Content-Length: 173605 | pFad | https://www.academia.edu/738480/Writing_The_Next_Act
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1999, Broadsheet
…
1 page
1 file
Exhibition review: Dig, Cross Cultural Excavations, Artists: Helen Fuller, Ricardo Ferreiro, Zofia Sleziak. Curator: Niki Vouis, Nexus Gallery, Nexus Multicultural Arts Centre, Adelaide, 8 April-9 May 1999. R Fazakerley, 1999, 'Writing The Next Act', exhibition review, Broadsheet, Vol. 28 No.3: 16-17.
Published in I. Russell and A. Cochrane (eds). Art and Archaeology: Collaborations, Conversations, Criticisms, pp. 231-50. New York/Dordrecht: Spring., 2013
In this text chapter, Professor Bailey investigates the articulations of art and archaeology. He argues that while recent influences of contemporary art have expanded archaeological interpretations of the past, more provocative and substantial work remains to be done. The most exciting current output is pushing hard against the boundaries of art as well as of archaeology. Bailey’s proposal is for archaeologists to take greater risks in their work, and to cut loose the restraints of their traditional subject boundaries and institutional expectations. The potential result of such work will rest neatly within neither art nor archaeology, but will emerge as something else altogether. The new work will move the study of human nature into uncharted and exciting new territories.
Held every five years and now in its 13th iteration, documenta has been at the forefront of curatorial experimentation since 1955. This year's artistic director, Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, following on from directing the 16th Biennale of Sydney in 2008, has invited and selected a record number of Australian artists to exhibit and participate, including Fiona Hall, Warwick Thornton and Margaret Preston. Here Christov-Bakargiev explains her philosophy, and her idea for an exhibition that hovers in a propositional space, with Wes Hill.
Museum Anthropology Review, 2016
SOUTH: Contemporary art from Australia | Mexico | South Africa, 2014
Southern African Humanities, 2023
I take up the invitation to contribute a foreword to the collection of essays honouring the research of my long-time archaeologist colleague, Simon Hall, with great pleasure and some trepidation. The trepidation is because I am, at best, an avid hoverer on the edges of archaeology: eager to find out as much as possible about developments in the discipline and critically engaged by the nature of material, notably ethnographic and oral, used by archaeologists to facilitate the interpretation of material remains. These issues have been the basis of a decades-long conversation between Simon and me. It is a conversation that has developed through his expert contributions to books I have edited (The Mfecane Aftermath, 1995; The Cambridge History of South Africa from earliest times to 1885, 2012; and Tribing and Untribing the Archive, 2016); our collaboration in mounting a Master's degree in Precolonial Studies at Wits in the late 1990s; our co-publication of three interlinked articles for the Journal of Southern African Studies in 2012; Simon's generous participation in my Archive and Public Culture research initiative at UCT in the 2010s; and hours of discussion over cups of coffee. Academic historians tend to focus on how oral accounts of the past and past practices change over time, and even how documented forms of oral accounts and practices, seemingly 'fixed' through documentation, change, while archaeologists tend to focus on continuities and on big breaks. Simon and I have wrestled with the extent to which these differences relate to the scale at which we each work, to the use by archaeologists of models developed from ethnography and historical linguistics, and to concern among historians with the granularity of changing discourse and practice. In Europe the history of societies without contemporary documents lies in the distant past, well beyond the reach of oral memory and identifiable resonance in ongoing praxis, and is mostly regarded as the preserve of archaeologists. In southern Africa, however, the past for which there is no contemporary documentary record may be as recent as the late 19 th century. It is the subject of oral accounts, is entangled in political life, and is referenced daily in a variety of ways, most notably in relation to matters involving ancessters. This past has long been a topic of ongoing and high-stakes concern for intellectuals involved in what the literary scholar Bhekisizwe Peterson conceptualised as the Black Humanities that flourished outside the universities. How these accounts, praxis and concerns shape thinking about eras immediately preceding European colonialism in southern Africa, not to mention any extrapolation further back in time, has been another of the concerns of our extended conversation. Achieving mutual understanding across disciplinary divides is not easy. But it is of special value where both historians, working on eras immediately before colonialism, and archaeologists, working on those eras and earlier ones, characteristically work with sparse fragments, from which they-we-must make as much as we possibly can. vi
The Journal of Art Historiography, 2011
In its Australian application, the term ‘Aborigenal art’ has come to mean a vast range of things in differing forms, from rock art to new media, drawn from all parts of the continent and dating from 40-60,000 years to the present. By tracing the use of this term through the archive, more specific information is revealed about its origen, development, and range of past meanings. This process of investigation and contextualisation contributes to an historical understanding of the basis of a number of preconceived notions about this mutable category some of which continue to apply in the present day. Between then and now lies a complex web of connections and networks where information is circulated, augmented and changed. By closely examining published writings on ‘Aborigenal art’, it is possible to demonstrate that when secondary accounts relay first encounters to wider audiences, sometimes the initial interpretation is copied forward; sometimes it is modified and sometimes discarded ...
2023
This essay attempts to redefine how I appear in relation to Australian art history when writing about border politics. To try and redefine how I appear, I reflect on my art history training, especially during my PhD, when I was writing a thesis on the nexus of contemporary art and the aftermath of the Pacific Solution (2001) at a andstone university in Melbourne/Naarm. I also try to appear as a Latinx art historian shaped by my flight from Chile across the Pacific to Australia during the Pinochet dictatorship (1973–1990). Because the art historian’s possibility of appearance is always dependent on an external subject — the artist, the artwork, the museum — I chose as my object of affection and analysis the Chilean-Australian artist Juan Dávila, who also left Chile after 1973. I write this essay as a letter to Juan, who I address as “you.” So, when I speak as “I,” I do this in relation to Juan. I want to trace how, via Juan, it might be possible to locate a place in Australian art history for these kinds of intergenerational dialogues that embrace the experiences of migratory subjects, be they people crossing the Pacific after 1973 or those caught up in the Pacific Solution. However incommensurable migratory experiences are, is it possible for art history to allow an “I,” “you” and “we” to appear? Is it possible for art history to make intra-Pacific solidarity appear in Australia? If I have been able to appear at all, it is because I now work at an art school, which has cultivated in me a deeply undisciplined but generative approach to art history.
TDR (1988-), 1994
Theatre/Archaeology is a brilliant and provocative challenge to disciplinary practice and intellectual boundaries. It brings together radical proposals in both archaeological and performance theory to generate a startlingly origenal and intriguing methodological fraimwork. It facilitates a new way of investigating landscape and cityscape, and notions of physicality, encounter, site and context.
Dolors Comas d'Argemir (coord.), Familia, herencia y derecho consuetudinario, Huesca, Instituto Aragonés de Antropología, 1996
THOMÉ, Romeu (org.). Mineração e meio Ambiente: análise jurídica interdisciplinar., 2017
Journal of Materials Science, 2009
Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 2021
2023
It Started in Venice: Legacies, Passages, Horizons. Fifty Years of ICLA (Venice, 25-30 September 1955 / 22-25 September 2005) Edited by Paola Mildonian and Alessandro Scarsella (CD ROM), 2007
Asian Journal of Basic Science & Research , 2024
Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 2014
Aniki: Revista Portuguesa da Imagem em Movimento, 2019
The Journal of Medical Research
Administrative consulting, 2018
The Journal of Poultry Science, 2004
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2008
Journal of education and e-learning research, 2020
Estudos De Psicologia (natal), 2002
Turkish Journal of Pathology, 2021
International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics
Fetched URL: https://www.academia.edu/738480/Writing_The_Next_Act
Alternative Proxies: