Adjusting and Calibrating Elicited Values Based on Follow-up Certainty Questions: A Meta-analysis

Jerrod Penn () and Wuyang Hu ()
Additional contact information
Jerrod Penn: Louisiana State University & LSU Agricultural Center
Wuyang Hu: The Ohio State University

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2023, vol. 84, issue 4, No 2, 919-946

Abstract: Abstract Researchers have proposed many methods to reduce hypothetical bias (HB) in stated preference studies. One of the earliest and most popular is Certainty follow-up, in which the respondent states how sure they are of their response to the valuation question they just responded to. Certainty follow-up enables the use of several cutoffs to calibrate for HB, whereas the efficacy of other popular HB mitigation methods, such as Cheap Talk, have no such flexibility. Even given a cutoff level, its ability to reduce HB may vary with characteristics of the Certainty follow-up and of the study. Using a meta-analysis, we find that Certainty follow-up is more effective than Cheap Talk at adjusting for potential HB and that value elicitation method, mode of data collection, as well as whether other HB mitigation methods are used in a study could affect Certainty follow-up efficacy. Using and recoding Certainty follow-up questions quantitatively or qualitatively can be equally effective when compared to unadjusted hypothetical values where potential HB may occur or to values elicited with real binding conditions in which the actual magnitude of the HB is known. There is strong evidence that HB can be completely calibrated for or even overcorrected, but we encourage more Certainty follow-up studies with binding elicitations to fully explore the potential of this method.

Keywords: Certainty follow-up; Hypothetical bias; Meta-analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D90 Q10 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-022-00742-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:84:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-022-00742-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-022-00742-6

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman

More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().