Papers by Meos Holger Kiik
Political Research Exchange, 2024
Epistocracy and populism are usually seen as opposites. The first finds error in democracy's reli... more Epistocracy and populism are usually seen as opposites. The first finds error in democracy's reliance on the sub-optimal decisions by the supposedly incompetent masses, and argues that political decisions should be tied to epistemic merit, not popularity. The populist critique of democracy, contrarily, finds that there is not enough political confrontation in standard representative democracies where the 'real people' are not properly embodied, and thus pits an imagined direct will of the unified and virtuous people against a self-serving establishment. This article demonstrates that these ideologies have surprising underlying similarities concerning their categorization, political ontology, epistemology and a conception of political authority. Firstly, they both are second-order political ideologies that are not directly tied with substantive political content but rather with the interpretation of how to govern assuming disagreement concerning first-order political ideologies. Secondly, their political ontology divides citizens into two constitutively differing parts, one of which they (partly) exclude from political membership. Thirdly, their political epistemology assumes the existence of political truths which makes their conception of authority antiproceduralist, either instrumentalist or moralist. Fourthly, they downplay the value of pluralism, deliberation and dissent. Uncovering these commonalities helps us detect and understand the dynamics of some anti-democratic tendencies better.
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, 2023
In this article I argue that including relaxed epistemic values in the justification of democracy... more In this article I argue that including relaxed epistemic values in the justification of democracy through a pragmatist and non-monist approach is compatible with the democratic values of selfrule and pluralism (which are often seen as incompatible with "political truth"). First, I contend that pragmatist epistemology offers a more suitable approach to politics instead of the correspondence theory of finding "the one truth". Secondly, I argue that instead of choosing between monist (purely epistemic or procedural) accounts of justification of democracy we should see epistemic values as part of a hybrid interpretation. Thirdly, I argue that epistemic values in democracy should be interpreted in a non-demanding way. Fourth and corresponding to previous points, I claim weak political cognitivism is phenomenologically most plausible for the democratic participant. I then continue to show that both the values of autonomy and pluralism, which are often considered antithetical to truth-claims, can be accommodated and even enhanced by epistemic values in the justification of democracy.
Books by Meos Holger Kiik
Praktilise eetika käsiraamat (Handbook of Practical Ethics), 2023
Keskkonnaeetika õpikupeatükk.
A textbook chapter on environmental ethics (in the Estonian langua... more Keskkonnaeetika õpikupeatükk.
A textbook chapter on environmental ethics (in the Estonian language).
Book: Praktilise eetika käsiraamat (Handbook of Practical Ethics)
Publisher: University of Tartu Press /TÜ Kirjastus
Editor: Simm, Kadri
Full book available OA: https://eetika.ee/et/opik
ISBN 978-9916-27-246-6
Uploads
Papers by Meos Holger Kiik
Books by Meos Holger Kiik
A textbook chapter on environmental ethics (in the Estonian language).
Book: Praktilise eetika käsiraamat (Handbook of Practical Ethics)
Publisher: University of Tartu Press /TÜ Kirjastus
Editor: Simm, Kadri
Full book available OA: https://eetika.ee/et/opik
ISBN 978-9916-27-246-6
A textbook chapter on environmental ethics (in the Estonian language).
Book: Praktilise eetika käsiraamat (Handbook of Practical Ethics)
Publisher: University of Tartu Press /TÜ Kirjastus
Editor: Simm, Kadri
Full book available OA: https://eetika.ee/et/opik
ISBN 978-9916-27-246-6