-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the WebRTC ICE Server config format #593
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant WebRTCHandler
participant STUNServer
Client->>WebRTCHandler: Request STUN server URLs
WebRTCHandler->>STUNServer: Fetch STUN server URLs
STUNServer-->>WebRTCHandler: Return STUN server URLs
WebRTCHandler-->>Client: Return JSON response with { urls: stunDomain }
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/webrtc.ts (3)
Line range hint
54-59
: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for improvementThe modification correctly addresses the PR objective by changing the
urls
value to a string instead of an array. This aligns with the WebRTC specification and simplifies the response structure.Consider further simplifying the response structure by removing the outer array, as it's no longer necessary with a single ICE server:
- return new Response(JSON.stringify([{ urls: stunDomain }]), { + return new Response(JSON.stringify({ urls: stunDomain }), { headers: { "content-type": "application/json;charset=UTF-8", "Access-Control-Allow-Origin": "*", }, });This change would make the response even more straightforward while still adhering to the WebRTC specification.
Line range hint
38-41
: Enhance error responses with informative messagesWhile the current error handling covers basic cases, it could be more informative to help with debugging and client-side error handling.
Consider modifying the error responses to include descriptive messages:
if (request.method !== "GET") { - return new Response(null, { status: 405 }); + return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: "Method Not Allowed" }), { + status: 405, + headers: { "content-type": "application/json" } + }); } if (requestUrl.pathname !== "/webrtc/ice_servers") { - return new Response(null, { status: 404 }); + return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: "Not Found" }), { + status: 404, + headers: { "content-type": "application/json" } + }); } if (!request.cf) { - return new Response(null, { status: 400 }); + return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: "Bad Request: Missing Cloudflare metadata" }), { + status: 400, + headers: { "content-type": "application/json" } + }); }This change would provide more context in error scenarios, aiding in troubleshooting and improving the API's usability.
Line range hint
54-59
: Add error handling for JSON stringificationThe current implementation doesn't handle potential errors that could occur during JSON stringification. While unlikely, it's a good practice to handle such cases.
Consider wrapping the response creation in a try-catch block:
- return new Response(JSON.stringify([{ urls: stunDomain }]), { - headers: { - "content-type": "application/json;charset=UTF-8", - "Access-Control-Allow-Origin": "*", - }, - }); + try { + return new Response(JSON.stringify([{ urls: stunDomain }]), { + headers: { + "content-type": "application/json;charset=UTF-8", + "Access-Control-Allow-Origin": "*", + }, + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error stringifying response:", error); + return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: "Internal Server Error" }), { + status: 500, + headers: { + "content-type": "application/json;charset=UTF-8", + "Access-Control-Allow-Origin": "*", + }, + }); + }This change ensures that any unexpected errors during response creation are caught and handled gracefully.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/services/webrtc.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/webrtc.handler.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/webrtc.handler.spec.ts (6)
Pattern
*/**(html|markdown|md)
: - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.
- Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
- In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
- In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
- In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
- do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'
Pattern
*/**(html|markdown|md)
: - Use bold to mark UI strings.
- If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.
Pattern
*/**(html|markdown|md)
: - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"
Pattern
*/**(html|markdown|md)
: - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.
Pattern
*/**(html|markdown|md)
: do not comment on HTML used for icons
Pattern
*/**(html|markdown|md)
: Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/webrtc.handler.spec.ts (1)
42-42
: LGTM: Test assertion updated to match new ICE Server config format.This change correctly updates the test assertion to expect a string value for the
urls
property instead of an array. This aligns well with the PR objective of fixing the WebRTC ICE Server config format.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed that too, thx. 👍
Despite the
urls
being plural in the response, the value should be a string, not a list.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes