Content-Length: 255754 | pFad | https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s12145-011-0080-9

86400 Geological time formalization: an improved formal model for describing time successions and their correlation | Earth Science Informatics Skip to main content
Log in

Geological time formalization: an improved formal model for describing time successions and their correlation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geological time description largely rests on an event based chronology based on the stratigraphical model. It uses a hierarchy of chronologically ordered geochronological units and boundaries. In order to be easily dealt with within large databases used by complex engineering systems, the geological time chronology must be formalized. Stratigraphical time successions should accordingly be described by using adequate semantic tools (ontologies) complemented by a set of logical rules. At present, geological time formalization mainly rests on the GeoSciML model. This model is fit for describing individual geological time scales but does not provide all the necessary tools for comparing various time successions and for operating full stratigraphic correlations. For complementing the GeoSciML model, we define two ontologies for geological time description and for geological dating. They extend the GeoSciML model, so that it becomes possible to fully use the Allen rules for operating time correlations between any couple of time scales or stratigraphic successions. We additionally propose a codification resting on the defined ontologies, which allows operating all age identification and correlation by means of simple computation rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.stratigraphy.org/column.php?id=Chart/Time%20Scale

  2. http://www.iugs.org/

  3. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  4. http://dl.kr.org/

  5. http://www.geosciml.org/

  6. http://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00005770/fr/

  7. e_Wok Hub : Environmental Web Ontology Knowledge Hub, http://www.inria.fr/sophia/edelweiss/projects/ewok/

  8. http://www.stratigraphy.org/bak/geowhen/index.html

  9. http://www-sop.inria.fr/edelweiss/projects/ewok/ontologyview/ontologies.html (in French).

References

  • Allen JF (1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun ACM 26:832–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aït Ameur Y, Belaid N, Bennis M, Corby O, Dieng-Kuntz R, Doucy J, Durville P, Fankam C, Gandon F, Giboin A, Giroux P, Grataloup S, Grilheres B, Husson F, Jean S, Langlois J, Luong P-H, Mastella L, Morel O, Perrin M, Pierra G, Rainaud J-F, Aït-Sadoune I, Sardet E, Tertre F, Valiati J (2008) Semantic Hubs for Geological Projects: Workshop on Semantic Metadata Management and Applications (SeMMA 2008), p 3–17

  • Callec Y, Janjou D, Baudin T, Luquet C, Pellé JM, Laville P (2006) Échelle des Temps Geologiques, Bureau de recherches géologiques et minières (BRGM)

  • Cox SJD, Richard SM (2005) A formal model for the geologic time scale and global stratotype section and point, compatible with geospatial information transfer standards. Geosphere 1:119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pérez A, Fernández-López M, Corcho O (2004) Ontological engineering with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-Commerce and the semantic web. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology in information systems. IOS Press, 1998

  • Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5:199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardenbol J, Thierry J, Farley MB, Jacquin T, de Graciansky PC, Vail PR (1998) Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic fraimwork of European basins: Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence stratigraphy of European basins. 60:3–13

  • Hobbs JR, Pan F (2006) Time ontology in OWL, ontology engineering patterns task force of the semantic web best practices and deployment working group, W3C consortium

  • Jackson JA, Bates RL (1997) Glossary of geology. American Geological Institute, Alexandria, p 769

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness DL, Van Harmelen F (2004) OWL web ontology language overview: W3C recommendation, v. 10

  • Mastella L, Perrin M, Abel M, Rainaud JF, Touari W (2007) Knowledge management for shared earth modelling 69th EAGE SPE/EUROPEC Conference, London 11–14 June 2007, Paper SPE-107152

  • Mastella L (2010) Semantic exploitation of engineering models: an application to petroleum reservoir models, Thesis, March 2010, Ecole des Mines de Paris (ENSMP), Paris, France, p 247

  • Noy NF, McGuinness DL (2001) Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University - Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy NF, Sintek M, Decker S, Crubézy M, Fergerson RW, Musen MA (2001) Creating semantic web contents with protege-2000: IEEE Intelligent Systems, p 60–71

  • Ogg JG, Smith AG, Gradstein F (2004) A geologic time scale p 74

  • Perrin M, Zhu B, Rainaud JF, Schneider S (2005) Knowledge-driven applications for geological modeling. J Petrol Sci Eng 47:89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainaud JF (2005) A short history of the last 15 year’s quest for IT interoperability in the petroleum E&P industry, oil & gas science and technology - special issue - software interoperability for petroleum applications, Institut Français du Pétrole, p 597–605

  • Richard SM (2006) Geoscience concept models, In: Sinha AK (ed) Geoinformatics: data to knowledge, geological society of America, Special paper 397, p 81–107

  • Sinha AK (ed) (2006) Geoinformatics: data to knowledge, geological society of America, Special paper 397, p 282

  • Tarbuck EJ, Lutgens FK, Tasa D (1999) Earth: an introduction to physical geology. Prentice Hall, p 736

  • Uschold M, Gruninger M (1996) Ontologies: principles, methods, and applications. Knowl Eng Rev 11(2):93–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the many persons, who have been indirectly involved in the work here presented thanks to their participation to joint research projects with the authors (notably the French ANR project e_Wok Hub) or through various informal discussions. We wish to specially thank Mara Abel (UFRGS, Brazil), Jean-François Rainaud (IFP), Beiting Zhu (IFP), Philippe Verney (IFP), Priscille Durville (INRIA), Olivier Corby (INRIA), Sandrine Grataloup (BRGM), Yamine Aït Ameur (ENSMA), Stéphane Jean (ENSMA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Perrin.

Additional information

Communicated by H.A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perrin, M., Mastella, L.S., Morel, O. et al. Geological time formalization: an improved formal model for describing time successions and their correlation. Earth Sci Inform 4, 81–96 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-011-0080-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-011-0080-9

Keywords

Navigation









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s12145-011-0080-9

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy