create a website

The Indifferent, the Good Samaritan, the Brave and the Agent in Allais Paradox situation – or How Endowment Effect Influences Our Decision in Case of Allais Paradox?. (2017). Kolnhofer-Derecskei, Anita ; Anita, Kolnhofer-Derecskei.
In: Organizacija.
RePEc:vrs:organi:v:50:y:2017:i:4:p:299-313:n:1.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 34

References cited by this document

Cocites: 31

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Allais, M. (1988, December 9). An Outline of My Main Contributions to Economic Science. Lecture notes distributed in Nobel Lectures. France, Paris. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1988/allais-lecture.html, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0013463410.1007/BF00134634

  2. Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2010). Certain and Uncertain Utility. The Allais Paradox and Five Decision Theory Phenomena. Levine’s Working Paper Archive 926159295. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/83da/ed55d89ad8d0b94ac72e509dbb118983f069.pdf

  3. Arrow, K. J. (1984). The Economics of Agency. Stanford University: A Report of the Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency, www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA151436
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Liu, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2016). Group Decision Rules and Group Rationality under Risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 52(3), 99-116, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-016-9237-810.1007/s11166-016-9237-8

  5. Bakacsi, Gy. (2015). Változó vezetési paradigma – változó megbízó ügynök probléma? [Changing leader-paradigm – changing principal-agent problem?] In Bakacsi, Gy. –Balaton, K. (Eds.): Vezetés és szervezet társadalmi kontextusban: Tanulmányok Dobák Miklós 60. születésnapja tiszteletére. Budapest, Akadémiai Press, 29-54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Birnbaum, M. H. (2007). Tests of branch splitting and branch-splitting independence in Allais paradoxes with positive and mixed consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 154-173, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.00410.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.004

  7. Birnbaum, M., H. (2008). New Paradox of Risky Decision Making. Psychological Review. 115(2), 463-501.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Camerer, C. (1998). Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision Making. Experimental Economics. 1, 163-183.

  9. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 81(1), 1-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.00910.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009

  10. Da Silva, S., Baldo, D., & Matsushita, M. (2013). Biological correlates of the Allais paradox. Applied Economics, 45(5). 555-568, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.60713310.1080/00036846.2011.607133

  11. Dupont, D., Y. & Lee, G., S. (2002). The Endowment Effect, Status Quo Bias and Loss Aversion: Rational Alternative Explanation. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(1), 87–101.10.1023/A:1016371414952

  12. Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fishbacher, U. (2008). Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287-303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.00110.1016/j.geb.2007.06.001

  13. Fan, Ch. (2002). Allais paradox in the small. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49, 411–421, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00012-410.1016/S0167-2681(02)00012-4

  14. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature0204310.1038/02043

  15. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U. & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534 – 539, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Hofstede, G. (2017). The Hofstede Centre [Online]. Retrieved February 2017 from https://geert-hofstede.com
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Huck, S., & Müller, W. (2012). Allais for all: Revisiting the paradox in a large representative sample. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44(3), 261–293, http://dx.doi.org/1007/s11166-012-9142-8

  18. Kádár, B. & Reicher, R. Z. (2016). Education Supported by SME vs. SME Supported by Education. Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2016 Budapest, 73-79.

  19. Khalil, E. L. (2015). Temptations as Impulsivity: How far are Regret and Allais Paradox from Shoplifting? Economic Modelling, 51, 551-559, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.01610.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.016

  20. Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A. (2017). How would you decide on behalf of your friend? Takács, I. (Eds). Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21 st century “Global challenges, local answers” Budapest, Obuda University. 195-205. Retrieved July 2017 from http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/publikaciok/management-enterprise-benchmarking-IV

  21. Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A., & Nagy, V. (2016). Under Risk. Proceedings of FIKUSZ ’16 Symposium for Young Researchers, 161-172. Retrieved February 2017 from https://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/sites/default/files/16_Derecskei_Nagy.pdf
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A., & Nagy, V. (2017). Comparing risk definitions giving by Hungarian and Belgian Bachelor Students. Thinking together. In Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Maletič, D., Maletič, M., Al-Najjar, B., Gotzamani, K., Gianni, M., Kalinowski, T., B. & Gomišček, B. (2017). Contingency Factors Influencing Implementation of Physical Asset Management Practices. Organizacija, 50, 3-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-000310.1515/orga-2017-0003
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Oliver, A. (2003). A quantitative and qualitative test of the Allais paradox using health outcomes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 35-48, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00153-810.1016/S0167-4870(02)00153-8

  25. Palmer, C. J., Paton, B., Ngo, T. T., Thomson, R. H., Hohwy, J., & Miller, S., M. (2013). Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty? Neuroethics, 6, 97-103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9158-410.1007/s12152-012-9158-4
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Reb, J., & Conolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107–114.

  27. Robison, L. J., Shupp, R. S., & Myers, R. J. (2010). Expected Utility Paradoxes. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 187-193, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.00510.1016/j.socec.2009.12.005

  28. Ross, S., A. (1973). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134-39. Retrieved February 2017 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1817064?origin=JSTOR-pdf

  29. Simon, H. (1971). Designing Organizations for an Information-rich World. In Greenberger, M. (Eds.) Computers, Communications and the Public Interest. The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 38-72.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Simon, H. (1978). Rational Decision-Making in Business Organization. Nobel Memorial Lecture. 8th of December 1978.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4157. (Sep. 27, 1974), pp. 1124-1131, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819740927%293%3A185%3A4157%3C1124%3AJUUHAB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Van de Kuilen, G. & Wakker, P. P. (2006). Learning in the Allais paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 33(3), 155–164, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0390-310.1007/s11166-006-0390-3

  33. Wu, G. & Gonzales, R. (1998). Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 115–139.10.1023/A:1007714509322

  34. Zoltay Paprika, Z., & Nagy, V. (2012). Assessment of Creativity on the Job Market. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 166-181, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00136-010.1016/S2212-5671(12)00136-0
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Background risk, insurance and investment behaviour: Experimental evidence from Kenya. (2022). Strobl, Renate.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:34-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Real Options and Reduction of Basic Risk of Index?Based Climate Agricultural Insurance. (2021). le Fur, Eric ; Outreville, Franois J ; Lefur, Eric .
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:43:y:2021:i:4:p:1658-1671.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. From Neoclassical Economics to Common Good Economics. (2021). Teitscheid, Petra ; Felber, Christian ; Dolderer, Johannes.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2093-:d:500109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Cognitive bias in insurance: Evidence from a health scheme in India. (2021). Ontiveros, Darwin Ugarte ; Platteau, Jean-Philippe.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:144:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21001108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. From expected utility theory to prospect theory: tracking down the experimental path after forty years. (2020). Kalinowski, Slawomir.
    In: Operations Research and Decisions.
    RePEc:wut:journl:v:4:y:2020:p:39-56:id:1555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Delayed Premium Payment, Insurance Adoption, and Household Investment in Rural China. (2020). Liu, Yanyan ; Hill, Ruth V ; Chen, Kevin.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:102:y:2020:i:4:p:1177-1197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Insurance contracts when individuals “greatly value” certainty: Results from a field experiment in Burkina Faso. (2020). Guirkinger, Catherine ; Carter, Michael ; Serfilippi, Elena.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:180:y:2020:i:c:p:731-743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A revealed reference point for prospect theory. (2019). Werner, Katarzyna ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:67:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00199-017-1096-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Influence modeling: Mathematical programming representations of persuasion under either risk or uncertainty. (2019). Lunday, Brian J ; Caballero, William N.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:1:p:266-282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Optimal Deterrence of Crime: A Focus on the Time Preference of DWI Offenders. (2019). Ru, Yan ; Wang, Yuqing.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1909.06509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Insurance Contracts when Individuals “Greatly Value” Certainty: Results from a Field Experiment in Burkina Faso. (2018). Guirkinger, Catherine ; Carter, Michael ; Serfilippi, Elena.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Preferences and decision support in competitive bidding. (2017). Rasch, Alexander ; Zeppenfeld, Christopher ; Gillen, Philippe ; Fugger, Nicolas .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:17057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Indifferent, the Good Samaritan, the Brave and the Agent in Allais Paradox situation – or How Endowment Effect Influences Our Decision in Case of Allais Paradox?. (2017). Kolnhofer-Derecskei, Anita ; Anita, Kolnhofer-Derecskei.
    In: Organizacija.
    RePEc:vrs:organi:v:50:y:2017:i:4:p:299-313:n:1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Deliberately Stochastic. (2017). Riella, Gil ; Ortoleva, Pietro ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:17-013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Individual Dynamic Choice Behaviour and the Common Consequence Effect. (2017). Ruiz-Martos, Maria.
    In: ThE Papers.
    RePEc:gra:wpaper:17/01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Insuring against droughts: Evidence on agricultural intensification and index insurance demand from a randomized evaluation in rural Bangladesh. (2017). Ward, Patrick ; Spielman, David ; Magnan, Nicholas ; Kumar, Neha ; Hill, Ruth ; de Nicola, Francesca ; Makhija, Simrin.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Demand for Microinsurance: A Literature Review. (2017). Gelade, Wouter ; de Bock, Ombeline ; Platteau, Jean-Philippe.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:94:y:2017:i:c:p:139-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Willingness-To-Pay and Willingness-To-Accept are Probably Less Correlated than You Think. (2017). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Dean, Mark ; Chapman, Jonathan ; Camerer, Colin ; Snowberg, Erik.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6492.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Insuring Against Drought: Evidence on Agricultural Intensification and Demand for Index Insurance from a Randomized Evaluation in Rural Bangladesh. (2017). Spielman, David ; Magnan, Nicholas ; Kumar, Neha ; Hill, Ruth ; de Nicola, Francesca ; Makhija, Simrin ; Ward, Patrick S.
    In: 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:aaea17:258090.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Preferences and Decision Support in Competitive Bidding. (2016). Rasch, Alexander ; Zeppenfeld, Christopher ; Fugger, Nicolas .
    In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145849.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. PREMISES OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE IN RATIONAL DECISION-MAKING. (2016). Droj, Laurentiu ; popovici -Coita, Ioana Florina.
    In: Annals of Faculty of Economics.
    RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:671-681.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Impact of Violence on Individual Risk Preferences: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. (2016). Ozier, Owen ; Jakiela, Pamela.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Attention and Endogenous Framing. (2015). Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus ; Wenzel, Tobias.
    In: Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc15:112971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences : evidence from a natural experiment. (2015). Ozier, Owen ; Jakiela, Pamela.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:7440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Impact of Violence on Individual Risk Preferences: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. (2015). Ozier, Owen ; Jakiela, Pamela.
    In: HiCN Working Papers.
    RePEc:hic:wpaper:204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Fact Sheet Research on Bayesian Decision Theory. (2015). H. R. N. van Erp, ; Linger, R. O. ; P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder, .
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1409.8269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Chance theory: A separation of riskless and risky utility. (2013). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Zank, Horst .
    In: Kiel Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Chance Theory: A Separation of Riskless and Risky Utility. (2013). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Zank, Horst .
    In: The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:man:sespap:1324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Reference dependent altruism in demand bargaining. (2013). Tan, Jonathan ; Breitmoser, Yves ; Tan, Jonathan H. W., .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:92:y:2013:i:c:p:127-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Unified Game Theory. (2002). Edward, JIMENEZ.
    In: Computing in Economics and Finance 2002.
    RePEc:sce:scecf2:25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-27 03:07:57 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy