Content-Length: 307956 | pFad | https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1979

ma=86400 Future flood losses in major coastal cities | Nature Climate Change
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Future flood losses in major coastal cities

Abstract

Flood exposure is increasing in coastal cities1,2 owing to growing populations and assets, the changing climate3, and subsidence4,5,6. Here we provide a quantification of present and future flood losses in the 136 largest coastal cities. Using a new database of urban protection and different assumptions on adaptation, we account for existing and future flood defences. Average global flood losses in 2005 are estimated to be approximately US$6 billion per year, increasing to US$52 billion by 2050 with projected socio-economic change alone. With climate change and subsidence, present protection will need to be upgraded to avoid unacceptable losses of US$1 trillion or more per year. Even if adaptation investments maintain constant flood probability, subsidence and sea-level rise will increase global flood losses to US$60–63 billion per year in 2050. To maintain present flood risk, adaptation will need to reduce flood probabilities below present values. In this case, the magnitude of losses when floods do occur would increase, often by more than 50%, making it critical to also prepare for larger disasters than we experience today. The analysis identifies the cities that seem most vulnerable to these trends, that is, where the largest increase in losses can be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The 20 cities where the relative risk is larger in 2005, that is, where the ratio of AAL with respect to local GDP is the largest.
Figure 2: The 20 cities where AAL increase most (in relative terms in 2050 compared with 2005) in the case of optimistic sea-level rise, if adaptation only maintains present defence standards or flood probability (PD).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanson, S. et al. A global ranking of port cities with high exposure to climate extremes. Climatic Change 104, 89–111 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Sherbinin, A., Schiller, A. & Pulsipher, A. The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards. Environ. Urban. 19, 39–64 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholls, R. J. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. & Hanson, C. E.) 315–356 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholls, R. J. Coastal megacities and climate change. GeoJournal 37, 369–379 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon, T. H. et al. Space geodesy: Subsidence and flooding in New Orleans. Nature 441, 587–588 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Climate Risks and Adaptation in Asian Coastal Megacities (The World Bank, 2010).

  7. Hallegatte, S. et al. Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: A case study on Copenhagen. Climatic Change 104, 113–137 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. http://nolarisk.usace.army.mil/.

  9. Link, L. E. The anatomy of a disaster, an overview of Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans. Ocean Eng. 37, 4–12 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallegatte, S. An Exploration of the Link between Development, Economic Growth, and Natural Risk Policy Research Working Paper No. 6216 (The World Bank, 2012).

  11. Evans, E. et al. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. 159, 53–61 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kabat, P. et al. Dutch coasts in transition. Nature Geosci. 2, 450–452 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kates, R. W., Colten, C. E., Laska, S. & Leatherman, S. P. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14653–14660 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ammerman, A. J. & McClennen, C. E. Saving Venice. Science 289, 1301–1302 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholls, R., Brown, S., Hanson, S. & Hinkel, J. Economics of Coastal Zone Adaptation to Climate Change (The World Bank, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peduzzi, P. et al. Global trends in tropical cyclone risk. Nature Clim. Change 2, 289–294 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium (The World Bank, 2010).

  18. Vafeidis, A. T. et al. A new global coastal database for impact and vulnerability analysis to sea-level rise. J. Coast. Res. 917–924 (2008).

  19. Chateau, J., Rebolledo, C. & Dellink, R. An Economic Projection to 2050: The OECD ‘ENV-Linkages’ Model Baseline No. 41 (OECD, 2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

These are early results from an ongoing OECD research project. The authors acknowledge support from the OECD for this research and support from J. Chateau to provide the socio-economic scenario data from the OECD’s ENV-Linkages model. C.G. acknowledges support from the AVOID project. The views shared in this article represent those of the authors and are not intended to represent the views of the OECD or of its Member countries, or the view of World Bank, its executive directors, or the countries they represent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The four authors designed the study, interpreted results and authored the paper. S.H. developed and ran the models. R.N. and C.G. provided expert input on depth–damage curves and coastal protection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephane Hallegatte.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. et al. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Clim Change 3, 802–806 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1979

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1979

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1979

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy