Technology adoption in markets with network effects: Theory and experimental evidence
Claudia Keser,
Irina Suleymanova and
Christian Wey
Information Economics and Policy, 2012, vol. 24, issue 3, 262-276
Abstract:
We examine a technology-adoption game with network effects in which coordination on either technology A or technology B constitutes a Nash equilibrium. Coordination on technology B is assumed to be payoff dominant. We define a technology’s critical mass as the minimal share of users, which is necessary to make the choice of this technology the best response for any remaining user. We show that the technology with the lower critical mass implies risk dominance and selection by the maximin criterion. We present experimental evidence that both payoff dominance and risk dominance explain participants’ choices in the technology-adoption game. The relative riskiness of a technology can be proxied using either technologies’ critical masses or stand-alone values absent any network effects.
Keywords: Network effects; Critical mass; Coordination; Riskiness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624512000261
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Technology adoption in markets with network effects: Theory and experimental evidence (2011) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Technology Adoption in Critical Mass Games: Theory and Experimental Evidence (2009) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54802/54802bf4190f3d41d4f1057108975b184d2bcfb3" alt="Downloads"
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:24:y:2012:i:3:p:262-276
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.03.001
Access Statistics for this article
Information Economics and Policy is currently edited by D. Waterman
More articles in Information Economics and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().