Content-Length: 9449 | pFad | https://www.w3.org/2011/10/12-er-minutes.html#item01

Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference -- 12 Oct 2011

W3C

Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference

12 Oct 2011

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Shadi, Christophe, Philip, Emmanuelle
Regrets
Kostas, CarlosV, Samuel
Chair
Shadi
Scribe
Philip

Contents


Processing remaining comments

<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011Jun/0000.html

Shadi: prefix "http" might cause problems with existing tools
... current up-to-date prefix for dublin core is "dc"

RESOLUTION: accept the comments from Thomas Steiner

<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011Sep/0000.html

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/#requestsProperty

PhilipA: What are the best practices in RDF?

Shadi: two opinions on that
... might not be a good idea to change this

Christophe: what would be the implications?

Shadi: parsers would have problems
... we have decided in the past that if someone needs to use http requests in another context, they would need to implement their own (for example SOAP messages)

RESOLUTION: reject the comments

<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011Sep/0002.html

Shadi: pointers use case: point to a specific location inside a resource
... suggestion to point inside an RDF document
... for example point to a location in a VCard document
... pointer in RDF at the moment working group note

<cstrobbe> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/charter WebID Incubator Group Charter : Henry Story mentioned as initial chair

Shadi: let us wait if there is more demand for an implementation of this in the future
... no implementation of this at the moment

Action item review

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tracker/

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tracker/actions/open

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tracker/actions/52

Shadi: idea was to register http-in-rdf as protocol

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MessageClass

Review of TAP

<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Sep/0006.html

Shadi: I think we can express that example (the outcomes) in EARL
... TAP outcomes can be expressed in EARL terms
... TAP and EARL not replicating each other
... Is there easy access to the developers of TAP, for example a mailing list?

Christophe: need to check

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/earl

<cstrobbe> http://testanything.org/wiki/index.php/TAP_at_IETF:_Draft_Standard see top : mailing list at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap

Christophe: there is a mailing list for TAP at IETF

Upcoming meetings

Shadi: Let's contact them

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/10/25 18:23:47 $









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://www.w3.org/2011/10/12-er-minutes.html#item01

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy