 Nonspeculative Bubbles Revisited: Speculation Does MatterWorking Papers in Economics from University of Waikato Abstract: Research in Finance has long been intrigued by the causes of price bubbles. It has been argued that investors having doubts about the rationality of others may speculate on future capital gains. However, in an important contribution, Lei et al. (2001) argue that speculation is not the driver of bubbles in the absence of common knowledge of rationality, suggesting a focus on mistakes and confusion. Indeed, interventions that reduce confusion, reduce the incidence of bubbles. Yet, it has been shown that this effect is likely due to these interventions also establishing common knowledge of rationality. This leaves a puzzle, when both speculation and confusion are excluded as an explanation for bubbles. We revisit Lei et al.’s (2001) design, confirming the existence of bubbles. However, we argue that, although their design removes the ability to speculate, it introduces several unintended design artifacts, inducing bubbles. We design a condition that eliminates any incentives for speculation without these effects. Bubbles are indeed eliminated in this treatment. We conclude that speculation plays a critical role in bubble formation, and thus does matter. Keywords: speculation; bubbles; cognitive ability; asset market experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wai:econwp:20/09 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers in Economics from University of Waikato Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand, 3240. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.