Do People Value More Informative News?

Felix Chopra, Ingar Haaland and Christopher Roth

CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)

Abstract: Drawing on representative samples of the U.S. population with more than 15,000 respondents in total, we measure and experimentally vary people’s beliefs about the informativeness of news. Inconsistent with the desire for more information being the dominant motive for people’s news consumption, treated respondents who think that a newspaper is less likely to suppress information reduce their demand for news from this newspaper. Furthermore, treated respondents who think that a news outlet is more likely to make false claims do not reduce their demand for this outlet. These findings strongly suggest that people have other motives to read news that sometimes conflict with their desire for more information. We discuss the implications of our findings for the regulation of media markets.

Keywords: News Consumption; Information; Media Bias; Belief Polarization; Informativeness. JEL Classification: D83; D91; L82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/c ... tions/wp493.2020.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Do People Value More Informative News? (2020)
Working Paper: Do People Value More Informative News? (2020)
Working Paper: Do People Value More Informative News? (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:493

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().