 Do they always say no? German consumers and second‐generation GM foodsJochen Hartl and Roland Herrmann Agricultural Economics, 2009, vol. 40, issue 5, 551-560 Abstract: European consumers and, in particular, German consumers are known to be very critical toward the introduction of genetically modified (GM) foods. It is analyzed here whether German consumers do reject second‐generation GM foods, too. Whereas first‐generation GM crops induced producer‐related benefits, second‐generation GM crops are associated with consumer‐oriented benefits like an improvement of nutritional quality. The determinants of demand for second‐generation GM rapeseed oil are investigated within an online survey of 1,556 German consumers. It is elaborated how two functional properties of the product matter; that is, long‐chain omega‐3 fatty acids and the cholesterol‐lowering effect of phytosterols. It turns out that GM rapeseed oil is neglected by 74% of all respondents. Output traits, however, will increase the probability of purchases of GM rapeseed oil. This is more the case for long‐chain omega‐3 fatty acids than for phytosterols. Date: 2009 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:agecon:v:40:y:2009:i:5:p:551-560 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Agricultural Economics is currently edited by W.A. Masters and G.E. Shively More articles in Agricultural Economics from International Association of Agricultural Economists Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.