The Returns to Seniority in France (and Why are They Lower than in the United States?)
Mosche Buchinsky,
Francis Kramarz (),
Fougère, Denis,
Thierry Kamionka and
Magali Beffy
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Denis Fougere
No 5486, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
We estimate a model of the joint participation and mobility along with the individuals' wage formation in France. Our model makes it possible to distinguish between unobserved person heterogeneity and state-dependence. We estimate the model using state of the art Bayesian methods employing a long panel (1976-1995) for France. Our results clearly show that returns to seniority are small, and for some education groups are close to zero. The specification here is the same as that used in Buchinsky, Fougère, Kramarz and Tchernis (2002) for the case of the United States, where the returns to seniority were found to be quite large. This result also holds when using the method employed by Altonji and Williams (1992) for both countries. It turns out that differences between the two countries relate to firm-to-firm mobility. Using a model of Burdett and Coles (2003), we explain the rationale for this phenomenon. Specifically, in a low-mobility country such as France, there is little gain in compensating workers for long tenures because they tend to stay in the firm for most, if not all, of their career. This is true even in cases where individuals clearly possess substantial amount of firm-specific human capital. In contrast, for a high-mobility country such as the United States, high returns to seniority have a clear incentive effect, and firms are induced to pay the premium associated with firm-specific human capital to avoid losing their most productive workers.
Keywords: Participation; Wage; Job mobility; Returns to seniority; Returns to experience; Individual effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 J31 J63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5486 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Working Paper: The Returns to Seniority in France (and Why are They Lower than in the United States ?) (2006) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: The Returns to Seniority in France (and Why Are They Lower than in the United States?) (2006) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5486
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5486
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().