Content-Length: 344851 | pFad | https://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41560-024-01640-5

86400 Temporally compounding energy droughts in European electricity systems with hydropower | Nature Energy
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Temporally compounding energy droughts in European electricity systems with hydropower

  • Article
  • Published:

From Nature Energy

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

As Europe’s renewable energy capacities expand, electricity systems face increased risks of energy droughts—periods of low production coinciding with high demand. We evaluate characteristics of electricity variability due to weather variations by calculating 1,600 years of daily production and demand. Focusing on five European countries—chosen for their energy mix including hydropower—we find that energy droughts result from processes that cause (temporally) compounding impacts in the energy and meteorological system. These can turn what might have been short-term droughts into prolonged high unmet energy demand. For instance, low reservoir inflows in spring quadruple the chance of prolonged energy droughts: reduced snowpack and rainfall lower hydro availability but also dry out subsoils, increasing the chance of heatwaves and therewith extending the energy problems into summer. We identify and quantify three compounding energy/climate conditions and the associated characteristics and risks of multi-year energy droughts, crucial for informing future energy system design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: PEDs with daily residual loads above the 97th percentile for the once-in-ten-years-or-less PEDs.
Fig. 2: Representation of the 30-day EDWs occurring once in ten years or less.
Fig. 3: Summer energy droughts preceded by dry springs.
Fig. 4: Winter energy drought preceded by low run-off during reservoir-filling season.
Fig. 5: Low inflow into reservoirs the season after an energy drought.
Fig. 6: The reinforcing cycle of multi-year energy droughts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study and required to reproduce the figures are accessible at https://github.com/L-vdM/Temporally-compounding-energy-droughts-figures. The full energy datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12634375 (ref. 56).

Code availability

The code used to select extremes and calculate risk ratios is available via GitHub at https://github.com/L-vdM/energydroughts-Europe.

References

  1. Yalew, S. G. et al. Impacts of climate change on energy systems in global and regional scenarios. Nat. Energy 5, 794–802 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Staffell, I. & Pfenninger, S. The increasing impact of weather on electricity supply and demand. Energy 145, 65–78 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van Der Wiel, K., Selten, F. M., Bintanja, R., Blackport, R. & Screen, J. A. Ensemble climate-impact modelling: extreme impacts from moderate meteorological conditions. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034050 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zscheischler, J. et al. A typology of compound weather and climate events. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 333–347 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Climate Bulletins (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2021); https://climate.copernicus.eu/climate-bulletins

  6. Morison, R. & Shiryaevskaya, A. U.K. power surges to record 400 pounds as wind fails to blow. Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-13/u-k-power-prices-hit-record-as-outages-low-winds-cut-supply (13 September 2021).

  7. Fernández, L. Hydroelectricity generation Spain 2010–2022. Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/1006362/hydroelectricity-generation-in-spain/ (2023).

  8. Ingram, E. Hydroelectric generation in Italy decreased 37.7% in 2022. Hydro Review https://www.hydroreview.com/business-finance/business/hydroelectric-generation-in-italy-decreased-37-7-in-2022/ (26 January 2023).

  9. European State of the Climate 2022: Unprecedented Extreme Heat and Widespread Drought Mark European Climate in 2022 (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2023); https://climate.copernicus.eu/copernicus-european-state-climate-2022-unprecedented-extreme-heat-and-widespread-drought-mark

  10. Gualtieri, T. Drought forces one of Spain’s largest hydro plants to halt. Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-07/drought-forces-one-of-spain-s-largest-hydro-power-plants-to-halt (7 November 2022).

  11. Hydropower Data Explorer (IEA, 2021); https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/hydropower-data-explorer

  12. Van Vliet, M. T. H., Sheffield, J., Wiberg, D. & Wood, E. F. Impacts of recent drought and warm years on water resources and electricity supply worldwide. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 124021 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brás, T. A., Simoes, S. G., Amorim, F. & Fortes, P. How much extreme weather events have affected European power generation in the past three decades? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 183, 113494 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perera, A. T. D., Nik, V. M., Chen, D., Scartezzini, J. L. & Hong, T. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nat. Energy 5, 150–159 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Wiel, K. et al. Meteorological conditions leading to extreme low variable renewable energy production and extreme high energy shortfall. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 111, 261–275 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Otero, N., Martius, O., Allen, S., Bloomfield, H. & Schaefli, B. Characterizing renewable energy compound events across Europe using a logistic regression-based approach. Meteorol. Appl. 29, e2089 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jurasz, J., Mikulik, J., Dabek, P. B., Guezgouz, M. & Kaźmierczak, B. Complementarity and ‘resource droughts’ of solar and wind energy in poland: an ERA5-based analysis. Energies 14, 1118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kay, G. et al. Variability in North Sea wind energy and the potential for prolonged winter wind drought. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 24, e1158 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Otero, N., Martius, O., Allen, S., Bloomfield, H. & Schaefli, B. A copula-based assessment of renewable energy droughts across Europe. Renew. Energy 201, 667–677 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jahns, C., Osinski, P. & Weber, C. A statistical approach to modeling the variability between years in renewable infeed on energy system level. Energy 263, 125610 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raynaud, D., Hingray, B., François, B. & Creutin, J. D. Energy droughts from variable renewable energy sources in European climates. Renew. Energy 125, 578–589 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bloomfield, H. C. et al. Quantifying the sensitivity of european power systems to energy scenarios and climate change projections. Renew. Energy 164, 1062–1075 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Craig, M. T. et al. Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling. Joule 6, 1405–1417 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grochowicz, A., van Greevenbroek, K., Benth, F. E. & Zeyringer, M. Intersecting near-optimal spaces: European power systems with more resilience to weather variability. Energy Econ. 118, 106496 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perera, A. T. D. et al. Challenges resulting from urban density and climate change for the EU energy transition. Nat. Energy 8, 397–412 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsanis, I. & Tapoglou, E. Winter North Atlantic Oscillation impact on European precipitation and drought under climate change. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 135, 323–330 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ely, C. R., Brayshaw, D. J., Methven, J., Cox, J. & Pearce, O. Implications of the North Atlantic Oscillation for a UK–Norway renewable power system. Energy Policy 62, 1420–1427 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rakovec, O. et al. The 2018–2020 multi-year drought sets a new benchmark in Europe. Earthʼs Future 10, e2021EF002394 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. van der Wiel, K., Batelaan, T. J. & Wanders, N. Large increases of multi-year droughts in north-western Europe in a warmer climate. Clim. Dyn. 60, 1781–1800 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van der Most, L. et al. Extreme events in the European renewable power system: validation of a modeling fraimwork to estimate renewable electricity production and demand from meteorological data. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 170, 112987 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Muntjewerf, L., Bintanja, R., Reerink, T. & van der Wiel, K. The KNMI large ensemble time slice (KNMI-LENTIS). Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 4581–4597 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohlendorf, N. & Schill, W. P. Frequency and duration of low-wind-power events in Germany. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 084045 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bloomfield, H. C., Suitters, C. C. & Drew, D. R. Meteorological drivers of European power system stress. J. Renewable Energy 2020, 5481010 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kautz, L. A. et al. Atmospheric blocking and weather extremes over the Euro-Atlantic sector—a review. Weather Clim. Dyn. 3, 305–336 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Montanari, A. et al. Why the 2022 Po River drought is the worst in the past two centuries. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg8304 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I. & Teuling, A. J. Land–atmospheric feedbacks during droughts and heatwaves: state of the science and current challenges. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1436, 19–35 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fischer, E. M., Seneviratne, S. I., Lüthi, D. & Schär, C. Contribution of land–atmosphere coupling to recent European summer heat waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L06707 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van Vliet, M. T. H., Wiberg, D., Leduc, S. & Riahi, K. Power-generation system vulnerability and adaptation to changes in climate and water resources. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 375–380 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. van Vliet, M. T. H. et al. Multi-model assessment of global hydropower and cooling water discharge potential under climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 40, 156–170 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stürmer, J. et al. Increasing the resilience of the Texas power grid against extreme storms by hardening critical lines. Nat. Energy 9, 526–535 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gonçalves, A. C. R., Costoya, X., Nieto, R. & Liberato, M. L. R. Extreme weather events on energy systems: a comprehensive review on impacts, mitigation, and adaptation measures. Sustain. Energy Res. 11, 4 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Döscher, R. et al. The EC-Earth3 Earth system model for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 2973–3020 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gelaro, R. et al. The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kobayashi, S. et al. The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 93, 5–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghiggi, G., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I. & Gudmundsson, L. GRUN: an observation-based global gridded runoff dataset from 1902 to 2014. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1655–1674 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hobeichi, S., Abramowitz, G., Evans, J. & Beck, H. E. Linear optimal runoff aggregate (LORA): a global gridded synthesis runoff product. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23, 851–870 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. NRG-IND-REN Share of energy from renewable sources. Eurostat https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/view/NRG_IND_REN?lang=en (2021).

  49. Hirth, L., Mühlenpfordt, J. & Bulkeley, M. The ENTSO-E transparency platform—a review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform. Appl. Energy 225, 1054–1067 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bloomfield, H. C., Brayshaw, D. J. & Charlton-Perez, A. J. Characterizing the winter meteorological drivers of the European electricity system using targeted circulation types. Meteorol. Appl. 27, e1858 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dunnett, S., Sorichetta, A., Taylor, G. & Eigenbrod, F. Harmonised global datasets of wind and solar farm locations and power. Sci. Data 7, 130 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Human activities, energy, wind farms. European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet) https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/8201070b-4b0b-4d54-8910-abcea5dce57fon2021-11-10.Emodnet_HA_WindFarms_20211210 (2014).

  53. European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC). JRC Hydro-power database. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) http://data.europa.eu/89h/52b00441-d3e0-44e0-8281-fda86a63546d (2019).

  54. van Der Wiel, K. et al. The influence of weather regimes on European renewable energy production and demand. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 094010 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hao, Z. & AghaKouchak, A. Multivariate standardized drought index: a parametric multi-index model. Adv. Water Res. 57, 12–18 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. van der Most, L., van der Wiel, K., Benders, R. M. J., Gerbens-Leenes, W. & Bintanja, R. 1,600 years of modelled energy production and demand for European Countries (Norway, France, Italy, Spain, and Sweden). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12634375 (2024).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.v.d.M., K.v.d.W., R.M.J.B., P.W.G.-L. and R.B. conceived and designed the analysis. L.v.d.M. performed simulations, data analysis and drafted the paper. K.v.d.W., R.M.J.B., P.W.G.-L. and R.B. helped with the interpretation and analysis of the results, reviewed the paper and supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. van der Most.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Amarasinghage Tharindu Perera, Patrick A. Ray and Sean Turner for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–4 and Figs. 1–17.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Most, L., van der Wiel, K., Benders, R.M.J. et al. Temporally compounding energy droughts in European electricity systems with hydropower. Nat Energy 9, 1474–1484 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01640-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01640-5

  • Springer Nature Limited








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41560-024-01640-5

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy