Content-Length: 258422 | pFad | https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s10584-012-0671-6

86400 On the estimation of systematic error in regression-based predictions of climate sensitivity | Climatic Change
Skip to main content

Advertisement

On the estimation of systematic error in regression-based predictions of climate sensitivity

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An extension of a regression-based methodology for constraining climate forecasts using a multi-thousand member ensemble of perturbed climate models is presented, using the multi-model CMIP-3 ensemble to estimate the systematic model uncertainty in the prediction, with the caveat that systematic biases common to all models are not accounted for. It is shown that previous methodologies for estimating the systematic uncertainty in predictions of climate sensitivity are dependent on arbitrary choices relating to ensemble sampling strategy. Using a constrained regression approach, a multivariate predictor may be derived based upon the mean climatic state of each ensemble member, but components of this predictor are excluded if they cannot be validated within the CMIP-3 ensemble. It is found that the application of the CMIP-3 constraint serves to decrease the upper bound of likelihood for climate sensitivity when compared with previous studies, with 10th and 90th percentiles of probability at 1.5 K and 4.3 K respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annan J, Hargreaves JC (2006) Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 33(6):L06,704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annan JD, Hargreaves JC, Ohgaito R, Abe-Ouchi A, Emori S (2005) Efficiently constraining climate sensitivity with ensembles of paleoclimate simulations. SOLA 1:181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Allen M (2002) Assessing the relative roles of initial and boundary conditions in interannual to decadal climate predictability. J Climate 15(21):3104–3109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame DJ, Booth BBB, Kettleborough JA, Stainforth DA, Gregory JM, Collins M, Allen MR (2005) Constraining climate forecasts: the role of prior assumptions. Geophys Res Lett 32:L09,702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleckler P, Taylor K, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res 113:D06,104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Stouffer RJ, Raper SCB, Stott PA, Rayner NA (2002) An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J Climate 15:3117–3121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell J, Delworth T, Danabasoglu G, Drange H, Griffies S, Holbrook N, Kirtman B, Keenlyside N, Latif M, Marotzke J, et al. (2009) Decadal climate prediction: opportunities and challenges. Ocean Obs 9

  • Jackson C, Huerta G, Sen M, Deng Y, Bowman K (2008) Error reduction and convergence in climate prediction. J Climate p 35

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J et al (1996) The ncep/ncar 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(3):437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Hegerl G (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat Geosci 1(11):735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Meehl GA, Allen MR, Stainforth DA (2006) Constraining climate sensitivity from the seasonal cycle in surface temperature. J Climate 19(17):4224–4233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grubler A, Jung T, Kram T et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. PNNL-SA-39650. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer T, Doblas-Reyes F, Weisheimer A, Rodwell M (2008) Toward seamless prediction: calibration of climate change projections using seasonal forecasts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(4):459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piani C, Frame DJ, Stainforth DA, Allen MR (2005) Constraints on climate change from a multi-thousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32(23)

  • Piani C, Sanderson B, Giorgi F, Frame D, Christensen C, Allen M (2007) Regional probabilistic climate forecasts from a multithousand, multimodel ensemble of simulations. J Geophys Res-Atmos 112(D24):D24,108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier J (2007) Probabilistic inference for future climate using an ensemble of climate model evaluations. Clim Chang 81(3):247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson BM (2011) A multimodel study of parametric uncertainty in predictions of climate response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations. J Clim 24:1362–1377

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson B, Piani C, Ingram W, Stone D, Allen M (2008) Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations. Clim Dyn 30(2):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton D, Murphy J (2012) Multivariate probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models. part ii: robustness of methodological choices and consequences for climate sensitivity. Clim Dyn 1–16

  • Sexton D, Murphy J, Collins M, Webb M (2011) Multivariate prediction using imperfect climate models part i: outline of methodology. Clim Dynam 1–30

  • Stainforth DA, Aina T, Christensen C, Collins M, Faull N, Frame DJ, Kettleborough JA, Knight SHE, Martin A, Murphy JM, Piani C, Sexton DMH, Smith L, Spicer R, Thorpe A, Allen MR (2005) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433(7024):403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind J, Barnet C, Blaisdell J (2003) Retrieval of atmospheric and surface parameters from airs/amsu/hsb data in the presence of clouds. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(2):390–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos T R Soc A 365(1857):2053–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wielicki B, Barkstrom B, Harrison E, Lee R, Smith G, Cooper J (1996) Clouds and the earth’s radiant energy system (ceres): an earth observing system experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(5):853–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Claudio Piani, David Sexton and Charles Jackson for their extensive comments. This work was only made possible with the efforts of the team who developed and continue to support the climateprediction.net project, as well as the members of the public who donated their idle computing time to the project. We acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Inter-comparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin M. Sanderson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 126 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanderson, B.M. On the estimation of systematic error in regression-based predictions of climate sensitivity. Climatic Change 118, 757–770 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0671-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0671-6

Keywords









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s10584-012-0671-6

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy