Can Commonality Relieve Cannibalization in Product Line Design?

Kilsun Kim (), Dilip Chhajed () and Yunchuan Liu ()
Additional contact information
Dilip Chhajed: Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana--Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61822
Yunchuan Liu: Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana--Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61822

Marketing Science, 2013, vol. 32, issue 3, 510-521

Abstract: The predominant perception on commonality strategy in product line design is that it entails a trade-off decision for a firm between cost savings and product differentiation. Adopting the commonality strategy may lower a firm's manufacturing costs, but it blurs the distinction between products targeting different consumer segments and makes consumer switching between products more likely such that cannibalization is always intensified. We show that this view in the literature is based on a crucial assumption that the quality valuation of one consumer segment is greater than that of another segment for all product attributes; i.e., one segment's preference structure dominates the other segment's preference structure. In this paper we consider the case of a nondominating preference structure where each segment has an attribute it values more than the other segment does. Interestingly, we show that the effect of commonality strategy is more diverse in this nondominating preference structure and that commonality can actually relieve cannibalization in the product line design. This finding gives rise to a previously unrecognized opportunity for firms to redesign their product lines to improve profits.

Keywords: marketing/operations interface; product line design; commonality; nondominating preference structure; price discrimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0774 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:32:y:2013:i:3:p:510-521

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().