I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

• attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 truetrue

This paper is unpublished scientific work because now it does not exist in Elsevier or any other databases. It existed, was removed from all databases without authors permissions and now it is placed in a variety of Internet web pages. This work is given to Commons on the bases of:

s:Wikisource:What Wikisource includes#Scientific research

Scientific research is acceptable to include in Wikisource if the work has verifiable scholarly peer review from a trusted entity. The work must be released under a free license, which precludes works already commercially published under an agreement that prohibits republishing. An example of such acceptable research work is a thesis that has been scrutinized and accepted by a thesis committee of an accredited university. Previously unpublished Scientific research, regardless of being peer reviewed or not, is acceptable to include in Wikisource if an author meets Wikipedia:Notability (regardless of the actual presence of Wikipedia article on the author) and the work is released under a Wikisource compatible license.

Under the proper licence, as suggested by cmadler: "No, there are exceptions, and among them are scientific research "if the work has verifiable scholarly peer review from a trusted entity", including a thesis or dissertation. Also, "Previously unpublished Scientific research, regardless of being peer reviewed or not, is acceptable to include in Wikisource if an author meets Wikipedia:Notability (regardless of the actual presence of Wikipedia article on the author) and the work is released under a Wikisource compatible license." (See s:Wikisource:What Wikisource includes#Scientific research) cmadler (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)"