Regression Based Expected Shortfall Backtesting

Sebastian Bayer and Timo Dimitriadis

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper introduces novel backtests for the risk measure Expected Shortfall (ES) following the testing idea of Mincer and Zarnowitz (1969). Estimating a regression framework for the ES stand-alone is infeasible, and thus, our tests are based on a joint regression for the Value at Risk and the ES, which allows for different test specifications. These ES backtests are the first which solely backtest the ES in the sense that they only require ES forecasts as input parameters. As the tests are potentially subject to model misspecification, we provide asymptotic theory under misspecification for the underlying joint regression. We find that employing a misspecification robust covariance estimator substantially improves the tests' performance. We compare our backtests to existing approaches and find that our tests outperform the competitors throughout all considered simulations. In an empirical illustration, we apply our backtests to ES forecasts for 200 stocks of the S&P 500 index.

Date: 2018-01, Revised 2019-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-rmg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Published in Journal of Financial Econometrics (2020+, forthcoming)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04112 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1801.04112

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().