Abstract
An extension of a regression-based methodology for constraining climate forecasts using a multi-thousand member ensemble of perturbed climate models is presented, using the multi-model CMIP-3 ensemble to estimate the systematic model uncertainty in the prediction, with the caveat that systematic biases common to all models are not accounted for. It is shown that previous methodologies for estimating the systematic uncertainty in predictions of climate sensitivity are dependent on arbitrary choices relating to ensemble sampling strategy. Using a constrained regression approach, a multivariate predictor may be derived based upon the mean climatic state of each ensemble member, but components of this predictor are excluded if they cannot be validated within the CMIP-3 ensemble. It is found that the application of the CMIP-3 constraint serves to decrease the upper bound of likelihood for climate sensitivity when compared with previous studies, with 10th and 90th percentiles of probability at 1.5 K and 4.3 K respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annan J, Hargreaves JC (2006) Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 33(6):L06,704
Annan JD, Hargreaves JC, Ohgaito R, Abe-Ouchi A, Emori S (2005) Efficiently constraining climate sensitivity with ensembles of paleoclimate simulations. SOLA 1:181–184
Collins M, Allen M (2002) Assessing the relative roles of initial and boundary conditions in interannual to decadal climate predictability. J Climate 15(21):3104–3109
Frame DJ, Booth BBB, Kettleborough JA, Stainforth DA, Gregory JM, Collins M, Allen MR (2005) Constraining climate forecasts: the role of prior assumptions. Geophys Res Lett 32:L09,702
Gleckler P, Taylor K, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res 113:D06,104
Gregory JM, Stouffer RJ, Raper SCB, Stott PA, Rayner NA (2002) An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J Climate 15:3117–3121
Hurrell J, Delworth T, Danabasoglu G, Drange H, Griffies S, Holbrook N, Kirtman B, Keenlyside N, Latif M, Marotzke J, et al. (2009) Decadal climate prediction: opportunities and challenges. Ocean Obs 9
Jackson C, Huerta G, Sen M, Deng Y, Bowman K (2008) Error reduction and convergence in climate prediction. J Climate p 35
Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J et al (1996) The ncep/ncar 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(3):437–471
Knutti R, Hegerl G (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat Geosci 1(11):735–743
Knutti R, Meehl GA, Allen MR, Stainforth DA (2006) Constraining climate sensitivity from the seasonal cycle in surface temperature. J Climate 19(17):4224–4233
Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772
Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grubler A, Jung T, Kram T et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. PNNL-SA-39650. Cambridge University Press, New York
Palmer T, Doblas-Reyes F, Weisheimer A, Rodwell M (2008) Toward seamless prediction: calibration of climate change projections using seasonal forecasts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(4):459–470
Piani C, Frame DJ, Stainforth DA, Allen MR (2005) Constraints on climate change from a multi-thousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32(23)
Piani C, Sanderson B, Giorgi F, Frame D, Christensen C, Allen M (2007) Regional probabilistic climate forecasts from a multithousand, multimodel ensemble of simulations. J Geophys Res-Atmos 112(D24):D24,108
Rougier J (2007) Probabilistic inference for future climate using an ensemble of climate model evaluations. Clim Chang 81(3):247–264
Sanderson BM (2011) A multimodel study of parametric uncertainty in predictions of climate response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations. J Clim 24:1362–1377
Sanderson B, Piani C, Ingram W, Stone D, Allen M (2008) Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations. Clim Dyn 30(2):175–190
Sexton D, Murphy J (2012) Multivariate probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models. part ii: robustness of methodological choices and consequences for climate sensitivity. Clim Dyn 1–16
Sexton D, Murphy J, Collins M, Webb M (2011) Multivariate prediction using imperfect climate models part i: outline of methodology. Clim Dynam 1–30
Stainforth DA, Aina T, Christensen C, Collins M, Faull N, Frame DJ, Kettleborough JA, Knight SHE, Martin A, Murphy JM, Piani C, Sexton DMH, Smith L, Spicer R, Thorpe A, Allen MR (2005) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433(7024):403–406
Susskind J, Barnet C, Blaisdell J (2003) Retrieval of atmospheric and surface parameters from airs/amsu/hsb data in the presence of clouds. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(2):390–409
Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos T R Soc A 365(1857):2053–2075
Wielicki B, Barkstrom B, Harrison E, Lee R, Smith G, Cooper J (1996) Clouds and the earth’s radiant energy system (ceres): an earth observing system experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(5):853–868
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Claudio Piani, David Sexton and Charles Jackson for their extensive comments. This work was only made possible with the efforts of the team who developed and continue to support the climateprediction.net project, as well as the members of the public who donated their idle computing time to the project. We acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Inter-comparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 126 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanderson, B.M. On the estimation of systematic error in regression-based predictions of climate sensitivity. Climatic Change 118, 757–770 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0671-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0671-6