 What citation tests really tell us about bias in academic publishingEuropean Economic Review, 2023, vol. 158, issue C Abstract: The concept of status bias in the academic publishing process has been studied for decades, and economists have often used citation tests to address the question: if editors are biased in favour of high-status economists, their published papers will tend to be of lower quality and thus receive fewer citations. While this literature has tended to find bias against high-status economists rather than in their favour, I argue that these citation tests are quite uninformative, as their interpretation depends on the very strong assumption that authors are unbiased when choosing which papers to cite. I then use publication and citation data to estimate a model of the publication process, and find that the results depend strongly on this same (untested) assumption: the data are consistent with editor bias in favour of high-status economists if I assume that authors are also significantly biased in favour of high-status economists when choosing which papers to cite. My findings indicate important shortcomings of citation tests, as well as the need to find new approaches to study the question of status bias. Keywords: Status bias; Academic publishing; Citation test (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:158:y:2023:i:c:s0014292123001630 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104534 Access Statistics for this article European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.