- Alberini, A. Repeated questioning in choice experiments: are we improving statistical efficiency or getting respondents confused?. 2012 J. Environ. Econ. Policy. 1 216-233
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ariely, D. ; Loewenstein, G. ; Prelec, D. “Coherent arbitrarinessâ€: stable demand curves without stable preferences. 2003 Q. J. Econ.. 118 73-106
Bateman, I.J. ; Burgess, D. ; Hutchinson, W.G. ; Matthews, D.I. Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness. 2008 J. Environ. Econ. Manage.. 55 127-141
- Bradley, M. ; Daly, A. Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data. 1994 Transportation. 21 167-184
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Braga, J. ; Starmer, C. Preference anomalies, preference elicitation and the discovered preference hypothesis. 2005 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 32 55-89
- Brouwer, R. Constructed preference stability: a test-retest. 2012 J. Environ. Econ. Policy. 1 70-84
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brouwer, R. ; Dekker, T. ; Rolfe, J. ; Windle, J. Choice certainty and consistency in repeated choice experiments. 2010 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 46 93-109
Campbell, D. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: combining mixed logit and random-effects models. 2007 J. Agric. Econ.. 58 467-483
Campbell, D. ; Erdem, S. Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: a case study on trust in institutions. 2015 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 97 526-545
Campbell, D. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Scarpa, R. Bounding WTP distributions to reflect the ‘actual’ consideration set. 2014 J. Choice Model.. 11 4-15
Campbell, D. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Scarpa, R. Cost thresholds, cut-offs and sensitivities in stated choice analysis: identification and implications. 2012 Resour. Energy Econ.. 34 396-411
Campbell, D. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Scarpa, R. Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification. 2011 J. Environ. Plan. Manage.. 54 1061-1076
- Campbell, D. ; Hess, S. ; Scarpa, R. ; Rose, J.M. Accommodating coefficient outliers in discrete choice modelling: a comparison of discrete and continuous mixing approaches. 2010 En : Hess, S. ; Daly, A. Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-art and the State-of-practice – Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference. Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carlsson, F. ; Mørkbak, M.R. ; Olsen, S.B. The first time is the hardest: a test of ordering effects in choice experiments. 2012 J. Choice Model.. 5 19-37
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carlsson, F. ; Martinsson, P. Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?. 2001 J. Environ. Econ. Manage.. 41 179-192
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Caussade, S. ; Ortúzar, J.D. ; Rizzi, L.I. ; Hensher, D.A. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. 2005 Transp. Res. B. 39 621-640
Czajkowski, M. ; Giergiczny, M.M. ; Greene, W.H. Learning and fatigue effects revisited: investigating the effects of accounting for unobservable preference and scale heterogeneity. 2014 Land Econ.. 90 324-351
Day, B. ; Bateman, I.J. ; Carson, R.T. ; Dupont, D. ; Louviere, J.J. ; Morimoto, S. ; Scarpa, R. ; Wang, P. Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies. 2012 J. Environ. Econ. Manage.. 63 73-91
Day, B. ; Prades, J.P. Ordering anomalies in choice experiments. 2010 J. Environ. Econ. Manage.. 59 271-285
DeShazo, J.R. ; Fermo, G. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. 2002 J. Environ. Econ. Manage.. 2002 123-143
- Doornik, J.A. Object-Oriented Matrix Programming Using Ox. 2007 Timberlake Consultants Press and Oxford: London
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Erdem, S. ; Campbell, D. ; Hole, A.R. Accounting for attribute-level non-attendance in a health choice experiment: does it matter?. 2015 Health Econ.. 24 773-789
Erdem, S. ; Campbell, D. ; Thompson, C. Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: prioritising health service innovations. 2014 J. Health Econ.. 38 10-22
Fosgerau, M. ; Hess, S. A comparison of methods for representing random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models. 2009 Eur. Transp.. 42 1-25
Greene, W.H. ; Hensher, D.A. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. 2003 Transp. Res. B. 37 681-698
Greene, W.H. ; Hensher, D.A. Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model. 2013 Appl. Econ.. 45 1897-1902
Hensher, D.A. ; Collins, A.T. ; Greene, W.H. Accounting for attribute non-attendance and common-metric aggregation in a probabilistic decision process mixed multinomial logit model: a warning on potential confounding. 2013 Transportation. 40 1003-1020
Hensher, D.A. ; Greene, W.H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. 2003 Transportation. 30 133-176
- Hensher, D.A. ; Rose, J.M. ; Greene, W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. 2005 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hess, S. Conditional parameter estimates from mixed logit models: distributional assumptions and a free software tool. 2010 J. Choice Model.. 3 134-152
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hess, S. ; Bierlaire, M. ; Polak, J.W. Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed logit models. 2005 Transp. Res. A. 39 221-236
Hess, S. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Daly, A. Not bored yet-revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments. 2012 Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract.. 46 626-644
Hess, S. ; Rose, J.M. Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models?. 2012 Transportation. 39 1225-1239
Holmes, T.P. ; Boyle, K.J. Dynamic learning and context-dependence in sequential, attribute-based, stated-preference valuation questions. 2005 Land Econ.. 81 114-126
Hu, W. ; Adamowicz, W.L. ; Veeman, M.M. Labeling context and reference point effects in models of food attribute demand. 2006 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 88 1034-1049
Kingsley, D.C. ; Brown, T.C. Preference uncertainty, preference learning, and paired comparison experiments. 2010 Land Econ.. 86 530-544
- Lagerkvist, C.J. ; Carlsson, F. ; Viske, D. Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: a choice experiment. 2006 AgBioForum: J. Agrobiotechnol. Manage. Econ.. 9 51-58
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lancaster, K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. 1966 J. Polit. Econ.. 74 132-157
- Louviere, J.J. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Swait, J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. 2003 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Magidson, J. ; Vermunt, J.K. Removing the scale factor confound in multinomial logit choice models to obtain better estimates of preference. 2008 En : Proceedings Of The Sawtooth Software Conference. :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Manski, C.F. The structure of random utility models. 1977 Theory Decis.. 8 229-254
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McNair, B.J. ; Hensher, D.A. ; Bennett, J. Modelling heterogeneity in response behaviour towards a sequence of discrete choice questions: a probabilistic decision process model. 2012 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 51 599-616
- Oppewal, H. ; Morrison, M. ; Wang, P. ; Waller, D. Preference stability: modeling how consumer preferences shift after receiving new product information. 2010 En : Hess, S. ; Daly, A. Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-art and the State-of-practice – Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference. Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Plott, C.R. Rational individual behaviour in markets and social choice processes: the discovered preference hypothesis. 1996 En : Arrow, K.J. ; Colombatto, E. ; Perlman, M. ; Schmidt, C. The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour. Macmillan Press, London:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Plott, C.R. ; Zeiler, K. The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the “endowment effectâ€, subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. 2005 Am. Econ. Rev.. 95 530-545
- Sælensminde, K. Inconsistent choices in stated choice data: use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases. 2001 Transportation. 28 269-296
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Savage, S.J. ; Waldman, D. Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes. 2008 J. Appl. Econ.. 23 351-371
Scarpa, R. ; Campbell, D. ; Hutchinson, W.G. Benefits estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment. 2007 Land Econ.. 83 617-634
Scarpa, R. ; Gilbride, T.J. ; Campbell, D. ; Hensher, D.A. Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. 2009 Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ.. 36 151-174
Swait, J. ; Adamowicz, W. Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: a theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice. 2001 Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.. 86 141-167
- Thurstone, L.L. A law of comparative judgment. 1927 Psychol. Rev.. 34 273-286
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Yu, J. ; Vishwanathan, S.V.N. ; Günter, S. ; Schraudolph, N.N. A quasi-Newton approach to nonsmooth convex optimization problems in machine learning. 2010 J. Mach. Learn. Res.. 11 1145-1200
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now