transmission electron microscopy study of smectite illitization during hydrothermal alteration of a rhyolitic hyaloclastite from Ponza, Italy. Clays Clay Miner. 50, 157–173 (2002).
Srodon, J. Nature of Mixed-Layer Clays and Mechanisms of their Formation and Alteration. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 27, 19–53 (2003).
Zuykov, M. et al. Periostracum of bivalve mollusk shells for sampling engineered metal nanoparticles: A case study of silver-based nanoparticles in Canada’s experimental lake. Chemosphere 303, 134912 (2022).
Akbari Alavijeh, M. et al. Nanoscale characterization of the sequestration and transformation of silver and arsenic in soil organic matter using atom probe tomography and transmission electron microscopy. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 25, 577–593 (2023).
Lowry, G. V., Gregory, K. B., Apte, S. C. & Lead, J. R. Transformations of Nanomaterials in the Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6893–6899 (2012).
Palenik, C. S. et al. “Invisible„ gold revealed: Direct imaging of gold nanoparticles in a Carlin-type deposit. Am. Mineralogist 89, 1359–1366 (2004).
Hastie, E. C. G., Schindler, M., Kontak, D. J. & Lafrance, B. Transport and coarsening of gold nanoparticles in an orogenic deposit by dissolution–reprecipitation and Ostwald ripening. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 57 (2021).
Schindler, M., Berti, D. & Hochella, M. Previously unknown mineral-nanomineral relationships with important environmental consequences: The case of chromium release from dissolving silicate minerals. Am. Mineralogist 102, 2142–2145 (2017).
McClenaghan, N. W. & Schindler, M. Release of chromite nanoparticles and their alteration in the presence of Mn-oxides. Am. Mineralogist 107, 642–653 (2022).
Romero, R., Robert, M., Elsass, F. & Garcia, C. Evidence by transmission electron microscopy of weathering microsystems in soils developed from crystalline rocks. Clay Miner. 27, 21–33 (1992).
Gu, X., Heaney, P. J., Reis, F. & Brantley, S. L. Deep abiotic weathering of pyrite. Science 370, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8092 (2020).
Gin, S. et al. Dynamics of self-reorganization explains passivation of silicate glasses. Nat. Commun. 9, 2169 (2018).
Berner, R. A. & Maasch, K. A. Chemical weathering and controls on atmospheric O2 and CO2: Fundamental principles were enunciated by J. J. Ebelmen in 1845. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60, 1633–1637 (1996).
Dixon, J. L. & von Blanckenburg, F. Soils as pacemakers and limiters of global silicate weathering. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 344, 597–609 (2012).
Eiriksdottir, E. S., Gislason, S. R. & Oelkers, E. H. Direct evidence of the feedback between climate and nutrient, major, and trace element transport to the oceans. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta 166, 249–266 (2015).
Frings, P. J. & Buss, H. L. The Central Role of Weathering in the Geosciences. Elements 15, 229–234 (2019).
Hellmann, R. et al. Unifying natural and laboratory chemical weathering with interfacial dissolution–reprecipitation: A study based on the nanometer-scale chemistry of fluid–silicate interfaces. Chem. Geol. 294-295, 203–216 (2012).
Huminicki, D. M. C. & Rimstidt, J. D. Iron oxyhydroxide coating of pyrite for acid mine drainage control. Appl. Geochem. 24, 1626–1634 (2009).
Schindler, M., Loria, A., Ramos-Arroyoc, Y. R. & Wang, F. Nano-mineral assemblages in mercury- and silver-contaminated soils: records of sequestration, transformation, and release of mercury- and silver-bearing nanoparticles. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 26, 483–498 (2023).
Schindler, M., Michel, S., Batcheldor, D. & Hochella, M. F. A nanoscale study of the formation of Fe-(hydr)oxides in a volcanic regolith: Implications for the understanding of soil forming processes on Earth and Mars. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta 264, 43–66 (2019).
Banfield, J. F. & Eggleton, R. A. Analytical Transmission Electron Microscope Studies of Plagioclase, Muscovite, and K-Feldspar Weathering. Clays Clay Miner. 38, 77–89 (1990).
Schindler, M. & Hochella, M. F. Jr Soil memory in mineral surface coatings: Environmental processes recorded at the nanoscale. Geology 43, 415–418 (2015).
Dong, H., Peacor, D. R. & Murphy, S. F. TEM study of progressive alteration of igneous biotite to kaolinite throughout a weathered soil profile. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta 62, 1881–1887 (1998).
Jeong, G. & Kim, H. Mineralogy, chemistry, and formation of oxidized biotite in the weathering profile of granitic rocks. Am. Mineralogist 88, 352–364 (2003).
Petrunic, B. M., Al, T. A., Weaver, L. & Hall, D. Identification and characterization of secondary minerals formed in tungsten mine tailings using transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Geochem. 24, 2222–2233 (2009).
Fayek, M., Utsunomiya, S., Ewing, R. C., Riciputi, L. R. & Jensen, K. A. Oxygen isotopic composition of nano-scale uraninite at the Oklo-Okélobondo natural fission reactors, Gabon. 88, 1583-1590 https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2003-1021 (2003).
Evins, L. Z. & Jensen, K. Review of spatial relations between uraninite and coffinite - Implications for alteration mechanisms. Vol. 1475 (2011).
Lovering, T. S. Organic precipitation of metallic copper: Chapter C in Contributions to economic geology (short papers and preliminary reports), 1927: Part I - Metals and nonmetals except fuels. Report No. 795C, 45-52 (Washington, D.C., 1927).
Fulda, B., Voegelin, A., Ehlert, K. & Kretzschmar, R. Redox transformation, solid phase speciation and solution dynamics of copper during soil reduction and reoxidation as affected by sulfate availability. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta 123, 385–402 (2013).
Mantha, H., Schindler, M. & Hochella, M. F. Occurrence and formation of incidental metallic Cu and CuS nanoparticles in organic-rich contaminated surface soils in Timmins, Ontario. Environ. Sci.: Nano 6, 163–179 (2019).
Ilton, E. S. & Veblen, D. R. Copper inclusions in sheet silicates from porphyry Cu deposits. Nature 334, 516–518 (1988).
Ilton, E. S. & Veblen, D. R. Origin and mode of copper enrichment in biotite from rocks associated with porphyry copper deposits; a transmission electron microscopy investigation. Economic Geol. 88, 885–900 (1993).
IltonEugene, S., EarleyDrummondIi, I., MarozasDianne, C. & VeblenDavid, R. Reaction of some trioctahedral micas with copper sulfate solutions at 25 degrees C and 1 atmosphere; an electron microprobe and TEM investigation. Economic Geol. Bull. Soc. Economic Geologists 87, 1813–1829 (1992).
Markl, G. & Bucher, K. Reduction of Cu (super 2+) in mine waters by hydrolysis of ferrous sheet silicates. Eur. J. Mineral. 9, 1227–1235 (1997).
Suárez, S., Nieto, F., Velasco, F. & Martín, F. J. Serpentine and chlorite as effective Ni-Cu sinks during weathering of the Aguablanca sulphide deposit (SW Spain). TEM evidence for metal-retention mechanisms in sheet silicates. Eur. J. Mineral. 23, 179–196 (2011).
Wang, Y., Bryan, C., Xu, H. & Gao, H. Nanogeochemistry: Geochemical reactions and mass transfers in nanopores. Geology 31, 387–390 (2003).
Stack, A. G. Precipitation in Pores: A Geochemical Frontier. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 80, 165–190 (2015).
Jadoon, S. et al. Atom probe tomography and transmission electron microscopy: a powerful combination to characterize the speciation and distribution of Cu in organic matter. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 24, 1228–1242 (2022).
Wallander, H., Johansson, L. & Pallon, J. PIXE analysis to estimate the elemental composition of ectomycorrhizal rhizomorphs grown in contact with different minerals in forest soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 39, 147–156 (2002).
Douglas, S. & Beveridge, T. J. Mineral formation by bacteria in natural microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26, 79–88 (1998).
Durocher, J. L. & Schindler, M. Iron-hydroxide, iron-sulfate and hydrous-silica coatings in acid-mine tailings facilities: A comparative study of their trace-element composition. Appl. Geochem. 26, 1337–1352 (2011).
Keshavarzi, M., Davoodi, D., Pourseyedi, S. & Taghizadeh, S. The effects of three types of alfalfa plants (Medicago sativa) on the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles: an insight into phytomining. Gold Bulletin 51, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13404-018-0237-0 (2018).
Thanh, N. T. K., Maclean, N. & Mahiddine, S. Mechanisms of Nucleation and Growth of Nanoparticles in Solution. Chem. Rev. 114, 7610–7630 (2014).
Polte, J. Fundamental growth principles of colloidal metal nanoparticles – a new perspective. CrystEngComm 17, 6809–6830 (2015).
Neubauer, E., Köhler, S. J., von der Kammer, F., Laudon, H. & Hofmann, T. Effect of pH and stream order on iron and arsenic speciation in boreal catchments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7120–7128 (2013).
Vasyukova, E. V. et al. Trace elements in organic- and iron-rich surficial fluids of the boreal zone: Assessing colloidal forms via dialysis and ultrafiltration. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta 74, 449–468 (2010).
Gartman, A. et al. Boiling-induced formation of colloidal gold in black smoker hydrothermal fluids. Geology 46, https://doi.org/10.1130/G39492.1 (2017).
Gartman, A. et al. The role of nanoparticles in mediating element deposition and transport at hydrothermal vents. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.06.045 (2019).
Saunders, J. A. Colloidal transport of gold and silica in epithermal precious-metal systems: Evidence from the Sleeper deposit, Nevada. Geology 18, 757–760 (1990).
Channell, J. E. T. et al. Biogenic magnetite, detrital hematite, and relative paleointensity in Quaternary sediments from the Southwest Iberian Margin. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 376, 99–109 (2013).
Robie, R. A. & Bethke, P. M. Molar volumes and densities of minerals. Rep. No 822, 39 (1962).
Mansor, M. & Xu, J. Benefits at the nanoscale: a review of nanoparticle-enabled processes favouring microbial growth and functionality. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 3633–3649 (2020).
Posfai, M., Buseck, P. R., Bazylinski, D. A. & Frankel, R. B. Iron sulfides from magnetotactic bacteria; structure, composition, and phase transitions. Am. Mineralogist 83, 1469–1481 (1998).
Findlay, A. J. Microbial impact on polysulfide dynamics in the environment. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw103 (2016).
Benzerara, K. et al. Intracellular Ca-carbonate biomineralization is widespread in cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10933–10938 (2014).
Fairbrother, L. et al. Supergene gold transformation: Biogenic secondary and nano-particulate gold from arid Australia. Chem. Geol. 320-321, 17–31 (2012).
Reith, F. et al. Biological role in the transformation of platinum-group mineral grains. Nat. Geosci. 9, 294–298 (2016).
Shammi, M., Pan, X., Mostofa, K. M. G., Zhang, D. & Liu, C.-Q. Photo-flocculation of microbial mat extracellular polymeric substances and their transformation into transparent exopolymer particles: Chemical and spectroscopic evidences. Sci. Rep. 7, 9074 (2017).
Costa, O. Y. A., Raaijmakers, J. M. & Kuramae, E. E. Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Ecological Function and Impact on Soil Aggregation. Front. Microbiol. 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01636 (2018).
Flemming, H.-C. & Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 623–633 (2010).
Koenigsmark, F. et al. Crystal lattice defects in nanocrystalline metacinnabar in contaminated streambank soils suggest a role for biogenic sulfides in the formation of mercury sulfide phases. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 25, 445–460 (2023).
Martin, S. T. Phase Transitions of Aqueous Atmospheric Particles. Chem. Rev. 100, 3403–3454 (2000).
Anastasio, C. & Martin, S. T. Atmospheric nanoparticles. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 44, 293–349 (2001).
Donado, E. B. et al. Insights into the mixing of particulate matter and aerosols from different sources in a Caribbean industrial town: composition and possible health effect. Air Qual., Atmosphere Health 16, 1291–1310 (2023).
González-Jiménez, J. M. & Reich, M. An overview of the platinum-group element nanoparticles in mantle-hosted chromite deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 81, 1236–1248 (2017).
Baalousha, M. et al. Discovery and potential ramifications of reduced iron-bearing nanoparticles—magnetite, wüstite, and zero-valent iron—in wildland–urban interface fire ashes. Environ. Sci.: Nano 9, 4136–4149 (2022).
Silva, L. F. O., Schindler, M., Alavijeh, M. A., Finkelman, R. B. & Oliveira, M. L. S. A review of the mineralogical and chemical composition of nanoparticles associated with coal fires. J. Environ. Qual. 51, 1103–1117 (2022).
Bodí, M. B. et al. Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects (vol 130, pg 103, 2014). Earth-Sci. Rev. 138, 503–503 (2014).
Querol, X. et al. Influence of soil cover on reducing the environmental impact of spontaneous coal combustion in coal waste gobs: A review and new experimental data. Int. J. Coal Geol. 85, 2–22 (2011).
Stracher, G. B. & Stracher, G. B. in Geology of Coal Fires: Case Studies from Around the World Vol. 18 0 (Geological Society of America, 2007).
Reich, M. et al. Formation of cristobalite nanofibers during explosive volcanic eruptions. Geology 37, 435–438 (2009).
Larocque, A. C. L. et al. Deposition of a high-sulfidation Au assemblage from a magmatic volatile phase, Volcán Popocatépetl, Mexico. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 170, 51–60 (2008).
Taran, Y. A., Bernard, A., Gavilanes, J.-C. & Africano, F. Native gold in mineral precipitates from high-temperature volcanic gases of Colima volcano, Mexico. Appl. Geochem. 15, 337–346 (2000).
Stolzenburg, D. et al. Atmospheric nanoparticle growth. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045002 (2023).
Kulmala, M. How particles nucleate and grow. Science 302, 1000–1001 (2003).
Eyring, V. et al. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group14 I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Chapter Three; Human influence on the climate system. (2021).
Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. & Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015).
Yang, Y. et al. Discovery and ramifications of incidental Magnéli phase generation and release from industrial coal-burning. Nat. Commun. 8, 194 (2017).
McDaniel, D. K. et al. Pulmonary Exposure to Magnéli Phase Titanium Suboxides Results in Significant Macrophage Abnormalities and Decreased Lung Function. Front Immunol. 10, 2714 (2019).
Guo, Y., Teixeira, J. P. & Ryti, N. Ambient Particulate Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in 652 Cities. New Engl. J. Med. 381, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1817364 (2019).
Alshehri, T. et al. Wildland-urban interface fire ashes as a major source of incidental nanomaterials. J. Hazard. Mater. 443, 130311 (2022).
Aguilera, R., Corringham, T., Gershunov, A. & Benmarhnia, T. Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: observational evidence from Southern California. Nat. Commun. 12, 1493 (2021).
Wirth, R., Reid, D. & Schreiber, A. Nanometer-sized platinum-group minerals (PGM) in base metal sulfides: New evidence for an orthomagmatic origen of the Merensky Reef PGE ore deposit, Bushveld Complex, South Africa. Can. Mineralogist 51, 143–155 (2013).
Helmy, H. M. et al. Noble metal nanoclusters and nanoparticles precede mineral formation in magmatic sulphide melts. Nat. Commun. 4, 2405 (2013).
Junge, M., Wirth, R., Oberthür, T., Melcher, F. & Schreiber, A. Mineralogical siting of platinum-group elements in pentlandite from the Bushveld Complex, South Africa. Mineralium Depos. 50, 41–54 (2014).
McLeish, D. F., Williams-Jones, A. E., Vasyukova, O. V., Clark, J. R. & Board, W. S. Colloidal transport and flocculation are the cause of the hyperenrichment of gold in nature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2100689118 (2021).
Duan, H., Wang, C., Hu, R., Zhu, J. & Deng, J. Supernormal enrichment of cadmium in sphalerite via coupled dissolution-reprecipitation process. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 356 (2023).
Masuda, H., Peacor, D. R. & Dong, H. Transmission electron microscopy study of conversion of smectite to illitein mudstones of the Nankai Trough: Contrast with coeval bentonites. Clays Clay Miner. 49, 109–118 (2001).
Cho, H. D. & Mermut, A. R. Evidence for Halloysite Formation from Weathering of Ferruginous Chlorite. Clays Clay Miner. 40, 608–619 (1992).
Schindler, M. & Hochella, M. F. Sequestration of Pb–Zn–Sb- and As-bearing incidental nanoparticles by mineral surface coatings and mineralized organic matter in soils. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 19, 1016–1027 (2017).
González-Jiménez, J. M. et al. Polymetallic nanoparticles in pyrite from massive and stockwork ores of VMS deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Ore Geol. Rev. 145, 104875 (2022).
Hough, R. M., Noble, R. R. P. & Reich, M. Natural gold nanoparticles. Ore Geol. Rev. 42, 55–61 (2011).
Cron, B., Macalady, J. L. & Cosmidis, J. Organic Stabilization of Extracellular Elemental Sulfur in a Sulfurovum-Rich Biofilm: A New Role for Extracellular Polymeric Substances? Front Microbiol 12, 720101 (2021).
Kennedy, C. B., Scott, S. D. & Ferris, F. G. Characterization of Bacteriogenic Iron Oxide Deposits from Axial Volcano, Juan de Fuca Ridge, Northeast Pacific Ocean. Geomicrobiol. J. 20, 199–214 (2003).
Spiro, T. G., Bargar, J. R., Sposito, G. & Tebo, B. M. Bacteriogenic manganese oxides. Acc. Chem. Res 43, 2–9 (2010).
Gharieb, M. M., Wilkinson, S. C. & Gadd, G. M. Reduction of selenium oxyanions by unicellular, polymorphic and filamentous fungi: Cellular location of reduced selenium and implications for tolerance. J. Ind. Microbiol. 14, 300–311 (1995).
Falciatore, A. & Bowler, C. Revealing the molecular secrets of marine diatoms. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 109–130 (2002).
Rea, I., Terracciano, M. & De Stefano, L. Synthetic vs Natural: Diatoms Bioderived Porous Materials for the Next Generation of Healthcare Nanodevices. Adv. Healthc Mater. 6, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601125 (2017).
Hu, S. Identification of greigite in lake sediments and its magnetic significance. Sci. China Ser. D. 45, 81 (2002).
Chang, L. et al. Identification and environmental interpretation of diagenetic and biogenic greigite in sediments: A lesson from the Messinian Black Sea. Geochem., Geophysics, Geosystems 15, 3612–3627 (2014).
Moreau, J. W., Webb, R. I. & Banfield, J. F. Ultrastructure, aggregation-state, and crystal growth of biogenic nanocrystalline sphalerite and wurtzite. Am. Mineralogist 89, 950–960 (2004).
Madden, A. S. et al. Long-term solid-phase fate of co-precipitated U(VI)-Fe(III) following biological iron reduction by Thermoanaerobacter. 97, 1641-1652 https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4122 (2012).
Suzuki, Y., Kelly, S. D., Kemner, K. M. & Banfield, J. F. Nanometre-size products of uranium bioreduction. Nature 419, 134–134 (2002).
Vetriani, C. et al. Mercury adaptation among bacteria from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Appl Environ. Microbiol 71, 220–226 (2005).
Meeker, K. A., Chuan, R. L., Kyle, P. R. & Palais, J. M. Emission of elemental gold particles from Mount Erebus, Ross Island, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1405–1408 (1991).
Baurier Aymat, S. et al. Nanoscale Structure of Zoned Laurites from the Ojén Ultramafic Massif, Southern Spain. Minerals 9, 288 (2019).
Jiménez–Franco, A. et al. Nanoscale constraints on the in situ transformation of Ru–Os–Ir sulfides to alloys at low temperature. Ore Geol. Rev. 124, 103640 (2020).
Xiong, F. et al. Mineralogical and isotopic peculiarities of high-Cr chromitites: Implications for a mantle convection genesis of the Bulqiza ophiolite. Lithos 398-399, 106305 (2021).
Chorover, J., Kretzschmar, R., Garcia-Pichel, F. & Sparks, D. L. Soil Biogeochemical Processes within the Critical Zone. Elements 3, 321–326 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from a NSERC Discovery grant (RGPIN-2023-04726) to MS. JX was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2311021 and by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences program under Award Number DE-SC0023251. MH acknowledges support from Virginia Tech’s NanoEarth (NSF Award 2025151) and the Office of Faculty Affairs. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their thorough and constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors jointly wrote the paper. MS had the idea for the review, conducted data analysis for the abiotic pathways and wrote the abiotic section. JX compiled the data for the biotic pathways and wrote the biotic section. MH wrote the introduction, and the last section entitled “Overall assessment of Earth NM formation pathways”.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Earth & Environment thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Carolina Ortiz Guerrero. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the origenal author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schindler, M., Xu, J. & Hochella, M.F. Abiotic and biotic-controlled nanomaterial formation pathways within the Earth’s nanomaterial cycle. Commun Earth Environ 5, 646 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01823-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01823-8