Eine invariante Bewertung wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften

Klaus Ritzberger

Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 2008, vol. 9, issue 3, 267-285

Abstract: Abstract: This article presents an update of the ranking of economics journals by the invariant method, as introduced by Palacio‐Huerta and Volij (2004) , with a broader sample of 261 journals. By comparison with the two other most prominent rankings it also proposes a list of “target journals,” ranked according to their quality, as a standard for the field of economics. It appears that economics is still the dominant discipline, but finance has caught up.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2516.2008.00280.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:perwir:v:9:y:2008:i:3:p:267-285

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1465-6493

Access Statistics for this article

Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik is currently edited by Lars P. Feld, J¸rgen von Hagen, Bernd Rudolph and Achim Wambach

More articles in Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik from Verein für Socialpolitik Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().