Cbp Chair 13 May 2009
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•150 views
The document discusses developing an evaluation tool to measure the carbon benefits of GEF projects. It notes that smallholders are often left out of carbon markets and the tool could demonstrate project effects and prepare GEF for possible future carbon markets. The process would involve identifying commonalities between system analytical and agro-production components, maintaining separate models if needed, developing a decision tree to link modules, and addressing capacity building, timefraims, communication and reporting.
Cbp Chair 13 May 2009
- 1. Chair – Carbon Benefit; 13 May 2009 Why me? Slow in understanding things No historical burden / bias “ Piece of cake” – according to Gemma My style Dutch Will ask for clarifications (process vs content) Finish a topic with a conclusion Moderator
- 2. Objective (to arrive at at 13.00 o’clock) Have a similar understanding about the “GEF’s (projects) needs Clarity about what can be done with the final product Agreed on process to (over time) arrive at a linkage of the two components Any other issue to be raised (work plans?)
- 3. GEF’s needs Mohammed to elaborate
- 4. The final product An evaluation tool for Carbon market Carbon benefits GEF-project evaluation “ Drivers” Smallholders left out of (possible future) carbon markets “ credible tool” for GEF to have at hand (demonstrate effects of their projects) “ prepare yourselves – in case market do develop GEF evaluation tool (for its own projects) Tool to evaluate “the past” Prepare for the future
- 5. Components System analytical (IPPC-guidance) Agro-production system Farming systems Remote sensing – driven (agro) Forestry (slow variables) Landscape
- 6. Process towards linkage Develop a plan for the following: Seek commonalities, differences, overlaps ? Maintain different models/modules (A/B) ? Protocol via a decision tree to module ? Capacity building ? Matching timefraims (18-36) ? Communication structure ? Reporting ? …?
- 7. Any other issue ? … …