create a website

How can behavioral economics inform non-market valuation? An example from the preference reversal literature. (2010). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
RePEc:feb:artefa:00002.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 29

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. ———. 1998. Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued more Highly than High-Value Options. Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making 11: 107-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Adamowicz, W. L. 2000. Environmental Valuation. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. eds. J. Louviere, D. Hensher, and J. Swait. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  3. Adamowicz, W. L., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1998. Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80, no. 1: 6475.

  4. Bazerman, M. H. D. A Moore A. E. Tenbrunsel K. A. Wade-Benzoni and S. Blount. 1999. Explaining how Preferences Change Across Joint versus Separate Evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39: 41-58.

  5. Bazerman, M. H. G. F. Loewenstein and S. B. White. 1992. Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decisions: Judging an Alternative versus Choosing Among Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly: 220-240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Boxall, P. C., W. L. Adamowicz, J. Swait, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1996. A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation. Ecological Economics 18, no. 3: 243-53.

  7. Carson, Richard T., Nicholas E. Flores,and Norman F. Meade. 2001. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19: 173-210.

  8. Chaikin, S., and Y. Trope, Eds. 1999. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Desvousges,W.H., F.R. Johnson, R.W. Dunford, K.J. Boyle, S.P. Hudson, K.N. Wilson, 1993. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: tests of validity and reliability, Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 91–159. Ed. J.A. Hausman, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Frederick, Shane 2002. Automated Choice Heuristics. Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment. Eds. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 548-58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Frederick, Shane, and Baruch Fischoff. Scope (In)sensitivity in Elicited Valuations, Risk Decision and Policy, 1998, 3, pp. 109-123.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Grether, David M. and Plott, Charles. Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon, American Economic Review, September 1979, 69, pp. 623-638.

  13. Heberlein, Thomas A., Matthew W Wilson, Richard C. Bishop and Nora Schaeffer. Scope Sensitivity and the Validity of Contingent Valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005, 50. pp 1-22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Hsee, C. K G. F. Loewenstein S. Blount and M. A. Bazerman. 1999. Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125, no. 5: 576-90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Hsee, C. K. 1996. The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation of Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 46: 247-57.

  16. Irwin, J. R., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, and McClelland. G.H. 1993. Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6: 5-18.

  17. Kahneman, D. and J.L. Knetsch. 1992. Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 57-70.

  18. Kahneman, D., and S. Frederick. 2002. Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Thought. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 49-81. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Kahneman, Daniel. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 2003, 93 (5), 1449-1475.

  20. List, J. A. 2002. Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The more is less Phenomenon. American Economic Review 92, no. 5: 1636-43.

  21. List, John A., “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (2003), pp. 41-71 List, John A., Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace, Econometrica, 72 (2004), pp. 615-625.

  22. Louviere, J. J. D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Models: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Magat, W. A., W.K. Viscusi, and J. Huber. 1988. Paired Comparison and Contingent Valuation Approaches to Morbidity Risk Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, no. 4: 395-411.

  24. Shogren, Jason F., Michael Margolis, Cannon Koo, and John A. List. 2001. A Random nth-price Auction. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 409-421.

  25. Slovic, Paul, Melissa Finucane, Ellen Peters, and Donald G. MacGregor. 2007. The Affect Heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research 177 (3): 1333-1352.

  26. Slovic, Paul., and S. Lichtenstein. 1968. Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78: 1-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Takatsuka, Y., J. Kahn, and S. Stewart. 2002. Choice Model and Contingent Valuation Estimates of the Value of Ecosystem Attributes. Working Paper: University of Tennessee.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16:8-37.

  29. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Estimation of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Valuing health at the end of life: A stated preference discrete choice experiment. (2015). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Shah, Koonal ; Wailoo, Allan J..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:124:y:2015:i:c:p:48-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Contracts for afforestation and the role of monitoring for landowners’ willingness to accept. (2015). Thorsen, Bo ; Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:29-37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Inner conflict between nuclear power generation and electricity rates: A Japanese case study. (2015). Sato, Masayuki ; Ida, Takanori ; Takemura, Kosuke.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:48:y:2015:i:c:p:61-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Spatial analysis of the competitiveness of the high-speed train and air transport: The role of access to terminals in the Madrid–Barcelona corridor. (2014). Roman, Concepcion ; Martin, Juan Carlos ; Garcia-Palomares, Juan Carlos ; Gutierrez, Javier.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:392-408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Solar cooking in Senegalese villages: An application of best–worst scaling. (2014). Swinnen, Gilbert ; van Passel, Steven ; Lizin, Sebastien ; Vanschoenwinkel, Janka ; Azadi, Hossein.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:67:y:2014:i:c:p:447-458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Categories shape preferences: A model of taste heterogeneity arising from categorization of alternatives. (2014). Swait, Joffre ; Johnson, Richard D. ; Brigden, Neil .
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:13:y:2014:i:c:p:3-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Do Consumers Pay More for What They Value More? The Case of Local Milk-based Dairy Products in Senegal. (2014). Lefvre, Mlanie .
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:165909.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels. (2013). Siikamäki, Juha ; Newell, Richard ; Siikamaki, Juha V..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators. (2013). bergantino, angela ; Amoroso, Salvatore ; Bierlaire, Michel ; Catalano, Mario ; Migliore, Marco .
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:30:y:2013:i:c:p:77-91.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Explaining differences in real and hypothetical experimental auctions and choice experiments with personality. (2013). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Lusk, Jayson ; Grebitus, Carola.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:36:y:2013:i:c:p:11-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Another avenue for anatomy of income comparisons: Evidence from hypothetical choice experiments. (2013). Yamada, Katsunori ; Sato, Masayuki.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:89:y:2013:i:c:p:35-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A cost-benefit analysis on the specialization in departments of obstetrics and gynecology in Japan. (2012). Shen, Junyi ; Saijo, Tatsuyoshi ; Fukui, On ; Morishige, Kenichiro ; Hashimoto, Hiroyuki ; Nakashima, Takako ; Kimura, Tadashi.
    In: Health Economics Review.
    RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:1-10:10.1186/2191-1991-2-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Using the internet to administer more realistic vignette experiments. (2012). Winter, Joachim ; McFadden, Daniel ; Ho, Teck ; Gottlieb, Alison S. ; Chan, Taizan ; Caro, Francis G. ; Yee, Christine .
    In: Munich Reprints in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenar:19971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Factors Affecting Land Trust Agents’ Preferences for Conservation Easements. (2012). Hoag, Dana ; Keske, Catherine M. ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Cropper, Eric D. ; McLeod, Donald M. ; Bastian, Christopher T..
    In: Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:ags:jrapmc:143769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Existence and Magnitude of Health-related Externalities: Evidence from a Choice Experiment. (2011). Mentzakis, Emmanouil ; Hurley, Jeremiah.
    In: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hpa:wpaper:201101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Incorporating Local Water Quality in Welfare Measures of Agri-environmental Policy: A Choice Modelling Approach Employing GIS. (2011). Baskaran, Ramesh ; Tait, Peter .
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:116074.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Is the Welfare State Sustainable? Experimental Evidence on Citizens’ Preferences for Redistribution. (2010). Neustadt, Ilja ; Zweifel, Peter.
    In: SOI - Working Papers.
    RePEc:soz:wpaper:1003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Putting the Spotlight on Attribute Definition: Divergence Between Experts and the Public. (2010). Rogers, Abbie ; Cleland, Jonelle .
    In: Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports.
    RePEc:een:eenhrr:1077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The influence of (toll-related) travel costs in residential location decisions of households: A stated choice approach. (2010). van Wee, Bert ; Tillema, Taede ; Ettema, Dick.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:44:y:2010:i:10:p:785-796.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: A review of the evidence and methodological implications. (2010). Mourato, Susana ; Pietzner, Katja ; Viebahn, Peter ; Roche, Maria Yetano ; Fischedick, Manfred.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:10:p:5301-5310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Changes in consumers behavior when a vertically integrated service is separated —The case of Japanese mobile phone services—. (2010). Nakamura, Akihiro.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services in New Zealand Winegrowing Regions: Testing for Benefit Transfer. (2010). Cullen, Ross ; Baskaran, Ramesh ; Colombo, Sergio .
    In: Review of Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:reapec:143269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Putting the Spotlight on Attribute Definition: a knowledge base approach. (2010). Rogers, Abbie ; Cleland, Jonelle .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:eerhrr:107578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. “Pick the Tick” The Impact of Health Endorsements on Consumers’ Food Choices. (2010). Umberger, Wendy ; Mueller, Simone C..
    In: 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
    RePEc:ags:eaa115:116436.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Willingness to pay: how stable are the estimates?. (2009). Choi, Andy.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:33:y:2009:i:4:p:301-310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Valuation of Marine Ecosystem Threshold Effects: Application of Choice Experiments to Value Algal Bloom in the Black Sea Coast of Bulgaria. (2009). Longo, A. ; Taylor, Timothy .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:eid:wpaper:7/09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Option and non-use values and rail project appraisal. (2009). Nash, Chris ; Geurs, Karst ; Laird, James .
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:16:y:2009:i:4:p:173-182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests. (2009). STENGER, Anne ; Navrud, Stle ; Harou, Patrice.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:15:y:2009:i:1-2:p:1-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
    In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Consumer Behavior: Product Characteristics and Quality Perception. (2008). de Borobia Pires Gonçalves, Ricardo ; de Borobia Pires Gonçalves, Ricardo ; de Borobia Pires Gonçalves, Ricardo ; de Borobia Pires Gonçalves, Ricardo ; Gonalves, Ricardo Pires.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Emotions and decision rules in discrete choice experiments for valuing health care programmes for the elderly. (2008). Hanemann, Michael ; Araña, Jorge ; Leon, Carmelo J. ; Araa, Jorge E..
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:3:p:753-769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study. (2008). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:56:y:2008:i:3:p:275-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Preferences for environmental quality under uncertainty. (2008). Roberts, David ; Lusk, Jayson ; Boyer, Tracy.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:66:y:2008:i:4:p:584-593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. DIFFERENCES IN U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR CERTIFIED PORK CHOPS WHEN FACING BRANDED VS. NON-BRANDED CHOICES. (2008). Ubilava, David ; Nilsson, Tomas ; Lusk, Jayson ; Foster, Kenneth.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Farmer preferences for Milpa diversity and genetically modified maize in Mexico: A latent class approach. (2007). Smale, Melinda ; Birol, Ekin ; VILLALBA, ERIC RAYN .
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:726.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The drivers of and barriers to energy efficiency in renovation decisions of single-family home-owners. (2007). Jakob, Martin .
    In: CEPE Working paper series.
    RePEc:cee:wpcepe:07-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Consumer Awareness of and Preferences for Bio-active Lipid Enhanced Beef. (2007). Cash, Sean ; McCann-Hiltz, Diane ; Ding, Yulian ; Peng, Yanning ; Beaunom, Wendy ; Kingston-Riechers, JoAnn .
    In: Project Report Series.
    RePEc:ags:ualbpr:52089.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Using Discrete Choice Experiments within a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework. (2006). McIntosh, Emma.
    In: PharmacoEconomics.
    RePEc:spr:pharme:v:24:y:2006:i:9:p:855-868.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The Influence of Environmental Deterioration and Network Improvement on Transport Modal Choice. (2006). Shen, Junyi ; Sakata, Yusuke ; Hashimoto, Yoshizo.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics and Business.
    RePEc:osk:wpaper:0604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. How much is too much? - An investigation of the effect of the number of choice sets, starting point and the choice of bid vectors in choice experiments. (2006). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Internalization of Externalities in The Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy. (2006). MARKANDYA, ANIL ; Longo, Alberto ; Petrucci, Marta.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Using choice experiments to value non-market goods and services: Evidence from field experiments. (2006). list, john ; Sinha, Paramita ; Taylor, Michael.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Towards a practical method to establish comparable values of travel time savings from stated choice experiments with differing design dimensions. (2006). Hensher, David.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:40:y:2006:i:10:p:829-840.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Willingness-to-Pay for Genetic Attributes in Aquaculture Industries. (2006). Harrison, R Wes ; Boever, Brian P. ; Tiersch, Terrence R..
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. MEASURING U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS USING CHOICE MODELING EXPERIMENTS: THE ROLE OF PRICE, PRODUCT BENEFITS AND TECHNOLOGY. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. A HIERARCHICAL BAYES APPROACH TO MODELING CHOICE DATA: A STUDY OF WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAMS. (2004). Kramer, Randall ; Eisen-Hecht, Jonathan I. ; Huber, Joel.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Estimating the Nonmarket Value of Green Technologies Using Partial Data Enrichment Techniques. (2004). Peterson, Jeffrey ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19994.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Consumers and Experts : An Econometric Analysis of the Demand for Water Heaters. (2003). van soest, arthur ; Fiebig, Denzil ; van Soest, A. H. O., ; Bartels, R..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:700496ed-75bb-495d-a00c-b08ea79420c6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-27 09:16:43 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy