1. The motivation of mission statements: How regulatory mode influences workplace discrimination. (2021). Higgins, Tory E ; Conley, Mark A ; Kanze, Dana.
   In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
   RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:166:y:2021:i:c:p:84-103.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Will Procurement Officials be Biased to Disregard Procurement Rules in Favor of a Low-priced, Albeit Defective, Bid?. (2018). Yoav, Dotan ; Omer, Dekel .
   In: Review of Law & Economics.
   RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:14:y:2018:i:2:p:30:n:5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Self-reported ethical risk taking tendencies predict actual dishonesty. (2014). Zimerman, Liora ; Bereby-Meyer, Yoella ; Shalvi, Shaul .
   In: Judgment and Decision Making.
   RePEc:jdm:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:58-64.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Moral firmness. (2013). Leiser, David ; Shalvi, Shaul .
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:400-407.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Dishonestly increasing the likelihood of winning. (2012). Shalvi, Shaul .
   In: Judgment and Decision Making.
   RePEc:jdm:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:3:p:292-303.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. (2011). Ethical maneuvering: Why people avoid both major and minor lies. British Journal of Management, 22, s16–s27.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Aquino, K., & Reed, I. A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Association of Cerified Fraud Examiners (2008). In ACFE Report on the Naion on Occupational Fraud & Abuse. Retrieved July 28, 2011, from http://www.acfe. com/documents/2008-rttn.pdf Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M. H., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81, 56–64.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Barkan, R., Ayal, S., Gino, F., & Ariely D. (2012). The pot calling the kettle black: Distancing reponse to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141. 757–773.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). New York: McGrawHill.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Bazerman, M. H, Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., WadeBenzoni, K. A. & Blount, S. (1999). Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39, 41–58.

7. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Bazerman, M. H., Gino, F., Shu, L. L., & Tsay, C. (2011). Joint evaluation as a real world tool for managing emotional assessment of morality. Emotion Review, 3, 290– 292.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Bem, D. (1972). Self perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6 pp. 1—62). New York: Academic Press.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Bereby-Meyer, Y., Meyer, J., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). Decision making under internal uncertainty: The case of multiple-choice tests. Acta Psychologica, 112, 207– 220.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Cain D. M., Loewenstein, G., Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies, 34, 1– 25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Chance, Z., Norton, M., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of selfdeception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 15655–15659.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing con[FB02?]icts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M.H Bazerman (Eds.), Conflict of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393–398.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Gino, F., Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 708–719.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Gino, F., Shu, L. L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Nameless + Harmless = Blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 102–115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 247– Irwin, J. R., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & McClelland, G. H. (1993). Preference[2028?]reversals and the measurement of environmental values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 5–18.

20. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 6, November 2012 Perspective effect on unethical behavior 688 Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2010). The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science, 21, 712–720.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Kern, M., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20, 378– 384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people?. Psychological Science, 21, 494–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Mead, N. F., Baumeister, R. F., Gino,F., Schweitzer, M. E, & Ariely, D. (2009). Too tired to tell the truth: Selfcontrol resource depletion and dishonesty, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 594–597.

25. Payne, J.W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382–402.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (2010). Joint presentation reduces the effect of emotion on evaluation of public actions. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 657—75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Sachdeva S., Iliev R., & Medin D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral selfregulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523–528.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Schurr, A., Avrahami, J., Kareev, Y., & Ritov, I. (2012). Sequential and aggregate choice procedures, and their effect on choices, anticipated and actual satisfaction. Manuscript under revision.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Schurr, A., Rodensky, D., & Erev, I. (2012). The effect of unpleasant experiences on evaluation and behavior. Manuscript under review.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546–556.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Shalvi, S. (2012). Dishonestly increasing the likelihood of winning. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 292– 303.

32. Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M.J.J., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 181–190.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Shalvi, S., Eldar, O. & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23, 1264–1270 Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Slovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. (1983), Preference reversals: A broader perspective. American Economic Review, 73, 596–605.

35. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Speights, D., & Hilinski , M. (2005). Return fraud and abuse: How to protect profits. . Retailing Issues Letter, 17, 1–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251–S278.

39. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P.(1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice, Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversals, American Economic Review, 80, 204–217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19, 49–54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. The effect of deliberate ignorance and choice procedure on pro-environmental decisions. (2022). Schurr, Amos ; Moyal, Adiel.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:200:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922001744.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Oversized Area Indications on Bonus Packs Fail to Affect Consumers’ Transactional Decisions—More Experimental Evidence on the Mars Case. (2021). Michetti, F ; Kamps, S ; Herpen, E ; Purnhagen, K P.
   In: Journal of Consumer Policy.
   RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:44:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10603-021-09490-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Seven (weak and strong) helping effects systematically tested in separate evaluation, joint evaluation and forced choice. (2021). Erlandsson, Arvid.
   In: Judgment and Decision Making.
   RePEc:jdm:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:5:p:1113-1154.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Responding to requests for help: Effects of payoff schemes with small monetary units. (2020). Jie, Yun.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:88:y:2020:i:c:s2214804320304882.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Violations of dominance in decision-making. (2019). Bauer, Thomas ; Kourouxous, Thomas.
   In: Business Research.
   RePEc:spr:busres:v:12:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40685-019-0093-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. An exploratory investigation of the impact of evaluation context on ambiguity aversion. (2019). Newell, Ben R ; Gney, Ule.
   In: Judgment and Decision Making.
   RePEc:jdm:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:335-348.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. (2019). Moore, Don A ; Minson, Julia A ; Logg, Jennifer M.
   In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
   RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:151:y:2019:i:c:p:90-103.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. On preferring A to B, while also preferring B to A. (2018). .
   In: Rationality and Society.
   RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:305-331.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Overhead aversion: Do some types of overhead matter more than others?. (2018). Portillo, Javier E ; Stinn, Joseph.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:40-50.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Improving scope sensitivity in contingent valuation: Joint and separate evaluation of health states. (2017). Sanchez Martinez, Fernando Ignacio ; ABELLAN-PERPIÑAN, JOSE-MARIA ; Prez, Jorge Martneza ; Abellna, Jos Mara ; Sncheza, Fernandoa Ignacio ; Roblesa, Jos Antonio ; Pintoa, Jos Luis.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:12:p:e304-e318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Choice-justifications after allocating resources in helping dilemmas. (2017). Bckstrm, Martin ; Bjrklund, Fredrik ; Erlandsson, Arvid .
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:60-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Overcoming the outcome bias: Making intentions matter. (2016). Sezer, Ovul ; Bazerman, Max H ; Gino, Francesca ; Zhang, Ting.
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:137:y:2016:i:c:p:13-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Bounded awareness: Implications for ethical decision making. (2016). Bazerman, Max H ; Sezer, Ovul .
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:136:y:2016:i:c:p:95-105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Relative willingness to pay and surplus comparison mechanism in experimental auctions. (2015). Pierre, COMBRIS ; Eric, GIRAUD HERAUD ; Alexandra, SEABRA PINTO .
    In: Cahiers du GREThA.
    RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2015-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Is there a place for sympathy in negotiation? Finding strength in weakness. (2015). Shirako, Aiwa ; Kray, Laura J ; Kilduff, Gavin J.
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:131:y:2015:i:c:p:95-109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:4:p:185-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Relative willingness to pay and surplus comparison mechanism. (2015). Pinto, Alexandra Seabra ; Combris, Pierre ; Giraud-Heraud, Eric.
    In: 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:eaa143:202755.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Estimation du poids dun attribut environnemental : influence et effet des mesures dévaluation. (2014). Irwin, Julie ; Jongmans, Eline ; Jolibert, Alain.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01185772.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Cognitive Biases in Government Procurement – An Experimental Study. (2014). Omer, Dekel ; Amos, Schurr .
    In: Review of Law & Economics.
    RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:32:n:4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Do experimental auction estimates pass the scope test?. (2013). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Loureiro, Maria ; Gracia, Azucena .
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:37:y:2013:i:c:p:7-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Is that the answer you had in mind? The effect of perspective on unethical behavior. (2012). Schurr, Amos ; Kareev, Yaakov ; Avrahami, Judith ; Ritov, Ilana.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:6:p:679-688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. The Effect of Perspective on Unethical Behavior. (2012). Schurr, Amos ; Kareev, Yaakov ; Avrahami, Judith ; Ritov, Ilana.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:huj:dispap:dp620.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Violations of procedure invariance—The case of preference reversals in monadic and competitive product evaluations. (2012). Mller, Holger ; Vogt, Bodo ; Kroll, Eike B.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:19:y:2012:i:4:p:406-412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Unsure what the future will bring? You may overindulge: Uncertainty increases the appeal of wants over shoulds. (2012). Milkman, Katherine.
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:119:y:2012:i:2:p:163-176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Trolley problems in context. (2011). Shallow, Christopher ; Iliev, Rumen ; Medin, Douglas .
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:593-601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2010). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. When Judgments and Preferences Fail to Conform: Research on Preference Reversals for Product Purchases. (2010). Mueller, Holger ; Kroll, Eike ; Vogt, Bodo ; Muller, Holger .
    In: FEMM Working Papers.
    RePEc:mag:wpaper:100003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. How can behavioral economics inform non-market valuation? An example from the preference reversal literature. (2010). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. How can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2010). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ala:wpaper:2010-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment. (2007). Harvey, Robert ; McMahon, Joan.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:72:y:2007:i:4:p:335-357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. (2005). Ritov, Ilana ; Kogut, Tehila.
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:97:y:2005:i:2:p:106-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Eliciting several willingness to pay in a single contingent valuation survey: application to health care. (2003). Protière, Christel ; Protiere, Christel ; Luchini, Stephane ; Moatti, Jean-Paul.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:51-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The Hot Versus Cold Effect in a Simple Bargaining Experiment. (2003). Weimann, Joachim ; Brosig-Koch, Jeannette ; Yang, Chun-Lei.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:75-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The More Is Less Phenomenon. (2002). list, john.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:92:y:2002:i:5:p:1636-1643.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Identifying the structure of institutions to promote innovation and growth. (1999). Petit, Pascal ; Amable, Bruno.
    In: CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange).
    RePEc:cpm:cepmap:9919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-02-27 06:33:51 || Missing content? Let us know