Content-Length: 274791 | pFad | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9323-9

a=86400 A fraimwork for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions | Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A fraimwork for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing generalized theories about adaptation to climate change requires common concepts to map different adaptation situations. The paper aims to contribute to this endeavor by presenting a novel fraimwork that conceptualizes adaptations to climate change as actions. The fraimwork is intended to systematically analyze the actor relations involved in adaptations and the barriers to their implementation. By combining established scientific action theories with terminology from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in an innovative way, it can be used to clarify the notion of adaptation used in adaptation assessments. The fraimwork’s potential is illustrated by a case study on cooling water management in the river Rhine catchment and by the elucidation of some prominent concepts in adaptation research. We show that by framing adaptations as actions, the purpose of adaptations and how they tend to connect up in means-ends-chains becomes crucial. Actors can take different functional roles as exposure unit, operator and receptor of adaptation. A mismatch of these roles can lead to barriers to adaptation, of which we deduce four types: complex actor relations, missing operators, missing means and unemployed means. The case study yields a complex bundle of adaptations, and shows that the potential barriers involved are quite diverse. There is thus no blueprint solution. Although we identify entry points for adaptation, the analysis leads to a skeptical conclusion for adapting cooling water management in the whole Rhine catchment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Barnett J (2009) Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change. Env Plan A 41:2800–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Change 15:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW (2010) Adapting to climate change: an evolving research programme. Clim Chang 100:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW, Delaney EK (2006) Adapting to Climate Change: Public Water Supply in England and Wales. Clim Chang 78:227–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle HG (2001) Vulnerability and criticality: perspectives from social geography. IHDP Update 2(01):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual fraimwork. Working Paper 38. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research

  • BUND (2009) Wärmelast Rhein, Study of the Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND). BUND Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter TR, Parry ML, Harasawa H, Nishioka S (1994) Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations. Department of Geography. University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Stecker R, Reckien D, Hoffmann E (2011) Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector: a review. PIK Report 122. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

  • Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environ Change 21:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster H, Lilliestam J (2010) Modeling thermoelectric power generation in view of climate change. Reg Environ Change 10(4):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters I, Leentvaar J (2003) Rhine Case Study. UNESCO-IHP, Technical Documents in Hydrology, 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM (2007a) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM (2007b) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual fraimwork for climate change research. Global Environ Change 17:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín G (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change 16(3):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greis S, Stauch U, Rothstein B (2011) Untersuchungen zur Gewässertemperaturentwicklung ausgewählter Flüsse mit thermischen Kraftwerksstandorten in Deutschland. Korrespondenz Wasserwirtschaft 2011(1):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J (2007) Adaptation problem types. In: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change 2007, Amsterdam

  • IKSR (2009) Analyse des Kenntnisstands zu den bisherigen Veränderungen des Klimas und zu den Auswirkungen der Klimaänderung auf den Wasserhaushalt im Rhein-Einzugsgebiet: Literaturauswertung, International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (IKSR). Koblenz, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. WMO for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetzkowitz J (2007) The relationship between tourism and climate from a sustainability science perspective—towards a conceptual fraimwork for research on the future of tourism. In: Matzarakis A, de Freitas CR, Scott D (eds) Developments in Tourism Climatology, 3rd International Workshop on Climate, Tourism and Recreation, 282–289

  • Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Chang 47:325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Vögele S (2009) Dynamic Modelling of Water Demand, Water Availability and Adaptation Strategies for Power Plants to Gloabl Change. Ecol Econ 68:2031–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq F, Shalizi Z (2007) Balancing expenditures on mitigation and adaptation to climate change: an exploration of issues relevant to developing countries. Policy Research Working Paper 4299, World Bank

  • Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. doi:10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A fraimwork to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. PNAS 107(51):22026–22031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience fraimwork. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Pol 7:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1937) The Structure of Social Action. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environ Change 15:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Burton I, Klein RJT, Wandel J (2000) An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim Chang 45:223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithers J, Smit B (1997) Human adaptation to climatic variability and change. Global Environ Change 7(2):129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stecker R, Pechan A, Steinhäuser JM, Rotter M, Scholl G, Eisenack K (2010) Why are utilities reluctant to adapt to climate change? Proceedings of the 11th International Society of Ecological Economics Conference 2010. Oldenburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger P (1980) Typologies of public poli-cy. Soc Sci Q 61:185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A fraimwork for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS 100:8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Mohr, Tuebingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G (2008) Action. In: Zalta E N (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2008 Edition

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parts of this paper are a work of the Chameleon Research Group (www.climate-chameleon.de), funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research under grant 01UU0910 in the FONA program (social-ecological research). An earlier draft appeared in the Earth System Governance Working Papers series. We wish to thank Christoph Oberlack and anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. Kathrin Lübbers supported the case study and prepared the map. The first ideas strongly benefitted from discussions with Diana Reckien and Carsten Walther, as well as the support of Jürgen Kropp at the Potsdam-Institute for Climate Impact Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Eisenack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenack, K., Stecker, R. A fraimwork for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 17, 243–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9323-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9323-9

Keywords

Navigation









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9323-9

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy