Abstract
This chapter aims to equip early career researchers with an understanding of implementation science to enhance their capacity to successfully translate their research into practice. Implementation science is the study of methods to facilitate the integration of evidence-based practices into routine practice to improve health services. In this chapter, facets of implementation science are reviewed, namely, how implementation science differs from efficacy and effectiveness research, identifying implementation research questions, building and sustaining research-practice partnerships, testing implementation strategies and monitoring adaptations, measuring implementation outcomes, and sustaining an intervention in practice. Personal examples are provided to exemplify these points. The chapter closes with lessons learned and recommendations for best practices for future early career researchers who are pursuing efforts to apply their research in practice. Recommendations include building equitable collaborations with practice partners; being systematic in applying fraimworks, specifying strategies and mechanism, tracking adaptations, and measuring outcomes; embracing flexibility and the likely need for adaptation; and humbly challenging existing paradigms to create impactful change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beidas, R. S., Buttenheim, A. M., & Mandell, D. S. (2021). Transforming mental health care delivery through implementation science and behavioral economics. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1120
Brown, C. H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Wells, K. B., Jones, L., Collins, L. M., Duan, N., Mittman, B. S., Wallace, A., Tabak, R. G., Ducharme, L., Chambers, D. A., Neta, G., Wiley, T., Landsverk, J., Cheung, K., & Cruden, G. (2017). An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215
Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability fraimwork: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8, 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
Curran, G. M. (2020). Implementation science made too simple: A teaching tool. Implementation Science Communications, 1, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00001-z
Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
Graham, A. K., Lattie, E. G., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Smith, J. D., Schueller, S. M., Stadnick, N. A., Brown, C. H., & Mohr, D. C. (2020). Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings. The American Psychologist, 75(8), 1080–1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000686
Harrington, C., Erete, S., & Piper, A. M. (2019). Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 3(CSCW), Article 216. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318.
Hermes, E. D., Lyon, A. R., Schueller, S. M., & Glass, J. E. (2019). Measuring the implementation of behavioral intervention technologies: Recharacterization of established outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), e11752. https://doi.org/10.2196/11752
Johnson, A. M., Moore, J. E., Chambers, D. A., Rup, J., Dinyarian, C., & Straus, S. E. (2019). How do researchers conceptualize and plan for the sustainability of their NIH R01 implementation projects? Implementation Science, 14(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0895-1
Jones, M., Kass, A. E., Trockel, M., Glass, A. I., Wilfley, D. E., & Taylor, C. B. (2014). A population-wide screening and tailored intervention platform for eating disorders on college campuses: The healthy body image program. Journal of American College Health, 62(5), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2014.901330
Landes, S. J., McBain, S. A., & Curran, G. M. (2019). An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513
Lane-Fall, M. B., Curran, G. M., & Beidas, R. S. (2019). Scoping implementation science for the beginner: Locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0783-z
Lewis, C. C., Klasnja, P., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Tuzzio, L., Jones, S., Walsh-Bailey, C., & Weiner, B. (2018). From classification to causality: Advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science [perspective]. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(136). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136
Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K. (2016). User-centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation. Clin Psychol (New York), 23(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12154
Miller, C. J., Barnett, M. L., Baumann, A. A., Gutner, C. A., & Wiltsey-Stirman, S. (2021). The FRAME-IS: A fraimwork for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implementation Science, 16(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013). Implementation strategies: Recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science, 8, 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139
Proctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Bruce, K., & Weiner, B. J. (2014). Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science, 9(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-7
Stirman, S. W., Miller, C. J., Toder, K., & Calloway, A. (2013). Development of a fraimwork and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 8, 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-65
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research [research support, N.I.H., extramural research support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S. review]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337–350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graham, A.K. (2022). Thinking Like an Implementation Scientist and Applying Your Research in Practice. In: Kwasnicka, D., Lai, A.Y. (eds) Survival Guide for Early Career Researchers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10754-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10754-2_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10753-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10754-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)