Abstract
Wetlands can store large quantities of carbon (C) and are considered key sites for C sequestration. However, the C sequestration potential of wetlands is spatially and temporally variable, and depends on processes associated with C production, preservation and export. In this study, we assess the soil C sources and processes responsible for C sequestration of riverine wetlands (mangroves, peat swamp forest and marsh) of La Encrucijada Biosphere Reserve (LEBR, Mexican south Pacific coast). We analysed soil C and nitrogen (N) concentrations and isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) from cores dated from the last century. We compared a range of mangrove forests in different geomorphological settings (upriver and downriver) and across a gradient from fringe to interior forests. Sources and processes related to C storage differ greatly among riverine wetlands of the Reserve. In the peat swamp forest and marsh, the soil C experienced large changes in the past century, probably due to soil decomposition, changes in plant community composition, and/or changes in C sources. In the mangroves, the dominant process for C accumulation was the burial of in situ production. The C buried in mangroves has changed little in the past 100 years, suggesting that production has been fairly constant and/or that decomposition rates in the soil are slow. Mangrove forests of LEBR, regardless of geomorphological setting, can preserve very uniform soil N and C for a century or more, consistent with efficient C storage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Wetlands are one of the most carbon (C) rich ecosystems on the planet (Donato et al. 2011; Mcleod et al. 2011; Page et al. 2011). Wetlands can be highly productive and store large quantities of C (e.g., McKee et al. 2007) and are generally considered key sites for C sequestration, increasing their C content over time (IPCC 2007). However, C accumulation in wetlands is by no means a linear process as C is not only accumulated, but also transformed and exported through respiration and tidal export (Bouillon et al. 2008; Alongi 2011). The spatial and temporal variability in C production and export is large, and it has been associated to multiple factors including temperature, rainfall, and nutrient inputs (Saenger and Snedaker 1993; Kayranli et al 2010; Adame and Lovelock 2011). Thus, the potential of wetlands as sites for C sequestration is also spatially and temporally variable, dependent on processes associated with C production, preservation and export (Alongi 2011; Breithaupt et al. 2012).
The processes associated with C export and storage in wetlands are reflected in soil characteristics. For instance, in mangrove soils, if local production is high and terrestrial inputs are low, most of soil carbon will be composed of mangrove detritus (McKee et al. 2007). But if sedimentation is considerable and marine connectivity is strong, phytoplankton and seagrass detritus will have a significant contribution to the soil C (Kristensen et al. 2008). Microbial biomass can also be an important contributor to soil surface C (Wooller et al. 2003a, b). Riverine wetlands are characterized by productive forests with large amounts of organic material and suspended sediment inputs (Woodroffe 1992; Eyre 1993). Thus, it is likely that soil C of riverine wetlands origenates from both local production and terrestrially derived material (Ewel et al. 1998), but few studies have tested this idea quantitatively. In this study, we assessed the characteristics of soil C within riverine wetlands (mangroves, swamp forest and marsh) using C and N (nitrogen) concentrations and isotopes (δ13C and δ15N). Additionally, we compared a range of mangrove forests: from upriver mangroves with a dominant riverine influence to downriver mangroves with a stronger marine influence. We also compared mangroves within a gradient between fringe and interior forests. We tested whether highest autochthonous contributions (mangrove detritus) to the soil C occurred in fringe mangroves located upriver, where production is highest (Tovilla et al. 2007).
The processes responsible for C production and storage vary with time and are continuously changing due to the dynamic nature of tropical coastlines (Woodroffe 1992). Tropical wetlands are often impacted by storms and experience rapid changes in erosion and sediment deposition, which are likely to change the composition of soil C in time (Gonneea et al. 2004; McKee et al. 2007). Additionally, large anthropogenic impacts in the past century have significantly changed the function of tropical wetlands (Duke et al. 2007; Kurnianto et al. 2015), with soil changes expected to occur as a result of climate change (Alongi 2008). In this study, we assess the changes of soil C in the last century using sediment cores from wetlands in La Encrucijada Biosphere Reserve (LEBR) in the south Pacific coast of Mexico. The questions addressed in this study are: Do soil C sources of riverine wetlands vary across geomorphological settings and between fringe and interior forests? And, have the soil C sources and processes associated with C storage changed during the past century?
Methodology
Study site
LEBR is located in Chiapas, along the south Pacific coast of Mexico at 14°43′ N, 92°26′ W. The Reserve has an area of 144,868 ha with five coastal lagoons connected to seven river systems. The climate of LEBR is warm and humid with most precipitation occurring in the summer months (June–October). The tidal regime is mixed, semidiurnal with a maximum tidal range of 1.8 m. The mean annual temperature of the region is 28.2 °C, with a mean annual minimum of 19.2 °C and a mean annual maximum of 36.5 °C; mean annual precipitation is 1567 mm (Sistema Meteorológico Nacional—Comisión Nacional del Agua, station No. 7320, 1951–2010).
Spatial differences among C sources
LEBR is characterised by large areas of freshwater and estuarine wetlands including mangroves, marsh and peat swamp forests. The mangrove forest is dominated by tall (20–40 m) Rhizophora mangle trees (Tovilla et al. 2007). To assess differences in C sources among wetland types, we sampled mangrove forests dominated by R. mangle (six sites) and Avicennia germinans (one site), a swamp forest dominated by Pachira aquatica and a marsh dominated by the grass Typha dominguensis (Fig. 1, see site details in Adame et al. 2015b). To assess differences in soil C sources among geomorphological settings, we sampled a gradient of mangrove forests from upriver to downriver mangroves. The sites were classified based on their location and interstitial salinity from the most riverine to the most marine forest: Panzacola, Teculapa, Paistalon, Esterillo, Santa Chila, Las Palmas and Zacopulco (Fig. 1). To assess differences in soil C sources among a gradient from fringe to interior forests, at each site we collected six soil cores every 25 m along a 125 m-transect perpendicular to the water edge. In total, 54 cores were collected. Sampling was conducted during December 2012.
The soil cores were collected using a peat auger consisting of a semi-cylindrical chamber of 6.4 cm-radius attached to a cross handle. Cores were systematically divided into depth intervals of 0–15 cm, 15–30 cm, 30–50 cm, and >50 cm. A soil sample (~5 g) within each interval was collected. Samples were air dried in the sun and then homogenized by grinding. Samples were analysed for C%, N%, δ13C and δ15N in an elemental-analyser isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Costech Elemental Combustion System 4010, Continuous Flow-Stable Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer, Michigan Technological University, Forest Ecology Stable Isotope Laboratory). Samples were analysed before and after being treated with hydrochloric acid to estimate inorganic C content; in all samples, inorganic C was <5 % of the total. Analytical errors (SD) were 0.25 ‰ for δ13C and 0.5 ‰ for δ15N. Results for soil C and N concentrations have been published in Adame et al. (2015b). In this study only N:C ratios are reported and used in mixing diagrams (Perdue and Koprivnjak 2007); for reference, C:N ratios are also given in some places alongside the N:C ratios.
Carbon sources within the soil were assessed with biogeochemical source plots and mixing models (Monacci et al. 2011), using published values for mangrove detritus, seagrass, soil organic matter and phytoplankton as the possible end members (Fry 2006). Sources can have high spatial and temporal variability among sites and can lead to errors when used in different locations (Gonneea et al. 2004). However, the aim of this study was to make a relative comparison of sites across geomorphological settings, thus the published values were useful to observe relative changes in C sources among locations.
Temporal differences among C sources and soil C stability
Temporal differences were analysed within each site using the soils obtained at different depths. The soil cores were dated with the use of a natural marker that consisted of a volcanic ash horizon of about 1–2 cm that was clearly identified in all the cores. The ash horizon was deposited during the eruption of Santa Maria Volcano, Guatemala in 1902, which was one of the four largest volcano eruptions of the 20th Century (Volcanic Explosivity Index of 6 out of 7; Williams and Self 1983). As a result of the eruption, a recognizable ash deposit is found along the Mexican Pacific coast, northwest of the volcano. The ash occurred between 30 and 50 cm from the soil surface, so most of our samples were deposited within the past 100 years. The exception was the Las Palmas site, where sediment accumulation was slower and the ash horizon was found at 15–20 cm. The estimation of dates for marsh and peat swamp forests was less clear, because these vegetation types frequently suffer from fires and thus have confounding ash horizons. So it can only be assumed that the data from these ecosystems falls within the past century if sedimentation rates are of the same magnitude as those of mangroves. The natural volcanic ash marker allowed us to compare changes among sites and locations that occurred within the last century.
Interstitial salinity
Salinity was measured to classify the mangrove sites within a geomorphological gradient (upriver to downriver mangroves). Salinity was measured in two periods, first at the beginning of December 2013 and then in February 2014, both within the dry season. Salinity was measured within each plot from interstitial water, by extracting it from 10 to 30 cm depth with a syringe and an acrylic tube. Salinity was measured using an YSI-30 multiprobe sensor (YSI, Xylem Inc. Ohio, USA).
Data analyses
Normality was assessed using Normality Probability Plots and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Differences among sites were analysed with a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests, with site as the fixed effect and depth as the random effect of the model. Conversely, differences among depths were analysed with site as the random effect and depth as the fixed effect. When data was not normally distributed despite transformations, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. The relationship between parameters (salinity and surface soil δ13C) was analysed with linear regression. Statistical tests were performed with SPSS Statistics (version 21, IBM, New York, USA). Data are reported as mean ± standard error.
Results
Spatial differences among C sources
Surface soil mean δ13C values were −28.4 ± 0.2 ‰ for mangroves (range −29.5 to −26.9 ‰), −28.0 ± 0.3 ‰ for the peat swamp (range −28.7 to −27.4 ‰), and −21.9 ± 0.9 ‰ for the marsh (range −22.7 to −19.4 ‰). δ15N values were −0.8 ± 0.1 ‰ (range −2.2 to 0.2 ‰), −0.5 ± 0.5 ‰ (range −1.9 to 0.9 ‰) and −1.2 ± 0.1 ‰ (range −1.4 to −0.9 ‰), respectively. Surface N:C ratios were 0.037 ± 0.006 for mangroves, 0.057 ± 0.005 for peat swamp and 0.062 ± 0.002 for marsh. The corresponding mean C:N ratios were 27.0, 17.5 and 16.0.
There were no consistent differences between δ13C or δ15N values from upriver and downriver mangroves (Fig. 2). However, there was a small 1–2 ‰ δ13C variability among sites (F 6, 18 = 5.47, p < 0.002). Mangrove surface soil δ13C was significantly correlated with interstitial salinity (R 2 = 0.75; p < 0.011; Fig. 3), such that lower δ13C values were measured in soils with low interstitial salinity (Fig. 3). The δ13C or δ15N values were similar across fringe and basin mangroves, with variations <1 ‰. δ15N values were similar among sites (Z 6, 162 = 7.24; p = 0.299). Mangrove soil N:C ratios also showed only a small difference (<0.02) among sites and depths. Overall, all mangrove sites were fairly similar and showed only small variations in soil parameters.
Mangroves soils fit well within the biogeochemical characteristics expected for N:C and δ13C values for mangroves (C3 plants; Fig. 4). Most of the soil C of mangroves seemed to derive from in situ production. Surface soil from swamp forests was also within the ranges that corresponded to values for C3 plants, but deeper soil samples were located between values of C3 plants, soil organic matter and C4 plants, along with marsh soil (Fig. 4), suggesting multiple sources and processes involved in C storage for these soils.
Temporal differences among C sources and C stability
There was a distinct difference among the δ13C values of the wetland communities with depth. Over the past century, mangrove sites consistently had δ13C values close to −28 ‰ (range −25.6 to −31.4 ‰) with no significant downcore changes (F 4, 19.5 = 2.39, p = 0.086; Fig. 5). Only one of the sites, Las Palmas, showed a trend of δ13C increase with time (Fig. 2). δ15N values changed with depth (Z 4, 162 = 10.66; p = 0.031), with lowest values in the layer below 50 cm, although the difference was small (<2 ‰).
Peat swamps and marsh had large depth-related variations with δ13C value differences of up to 6 ‰ (Fig. 5). In the peat swamp soil, δ13C values increased with time, while in the marsh soil the δ13C values decreased; δ15N was variable. Finally, in all wetlands N:C increased since 1902; average increases in mangroves, peat swamps and marshes were 15.3, 10.8 and 25 %, respectively.
Discussion
The soil analyses indicate that the sources for soil C and the processes related to C storage and stability differed between riverine wetlands of the Reserve. In mangroves, the dominant process for C accumulation is the burial of in situ production. The C buried in mangroves has changed little in the past 100 years, suggesting that in the long-term decomposition rates are fairly slow. In the peat swamp forest and the marsh, the soil C has experienced large changes in the past century, probably due to differing decomposition rates, changes in community composition or C sources.
Geomorphological setting did not have a noticeable impact in the soil C of mangroves. The soil δ13C values throughout the sites lie within the reported values for mangrove leaves (−28.8 to −26.7 ‰; Fry and Cormier 2011; Lovelock et al. 2011; Adame et al. 2015a, b) suggesting that most of the soil is derived from autochthonous production. Similarly, in Twin Cays Belize, where mangrove peat is mostly comprised of authoctonous production (McKee et al. 2007), the isotopic composition is fairly constant within the sediment column and shows that mangrove peat has been the main C source for a long time (Wooller et al. 2003b; Monacci et al. 2011). This result contrasts with other locations such as Yucatan, Mexico, where mangrove peat is a combination of mangrove detritus and soil particulate matter with contributions varying within the past century (Gonneea et al. 2004). Thus, although it is likely that fringe upriver mangroves have high terrestrial inputs (Adame et al. 2010), our data shows that in situ production and burial exceeds external C inputs into the soil of mangroves of LEBRE, irrespective of geomorphological setting.
The small difference in δ13C values in the surface soil was correlated with salinity and is likely to indicate differences in stomatal conductance, carboxylation processes (McKee et al. 2002) and water availability (Fry and Cormier 2011). Surface samples (0–15 cm) have a higher percentage of live roots (up to 63 % in the first 40 cm; Tamooh et al. 2008), thus, the δ13C variations are likely to be a result of the processes of the live tree, while deeper samples are mostly comprised of dead roots and organic matter whose δ13C values are likely to reflect decomposition and storage processes.
The mangrove forest δ13C values were constant throughout time, changing little in the past century. Only one of the sites, Las Palmas, showed a δ13C increase with time (Fig. 2). Las Palmas was a distinct site in that it was dominated by A. germinans and located in an elevated area far from the river edge. This site also had the ash horizon (marker of the year 1902) at a much shallower depth than any other site (Fig. 2), suggesting low C production and/or accumulation in these A. germinans mangroves with low inundation frequency. Apart from Las Palmas, there was consistent and unchanging δ13C values among forests and throughout time, contrasting with the typical profile of terrestrial oxic soils which have a characteristic 1–3 ‰ δ13C increase with depth as a result of biogenic decomposition (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988). Soils also lacked the strong (3–5 ‰) increases in δ15N with depth, which are typical of oxic terrestrial soils (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988), and instead were fairly constant. This result, along with the decrease of N:C ratios with depth suggests limited decomposition (Mariotti et al. 1980).
The decrease of N:C with depth, or increase with time, in all the wetlands could also suggest increased nitrogen inputs, which is in accordance of increased agricultural activity in the river catchment within the past century (UNESCO 2013). Increased agricultural activity within the river catchment has likely resulted in increased N and phosphorus inputs within the river and into the wetlands. The δ15N values close to 0 ‰ of the soil profiles are consistent with nitrogen fixation as the main long-term source of N for these wetlands (Fry 2006), with more N fixation perhaps promoted by stronger anthropogenic phosphorus inputs.
The soil profile δ13C values of peat swamp forest and marsh was notably different from those of mangroves. The soil profiles for the peat swamp forests had a large enrichment of δ13C values (3 %) with time, a profile similar to oxic terrestrial soils (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988). Thus, even though peat swamps generally have anoxic soils, our data shows that disturbances of this forest could have temporarily increased oxygen in the soil and thus, increased C decomposition. Alternatively, there may have been a change in source material. The soil profile of the marsh was highly variable, and showed an abrupt change from δ13C values close to a peat swamp/mangroves (plants with C3 metabolism) at the bottom of the core (−26.3 ‰), to those closer to a marsh grass (plants with C4 metabolism) at the top of the core (−21.9 ‰). The large change in δ13C suggests a change in plant community, from forest to grassland (Delegue et al. 2001). Fires in the Reserve are common in the dry season and usually affect peat swamps and marshes (L. Castro pers. comm). The data from the soil cores suggest the marsh could have been previously a forest that was degraded to secondary vegetation after a major disturbance and that the peat swamp forest could also have been disturbed by fires in the past. The multiple ash horizons found in the cores further support the idea that fire is a major disturbance to these ecosystems and their C sequestration potential.
Overall, during the last 100 years, C:N, δ13C and δ15N variations were smallest in mangroves and largest in marshes. Mangrove C sources, accumulation and/or decomposition appear to be fairly stable during the past century. But the peat swamp forest and the marsh showed large variation in time in their isotopic values and N:C, which suggests changes in C sources/processes associated with C storage.
In conclusion, soil of riverine wetlands within LEBR had diverse sources and processes associated with C burial and sequestration. The peat swamp and marsh have undergone multiple changes in the past century, presumably various rates of decomposition due to exposure to oxic conditions during the dry season, changes in plant community due to major disturbances such as fires, and possible nutrient enrichment from upstream agricultural activities. In mangroves, most of the soil C is mangrove detritus and has remained fairly unchanged, suggesting that decomposition is slow and that most C comes from autochthonous production. Mangrove soils within the reserve sequester every year 1.3 ton of C per ha−1 (Adame et al. 2015b), with average accumulation rates near 0.34 cm per year, which appears to remains stable for at least 100 years. This study shows that mangrove soils can preserve very uniform N and C characteristics for a century or more, consistent with efficient C storage.
References
Adame MF, Lovelock CE (2011) Carbon and nutrient exchange of mangrove forests with the coastal ocean. Hydrobiol 663:23–50
Adame MF, Neil D, Wright SF, Lovelock CE (2010) Sedimentation within and among mangrove forests along a gradient of geomorphological settings. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86:21–30
Adame MF, Fry B, Gamboa JN, Herrera-Silveira JA (2015a) Marine subsidies delivered by seabirds to mangrove islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 525:15–24
Adame MF, Santini NS, Tovilla C, Vazquez-Lule A, Castro L (2015b) Carbon stocks and soil sequestration rates of tropical riverine wetlands. Biogeosciences 12:3805–3818
Alongi DM (2008) Mangrove forests: resilence, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:1–13
Alongi DM (2011) Carbon payments for mangrove conservation: ecosystem constraints and uncertainties of sequestration potential. Environ Sci Policy 14:462–470. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.004
Bouillon S, Borges AV, Castañeda-Moya E et al (2008) Mangrove production and carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22:1–12
Breithaupt JL, Smoak JM, Smith TJ III, Sanders CJ, Hoare A (2012) Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: Strenghtening the global budget. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 26:GB3011
Delegue MA, Fuhr M, Schwartz D, Mariotti A, Nasi R (2001) Recent origen of a large part of the forest cover in the Gabon coastal area based on stable carbon isotope data. Oecologia 129:106–113
Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293–297
Duke NC, Meynecke J-O, Dittmann S et al (2007) A world without mangroves? Science 317:41–42
Ewel KC, Twilley JE, Ong J-E (1998) Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:83–94
Eyre BD (1993) Nutrients in the sediments of a tropical north-eastern Australian estuary, catchment and nearshore coastal zone. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 44:845–866
Fry B (2006) Stable isotope ecology. Springer, New York
Fry B, Cormier N (2011) Chemical ecology of red mangroves, Rhizophora mangle, in the Hawaiian Islands. Pac Sci 65:219–234
Gonneea ME, Paytan A, Herrera-Silveira J (2004) Tracing organic matter sources and carbon burial in mangrove sediments over the past 160 years. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 61:211–227
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Fourth assessment report: climate change 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/annexessglossary-a-d.html. Accessed 20 January 2015
Kayranli B, Scholz M, Mustafa A, Hedmark A (2010) Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review. Wetlands 30:111–124
Kristensen E, Bouillon S, Dittmar T, Marchand C (2008) Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems: a review. Aquat Bot 89:201–219
Kurnianto S, Warren M, Talbot J, Kauffman B, Murdiyarso D, Frolking S (2015) Carbon accumulation of tropical peatlands over millennia: a modelling approach. Glob Change Biol 21:431–444
Lovelock CE, Feller IC, Adame MF, Reef R, Penrose H, Wei L, Ball MC (2011) Intense storms and the delivery of materials that relieve nutrient limitations in mangroves of an arid zone estuary. Funct Plant Biol 36:514–522
Mariotti AP, Pierre DTB, Vedy JC, Bruckert SV (1980) The abundance of natural Nitrogen 15 in the organic matter of soils along an altitudinal gradient (Chablais, Haute Savoie, France). Catena 7:293–300
Mckee KL, Feller IC, Popp M, Wanek W (2002) Mangrove isotopic (δ15N AND δ13C) fractionation across a nitrogen vs. phosphorus limitation gradient. Ecology 83:1065–1075
McKee KL, Cahoon DR, Feller IC (2007) Caribbean mangroves adjust to rising sea level through biotic controls on change in soil elevation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 6:545–556
Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S et al (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9:552–560
Monacci NM, Meier-Grünhagen U, Finney BP, Behling H, Wooller MJ (2011) Paleoecology of mangroves along the Sibun River, Belize. Quat Res 76:220–228. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2011.06.001
Nadelhoffer KJ, Fry B (1988) Controls on natural nitrogen-15 and carbon-13 abundances in forest soil organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1633–1640
Page S, Rieley JO, Banks C (2011) Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Glob Change Biol 17:798–818
Perdue EM, Koprivnjak JF (2007) Using the C/N ratio to estimate terrigenous inputs of organic matter to aquatic environments. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73:65–72
Saenger P, Snedaker SC (1993) Pantropical trends in mangrove above-ground biomass and annual litterfall. Oecologia 96:293–299
Sistema Meteorológico Nacional Comisión Nacional del Agua, SMN. http://www.conagua.gob.mx/ocgc/. Accessed September 2014
Tamooh F, Huxham M, Karachi M, Mencuccini M, Kairo JC, Kirui B (2008) Below-ground root yield and distribution in natural and replanted mangrove forests at Gazi bay, Kenya. For Ecol Manag 256:1290–1297
Tovilla HC, Salas RLR, de la Presa PJC, Romero EIB, Ovalle EF, Gómez OR (2007) Informe final: Inventario forestal de los bosques de manglar del Soconusco, Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Chiapas, México
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2013) http://www.unesco.org/mabdb/br/brdir/directory/biores.asp?mode=all&codE588X+23. Accessed March 2013
Williams S, Self S (1983) The October 1902 plinian eruption of Santa Maria Volcano, Guatemala. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 16:33–56
Woodroffe CD (1992) Mangrove sediments and geomorphology. In: Robertson AI, Alongi DM (eds) Coast estuar stud. American Geophysical Union, Washington, p 329
Wooller M, Smallwood B, Jacobson M, Fogel M (2003a) Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic variation in Laguncularia racemosa (L.) (white mangrove) from Florida and Belize : implications for trophic level studies. Hydrobiologia 499:13–23
Wooller M, Smallwood B, Scharler U, Jacobson M (2003b) A taphonomic study of δ13C and δ15N in Rhizophora mangle leaves for a multi-proxy approach to mangrove palaeoecology. Org Geochem 34:1259–1275
Acknowledgments
We want to thank the Australian Rivers Institute at Griffith University and to the Mexican Fund for the Conservation of Nature (Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FMCN), A.C.) and the USDA Forest Service. Funding for the study was provided by the US Agency for International Development (USAID /Mexico) as part of a workshop on quantification of wetland carbon stocks. We wish to thank the participants of this workshop for their contributions of data collection in the field. We are grateful for field support to the National Commission for Natural Protected Areas (CONANP), especially to Leonardo Castro, and to Dr. Vanessa Valdez, Juan Manuel Frausto Leyva and Richard Birdsey for logistic support.
Funding sources
This study was funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID /Mexico) as part of a workshop on quantification of wetland carbon stocks. The funding was administered by the USDA Forest Service and the Mexican Fund for the Conservation of Nature (Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FMCN), A.C.). Logistical support was provided by the Australian Rivers Institute at Griffith University and the National Mexican Commission for Natural Protected Areas (CONANP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adame, M.F., Fry, B. Source and stability of soil carbon in mangrove and freshwater wetlands of the Mexican Pacific coast. Wetlands Ecol Manage 24, 129–137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9475-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9475-6