docs: slightly improve search experience #1576
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nice modification! Could we exclude HTTP client from search too, similarly as it was done in v4? |
|
Depends on the other maintainers. I like the idea, but wanted to play it safe here. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Type
Description
This PR slightly improves the search experience by boosting the guides to appear more predominantly in search results and removing index pages from being able to be indexed.
Unfortunately, the search is still pretty bad, but it's better than before.
Changes
See diff and description.
Related Issues
Test Scenarios
Python Compatibility
3.10.x3.11.xChecklist
pre-commitcode linter over all edited files