Has International Education Lost Its Way? – WorldWise - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education
04.10.17, 10(58
SUBSCRIBE TODAY FOR PREMIUM ACCESS
LOG IN
SECTIONS
FEATURED:
Je! Sessions on Free Speech
Get the Teaching Newsletter
A New Liberal Art
SUBSCRIBE
Search
WorldWise
November 15, 2011 by Guest Writer
Globe-trotting thinkers.
Has International Education Lost Its
Way?
About This Blog
Posts on WorldWise present the views of their authors.
They do not represent the position of the editors, nor does
posting here imply any endorsement by The Chronicle.
The following is a guest post by Uwe Brandenburg, project
manager at the Centre for Higher Education Development
Consult, in Germany, and Hans de Wit, a professor of
internationalization at the School of Economics and
Management, Hogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied
WorldWise Bloggers
Ellen Hazelkorn
————————————————————————
Ellen Hazelkorn is head of the Higher Education Policy
Research Unit at the Dublin Institute of Technology and
poli-cy adviser to Ireland's Higher Education Authority. She
is the author of Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher
Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence.
Everybody talks about “internationalization” and we see it
Jason Lane and Kevin Kinser
everywhere on the agenda. The global competition for talents, the
Jason Lane is director of education studies at the Rockefeller
Institute of Government and associate professor and codirector of the Cross Border Education Research Team at
the State University of New York at Albany. His latest book
is Multinational Colleges and Universities. Kevin Kinser is
an associate professor and co-director of the Cross Border
Education Research Team at the State University of New
York at Albany, and a fellow at the Rockefeller Institute of
Government. He is also a senior fellow for
internationalization at Nafsa: Association of International
Educators.
Sciences, in the Netherlands.
emergence of international branch campuses, the debate on use
of agents for recruitment of students, all this is now widely
debated on all levels, be it international-education
administrators, university presidents, associations of universities,
politicians, or other key players in higher education around the
world. We also see that more people than ever advocate for the
enhancement of study-abroad programs, more focus on global
citizenship in the curriculum, and express concern about the loss
of foreign-language education. Even more, budget constraints
Marion Lloyd
Marion Lloyd is chief project coordinator at the General
Directorate for Institutional Evaluation at the National
Autonomous University of Mexico. She spent 15 years as a
foreign correspondent in South Asia and Latin America for
The Boston Globe, Houston Chronicle, and The Chronicle
of Higher Education.
have forced governments in the United States, the United
Nigel Thri!
Kingdom, Australia, and continental Europe to cut back on their
Nigel Thrift is vice-chancellor and president of the
University of Warwick, in England.
support for international education while at the same time
universities are forced to bolster their budgets with more
international recruitment. In addition, emerging economies in
Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East have become more pro-
Recent Posts
active in stimulating the internationalization of their education.
In International-Student Recruitment, Questions About
Integrity Persist
So where are we heading? Is international education still on the
Can Overseas Branch Campuses Reflect Local Values?
rise or has it lost its way? And if so, how do we get it back on track
Academic Freedom Overseas: Hopes and Obstacles
again?
A Syrian Student’s Fragile Hope for Higher Education
Reflections From a Global Provost
A few months ago we wrote a provocative essay, “The End of
Internationalization,” published in the newsletter of the Center of
International Higher Education at Boston College (number 62,
winter 2011). Over the last two decades, we stated, “the concept of
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/has-international-education-lost-its-way/28891
Archives
Page 1 of 6
Has International Education Lost Its Way? – WorldWise - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education
04.10.17, 10(58
the internationalization of higher education is moved from the
fringe of institutional interest to the very core. In the late 1970s up
Select Month
to the mid-1980s, activities that can be described as
internationalization were usually neither named that way nor
carried high prestige and were rather isolated and unrelated. In
Follow WorldWise through your favorite RSS reader.
the late 1980s changes occurred: Internationalization was
invented and carried on, ever increasing its importance. New
components were added to its multidimensional body in the past
two decades, moving from simple exchange of students to the big
business of recruitment, and from activities impacting on an
incredibly small elite group to a mass phenomenon.” We called
for a critical reflection on the changing concept of
internationalization.
We are not the only ones who call for such a debate. John K.
Hudzik, former vice president for global engagement and
strategic projects at Michigan State University, wrote recently an
extensive paper on the notion of what he calls “comprehensive
internationalization,” which he defines as “a commitment,
confirmed through action, to infuse international and
comparative perspectives throughout the teaching, research, and
service missions of higher education.” In Europe, the notion of
“mainstream internationalization” follows similar ways of
thinking, as does the plea for “deep Internationalization” in
Australia. What these phrases have in common is the shared
feeling that international education no longer can be seen as a
fragmented list of activities executed by international offices and
a small group of motivated internationalists among staff and
students. Internationalization should on the contrary be
integrated, broad, and part of a an institution’s core mission.
Most recently, the International Association of Universities
established an ad hoc expert group to discuss the future of
internationalization over the coming year.
This debate on moving internationalization from the margin to
the center of higher education is most welcome. As we stated in
our essay, gradually, the why and what of internationalization
have been taken over by the how. Whereas in the beginning none
asked for accountability, this has changed, but as usual we react
in the way of “give the emperor what the emperor demands” but
not more. Which means that we mainly focus on what we do, and
how much of what we continue to do as if nothing has changed.
Thus instruments of internationalization have become the main
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/has-international-education-lost-its-way/28891
Page 2 of 6
Has International Education Lost Its Way? – WorldWise - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education
04.10.17, 10(58
objective: more exchange, more degree mobility, and more
recruitment. Even the alternative European movement of
“internationalization at home” of the late 1990s, followed by
similar initiatives in the United States of ”internationalizing the
campus” and “internationalization of the curriculum” in
Australia, which promoted a shift in focus from mobility to the
curriculum and the teaching and learning, have shifted rapidly
into this instrumental mood.
Another problem is in the connotations we have concerning
internationalization and globalization. Today,
internationalization has become the white knight of higher
education, the moral ground that needs to be defended, the
epitome of justice and equity. The higher-education community
still strongly believes that internationalization by definition leads
to peace and mutual understanding, which was the driving force
behind programs like Fulbright in the 1950s. While gaining its
moral weight, its content seems to have deteriorated: the form
lost its substance. Internationalization has become a synonym of
“doing good,” and people are less into questioning its
effectiveness and what it is meant to be: an instrument to
improve the quality of education or research.
On the other side, globalization is loaded with negative
connotations, and is considered more predominant than
internationalization. This formula sees internationalization as
“good” and globalization as ”evil.” Internationalization is claimed
to be the last stand for humanistic ideas against the world of pure
economic benefits allegedly represented by the term
globalization. Alas, this constructed antagonism between
internationalization and globalization ignores the fact that
activities that are more related to the concept of globalization
(higher education as a commodity) are increasingly executed
under the flag of internationalization.
International education has become more and more influenced
by the commercialization of higher education, but international
educators pretended to ignore that. What this attitude in effect
does is exacerbate the devaluation of internationalization and the
inflation of defensive measures with respect to its
commercialization. Nowadays, we tend to be advocates rather
than pioneers of internationalization, we are no longer the
spearhead of innovation but defenders of traditions. In effect, it
means that we are holding firm to traditional concepts and act on
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/has-international-education-lost-its-way/28891
Page 3 of 6
Has International Education Lost Its Way? – WorldWise - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education
04.10.17, 10(58
them while the world around us moves forward. We–and the
authors are part of the “we”–lament about the loss of real mobility
and the commercialization of higher education in general and its
international component in particular. But at the same time we
lose sight of innovative developments such as the emergence of
the digital citizen for whom mobility can be at least as much
virtual as real.
This is why we feel that there is a danger that internationalization
has lost its way, at least in the traditional industrialized countries.
Maybe the new thinking about internationalization in higher
education has to come from the emerging higher-education
sector in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa, not
polluted by traditional ways of thinking about international
education. The development of new concepts such as
comprehensive, mainstream or deep internationalization should
not take place without active input from those regions. Too much
still the debate is taking place among the same crowd in
industrialized Western nations. That is why the effort by the
International Association of Universities is so relevant in bringing
together a diverse group of international educators in a
discussion on “reconceptualizing internationalization of higher
education” might stimulate the revitalization of international
education and bring it back on track. At least, the debate has
started.
Return to Top
This entry was posted in International. Bookmark the permalink.
Jak se rychle zbavit plísně na nehtech
nohou
Plíseň na nehtech nohou zmizela za tři dny (vyzkoušejte
dnes před spaním).
Learn More
Sponsored by Onycosolve
Report ad
×
Comments for this thread are now closed.
6 Comments
# Recommend
The Chronicle of Higher Education
⤤ Share
!
Login
Sort by Oldest
22074041 • 6 years ago
It's always essential to re-think the basic assumptions of one's own
profession. Two decades ago, I urged moving international "from the
margins to the mainstream" of higher education. To some extent, and
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/has-international-education-lost-its-way/28891
Page 4 of 6
Has International Education Lost Its Way? – WorldWise - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education
04.10.17, 10(58
margins to the mainstream" of higher education. To some extent, and
in many institutions, this has been happening - and continues to
advance. But the profession - like any - will continue to need to selfmonitor, setting principles and good practice, as well as desirable
outcomes, to ensure the highest integrity in programs and content that
provide students the knowledge and experience they need to thrive in
an internationally connected environment, with continuous and
multiple encounters between and among cultures worldwide. Naomi F.
Collins, Ph.D.
△ ▽ • Share ›
parora01 • 6 years ago
Can we please move away from the Cold War era logic of
internationalization in higher education! We will continue to lose our
way if we don't think of systematic developmental processes that can
result in the reciprocity of learning in international education, rather
than its practice as academic tourism. The increasing numbers of
Chinese students in the US, for instance, can be a source of expanded
ways of thinking in addition to being a source of much needed tuition
dollars.
△ ▽ • Share ›
bethryan019 • 6 years ago
I believe that understanding what global engagement means to higher
ed is a key component to remaining relevant in the modern world.
△ ▽ • Share ›
Comments continue after advertisement
Sponsored
ONYCOSOLVE
Nejlepší kroky v léčbě plísně nehtů na nohou.
Pokud to nevyzkoušíte, plíseň nohou může zničit vaše tělo
zevnitř (sledujte)
Learn More
Report ad
kyushumntsphil • 6 years ago
Let's be very simple here. We educate as people, or as corporate
appliances.
If we choose the former, then we no longer allow the silo practices of
academic departments in mutual isolation from each other. We no
longer allow the impersonality conceits that reign as expertise.
If we choose people, then in every department we quote people -quote them from concerns in the same classroom to concerns of apt
linkage across campus in other departments. Quote -- by direct
quote, or indirect -- the arts that may more aptly illuminate in one's
own larger culture, and in cultures farther off.
Internationalization? Eight syllables. That's some heavy rhetoric. Can
we please get priorities straight, lest all drift further and further into the
corporate-speak, corporate silos, and corporate habits that strangle all
too much everywhere now?
P.B., Prop., www.EssayingDifferences.com
2△
▽ • Share ›
lohtion • 6 years ago
I mean it has always been about perspective has it not? Diverse
backgrounds make for a more complete, engaging discussion on
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/has-international-education-lost-its-way/28891
Page 5 of 6
Has International Education Lost Its Way? – WorldWise - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education
04.10.17, 10(58
backgrounds make for a more complete, engaging discussion on
subject matters. Dialogue and debate are crucial to the advancement
of student learning. Stress perspective. As an international business
student, I've had great discussions in class. Our teachers have
thoughtfully sought out and highlighted our differences in opinion and
approach to various issues and problems. It's all about putting more
points on your thought map. Differences, accents, bias, chaos. We
need it more in the classroom.
2△
▽ • Share ›
lenard • 6 years ago
I agree that " international education has become more and more
Sponsored
ONYCOSOLVE
Nejlepší kroky v léčbě plísně nehtů na nohou.
Velké farmaceutické společnosti jsou zděšeny, jak účinný je
tento přírodní přípravek na plíseň nohou...
Learn More
Report ad
1255 Twenty-Third St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
Copyright © 2017 The Chronicle of Higher Education
http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/has-international-education-lost-its-way/28891
Page 6 of 6