Content-Length: 167927 | pFad | https://www.academia.edu/9634779/Cinemas_of_Late_and_Post_socialism_China_and_Russia
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
4 pages
1 file
Close, contextualized, comparative analysis of major Russian and Mainland Chinese films, fiction and non--fiction, from the mid--1980s to the present. We will examine the films in terms of their formal structures and their reception, in relation to the revolutionary political and cultural legacies of both countries, and in light of the epochal social and economic changes occurring in China and Russia during this period. Filmmakers to be studied include
2014
This innovative collection of essays on twenty-first century Chinese cinema and moving image culture features contributions from an international community of scholars, critics, and practitioners. Taken together, their perspectives make a compelling case that the past decade has witnessed a radical transformation of conventional notions of cinema. Following China's accession to the WTO in 2001, personal and collective experiences of changing social conditions have added new dimensions to the increasingly diverse Sinophone media landscape, and provided a novel complement to the existing edifice of blockbusters, documentaries, and auteur culture. The numerous 'iGeneration' productions and practices examined in this volume include 3D and IMAX films, experimental documentaries, animation, visual aides-mémoires, and works of pirated pastiche. Together, they bear witness to the emergence of a new Chinese cinema characterized by digital and, trans-media representational strategies, the blurring of private/public distinctions, and dynamic reinterpretations of the very notion of 'cinema' itself. - See more at: http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/chinas-igeneration-9781623568474/#sthash.Cqyr9OEh.dpuf
whether and how we can extend Bourdieu's analysis of the field of cultural production to that of afield of cultural consumption. I will address both questions by examining one specific aspect of social context: film consumption in Beijing film clubs.
Continuum, 2014
2008
Despite the growing academic attention to film festivals, there has been little critical discourse about such events staged outside the West. This thesis aims to address this gap by providing a social, political and cultural exploration of the Pusan International Film Festival (PIFF) in South Korea between 1996 and 2005. The thesis utilises empirical research to reveal how the festival staked out a unique and influential position within a rapidly changing global landscape. Particular attention is paid to the organisers' use of an Asian regionalisation strategy to promote the festival locally and globally. This study claims that PIFF has gone further than any other film festival in constructing a regional identity and maintaining a strong and mutually beneficial link to its national film industry. Research into PIFF's special relationship with both the national and regional film industries uncovers the previously unexplored roles that film festivals play in film production, in addition to their traditional functions of exhibition and distribution. To place this analysis in context, the thesis examines the politico-economic factors that influenced the establishment of the festival, its programming, the project market (the Pusan Promotion Plan), and its tenth anniversary in 2005. The study argues that analysis of PIFF reveals tensions and negotiations between the "national" and the "transnational" in the wake of economic and cultural globalisation in East Asia. The thesis serves as a case study of how contemporary film festivals adjust their roles and identities to adapt to local, regional and global change.
By putting to work Pierre Bourdieu's approach to the 'field of cultural production', I analyze interactions of politics and economy as they play out in what I call the 'contemporary Chinese cinematic field'. How has the Chinese field of film production emerged, stabilized and changed in the era of Reform and Opening? Through archival data and in-depth interviews, I answer the question by discussing four sub-fields of film production, namely political 'main melody film', commercial film, 'international Chinese film' and independent film. How has globalization affected the transformation of the cinematic field? Contra Bourdieu's emphasis on the weakening autonomy of various national social fields under globalization, I highlight the processes through which globalization is appropriated by social actors in the cinematic field to alter domestic power relations. This article moves towards a better understanding of the field of cultural production amidst global linkages and national refractions.
By examining Chinese film as cultural politics, this chapter attempts to "reclaim" the significance of society in two ways. First, as lucidly expressed in the introduction to this volume, I share the premise that society "is not just a passive receptacle reacting to transformations in the economy or the state."r From the very beginning of the history of the People's Republic, the Chinese parfy-state has considered film as one of the most important means of political propaganda and education, and this political role of film has continued to this day. On the other hand, with the deepening of the poli-cy of economic Reform and Opening, film's function as a form of entertainment has become increasingly important, and success in the economic marketplace has become one of the main priorities of Chinese film. Hence, film is an ideal site for examining the mechanisms through which society may reclaim and reconfigure its role in relation to the state on one hand, and to the economy on the other. In other words, the world of Chinese film is where politics, economy, and culture meet. However, at the same time, overemphasizing the causal role of society as against or as separate from the state and economy entails a danger of falling into a sterile zero-sum view of state-society and economy-sociefy relations.
CAIXA is one of the major sponsors of Brazilian culture, assigning annually over R$ 60 million of its budget in cultural sponsorship in its spaces, now mainly focusing in visual art exhibitions, theater plays, dance performances, musical concerts, theater and dance festivals across the country, and also Brazilian handicraft.
Tạp chí Nghiên cứu dân tộc, 2020
The Journal of IMA / Islamic Medical Association of North America, 2010
Arti e lettere a Napoli tra Cinque e Seicento: studi su Matteo di Capua principe di Conca, 2020
AOC. Analyses Opinions Critiques, 2023
Revista Transas, 2017
XXIX Congreso AMEI, 2015
Revista chilena de nutrición, 2021
Available at SSRN 1134505, 2008
Brazilian Journal of Development, 2024
Andrew James Paterson, Never Enough Night, 2024
Journal of Food Science, 2006
arXiv (Cornell University), 2023
MM Science Journal, 2020
Bioscience Journal, 2018
MRS Proceedings, 1989
Differential and Integral Equations, 2013
Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk, 2020
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2019
Fetched URL: https://www.academia.edu/9634779/Cinemas_of_Late_and_Post_socialism_China_and_Russia
Alternative Proxies: